Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)Phase 3NCT03512197
A Global Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Midostaurin + Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Patients With FLT3 Mutation Negative (FLT3-MN) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
A Phase 3 study testing Midostaurin and Chemotherapy in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 133 sites in 20 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to confirm the preliminary evidence from early clinical trials that midostaurin may provide clinical benefit not only to AML patients with the FLT3-mutations but also in FLT3-MN (SR<0.05) AML (FLT3 mutant to wild type signal ratio below the 0.05 clinical cut-off). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
- What is being tested?
- Midostaurin and Chemotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 511 participants
- Where
- 133 sitesin 20 countries
- Study dates
- 20 Jul 2018to 12 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of AML (≥20% blasts in the bone marrow based on WHO 2016 classification). Patients with APL with PML-RARA are not eligible.
- Suitability for intensive induction chemotherapy in the judgment of the investigator
- Documented absence of an ITD and TKD activating mutation at codons D835 and I836 in the FLT3 gene, as determined by analysis in a Novartis designated laboratory using a validated clinical trial assay with clinical cutoff of 0.05 mutant to wild type signal ratio
- Age ≥18 years
- Laboratory values that indicate adequate organ function assessed locally at the screening visit
Who cannot join
- Central nervous system (CNS) leukemia
- Therapy-related secondary AML
- Isolated extramedullary leukemia
- Prior therapy for leukemia or myelodysplasia
- AML after antecedent myelodysplasia (MDS) with prior cytotoxic treatment (e.g., azacytidine or decitabine)
- Prior treatment with a FLT3 inhibitor (e.g., midostaurin, quizartinib, sorafenib)
Trial locations and contacts
133 sites in 20 countries.
133 sites in 20 countries
Germany38 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bad Saarow, 15526
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 10967
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 12351
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13125
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 13353
Novartis Investigative Site
Bochum, 44892
Novartis Investigative Site
Bonn, 53105
Novartis Investigative Site
Braunschweig, 38114
Novartis Investigative Site
Darmstadt, 64283
Novartis Investigative Site
Duisburg, 47166
Novartis Investigative Site
Düsseldorf, 40225
Novartis Investigative Site
Eschweiler, 52249
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen Werden, 45239
Novartis Investigative Site
Flensburg, 24939
Novartis Investigative Site
Giessen, 35392
Novartis Investigative Site
Göttingen, 37075
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 20099
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamburg, 20246
Novartis Investigative Site
Hanover, 30625
Novartis Investigative Site
Homburg, 66421
Novartis Investigative Site
Karlsruhe, 76133
Novartis Investigative Site
Kiel, 24116
Novartis Investigative Site
Leipzig, 04103
Novartis Investigative Site
Lübeck, 23538
Novartis Investigative Site
Magdeburg, 39120
Novartis Investigative Site
Mainz, 55131
Novartis Investigative Site
München, 80377
Novartis Investigative Site
Osnabrück, 49076
Novartis Investigative Site
Paderborn, 33098
Novartis Investigative Site
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053
Novartis Investigative Site
Rostock, 18057
Novartis Investigative Site
Schwerin, Brandenburg, 19049
Novartis Investigative Site
Siegen, 57072
Novartis Investigative Site
Stuttgart, 70176
Novartis Investigative Site
Stuttgart, 70376
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulm, 89081
Novartis Investigative Site
Würzburg, 97080
Novartis Investigative Site
Zwickau, 08060
Japan20 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aomori, 030 8553
Novartis Investigative Site
Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, 113-8677
Novartis Investigative Site
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukushima, Fukushima, 960 1295
Novartis Investigative Site
Fukuyama, Hiroshima, 720-0001
Novartis Investigative Site
Gifu, Gifu, 500 8513
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 432-8580
Novartis Investigative Site
Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191
Novartis Investigative Site
Isehara, Kanagawa, 259-1193
Novartis Investigative Site
Kyoto, 606 8507
Novartis Investigative Site
Matsuyama, Ehime, 790-8524
Novartis Investigative Site
Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8501
Novartis Investigative Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 466-8650
Novartis Investigative Site
Okayama, Okayama-ken, 701-1192
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, 534-0021
Novartis Investigative Site
Ōsaka-sayama, Osaka, 589 8511
Novartis Investigative Site
Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498
Novartis Investigative Site
Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8576
Novartis Investigative Site
Yamagata, 990 9585
Italy18 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Alessandria, AL, 15100
Novartis Investigative Site
Ancona, AN, 60126
Novartis Investigative Site
Bergamo, BG, 24127
Novartis Investigative Site
Brescia, BS, 25123
Novartis Investigative Site
Catania, CT, 95123
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20162
Novartis Investigative Site
Modena, MO, 41124
Novartis Investigative Site
Palermo, PA, 90146
Novartis Investigative Site
Perugia, PG, 06129
Novartis Investigative Site
Pescara, PE, 65124
Novartis Investigative Site
Piacenza, PC, 29100
Novartis Investigative Site
Reggio Calabria, RC, 89124
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00133
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00161
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00168
Novartis Investigative Site
Taranto, TA, 74100
Novartis Investigative Site
Torino, TO, 10126
Novartis Investigative Site
Vicenza, VI, 36100
Spain11 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barakaldo, Basque Country, 48903
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, 08041
Novartis Investigative Site
Cáceres, Extremadura, 10003
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, Andalusia, 14004
Novartis Investigative Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28034
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28041
Novartis Investigative Site
Salamanca, Castille and León, 37007
Novartis Investigative Site
Seville, Andalusia, 41013
Novartis Investigative Site
Valencia, 46026
Novartis Investigative Site
Zaragoza, 50009
France9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Angers, 49033
Novartis Investigative Site
Avignon, 84000
Novartis Investigative Site
Bayonne, Bayonne Cedex, 64109
Novartis Investigative Site
Dijon, 21034
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59037
Novartis Investigative Site
Nantes, 44093
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75012
Novartis Investigative Site
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31059
Australia4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
Novartis Investigative Site
Prahran, Victoria, 3181
Novartis Investigative Site
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
Novartis Investigative Site
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Taiwan4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung City, 83301
Novartis Investigative Site
Kuei Shan Chiang, Taoyuan Taiwan ROC, 33305
Novartis Investigative Site
Putzu City, Chiayi Hsien, 61363
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 10002
United States3 sites
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
University of Chicago Medical Center .
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Oregon Health and Science Univ
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Austria3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Linz, A-4010
Novartis Investigative Site
Vienna, 1090
Novartis Investigative Site
Vienna, 1140
Belgium3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Antwerp, 2060
Novartis Investigative Site
Bruges, 8000
Novartis Investigative Site
Roeselare, 8800
Brazil3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-003
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 04014-002
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, 01221 900
Israel3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Haifa, 3109601
Novartis Investigative Site
Petah Tikva, 4941492
Novartis Investigative Site
Tel Aviv, 6423906
Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Adana, 01330
Novartis Investigative Site
Ankara, 06100
Novartis Investigative Site
Aydin, 09100
Czechia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brno-Bohunice, 625 00
Novartis Investigative Site
Plzen-Bory, 30599
Norway2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bergen, NO-5021
Novartis Investigative Site
Oslo, 0424
Portugal2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Lisbon, 1099 023
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto, 4200-072
Switzerland2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bern, 3010
Novartis Investigative Site
Zurich, 8091
About this study
Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Chemotherapy With Daunorubicin or Idarubicin and Cytarabine for Induction and Intermediate Dose Cytarabine for Consolidation Plus Midostaurin (PKC412) or Chemotherapy Plus Placebo in Newly Diagnosed Patients With FLT-3 Mutation Negative Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
The purpose of this study was to confirm the preliminary evidence from early clinical trials that midostaurin may provide clinical benefit not only to AML patients with the FLT3-mutations but also in FLT3-MN (SR<0.05) AML (FLT3 mutant to wild type signal ratio below the 0.05 clinical cut-off).
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of midostaurin in combination with daunorubicin or idarubicin and cytarabine for induction and intermediate-dose cytarabine for consolidation, and midostaurin single agent post-consolidation therapy in newly diagnosed patients with FLT3-MN (SR<0.05) AML.
Read the detailed description
This was a multi-center, multinational, randomized, double-blind Phase III study using a group sequential design. Subjects were stratified according to age (<60 vs. ≥ 60 years). Subjects within each stratum were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into one of two treatment arms: Midostaurin + chemotherapy 'or' Placebo + chemotherapy.
The study consisted of the following phases:
Screening/randomization phase: Subjects had to sign informed consent form before screening for enrollment. Subjects started chemotherapy at day 1 and were randomized at day 8.
Induction phase: All subjects received at least one cycle (28 days) of induction therapy with continuous infusion cytarabine (D1 - D7) and daunorubicin or idarubicin (D1 - D3) (induction 1). Subjects who did not achieve CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery after Induction 1 received a second cycle with intermediate-dose cytarabine (D1 - D3) and daunorubicin or idarubicin (D1 - D3) (induction 2). Subjects who did not achieve CR or CRi with adequate blood recovery after induction 2 discontinued study treatment and were followed for survival.
Consolidation phase: Subjects who achieved CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery after induction with one or two cycles of induction proceeded to consolidation therapy with either 3 or 4 cycles respectively of intermediate-dose cytarabine (D1 - D3), or to Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation (HSCT) with or without preceding consolidation cycles.
Post-consolidation phase: Subjects who maintained CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery at the end of the consolidation phase received 12 cycles (28 days/cycle) of continuous therapy with midostaurin or placebo twice daily at 50 mg. Subjects who underwent HSCT after achieving CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery received midostaurin or placebo twice daily 50 mg post-transplant therapy, continuously, for up to 12 cycles (28 days/cycle). Post HSCT post-consolidation therapy began >30 days but not later than 100 days following HSCT.
Follow-up phase: All enrolled subjects were followed through the treatment period and until relapse/treatment failure, thereafter for start of new line of therapy and survival.
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
- Being tested
- Midostaurin, Placebo, Chemotherapy
- Keywords
- Newly diagnosed FLT3-mutation negative, PKC412, midostaurin, cytarabine, daunorubicin, idarubicin, acute myeloid leukemia, AML, FLT3-MN (SR<0.05), combination treatment, induction failure, event free survival, EFS, minimal residual disease
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Neoplasm, Residual
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MidostaurinDrug
Also called PKC412
Midostaurin was provided as 25 mg capsules 8PC, was supplied as double-blind in blister packs and taken orally.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo was provided as 25 mg soft gelatin capsules 8PC, was supplied as double-blind in blister packs and taken orally.
ChemotherapyDrug
Along with the study drug/placebo, chemotherapy was given as well: either Daunorubicin or Idarubicin and Cytarabine - all taken by i.v.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Midostaurin + chemotherapy | Experimental | Participants received Midostaurin in Induction 50mg twice daily on Day 8 until 48 hrs before start of next cycle. During Induction 2 and consolidation 50mg twice daily on Day 4 until 48 hrs before start of next cycle. During post-consolidation 50mg twice daily for 28 consecutive days of each 28-day treatment cycle up to 12 cycles. For participants who could not tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule, dose interruptions and/or reductions were either recommended or mandated allowing participants to continue the study treatment. Chemotherapy consisted of daunorubicin or idarubicin and cytarabine for induction and intermediate dose cytarabine for consolidation. Receives: Drug: Midostaurin; Drug: Chemotherapy |
| Placebo + chemotherapy | Placebo comparator | Participants received matching placebo to midostaurin with same dose, plus chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of daunorubicin or idarubicin and cytarabine for induction and intermediate dose cytarabine for consolidation Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Chemotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Event Free Survival (EFS)
EFS was defined as the time from randomization to failure to obtain a complete remission (CR) or Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) with adequate blood count recovery in induction, relapse after CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first as assessed by the investigator.
Measured: From date of Randomization up to approx. 30 months
Secondary outcomes (18)
Overall Survival (OS) (Key Secondary)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to date of death due to any cause. Patients entered the survival follow-up phase once they completed the safety follow up period (30 days after the last dose of midostaurin/placebo) in case of induction failure or if they had relapsed during post-treatment follow-up. Patients were then contacted by telephone every 3 months +/- 2 weeks or had a visit to follow up on their survival status, per Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Measured: Between randomization to date of death up to approx. 30 months
Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) and Complete Remission With Incomplete Hematological Recovery (CRi) But With Adequate Blood Count Recovery Rate.
Assessment was based on the International Working Group (IWG) criteria for AML as per investigator assessment.
CR: Bone marrow: < 5% blasts no blasts with Auer rods; Peripheral blood: neutrophils ≥ 1.0 x 109/L platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L, no blasts; No evidence of extramedullary disease (such as central nervous system (CNS) or soft tissue involvement); Transfusion independent.
CRi with adequate blood count recovery is defined as the following:
Bone marrow < 5% blasts no blasts with Auer rods Peripheral blood Neutrophils >= 1.0 x 109/L and 50 x 109/L <=platelets < 100 x 109/L no blasts No evidence of extramedullary disease (such as CNS or soft tissue involvement).
Measured: At maximum 93 days from induction therapy start
Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Status
MRD- rate was defined as the rate of participants reaching MRD at any timepoint. Participants with leukemic blasts below 0.1% were considered as MRD-negative based on leukemia-associated immunophenotype (LAIP).
MRD was derived from bone marrow and blood data using cellular and molecular technologies and MRD status was measured using the flow cytometry assessments for LAIP irrespective of the investigator's overall clinical response assessment.
Measured: from start of treatment up to end of post-consolidation (approximately 17 months)
Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Status During Post-consolidation Phase
MRD- rate was defined as the rate of participants reaching MRD at any timepoint during Post-consolidation phase. Participants with leukemic blasts below 0.1% were considered as MRD-negative based on leukemia-associated immunophenotype (LAIP).
MRD was derived from bone marrow and blood data using cellular and molecular technologies and MRD status was measured using the flow cytometry assessments for LAIP irrespective of the investigator's overall clinical response assessment.
Measured: from start of post-consolidation to end of post-consolidation phase (up to 12 months)
Time to Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity by Flow Cytometry
Time to MRD- is defined as time from randomization to first occurrence of MRD-. Participants with leukemic blasts below 0.1% were considered as MRD-negative based on leukemia-associated immunophenotype (LAIP).
MRD was derived from bone marrow and blood data using cellular and molecular technologies and MRD status was measured using the flow cytometry assessments for LAIP irrespective of the investigator's overall clinical response assessment.
Measured: From date of Randomization up to approx. 17 months
Disease-free Survival (DFS)
DFS as measured from the date of first CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery to relapse or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not relapse nor die were censored at the last adequate response assessment. Assessment was based on the IWG criteria for AML as per investigator assessment
Measured: From date of CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery up to approx. 30 months
Cumulative Incidence of Relapse (CIR)
Cumulative Incidence of Relapse (CIR) was defined for participants with CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery and was the time from achieving the CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery until the onset of relapse from CR or CRi with adequate blood recovery. Participants without relapse were censored at the last adequate response assessment. Participants who died without relapse were counted as a competing cause of failure.
Measured: From date of CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery up to approx. 30 months
Cumulative Incidence of Death (CID)
Cumulative Incidence of Death (CID) was defined for all participants achieving CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery measured from the date of achievement of CR or CRi until the date of death due to any reason. Participants not known to have died were censored on the last contact date. Participants who experienced relapse were counted as a competing cause of failure.
Measured: From date of CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery up to approx. 30 months
Time to CR or CRi With Adequate Blood Count Recovery
Time to CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery was defined as the time from randomization to CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery whichever occurred first
Measured: At maximum 93 days from induction therapy start
Time to Partial and Full Neutrophil Recovery
The time to neutrophil recovery was assessed for the following criteria: Partial neutrophil recovery: Number of days from start of treatment to the first day neutrophils ≥0.5 x 10^9/L.
Full neutrophil recovery: Number of days from start of treatment to the first day neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10^9/L
Measured: At maximum 93 days from induction therapy start
Time to Partial and Full Platelet Recovery
Time to platelet recovery was assessed for the following criteria: Partial platelet recovery: Number of days from start of treatment to the first day platelets ≥50 x 10^9/L.
Full platelet recovery: Number of days from start of treatment to the first day platelets ≥100 x 10^9/L.
Measured: At maximum 93 days from induction therapy start
Plasma Concentrations for Midostaurin and Its Metabolites: CGP52421 and CGP62221 for Non-poor Metabolizers
Serial pharmacokinetics (PK) samples were collected in Non-poor metabolizer participants to assess the plasma concentrations of midostaurin, CGP52421 and CGP62221.
Measured: from Induction (IND) phase 0hr (predose) to Post-consolidation phase (POSTCONS) 12hr
AUC0-t: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Midostaurin and Its Metabolites: CGP52421 and CGP62221 at Cycle 1, Day 8
The AUC from time zero to a measurable concentration sampling time (t) (mass x time x volume-1). Note: as the last sampling time was at 12 h, AUC0-12h was determined after the first dose, reported at Cycle 1, Day 8
Measured: 0 - 12 hrs
AUClast: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Midostaurin and Its Metabolites: CGP52421 and CGP62221 at Cycle 1, Day 8
The AUC from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time after the first dose reported at Cycle 1, Day 8
Measured: 0 - 12 hrs
Cmax: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Midostaurin and Its Metabolites: CGP52421 and CGP62221 at Cycle 1, Day 8
The maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration after the first dose administration reported at Cycle 1, Day 8
Measured: 0 - 12 hrs
Tmax: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Midostaurin and Its Metabolites: CGP52421 and CGP62221 at Cycle 1, Day 8
The time to reach maximum (peak) plasma, blood, serum, or other body fluid drug concentration after single dose administration reported at Cycle 1, Day 8
Measured: 0 - 12 hrs
Total Score for Each Time Point for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu)
The total FACT-Leu score consists of 44 items with total scores ranging from 0 to 176. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life ( HRQoL). Negative changes from baseline indicate a worsening of HRQoL while positive changes indicate an improvement in HRQoL.
Measured: From date of Randomization up to approx. 18 months
Scores for Each Time Point for the EQ5D-5L (a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS))
The EQ5D-5L questionnaire assesses 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems) that reflect increasing levels of difficulty. The patient is asked to indicate his/her current health state by selecting the most appropriate level in each of the 5 dimensions. The questionnaire also included a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), where the patient is asked to rate current health status on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being the worst imaginable health state.
Measured: From date of Randomization up to approx. 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Apr 2018
- Study start20 Jul 2018
- Primary completion12 Feb 2021
- Study completion12 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 511 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03512197
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CPKC412E2301
- Other IDs
- 2017-003540-21, 2017
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent expert panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data is currently available according to the process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Publications
Sechaud R, Peters T, Gu H, Rahmanzadeh G, Sharma GK, Guichard N, Menssen HD. Pharmacogenomic, pharmacokinetic, and safety analysis of CYP3A4/CYP3A5 polymorphisms of midostaurin in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Dec 23;82(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03971-y.
PubMed 41432755
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind Study of Chemotherapy With Daunorubicin or Idarubicin and Cytarabine for Induction and Intermediate Dose Cytarabine for Consolidation Plus Midostaurin (PKC412) or Chemotherapy Plus Placebo in Newly Diagnosed Patients With FLT-3 Mutation Negative Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03512197
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CPKC412E2301
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
- Keywords
- Newly diagnosed FLT3-mutation negative, PKC412, midostaurin, cytarabine, daunorubicin, idarubicin, acute myeloid leukemia, AML
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 511 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 18 Jun 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to confirm the preliminary evidence from early clinical trials that midostaurin may provide clinical benefit not only to AML patients with the FLT3-mutations but also in FLT3-MN (SR<0.05) AML (FLT3 mutant to wild type signal ratio below the 0.05 clinical cut-off).
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of midostaurin in combination with daunorubicin or idarubicin and cytarabine for induction and intermediate-dose cytarabine for consolidation, and midostaurin single agent post-consolidation therapy in newly diagnosed patients with FLT3-MN (SR<0.05) AML.
Detailed description
This was a multi-center, multinational, randomized, double-blind Phase III study using a group sequential design. Subjects were stratified according to age (<60 vs. ≥ 60 years). Subjects within each stratum were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into one of two treatment arms: Midostaurin + chemotherapy 'or' Placebo + chemotherapy.
The study consisted of the following phases:
Screening/randomization phase: Subjects had to sign informed consent form before screening for enrollment. Subjects started chemotherapy at day 1 and were randomized at day 8.
Induction phase: All subjects received at least one cycle (28 days) of induction therapy with continuous infusion cytarabine (D1 - D7) and daunorubicin or idarubicin (D1 - D3) (induction 1). Subjects who did not achieve CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery after Induction 1 received a second cycle with intermediate-dose cytarabine (D1 - D3) and daunorubicin or idarubicin (D1 - D3) (induction 2). Subjects who did not achieve CR or CRi with adequate blood recovery after induction 2 discontinued study treatment and were followed for survival.
Consolidation phase: Subjects who achieved CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery after induction with one or two cycles of induction proceeded to consolidation therapy with either 3 or 4 cycles respectively of intermediate-dose cytarabine (D1 - D3), or to Hematopoietic Stem Cells Transplantation (HSCT) with or without preceding consolidation cycles.
Post-consolidation phase: Subjects who maintained CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery at the end of the consolidation phase received 12 cycles (28 days/cycle) of continuous therapy with midostaurin or placebo twice daily at 50 mg. Subjects who underwent HSCT after achieving CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery received midostaurin or placebo twice daily 50 mg post-transplant therapy, continuously, for up to 12 cycles (28 days/cycle). Post HSCT post-consolidation therapy began >30 days but not later than 100 days following HSCT.
Follow-up phase: All enrolled subjects were followed through the treatment period and until relapse/treatment failure, thereafter for start of new line of therapy and survival.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Midostaurin + chemotherapy | Experimental | Drug: Midostaurin, Drug: ChemotherapyParticipants received Midostaurin in Induction 50mg twice daily on Day 8 until 48 hrs before start of next cycle. During Induction 2 and consolidation 50mg twice daily on Day 4 until 48 hrs before start of next cycle. During post-consolidation 50mg twice daily for 28 consecutive days of each 28-day treatment cycle up to 12 cycles. For participants who could not tolerate the protocol-specified dosing schedule, dose interruptions and/or reductions were either recommended or mandated allowing participants to continue the study treatment. Chemotherapy consisted of daunorubicin or idarubicin and cytarabine for induction and intermediate dose cytarabine for consolidation. |
| Placebo + chemotherapy | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: ChemotherapyParticipants received matching placebo to midostaurin with same dose, plus chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of daunorubicin or idarubicin and cytarabine for induction and intermediate dose cytarabine for consolidation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of AML (≥20% blasts in the bone marrow based on WHO 2016 classification). Patients with APL with PML-RARA are not eligible.
- Suitability for intensive induction chemotherapy in the judgment of the investigator
- Documented absence of an ITD and TKD activating mutation at codons D835 and I836 in the FLT3 gene, as determined by analysis in a Novartis designated laboratory using a validated clinical trial assay with clinical cutoff of 0.05 mutant to wild type signal ratio
- Age ≥18 years
- Laboratory values that indicate adequate organ function assessed locally at the screening visit
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Central nervous system (CNS) leukemia
- Therapy-related secondary AML
- Isolated extramedullary leukemia
- Prior therapy for leukemia or myelodysplasia
- AML after antecedent myelodysplasia (MDS) with prior cytotoxic treatment (e.g., azacytidine or decitabine)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MidostaurinAlso: PKC412Midostaurin was provided as 25 mg capsules 8PC, was supplied as double-blind in blister packs and taken orally. | Drug | Midostaurin + chemotherapy |
| PlaceboPlacebo was provided as 25 mg soft gelatin capsules 8PC, was supplied as double-blind in blister packs and taken orally. | Drug | Placebo + chemotherapy |
| ChemotherapyAlong with the study drug/placebo, chemotherapy was given as well: either Daunorubicin or Idarubicin and Cytarabine - all taken by i.v. | Drug | Midostaurin + chemotherapy, Placebo + chemotherapy |
Primary outcome
Event Free Survival (EFS)
Time frame: From date of Randomization up to approx. 30 months
EFS was defined as the time from randomization to failure to obtain a complete remission (CR) or Complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) with adequate blood count recovery in induction, relapse after CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first as assessed by the investigator.
18 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS) (Key Secondary)
Time frame: Between randomization to date of death up to approx. 30 months
Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR) and Complete Remission With Incomplete Hematological Recovery (CRi) But With Adequate Blood Count Recovery Rate.
Time frame: At maximum 93 days from induction therapy start
Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Status
Time frame: from start of treatment up to end of post-consolidation (approximately 17 months)
Percentage of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Status During Post-consolidation Phase
Time frame: from start of post-consolidation to end of post-consolidation phase (up to 12 months)
Time to Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity by Flow Cytometry
Time frame: From date of Randomization up to approx. 17 months
Disease-free Survival (DFS)
Time frame: From date of CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery up to approx. 30 months
Cumulative Incidence of Relapse (CIR)
Time frame: From date of CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery up to approx. 30 months
Cumulative Incidence of Death (CID)
Time frame: From date of CR or CRi with adequate blood count recovery up to approx. 30 months
Time to CR or CRi With Adequate Blood Count Recovery
Time frame: At maximum 93 days from induction therapy start
Time to Partial and Full Neutrophil Recovery
Time frame: At maximum 93 days from induction therapy start
Time to Partial and Full Platelet Recovery
Time frame: At maximum 93 days from induction therapy start
Plasma Concentrations for Midostaurin and Its Metabolites: CGP52421 and CGP62221 for Non-poor Metabolizers
Time frame: from Induction (IND) phase 0hr (predose) to Post-consolidation phase (POSTCONS) 12hr
AUC0-t: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Midostaurin and Its Metabolites: CGP52421 and CGP62221 at Cycle 1, Day 8
Time frame: 0 - 12 hrs
AUClast: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Midostaurin and Its Metabolites: CGP52421 and CGP62221 at Cycle 1, Day 8
Time frame: 0 - 12 hrs
Cmax: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Midostaurin and Its Metabolites: CGP52421 and CGP62221 at Cycle 1, Day 8
Time frame: 0 - 12 hrs
Tmax: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter for Midostaurin and Its Metabolites: CGP52421 and CGP62221 at Cycle 1, Day 8
Time frame: 0 - 12 hrs
Total Score for Each Time Point for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu)
Time frame: From date of Randomization up to approx. 18 months
Scores for Each Time Point for the EQ5D-5L (a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS))
Time frame: From date of Randomization up to approx. 18 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41432755Sechaud R, Peters T, Gu H, Rahmanzadeh G, Sharma GK, Guichard N, Menssen HD. Pharmacogenomic, pharmacokinetic, and safety analysis of CYP3A4/CYP3A5 polymorphisms of midostaurin in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Dec 23;82(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03971-y.
- A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on novctrd.comLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent expert panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data is currently available according to the process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
133 sites in 20 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Midostaurin and Chemotherapy in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 133 sites in 20 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 133 sites in Germany, Japan, Italy, Spain, France and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jun 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Event Free Survival (EFS) (time frame: From date of Randomization up to approx. 30 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03512197, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.