Coronary Artery DiseaseSLIMNCT03562572
FFR Driven Complete Revascularization Versus Usual Care in NSTEMI Patients and Multivessel Disease
A study testing Ischemia driven revascularization in people with Coronary Artery Disease and NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI, run by Zuyderland Medisch Centrum at 9 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
To compare FFR guided complete revascularization during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with multivessel disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
- What is being tested?
- Ischemia driven revascularization
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 476 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 7 Jun 2018to Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged between 18-85 years presenting with non-STEMI according to current guidelines, who will be treated with PCI of the culprit and have at least one stenosis of >50% in a non-IRA on QCA or visual estimation of baseline angiography and judged feasible for treatment with PCI by the operator.
- Non-IRA stenosis amenable for PCI treatment (operator's decision)
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Left main disease (stenosis > 50%)
- Chronic total occlusion of a non-IRA
- Indication for or previous coronary artery bypass grafting
- Uncertain culprit lesion
- Complicated IRA treatment, e.g. extravasation, permanent no re-flow after IRA treatment (TIMI flow 0-1) and inability to implant a stent
- Known severe cardiac valve dysfunction that will require surgery or TAVI in the follow-up period.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Killip class III or IV during the completion of culprit lesion treatment.
- Life expectancy of < 1 year.
- Intolerance to Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor or Heparin.
- Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months.
- Planned elective surgical procedure necessitating interruption of thienopyridines during the first 6 months post enrolment.
- Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 3 countries.
9 sites in 3 countries
Netherlands5 sites
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch
Zuyderland MC
Heerlen
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht
Radboud University Medical Centre
Nijmegen
Viecuri Medisch Centrum
Venlo
Hungary3 sites
Gottsegen György Országos Kardiológiai Intézet
Budapest
Bacs-Kiskun Teaching Hospital
Kecskemét
Szeged University
Szeged
About this study
Official title: Ischemia (FFR) Driven Complete Revascularization Versus Usual Care in Patients With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Diseases: The South Limburg Myocardial Infarction Study Group The SLIM Study
To compare FFR guided complete revascularization during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI), as compared with STEMI patients, have a higher risk profile, more often MVD and less favourable outcome. Recent studies showed that complete revascularization in STEMI patients is feasible and effective. However, there is no clear evidence regarding the role of complete coronary revascularization by PCI in patients with non-STEMI with MVD.
Objective:
To compare FFR guided complete revascularization during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
Design:
Prospective, multicentre, 1:1 randomized, investigator initiated study.
Hypothesis:
FFR guided complete percutaneous revascularisation of all significant stenosis in the non-culprit lesion performed within the index PCI procedure will improve clinical outcomes compared to the usual care, guided by discretion of the physician.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Myocardial Revascularization, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Being tested
- Ischemia driven revascularization, Usual care group
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ischemia driven revascularizationProcedure or surgery
In the ischemia driven complete revascularisation strategy group all flow limiting (FFR ≤ 0.80) lesions will receive treatment by PCI and stenting during the index intervention
Usual care groupOther
In the randomised to usual care group the procedure will stop after the PCI of the culprit artery and the patient will be referred to his treating cardiologist and/ or heart team who will decide whether a staged PCI of the non- IRA artery should take place. If the treating cardiologist (after advise of the heart team) decides to perform the non-IRA PCI revascularisation, than such treatment should take place within six weeks from the primary PCI in order to count as a scheduled staged PCI procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ischemia driven revascularization | Experimental | In the ischemia driven complete revascularisation strategy group all flow limiting (FFR ≤ 0.80) lesions will receive treatment by PCI and stenting. The non-IRA PCI should be performed during the same intervention. Exceptions can be made for complex lesions where the operator estimates that the revascularisation procedure will require significant contrast overload, which may lead to deterioration of cardiac and renal function of the patient. Receives: Procedure: Ischemia driven revascularization |
| Usual care group | Active comparator | In the randomised to usual care group the procedure will stop after the PCI of the culprit artery and the patient will be referred to his treating cardiologist and/ or heart team who will decide whether a staged PCI of the non- IRA artery should take place. If the treating cardiologist (after advise of the heart team) decides to perform the non-IRA PCI revascularisation, than such treatment should take place within six weeks from the primary PCI in order to count as a scheduled staged PCI procedure. Receives: Other: Usual care group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The incidence of MACE at 12 months
MACE = The composite endpoint of all cause death, non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, any revascularisation and stroke at 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
The incidence of MACE in subgroups at 12 and 24 months.
Prespecified subgroup analyses of primary outcomes will be performed for:
- Diabetic patients versus non-diabetic patients
- Elderly (≥ 75 years) versus young patients (< 75 years)
- Male versus Female gender
- High versus low risk patients according to GRACE Risk Score
- Patients previous myocardial infarction versus patients with no previous myocardial infarction
The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score estimates the admission 6 month mortality for patients with acute coronary syndrome. The GRACE score ranges from 0 to > 285. A higher GRACE represents a higher mortality risk, ranging from 0-2% when the GRACE is between 0 and 87, to 99% when the GRACE exceeds 285.
Measured: 12 and 24 months
Composite endpoint of Net Adverse Clinical Events (NACE) defined as composite endpoint of Cardiac death, Myocardial Infarction, any Revascularisation, Stroke and major bleeding at 12, 24 and 36 months.
Measured: 12, 24 and 36 months
Composite endpoint hospitalisation for heart failure and unstable angina pectoris at 12, 24 and 36 months.
Measured: 12, 24 and 36 months
All-cause mortality or Myocardial infarction at 12, 24 and 36 months.
Measured: 12, 24 and 36 months
Any revascularisation at 12, 24 and 36 months.
Measured: 12, 24 and 36 months
Stent thrombosis at 12, 24 and 36 months.
Measured: 12, 24 and 36 months
Bleeding (major and minor) at 48 hours and 12 months.
Measured: 48 hours and 12 months
The incidence of MACE at 36 months as well as outcomes of each component of MACE at 12 and 24 and 36 months.
MACE = The composite endpoint of all cause death, non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, any revascularisation and stroke at 12 months.
Measured: 12, 24 and 36 months
Left ventricular ejection fraction at 12 and 24 and 36 month (MIBI scan, MRI or Echocardiography).
Measured: 12, 24 and 36 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jun 2018
- Study start7 Jun 2018
- Primary completion21 Jul 2025
- Study completionJul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- It concerns an investigator initiated prospective 1:1 randomised clinical trial in non-STEMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease amenable to treatment with PCI.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 476 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, VieCuri Medical Centre, Gottsegen György Országos Kardiológiai Intézet, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Brno University Hospital, Szeged University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Saman Rasoul, Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
- Investigators
- Saman Rasoul, Dr., Principal investigator, Zuyderland MCArnoud van 't Hof, Prof. Dr., Study director, Zuyderland MC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03562572
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17-T-142
- Other IDs
- 28708
- Acronym
- SLIM
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 23 May 2018
- Last updated
- 15 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Pustjens TFS, Veenstra L, Camaro C, Ruiters AW, Lux A, Ruzsa Z, Piroth Z, Ilhan M, Vainer J, Gho B, Winkler PJC, Stein M, Theunissen RALJ, Kala P, Polad J, Berta B, Gabrio A, van Royen N, van 't Hof AWJ, Rasoul S. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: The SLIM Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Nov 11;334(18):1628-1637. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.16189.
PubMed 40886310
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ischemia (FFR) Driven Complete Revascularization Versus Usual Care in Patients With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Diseases: The South Limburg Myocardial Infarction Study Group The SLIM Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03562572
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SLIM / 17-T-142
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Myocardial Revascularization, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 476 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Zuyderland Medisch CentrumUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, VieCuri Medical Centre, Gottsegen György Országos Kardiológiai Intézet, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Brno University Hospital, Szeged University
- Study start
- 7 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare FFR guided complete revascularization during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
Detailed description
Background:
Patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI), as compared with STEMI patients, have a higher risk profile, more often MVD and less favourable outcome. Recent studies showed that complete revascularization in STEMI patients is feasible and effective. However, there is no clear evidence regarding the role of complete coronary revascularization by PCI in patients with non-STEMI with MVD.
Objective:
To compare FFR guided complete revascularization during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with multivessel disease.
Design:
Prospective, multicentre, 1:1 randomized, investigator initiated study.
Hypothesis:
FFR guided complete percutaneous revascularisation of all significant stenosis in the non-culprit lesion performed within the index PCI procedure will improve clinical outcomes compared to the usual care, guided by discretion of the physician.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- It concerns an investigator initiated prospective 1:1 randomised clinical trial in non-STEMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease amenable to treatment with PCI.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ischemia driven revascularization | Experimental | Procedure: Ischemia driven revascularizationIn the ischemia driven complete revascularisation strategy group all flow limiting (FFR ≤ 0.80) lesions will receive treatment by PCI and stenting. The non-IRA PCI should be performed during the same intervention. Exceptions can be made for complex lesions where the operator estimates that the revascularisation procedure will require significant contrast overload, which may lead to deterioration of cardiac and renal function of the patient. |
| Usual care group | Active comparator | Other: Usual care groupIn the randomised to usual care group the procedure will stop after the PCI of the culprit artery and the patient will be referred to his treating cardiologist and/ or heart team who will decide whether a staged PCI of the non- IRA artery should take place. If the treating cardiologist (after advise of the heart team) decides to perform the non-IRA PCI revascularisation, than such treatment should take place within six weeks from the primary PCI in order to count as a scheduled staged PCI procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients aged between 18-85 years presenting with non-STEMI according to current guidelines, who will be treated with PCI of the culprit and have at least one stenosis of >50% in a non-IRA on QCA or visual estimation of baseline angiography and judged feasible for treatment with PCI by the operator.
- Non-IRA stenosis amenable for PCI treatment (operator's decision)
- Signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Left main disease (stenosis > 50%)
- Chronic total occlusion of a non-IRA
- Indication for or previous coronary artery bypass grafting
- Uncertain culprit lesion
- Complicated IRA treatment, e.g. extravasation, permanent no re-flow after IRA treatment (TIMI flow 0-1) and inability to implant a stent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ischemia driven revascularizationIn the ischemia driven complete revascularisation strategy group all flow limiting (FFR ≤ 0.80) lesions will receive treatment by PCI and stenting during the index intervention | Procedure or surgery | Ischemia driven revascularization |
| Usual care groupIn the randomised to usual care group the procedure will stop after the PCI of the culprit artery and the patient will be referred to his treating cardiologist and/ or heart team who will decide whether a staged PCI of the non- IRA artery should take place. If the treating cardiologist (after advise of the heart team) decides to perform the non-IRA PCI revascularisation, than such treatment should take place within six weeks from the primary PCI in order to count as a scheduled staged PCI procedure. | Other | Usual care group |
Primary outcome
The incidence of MACE at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
MACE = The composite endpoint of all cause death, non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, any revascularisation and stroke at 12 months.
9 secondary outcomes
The incidence of MACE in subgroups at 12 and 24 months.
Time frame: 12 and 24 months
Composite endpoint of Net Adverse Clinical Events (NACE) defined as composite endpoint of Cardiac death, Myocardial Infarction, any Revascularisation, Stroke and major bleeding at 12, 24 and 36 months.
Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months
Composite endpoint hospitalisation for heart failure and unstable angina pectoris at 12, 24 and 36 months.
Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months
All-cause mortality or Myocardial infarction at 12, 24 and 36 months.
Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months
Any revascularisation at 12, 24 and 36 months.
Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months
Stent thrombosis at 12, 24 and 36 months.
Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months
Bleeding (major and minor) at 48 hours and 12 months.
Time frame: 48 hours and 12 months
The incidence of MACE at 36 months as well as outcomes of each component of MACE at 12 and 24 and 36 months.
Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months
Left ventricular ejection fraction at 12 and 24 and 36 month (MIBI scan, MRI or Echocardiography).
Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Aug 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40886310Pustjens TFS, Veenstra L, Camaro C, Ruiters AW, Lux A, Ruzsa Z, Piroth Z, Ilhan M, Vainer J, Gho B, Winkler PJC, Stein M, Theunissen RALJ, Kala P, Polad J, Berta B, Gabrio A, van Royen N, van 't Hof AWJ, Rasoul S. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: The SLIM Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2025 Nov 11;334(18):1628-1637. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.16189.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD
Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Late Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in Testicular Cancer Survivors
Testicular Cancer, Survivorship
Recruiting
Intracoronary Cryotherapy Effect on Stabilization of Vulnerable Plaque in Patients With Stable Angina or ACS - A Traditional Feasibility Study
Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Plaque
Recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Value of Coronary CT Angiography in the Understanding and Management of Coronary Calcium (The Optimal Trial)
Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia
Enrolling by invitation
Optical Coherence Tomography in Acute Vessel Evaluation
Ischemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Saman Rasoul, Dr. principal investigator
Zuyderland MC
Arnoud van 't Hof, Prof. Dr. study director
Zuyderland MC
9 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ischemia driven revascularization in people with Coronary Artery Disease and NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI, run by Zuyderland Medisch Centrum at 9 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in Netherlands, Hungary, Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The incidence of MACE at 12 months (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03562572, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.