AzTrials
AzTrials

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsEXITNCT03542942

Exclusion of Non-involved Uterus From the Target Volume in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

A study testing treatment with EXIT-target volume in people with Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Both toxicity and local relapse are major concerns in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. The purpose of this study is to ameliorate both by integrating modern imaging (diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging; DW-MRI) into the treatment planning of modern radiotherapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What is being tested?
treatment with EXIT-target volume
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
30 Mar 2016to 22 Sep 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Biopsy proven carcinoma of the uterine cervix
  • locally advanced disease (FIGO IB2 or >FIGO IIB or node positive) proven by clinical examination, 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan (18FDG PET-CT) and MRI
  • no more than 2 distant metastases (other than para-aortic lymph nodes);
  • WHO 0-2;
  • adequate kidney function for CRT, if inadequate kidney function radiotherapy can be the sole therapeutic regimen;
  • not pregnant or breastfeeding
  • absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; - willing and able to sign a written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients unable to undergo MRI for any reason.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Radiotherapy Department Ghent University Hospital

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Exclusion of Non-involved Uterus Form the Target Volume: an Individualized Treatment for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Using Modern Radiotherapy and Imaging Techniques

Both toxicity and local relapse are major concerns in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. The purpose of this study is to ameliorate both by integrating modern imaging (diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging; DW-MRI) into the treatment planning of modern radiotherapy. We want to evaluate the safety and effect of excluding the unaffected uterus (as determined on magnetic resonance imaging) from the treatment field. Meanwhile we want to explore the possible use of apparent diffusion coefficient values (DW-MRI) as biomarker of treatment response.

Read the detailed description

In our previous research we successfully implemented Intensity Modulate Arc Therapy with concurrent administration of cisplatin 40mg/m2 weekly (IMAT-C) in the multimodality treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer (LACC) . By delivering a higher biological dose to the tumor and lowering the dose to the Organs at Risk (OARs), toxicity significantly dropped and local control improved. However, there remains room for improvement for both toxicity and response to the treatment. Macroscopic tumor rest on hysterectomy reflects the existence of chemoradiation (CRT) resistant foci and correlates with outcome. We hypothesize that both radiotherapy (RT)-related toxicity (a) as well as local response on CRT (b) can be improved by respectively:

  1. Reducing the dose on OARs by omitting iconographical non tumor-bearing parts of the uterus from the Clinical Target Volume (CTV).
  2. Performing a dose-escalation to those regions within the gross target volume (GTV) pointed out by Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) to be at risk for treatment failure.

To objectivize our hypotheses, we aim at:

  1. Demonstrating that omitting iconographical unaffected uterus from the treatment volume leaves no tumor behind in the non-targeted parts of the uterus, leads to lower doses to the OARs and decreases (acute) toxicity.
  2. Validating that a high baseline apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and an increase in ADC 2 weeks after start of CRT, for the whole tumor as well as for intra-tumoral regions, is prognostic for residual tumor on hysterectomy specimen and to consider the possibility for a further dose-escalation on tumors/intratumoral regions at risk for treatment failure.

Importance to the field: Both toxicity and local relapse are major concerns in the treatment of LACC. Grade ≥ 2 toxicity influences daily life of patients significantly and is present in the majority of patients treated and even with image guided BT local relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure.

Being tested
treatment with EXIT-target volume
Keywords
locally advanced, radiotherapy, DW-MRI, target volume
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • treatment with EXIT-target volumeOther

    exclusion of the unaffected part of the uterus out of the treatment field

Study groups in NCT03542942
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
treatment with EXIT-target volumeOtherThe radiotherapeutic treatment plan is based on an EXIT-target volume in which the non-involved uterus is excluded from the target volume. All other delineations are performed conform standard of care.
Receives: Other: treatment with EXIT-target volume

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. safety: abscence of tumor in the non-involved and non-high doses irradiated part of the uterus

    abscence of tumor in the non-involved (as determined on the pre-treatment MRI) and non-high doses irradiated part of the uterus in the hysterectomy specimen after CRT

    Measured: within 3 months after last inclusion

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. dosimetry

    dosimetric comparison of dose on the OARs when comparing study treatment plans compared to treatment of the whole uterus at high doses

    Measured: within 3 months after last inclusion

  2. number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by the radiotherapy oncology group toxicity criteria and CTCAEv4.0 for hematology

    evaluation of acute toxicity, grade 0 (no toxicity) to grade 5 (treatment related death).

    Measured: during treatment. 10 days, 1 months and 3 months after ending treatment

  3. number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by the radiotherapy oncology group toxicity criteria and CTCAEv4.0

    evaluation chronic toxicity, grade 0 (no toxicity) to grade 5 (treatment related death).

    Measured: 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatment.

  4. local, regional and distant control

    defined as absence of disease at the primary tumor bed, the regional lymph nodes and distant sites

    Measured: 1, 3, 6, 12,18 and 24 months after treatment

  5. Correlation of high-Risk regions on IMaging (DW-MRI) with Pathology and regression pattern analysis (CRIMP).

    The MRI at fixed time points will be supplemented with diffusion weighing (DW). The ultimate aim is the correlation of tumoral ADC-values of the different DW-MRI with the pathology in order to predict therapy resistance or response to CRT at an early stage or even before start.

    Measured: Within 6 months after surgery of the last patient

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 May 2018
  2. Study start30 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion22 Sep 2020
  4. Study completion22 Sep 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03542942
Sponsor's protocol ID
B670201526181
Acronym
EXIT
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
3 May 2018
Last updated
19 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: IPD can be shared. Decision is made upon request.

Publications

  • Vandecasteele K, Tummers P, Van Bockstal M, De Visschere P, Vercauteren T, De Gersem W, Denys H, Naert E, Makar A, De Neve W. EXclusion of non-Involved uterus from the Target Volume (EXIT-trial): an individualized treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer using modern radiotherapy and imaging techniques. BMC Cancer. 2018 Sep 17;18(1):898. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4800-0.

    PubMed 30223802

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing treatment with EXIT-target volume in people with Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

safety: abscence of tumor in the non-involved and non-high doses irradiated part of the uterus (time frame: within 3 months after last inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03542942, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in