Anterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureBIORELICANCT03529552
Evaluation After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Using the Bioresorbable Interference Screw (SMS): Resorbability, Per- and Post-operative Complications and Articular Functional Recovery.
A study testing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 3 sites in France.
Trial summary
The investigators will evaluate the benefit of a new bioresorbable screw for repair of anterior cruciate ligament over 3 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
- What is being tested?
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 17 Sep 2018to 24 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
- The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is at least 18 years old
- The patient is available for at least 3 years of follow-up
- The patient requires ligamentoplasty pour rupture of anterior cruciate ligament confirmed by MRI with or without meniscal lesions as scheduled surgery
Who cannot join
- The subject is participating in an interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
- The subject refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to give the subject informed information
- The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
- The patient is pregnant or breast-feeding
- The patient has a contra-indication (or a medically-incompatible association) for the treatment, including MRI
- Revision surgery
- Simultaneous surgery
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
France3 sites
Polyclinique Urbain V
Avignon, 84000
Centre Régina
Nice, 06000
CHU Nimes
Nîmes, 30029
About this study
Official title: Short-, Medium- and Long-term (up to 3 Years) Evaluation After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Using the Bioresorbable Interference Screw (SMS): Resorbability, Per- and Post-operative Complications and Articular Functional Recovery.
The investigators will evaluate the benefit of a new bioresorbable screw for repair of anterior cruciate ligament over 3 years.
- Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
- Being tested
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionProcedure or surgery
Placement of an SMS bioresorbable interference screw (DEDIENNE Santé)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
In situ degradation of screw
Assessed on T1 and proton density fat saturation MRI
Measured: Year 3
Secondary outcomes (65)
Knee stiffness
Articular amplitude test
Measured: Day -1
Knee stiffness
Articular amplitude test
Measured: Day 0
Knee stiffness
Articular amplitude test
Measured: Week 6
Knee stiffness
Articular amplitude test
Measured: Month 3
Knee stiffness
Articular amplitude test
Measured: Month 8
Knee stiffness
Articular amplitude test
Measured: Year 1
Knee stiffness
Articular amplitude test
Measured: Year 2
Knee stiffness
Articular amplitude test
Measured: Year 3
Knee mobility
Anterior pull test
Measured: Day -1
Knee mobility
Anterior pull test
Measured: Day 0
Knee mobility
Anterior pull test
Measured: Week 6
Knee mobility
Anterior pull test
Measured: Month 3
Knee mobility
Anterior pull test
Measured: Month 8
Knee mobility
Anterior pull test
Measured: Year 1
Knee mobility
Anterior pull test
Measured: Year 2
Knee mobility
Anterior pull test
Measured: Year 3
Lateral pivot shift of knee
MacIntosh test
Measured: Day -1
Lateral pivot shift of knee
MacIntosh test
Measured: Day 0
Lateral pivot shift of knee
MacIntosh test
Measured: Week 6
Lateral pivot shift of knee
MacIntosh test
Measured: Month 3
Lateral pivot shift of knee
MacIntosh test
Measured: Month 8
Lateral pivot shift of knee
MacIntosh test
Measured: Year 1
Lateral pivot shift of knee
MacIntosh test
Measured: Year 2
Lateral pivot shift of knee
MacIntosh test
Measured: Year 3
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Measured: Day -1
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Measured: Day 0
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Measured: Week 6
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Measured: Month 3
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Measured: Month 8
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Measured: year 1
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Measured: Year 2
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Measured: Year 3
Patient-reported knee problems
International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire
Measured: Day -1
Patient-reported knee problems
International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire
Measured: Day 0
Patient-reported knee problems
International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire
Measured: Week 6
Patient-reported knee problems
International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire
Measured: Month 3
Patient-reported knee problems
International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire
Measured: Month 8
Patient-reported knee problems
International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire
Measured: Year 1
Patient-reported knee problems
International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire
Measured: Year 2
Patient-reported knee problems
International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire
Measured: Year 3
Knee laxity
KT-1000 measurement
Measured: Day -1
Knee laxity
KT-1000 measurement
Measured: Day 0
Knee laxity
KT-1000 measurement
Measured: Week 6
Knee laxity
KT-1000 measurement
Measured: Month 3
Knee laxity
KT-1000 measurement
Measured: Month 8
Knee laxity
KT-1000 measurement
Measured: Year 1
Knee laxity
KT-1000 measurement
Measured: Year 2
Knee laxity
KT-1000 measurement
Measured: Year 3
Passive accessory movement of knee
Lachman test
Measured: Day -1
Passive accessory movement of knee
Lachman test
Measured: Day 0
Passive accessory movement of knee
Lachman test
Measured: Week 6
Passive accessory movement of knee
Lachman test
Measured: Month 3
Passive accessory movement of knee
Lachman test
Measured: Month 8
Passive accessory movement of knee
Lachman test
Measured: Year 1
Passive accessory movement of knee
Lachman test
Measured: Year 2
Passive accessory movement of knee
Lachman test
Measured: Year 3
Anterior cruciate ligament and posterior capsule integrity
Pivot-shift test
Measured: Day -1
Anterior cruciate ligament and posterior capsule integrity
Pivot-shift test
Measured: Day 0
Anterior cruciate ligament and posterior capsule integrity
Pivot-shift test
Measured: Week 6
Anterior cruciate ligament and posterior capsule integrity
Pivot-shift test
Measured: Month 3
Anterior cruciate ligament and posterior capsule integrity
Pivot-shift test
Measured: Month 8
Anterior cruciate ligament and posterior capsule integrity
Pivot-shift test
Measured: Year 1
Anterior cruciate ligament and posterior capsule integrity
Pivot-shift test
Measured: Year 2
Anterior cruciate ligament and posterior capsule integrity
Pivot-shift test
Measured: Year 3
Post-operative complications
Undesirable events
Measured: Year 3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 May 2018
- Study start17 Sep 2018
- Primary completion24 Apr 2019
- Study completion24 Apr 2019
Why it stopped: The Dm production has been stopped
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dedienne Sante S.A.S.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Philippe Marchand, MD, Principal investigator, CHU Nimes
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03529552
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IDIL/2017/PM-01
- Acronym
- BIORELICA
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 7 May 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Short-, Medium- and Long-term (up to 3 Years) Evaluation After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Using the Bioresorbable Interference Screw (SMS): Resorbability, Per- and Post-operative Complications and Articular Functional Recovery.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03529552
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BIORELICA / IDIL/2017/PM-01
- Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The Dm production has been stopped
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dedienne Sante S.A.S.
- Study start
- 17 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 May 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators will evaluate the benefit of a new bioresorbable screw for repair of anterior cruciate ligament over 3 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture | Experimental | Procedure: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
- The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is at least 18 years old
- The patient is available for at least 3 years of follow-up
- The patient requires ligamentoplasty pour rupture of anterior cruciate ligament confirmed by MRI with or without meniscal lesions as scheduled surgery
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- The subject is participating in an interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
- The subject refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to give the subject informed information
- The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
- The patient is pregnant or breast-feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionPlacement of an SMS bioresorbable interference screw (DEDIENNE Santé) | Procedure or surgery | Patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture |
Primary outcome
In situ degradation of screw
Time frame: Year 3
Assessed on T1 and proton density fat saturation MRI
65 secondary outcomes
Knee stiffness
Time frame: Day -1
Knee stiffness
Time frame: Day 0
Knee stiffness
Time frame: Week 6
Knee stiffness
Time frame: Month 3
Knee stiffness
Time frame: Month 8
Knee stiffness
Time frame: Year 1
Knee stiffness
Time frame: Year 2
Knee stiffness
Time frame: Year 3
Knee mobility
Time frame: Day -1
Knee mobility
Time frame: Day 0
Knee mobility
Time frame: Week 6
Knee mobility
Time frame: Month 3
Knee mobility
Time frame: Month 8
Knee mobility
Time frame: Year 1
Knee mobility
Time frame: Year 2
Knee mobility
Time frame: Year 3
Lateral pivot shift of knee
Time frame: Day -1
Lateral pivot shift of knee
Time frame: Day 0
Lateral pivot shift of knee
Time frame: Week 6
Lateral pivot shift of knee
Time frame: Month 3
Lateral pivot shift of knee
Time frame: Month 8
Lateral pivot shift of knee
Time frame: Year 1
Lateral pivot shift of knee
Time frame: Year 2
Lateral pivot shift of knee
Time frame: Year 3
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Time frame: Day -1
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Time frame: Day 0
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Time frame: Week 6
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Time frame: Month 3
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Time frame: Month 8
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Time frame: year 1
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Time frame: Year 2
Impact of knee pain on daily life
Time frame: Year 3
Patient-reported knee problems
Time frame: Day -1
Patient-reported knee problems
Time frame: Day 0
Patient-reported knee problems
Time frame: Week 6
Patient-reported knee problems
Time frame: Month 3
Patient-reported knee problems
Time frame: Month 8
Patient-reported knee problems
Time frame: Year 1
Patient-reported knee problems
Time frame: Year 2
Patient-reported knee problems
Time frame: Year 3
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The Dm production has been stopped). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2020.
Related trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Not yet recruiting
Supporting Athletes' Return to Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Study of a Psychological Readiness Program
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Biological Outcomes of BioBrace-Augmented ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Extended Post-Operative Oral Tranexamic Acid Dosing After ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
RecruitingObservational study
BioBrace® Augmentation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedures
ACL Tears
RecruitingPhase 2
Preventing Injured Knees From osteoArthritis: Severity Outcomes
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philippe Marchand, MD principal investigator
CHU Nimes
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 3 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The Dm production has been stopped). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
In situ degradation of screw (time frame: Year 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2020.