Prostate CancerPhase 2NGP2NCT03573011
PSMA PET/CT for Prostate Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing [18F]PSMA-11 in people with Prostate Cancer, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Prostate cancer is the most frequently occurring male cancer in Belgium. Patients who have been treated for prostate cancer, i.e. by surgery and/or radiotherapy, in a substantial degree suffer from a tumor recurrence, often diagnosed by an increase in serum tumor marker Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) within the first… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- [18F]PSMA-11
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 15 Jun 2018to 18 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, either in the setting of diagnosis of biochemical recurrence after previous treatment, or at primary diagnosis and staging.
Who cannot join
- Age: <18 years
- Physically or mentally unfit to perform the sequential procedures
- Refusal of patient to be informed about accidental findings on scans
- Patients with heart failure if ejection fraction < 45% (phase 2 trial)
- History of anaphylactic shock after administration of Visipaque CT contrast (phase 2 trial)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: PSMA-PET/CT for Prostate Cancer - Phase 2 Trial
Prostate cancer is the most frequently occurring male cancer in Belgium. Patients who have been treated for prostate cancer, i.e. by surgery and/or radiotherapy, in a substantial degree suffer from a tumor recurrence, often diagnosed by an increase in serum tumor marker Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) within the first few years. In these patients with evidence of a tumor recurrence after primary treatment, it is important to most exactly define the location(s) of tumor, to guide appropriate therapy by surgery, radiotherapy and/or hormonotherapy. In so-called oligo-metastatic disease targeted therapy may still be curative and prevent the disease from spreading to distant locations. Therefore it is of paramount importance to have an accurate tool of medical imaging to localize all possible locations to be treated.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- [18F]PSMA-11
- Keywords
- prostate cancer, biochemical recurrence, 18F-PET imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
[18F]PSMA-11Diagnostic test
18F-PET imaging
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 ± 0.2 MBq/kg [18F]PSMA-11 dosing group | Experimental | To define the optimal [18F]PSMA-11 scan protocol, the quality of the PET images from patients that received 2.0 ± 0.2 MBq/kg will be compared to the images from patients that received 4.0 ± 0.4 MBq/kg.
Patients in this study arm will receive 2.0 ± 0.2 MBq/kg for acquiring the [18F]PSMA-11 scan. All other study parameters and procedures are identical to those in the other study arm.
As for the use of radiopharmaceuticals, the ALARA ('as low as reasonably achievable') principle must be applied, this study arm is considered to be the reference. Receives: Diagnostic Test: [18F]PSMA-11 |
| 4.0 ± 0.4 MBq/kg [18F]PSMA-11 dosing group | Experimental | Concerning the dose of [18F]PSMA-11, the patients in this study arm will receive 4.0 ± 0.4 MBq/kg for the [18F]PSMA-11 scan. All other study parameters and procedures are identical to those in the other study arm Receives: Diagnostic Test: [18F]PSMA-11 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of effective targeting of prostate cancer and eventual metastases
Two PET/CT scans with [18F]PSMA-11 will be acquired to evaluate the effectiveness of targeting prostate cancer and eventual metastases
Measured: 0 to 3.5 hours post radiotracer injection
Determination of the optimal scan protocol: define optimal time of scanning
Based on the quality of the images and feasibility of tumor targetting (4 point '0-3' scoring scale - higher score represents a higher intensity lesion), the optimal time (60 min or 180 min post radiotracer injection) will be defined
Measured: 0 to 3.5 hours post radiotracer injection
Determination of the optimal scan protocol: define optimal scan duration
Based on the quality of the images and feasibility of tumor targetting (4 point '0-3' scoring scale, higher score represents a higher intensity lesion), the optimal scan duration (1.5 minutes/bed position or 3.0 minutes/bed position) will be defined
Measured: 0 to 3.5 hours post radiotracer injection
Determination of the optimal scan protocol: define optimal dose
Based on the overall image quality (7 point '1-7' scoring scale for image blurriness, higher score represents a higher quality image), the optimal dose of [18F]PSMA-11 (2.0 or 4.0 MBq/kg) will be defined
Measured: 0 to 3.5 hours post radiotracer injection
Determination of the optimal scan protocol: evaluation of the added value of furosemide (to improve diuresis), as part of the standard scanprotocol
Based on the degree that the radiotracer uptake in the bladder and in the ureters is disruptive for the interpretation of the scan (visual interpretation by nuclearist using a 7 point '1-7' scoring scale, higher score equals a more pronounced disturbance), the added value of furosemide, as part of the standard scanprotocol, will be defined
Measured: 0 to 1.5 hours post radiotracer injection
Secondary outcomes (3)
Evaluation of the inter-observer difference for interpretation of [18F]PSMA-11 scans
The inter-observer difference for analysing the [18F]PSMA-11 PET images will be investigated between at least two nuclear physicians. Results will be expressed as a cohen's kappa
Measured: 0 - 60 days post [18F]PSMA-11 administration
Evaluation of the diagnostic specificity of [18F]PSMA-11
Following the [18F]PSMA PET/CT scans in the phase 2 trial, the treating physician will continue the follow-up and treatment of the patient. Hereby, depending of the selected conventional treatment or procedure, the following data will be also collected (if available within 60 days following the day of the [18F]PSMA scan) to investigate the diagnostic specificity of [18F]PSMA-11:
- In case the treating physician opts to perform a radical prostatectomy or lymphadenectomy or to take a biopt, the anatomopathological diagnosis (PSMA expression in tissue) will be used as an endpoint for correlation with the results of the [18F]PSMA scan.
- In case the treating physician opts for radiotherapy or hormone therapy, the (change in) PSA levels will be used as an endpoint for correlation with the results of the [18F]PSMA scan.
- In case the treating physician opts to acquire an additional MRI, suspicious lesions on the MRI will be also compared with those observed on the [18F]PSMA PET/CT scan.
Measured: 0 - 60 days post [18F]PSMA-11 administration
Evaluation of the impact of the [18F]PSMA-11 scan on the choice of therapy
The treating physician must fill in a questionnaire concerning the patients 'pre [18F]PSMA-11 PET' management plan. After the scan, the physician must fill in a second part of the questionnaire concerning how the [18F]PSMA-11 scan would influence the patient's treatment plan.
Measured: Pre [18F]PSMA-11 PET management plan: between the date the patient signed the informed consent form and the date of the [18F]PSMA-11 scan. Post [18F]PSMA-11 PET management plan: 0 - 60 days post [18F]PSMA-11 administration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2018
- Study start15 Jun 2018
- Primary completion20 Dec 2018
- Study completion18 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GhentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Original phase 2 (44 subjects) Concerning the dose of \[18F\]PSMA-11, half of the patients in the phase 2 study will be injected with 2.0 ± 0.2 MBq/kg bodyweight. The other half will be injected with 4.0 ± 0.4 MBq/kg body weight. Randomization of patients to one of these two groups will be performed using a block randomization design with block sizes of two, four, and six. Extension phase 2 (22 subjects): For this part of the phase 2 study, all patients will be injected with 2.0 ± 0.2 MBq/kg bodyweight \[18F\]PSMA-11. No Randomisation or masking is applicable for this group of 22 subjects.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Ghent
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Piet Ost, Prof., Principal investigator, University Hospital, Ghent
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03573011
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AGO/2017/006 phase 2 trial
- Other IDs
- 2017-003461-96, 2017
- Acronym
- NGP2
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 6 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Piron S, De Man K, Schelfhout V, Van Laeken N, Kersemans K, Achten E, De Vos F, Ost P. Optimization of PET protocol and interrater reliability of 18F-PSMA-11 imaging of prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2020 Feb 24;10(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13550-020-0593-7.
PubMed 32095919
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PSMA-PET/CT for Prostate Cancer - Phase 2 Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03573011
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NGP2 / AGO/2017/006 phase 2 trial
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- prostate cancer, biochemical recurrence, 18F-PET imaging
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GhentUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prostate cancer is the most frequently occurring male cancer in Belgium. Patients who have been treated for prostate cancer, i.e. by surgery and/or radiotherapy, in a substantial degree suffer from a tumor recurrence, often diagnosed by an increase in serum tumor marker Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) within the first few years. In these patients with evidence of a tumor recurrence after primary treatment, it is important to most exactly define the location(s) of tumor, to guide appropriate therapy by surgery, radiotherapy and/or hormonotherapy. In so-called oligo-metastatic disease targeted therapy may still be curative and prevent the disease from spreading to distant locations. Therefore it is of paramount importance to have an accurate tool of medical imaging to localize all possible locations to be treated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Original phase 2 (44 subjects) Concerning the dose of [18F]PSMA-11, half of the patients in the phase 2 study will be injected with 2.0 ± 0.2 MBq/kg bodyweight. The other half will be injected with 4.0 ± 0.4 MBq/kg body weight. Randomization of patients to one of these two groups will be performed using a block randomization design with block sizes of two, four, and six. Extension phase 2 (22 subjects): For this part of the phase 2 study, all patients will be injected with 2.0 ± 0.2 MBq/kg bodyweight [18F]PSMA-11. No Randomisation or masking is applicable for this group of 22 subjects.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 ± 0.2 MBq/kg [18F]PSMA-11 dosing group | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: [18F]PSMA-11To define the optimal [18F]PSMA-11 scan protocol, the quality of the PET images from patients that received 2.0 ± 0.2 MBq/kg will be compared to the images from patients that received 4.0 ± 0.4 MBq/kg. Patients in this study arm will receive 2.0 ± 0.2 MBq/kg for acquiring the [18F]PSMA-11 scan. All other study parameters and procedures are identical to those in the other study arm. As for the use of radiopharmaceuticals, the ALARA ('as low as reasonably achievable') principle must be applied, this study arm is considered to be the reference. |
| 4.0 ± 0.4 MBq/kg [18F]PSMA-11 dosing group | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: [18F]PSMA-11Concerning the dose of [18F]PSMA-11, the patients in this study arm will receive 4.0 ± 0.4 MBq/kg for the [18F]PSMA-11 scan. All other study parameters and procedures are identical to those in the other study arm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, either in the setting of diagnosis of biochemical recurrence after previous treatment, or at primary diagnosis and staging.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age: <18 years
- Physically or mentally unfit to perform the sequential procedures
- Refusal of patient to be informed about accidental findings on scans
- Patients with heart failure if ejection fraction < 45% (phase 2 trial)
- History of anaphylactic shock after administration of Visipaque CT contrast (phase 2 trial)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| [18F]PSMA-1118F-PET imaging | Diagnostic test | 2.0 ± 0.2 MBq/kg [18F]PSMA-11 dosing group, 4.0 ± 0.4 MBq/kg [18F]PSMA-11 dosing group |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of effective targeting of prostate cancer and eventual metastases
Time frame: 0 to 3.5 hours post radiotracer injection
Two PET/CT scans with [18F]PSMA-11 will be acquired to evaluate the effectiveness of targeting prostate cancer and eventual metastases
Determination of the optimal scan protocol: define optimal time of scanning
Time frame: 0 to 3.5 hours post radiotracer injection
Based on the quality of the images and feasibility of tumor targetting (4 point '0-3' scoring scale - higher score represents a higher intensity lesion), the optimal time (60 min or 180 min post radiotracer injection) will be defined
Determination of the optimal scan protocol: define optimal scan duration
Time frame: 0 to 3.5 hours post radiotracer injection
Based on the quality of the images and feasibility of tumor targetting (4 point '0-3' scoring scale, higher score represents a higher intensity lesion), the optimal scan duration (1.5 minutes/bed position or 3.0 minutes/bed position) will be defined
Determination of the optimal scan protocol: define optimal dose
Time frame: 0 to 3.5 hours post radiotracer injection
Based on the overall image quality (7 point '1-7' scoring scale for image blurriness, higher score represents a higher quality image), the optimal dose of [18F]PSMA-11 (2.0 or 4.0 MBq/kg) will be defined
Determination of the optimal scan protocol: evaluation of the added value of furosemide (to improve diuresis), as part of the standard scanprotocol
Time frame: 0 to 1.5 hours post radiotracer injection
Based on the degree that the radiotracer uptake in the bladder and in the ureters is disruptive for the interpretation of the scan (visual interpretation by nuclearist using a 7 point '1-7' scoring scale, higher score equals a more pronounced disturbance), the added value of furosemide, as part of the standard scanprotocol, will be defined
3 secondary outcomes
Evaluation of the inter-observer difference for interpretation of [18F]PSMA-11 scans
Time frame: 0 - 60 days post [18F]PSMA-11 administration
Evaluation of the diagnostic specificity of [18F]PSMA-11
Time frame: 0 - 60 days post [18F]PSMA-11 administration
Evaluation of the impact of the [18F]PSMA-11 scan on the choice of therapy
Time frame: Pre [18F]PSMA-11 PET management plan: between the date the patient signed the informed consent form and the date of the [18F]PSMA-11 scan. Post [18F]PSMA-11 PET management plan: 0 - 60 days post [18F]PSMA-11 administration
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32095919Piron S, De Man K, Schelfhout V, Van Laeken N, Kersemans K, Achten E, De Vos F, Ost P. Optimization of PET protocol and interrater reliability of 18F-PSMA-11 imaging of prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2020 Feb 24;10(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13550-020-0593-7.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Veterans Affairs Seamless Phase II/III Randomized Trial of STAndard Systemic theRapy With or Without PET-directed Local Therapy for Oligometastatic pRosTate Cancer
Prostate Cancer, Oligometastasis
Not yet recruiting
Mind-Body Interventions for the Improvement of Quality of Life, Stress, and Sleep Quality Among Survivors of Breast, Prostate, Endometrial, or Colorectal Cancer
Breast Cancer Stage I, Colorectal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Opevesostat (MK-5684) Versus Alternative NHA in mCRPC (MK-5684-003)
Prostate Cancer Metastatic
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Spatial Needle Placement Strategies and Pathological Concordance in Prostate Biopsy: A National Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Prostate Cancer, Prostatic Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
177Lu Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibody HuJ591 (177Lu-J591) and Ketoconazole in Patients With Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Piet Ost, Prof. principal investigator
University Hospital, Ghent
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing [18F]PSMA-11 in people with Prostate Cancer, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of effective targeting of prostate cancer and eventual metastases (time frame: 0 to 3.5 hours post radiotracer injection). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03573011, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 5 Nov 2026.