Anesthesia, GeneralConox-loopNCT03540875
Automated Anesthesia Guided by the Conox Monitor for Surgery
A study testing Closed loop anesthesia, Propofol and Remifentanil in people with Anesthesia, General, run by CMC Ambroise Paré at 3 sites in France.
Trial summary
This study compares automated administration of propofol and remifentanil versus manual administration during general anesthesia for a surgery. The closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil is guided by qCon and qNox indexes from the Conox monitor. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia, General
- What is being tested?
- Closed loop anesthesia, Propofol and Remifentanil
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 62 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 2 Jul 2018to 18 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Scheduled surgery for at least one hour
- Consent for participation
- Affiliation to the social security system
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patients for which Conox monitor should not be used
- Allergies to propofol or remifentanil
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
France3 sites
Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation Chirurgicale, CHU Besançon
Besançon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, 25030
Service d'Anesthésie du Centre Clinical
Soyaux, Poitou-Charentes, 16800
Service d'Anesthésie, Hôpital Foch
Suresnes, Île-de-France Region, 92151
About this study
Official title: Comparison Between Manual Versus Closed-loop Titration of Propofol and Remifentanil Guided by the qCon and qNox Indexes During Induction and Maintenance of General Anesthesia in Adult Patients: a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Study
This study compares automated administration of propofol and remifentanil versus manual administration during general anesthesia for a surgery. The closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil is guided by qCon and qNox indexes from the Conox monitor.
Read the detailed description
Several monitors are currently proposed to evaluate the depth of hypnosis. The Conox monitor differentiates itself from the other brain monitor by calculating two EEG indexes, the qCon and the qNox. The qCon corresponds to the depth of the sedation and the qNox relates to the probability that a nociceptive stimulation triggers a movement of the patient. A controller allowing the automated titration of propofol guided by the qCon and remifentanil guided by the qNox has been developed. In preparation for a large multi-center control trial, this prospective randomized study evaluates the effectiveness of such a closed-loop anesthesia system. Two groups of patients are compared: one arm in which propofol and remifentanil are administered by the anesthesiologist using target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems, and the second arm in which propofol and remifentanil are administered automatically by the combined closed-loop anesthesia system. In both groups, the goal is to maintain qCon between 40 and 60, the recommended range during anesthesia by the manufacturer. It is expected the combined closed-loop anesthesia system group to do similar or better control to maintain the qCon in the desired range.
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, General
- Being tested
- Closed loop anesthesia, Propofol, Remifentanil
- Keywords
- Anesthesia, general, Total intravenous anesthesia, Closed loop anesthesia, Conox, EEG monitoring, qCon, qNox
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Closed loop anesthesiaDevice
Propofol and Remifentanil are administered automatically using a closed-loop system.
The goal of this study is to compare manual titration versus automated titration of propofol and remifentanil in adult patients undergoing surgery guided by the electro-cortical activity. The aim in both group is to maintain the qCon in the range 40-60 during induction and maintenance of general anesthesia using the propofol in TCI mode. But also the qNox in the range 40-60 using remifentanil. The controller is based on a Proportional-Integral-derivative algorithm which steers a target to the pumps during induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.
PropofolDrug
The dosage is modified automatically by the device or according to the new medical prescription.
RemifentanilDrug
The dosage is modified automatically by the device or according to the new medical prescription.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Full automation group | Experimental | Full automation control of propofol and remifentanil Receives: Device: Closed loop anesthesia; Drug: Propofol; Drug: Remifentanil |
| Control group | Other | Manual control of of propofol and remifentanil using TCI system Receives: Drug: Propofol; Drug: Remifentanil |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adequate sedation
Percentage of time with qCon index within the 40-60 range as recommended by the manufacturer of Conox monitor.
Data from the Conox monitor (signal quality index, qCon index, qNox index, Suppression ratio) are recorded every second.
Measured: Start of general anesthesia maintenance, i.e. qCon below 60 for 30 consecutive seconds for the first time, until the end of propofol et remifentanil infusion
Secondary outcomes (9)
Adequate analgesia
Percentage of time with qNox index within the 40-60 range as recommended by the manufacturer of Conox monitor.
Measured: Start of general anesthesia maintenance, i.e. qNox below 60 for 30 consecutive seconds for the first time, until the end of propofol et remifentanil infusion
Occurrence of Burst Suppression Ratio (bsr)
Presence of Burst Suppression defined by a rate > 10% for at least one minute
Measured: Intraoperative period
Dose of hypnotic drug
Total amount of propofol during the induction and the maintenance of the anesthesia
Measured: Intraoperative period
Dose of analgesic drug
Total amount of remifentanil during the induction and the maintenance of the anesthesia
Measured: Intraoperative period
Medical interventions on the dosage of drugs
Number of modifications of target of propofol and remifentanil
Measured: Intraoperative period
Hemodynamic status
Number of episodes of hemodynamic anomalies having required a treatment
Measured: Intraoperative period
Fluid therapy
Intraoperative volume loading and transfusion
Measured: Intraoperative period
Delay before awakening
Delay between the cessation of infusion of propofol and remifentanil and extubation
Measured: 12 hours
Explicit memorization
Awareness standardized questionnaire
Measured: 48 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2018
- Study start2 Jul 2018
- Primary completion18 Feb 2019
- Study completion18 Feb 2019
Why it stopped: Modification of the device
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anesthesia, GeneralStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CMC Ambroise Paré
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marc Fischler, MD, Study chair, Hôpital Foch
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03540875
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017/04
- Acronym
- Conox-loop
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 6 May 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Liu N, Chazot T, Hamada S, Landais A, Boichut N, Dussaussoy C, Trillat B, Beydon L, Samain E, Sessler DI, Fischler M. Closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil guided by bispectral index: a randomized multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2011 Mar;112(3):546-57. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318205680b. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
PubMed 21233500Jensen EW, Valencia JF, Lopez A, Anglada T, Agusti M, Ramos Y, Serra R, Jospin M, Pineda P, Gambus P. Monitoring hypnotic effect and nociception with two EEG-derived indices, qCON and qNOX, during general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Sep;58(8):933-41. doi: 10.1111/aas.12359. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
PubMed 24995461
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Manual Versus Closed-loop Titration of Propofol and Remifentanil Guided by the qCon and qNox Indexes During Induction and Maintenance of General Anesthesia in Adult Patients: a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03540875
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Conox-loop / 2017/04
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, General
- Keywords
- Anesthesia, general, Total intravenous anesthesia, Closed loop anesthesia, Conox, EEG monitoring, qCon, qNox
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Modification of the device
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CMC Ambroise ParéUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 May 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study compares automated administration of propofol and remifentanil versus manual administration during general anesthesia for a surgery. The closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil is guided by qCon and qNox indexes from the Conox monitor.
Detailed description
Several monitors are currently proposed to evaluate the depth of hypnosis. The Conox monitor differentiates itself from the other brain monitor by calculating two EEG indexes, the qCon and the qNox. The qCon corresponds to the depth of the sedation and the qNox relates to the probability that a nociceptive stimulation triggers a movement of the patient. A controller allowing the automated titration of propofol guided by the qCon and remifentanil guided by the qNox has been developed. In preparation for a large multi-center control trial, this prospective randomized study evaluates the effectiveness of such a closed-loop anesthesia system. Two groups of patients are compared: one arm in which propofol and remifentanil are administered by the anesthesiologist using target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems, and the second arm in which propofol and remifentanil are administered automatically by the combined closed-loop anesthesia system. In both groups, the goal is to maintain qCon between 40 and 60, the recommended range during anesthesia by the manufacturer. It is expected the combined closed-loop anesthesia system group to do similar or better control to maintain the qCon in the desired range.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Full automation group | Experimental | Device: Closed loop anesthesia, Drug: Propofol, Drug: RemifentanilFull automation control of propofol and remifentanil |
| Control group | Other | Drug: Propofol, Drug: RemifentanilManual control of of propofol and remifentanil using TCI system |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Scheduled surgery for at least one hour
- Consent for participation
- Affiliation to the social security system
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patients for which Conox monitor should not be used
- Allergies to propofol or remifentanil
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Closed loop anesthesiaPropofol and Remifentanil are administered automatically using a closed-loop system. The goal of this study is to compare manual titration versus automated titration of propofol and remifentanil in adult patients undergoing surgery guided by the electro-cortical activity. The aim in both group is to maintain the qCon in the range 40-60 during induction and maintenance of general anesthesia using the propofol in TCI mode. But also the qNox in the range 40-60 using remifentanil. The controller is based on a Proportional-Integral-derivative algorithm which steers a target to the pumps during induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. | Device | Full automation group |
| PropofolThe dosage is modified automatically by the device or according to the new medical prescription. | Drug | Control group, Full automation group |
| RemifentanilThe dosage is modified automatically by the device or according to the new medical prescription. | Drug | Control group, Full automation group |
Primary outcome
Adequate sedation
Time frame: Start of general anesthesia maintenance, i.e. qCon below 60 for 30 consecutive seconds for the first time, until the end of propofol et remifentanil infusion
Percentage of time with qCon index within the 40-60 range as recommended by the manufacturer of Conox monitor. Data from the Conox monitor (signal quality index, qCon index, qNox index, Suppression ratio) are recorded every second.
9 secondary outcomes
Adequate analgesia
Time frame: Start of general anesthesia maintenance, i.e. qNox below 60 for 30 consecutive seconds for the first time, until the end of propofol et remifentanil infusion
Occurrence of Burst Suppression Ratio (bsr)
Time frame: Intraoperative period
Dose of hypnotic drug
Time frame: Intraoperative period
Dose of analgesic drug
Time frame: Intraoperative period
Medical interventions on the dosage of drugs
Time frame: Intraoperative period
Hemodynamic status
Time frame: Intraoperative period
Fluid therapy
Time frame: Intraoperative period
Delay before awakening
Time frame: 12 hours
Explicit memorization
Time frame: 48 hours
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Modification of the device). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 21233500Liu N, Chazot T, Hamada S, Landais A, Boichut N, Dussaussoy C, Trillat B, Beydon L, Samain E, Sessler DI, Fischler M. Closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil guided by bispectral index: a randomized multicenter study. Anesth Analg. 2011 Mar;112(3):546-57. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318205680b. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 24995461Jensen EW, Valencia JF, Lopez A, Anglada T, Agusti M, Ramos Y, Serra R, Jospin M, Pineda P, Gambus P. Monitoring hypnotic effect and nociception with two EEG-derived indices, qCON and qNOX, during general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Sep;58(8):933-41. doi: 10.1111/aas.12359. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anesthesia, General
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
Tizanidine Premedication Versus Placebo for Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Recovery in Adults Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery
Airway Management
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Prophylactic Dexamethasone vs Placebo on Airway Dimensions Assessed by Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Airway Edema, Postoperative Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marc Fischler, MD study chair
Hôpital Foch
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Closed loop anesthesia, Propofol and Remifentanil in people with Anesthesia, General, run by CMC Ambroise Paré at 3 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Modification of the device). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adequate sedation (time frame: Start of general anesthesia maintenance, i.e. qCon below 60 for 30 consecutive seconds for the first time, until the end of propofol et remifentanil infusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03540875, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2021.