NSAIDPhase 4NCT03523988
Pre-emptive Analgesics in Orthodontic Treatment
A Phase 4 study testing Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen in people with NSAID and Pain Management, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is designed to determine if the preemptive use of a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen is more effective in reducing pain following orthodontic tooth movement when compared to the use of acetaminophen and ibuprofen alone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 59 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- NSAID, Pain Management
- What is being tested?
- Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 73 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 May 2017to 1 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 59 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- -Orthodontic patient presenting for orthodontic treatment
Who cannot join
- History of taking an analgesic in the past six hours
- Hypersensitivity to ibuprofen or acetaminophen
- Aspirin-sensitive asthma
- Renal or liver impairment
- History of GI bleeding or ulcers
- Cardiovascular disease, recent myocardial infarction, heart failure, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Show all 9Show fewer
- Currently taking antibiotics or other medications for a chronic systemic disease
- Bleeding disorder
- Pregnant or nursing
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Pre-emptive Use of Combined Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen on Pain Control in Orthodontic Treatment
This study is designed to determine if the preemptive use of a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen is more effective in reducing pain following orthodontic tooth movement when compared to the use of acetaminophen and ibuprofen alone.
Read the detailed description
This study is designed to determine if the preemptive use of a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen is more effective in reducing pain following orthodontic tooth movement when compared to the use of acetaminophen and ibuprofen alone. Before their orthodontic appointment, participants will be administered acetaminophen (650mg), ibuprofen (400mg), or acetaminophen (650mg) + ibuprofen (400mg). Participants will be asked to record their pain intensity using a numerical (0-10) visual analog scale (VAS) during rest, light biting, and while chewing paraffin wax during the following time intervals: immediately following drug administration, 6 hours after, the morning after, and the second morning after orthodontic treatment.
- Conditions
- NSAID, Pain Management
- Being tested
- Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen
- Keywords
- Pre-emptive analgesics, Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AcetaminophenDrug
Also called Tylenol, Paracetamol
Acetaminophen gel capsule
IbuprofenDrug
Also called Advil
Ibuprofen gel capsule
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Acetaminophen | Active comparator | Acetaminophen 650mg powder in gel capsule taken by mouth before entering appointment Receives: Drug: Acetaminophen |
| Ibuprofen | Active comparator | Ibuprofen 400mg powder in gel capsule taken by mouth before entering appointment Receives: Drug: Ibuprofen |
| Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen | Experimental | Acetaminophen 650mg and Ibuprofen 400mg powder in gel capsule taken by mouth before entering appointment Receives: Drug: Acetaminophen; Drug: Ibuprofen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After Treatment
Pain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number [0-10] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax.
The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing "no pain," to 10, representing "worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain."
Measured: 6 hours after orthodontic treatment
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After Treatment
Pain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number [0-10] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax.
The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing "no pain," to 10, representing "worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain."
Measured: 1 day after orthodontic treatment
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After Treatment
Pain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number [0-10] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax.
The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing "no pain," to 10, representing "worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain."
Measured: 2 days after orthodontic treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 May 2018
- Study start2 May 2017
- Primary completion23 Jun 2017
- Study completion1 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for NSAIDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients of the University of Washington Graduate Orthodontics Clinic
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 73 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrew Keith, University of Washington
- Investigators
- Anne-Marie Bollen, DDS, MS, PhD, Study director, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03523988
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00001679
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Pre-emptive Use of Combined Ibuprofen and Acetaminophen on Pain Control in Orthodontic Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03523988
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00001679
- Conditions
- NSAID, Pain Management
- Keywords
- Pre-emptive analgesics, Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 73 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 May 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 30 Oct 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to determine if the preemptive use of a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen is more effective in reducing pain following orthodontic tooth movement when compared to the use of acetaminophen and ibuprofen alone.
Detailed description
This study is designed to determine if the preemptive use of a combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen is more effective in reducing pain following orthodontic tooth movement when compared to the use of acetaminophen and ibuprofen alone. Before their orthodontic appointment, participants will be administered acetaminophen (650mg), ibuprofen (400mg), or acetaminophen (650mg) + ibuprofen (400mg). Participants will be asked to record their pain intensity using a numerical (0-10) visual analog scale (VAS) during rest, light biting, and while chewing paraffin wax during the following time intervals: immediately following drug administration, 6 hours after, the morning after, and the second morning after orthodontic treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Patients of the University of Washington Graduate Orthodontics Clinic
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Acetaminophen | Active comparator | Drug: AcetaminophenAcetaminophen 650mg powder in gel capsule taken by mouth before entering appointment |
| Ibuprofen | Active comparator | Drug: IbuprofenIbuprofen 400mg powder in gel capsule taken by mouth before entering appointment |
| Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen | Experimental | Drug: Acetaminophen, Drug: IbuprofenAcetaminophen 650mg and Ibuprofen 400mg powder in gel capsule taken by mouth before entering appointment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 59 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -Orthodontic patient presenting for orthodontic treatment
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- History of taking an analgesic in the past six hours
- Hypersensitivity to ibuprofen or acetaminophen
- Aspirin-sensitive asthma
- Renal or liver impairment
- History of GI bleeding or ulcers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AcetaminophenAlso: Tylenol, ParacetamolAcetaminophen gel capsule | Drug | Acetaminophen, Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen |
| IbuprofenAlso: AdvilIbuprofen gel capsule | Drug | Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen, Ibuprofen |
Primary outcome
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After Treatment
Time frame: 6 hours after orthodontic treatment
Pain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number [0-10] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax. The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing "no pain," to 10, representing "worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain."
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 1 Day After Treatment
Time frame: 1 day after orthodontic treatment
Pain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number [0-10] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax. The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing "no pain," to 10, representing "worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain."
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 2 Days After Treatment
Time frame: 2 days after orthodontic treatment
Pain scores were measured and recorded by selecting a number [0-10] using a visual analog scale to assess pain during the following actions: jaw at rest, lightly biting, and chewing paraffin wax. The VAS consisted of a 10cm numerical scale from 0, representing "no pain," to 10, representing "worst possible, unbearable, excruciating pain."
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for NSAID
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Medication vs. Meditation for Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthristis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
NSAID Use After Robotic Partial Nephrectomy
Kidney Cancer, Renal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Cold Water Papillary Irrigation Plus Rectal NSAIDs vs Rectal NSAIDs Alone for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (COLD)
Post ERCP Pancreatitis, Acute Pancreatitis (AP)
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Tenoxicam and Corticosteroid Injections for Lateral Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Ketorolac at Lower Doses for Analgesic Pain Control in ICU: A Pilot Feasibility Study
Pain Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anne-Marie Bollen, DDS, MS, PhD study director
University of Washington
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen in people with NSAID and Pain Management, run by University of Washington at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Oct 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Scores at 6 Hours After Treatment (time frame: 6 hours after orthodontic treatment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2019.