AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic Valve StenosisNCT03575039

VitaFlowTM II Transcatheter Aortic Valve System Study

A study testing VitaFlow II Transcatheter Aortic Valve System in people with Aortic Valve Stenosis, run by Shanghai MicroPort CardioFlow Medtech Co., Ltd..

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective, single arm clinical investigation evaluating safety and effectiveness/performance of the Microport CardioFlow VitaFlowTM II - Transcatheter Aortic Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis via transcatheter access in increased surgical risk patients Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aortic Valve Stenosis
What is being tested?
VitaFlow II Transcatheter Aortic Valve System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
178 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Aug 2018to Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects of age > 18 years
  • Subjects suffering from severe aortic valve stenosis, including bicuspid and tricuspid valves, defined as follows:
  • High-gradient aortic stenosis (mean pressure gradient across aortic valve >40 mmHg or peak velocity ≥4.0 m/s.
  • Subject has symptomatic valve stenosis presenting with NYHA ≥ Class II
  • Subjects with a documented heart team agreement of increased surgical risk as described in the population
  • ECG-gated multi-slice computed tomographic (MSCT) measurements determined an aortic annulus or supra-annular diameter ≥17 and ≤29mm. Findings of TTE, TEE and conventional aortography should be integrated in the anatomic assessment, when performed
  • Patient deemed eligible by Centralised Case Review Committee (CRC) assessment recommends VitaFlow™ II Transcatheter Aortic Valve System implantation
  • Subject can understand the purpose of the clinical investigation, has signed voluntary the informed consent form and is agreeing to the scheduled follow up requirements

Who cannot join

  • Arterial aorto-iliac-femoral axis unsuitable for transfemoral access as assessed by conventional angiography and/or multi-detector computed tomographic angiography (access vessel diameter incompatible with a 19 to 22F OD delivery system with integrated sheath or 21 to 24F OD sheath)
  • Aortic root anatomy condition or lesion preventing implantation or access to the aortic valve
  • Non-calcific acquired aortic stenosis
  • Native unicuspid aortic valve or congenital aortic abnormality (except for bicuspid aortic valve) not permitting TAVI
  • Previous implantation of heart valve in any position
  • Severe aortic regurgitation (>3+)
Show all 32Show fewer
  • Severe mitral regurgitation (>3+)
  • Severe tricuspid regurgitation (>3+)
  • Severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < 30%)
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation
  • Multi-vessel coronary artery disease with a Syntax score or residual Syntax score > 22 and/or unprotected left main coronary artery.
  • Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support
  • Untreated cardiac conduction disease in need of pacemaker implantation
  • Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation (resting heart rate > 120bpm)
  • Active and/or suspicion of endocarditis or ongoing sepsis
  • Blood dyscrasias defined as: leukopenia (WBC<1000 mm3), thrombocytopenia (PLT<50,000 cells/mm3), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or hypercoagulable states
  • Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month (30 days) before signing informed consent
  • Any need for emergency surgery
  • Recent (within 6 months of signing informed consent) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA)
  • Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease or successful treatment of carotid stenosis within 30 days prior to signing informed consent
  • Any active bleeding that precludes anticoagulation
  • Liver failure (Child-C)
  • End-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis or creatinine clearance < 20cc/min
  • Pulmonary hypertension (systolic pressure >80mmHg)
  • Severe chronic pulmonary disease (COPD) demonstrated by an expiratory volume (FEV1) < 750cc
  • Refusal of blood transfusion
  • A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to all anticoagulation/antiplatelet regimens (or inability to be anticoagulated for the index procedure), to nitinol, to dairy products, to polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or contrast media
  • Any medical, social or psychological condition that in the opinion of the investigator precludes the subject from giving appropriate consent or adherence to the required follow up procedures
  • Currently participating in another drug or device trial (excluding registries) for which the primary endpoint has not been assessed
  • Estimated life expectancy of less than 12 months
  • For female - pregnancy or intention to become pregnant prior to completion of all follow up procedures
  • Inability to comply with the clinical investigation follow-up or other clinical investigation requirements

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

Official title: The VITALE Study Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness/Performance of the Microport CardioFlow VitaFlow II - Transcatheter Aortic Valve System

A prospective, single arm clinical investigation evaluating safety and effectiveness/performance of the Microport CardioFlow VitaFlowTM II - Transcatheter Aortic Valve System for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis via transcatheter access in increased surgical risk patients

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multicenter, single arm and controlled clinical investigation compared to recent historical results. The purpose is to evaluate the safety, performance and efficacy of the VitaflowTM II Transcatheter Aortic Valve system.

The entire system including valve system, delivery system and introducer system. We will implant the valve system into subjects and followed up them for 5 years after the procedure. This clinical trial will be conducted in 15 sites in Europe.

Being tested
VitaFlow II Transcatheter Aortic Valve System
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VitaFlow II Transcatheter Aortic Valve SystemDevice

    VitaFlow II Transcatheter Aortic Valve System contains a Valve stent -VitaFlow Aortic Valve, a Delivery system-VitaFlow II Delivery System and a Introducer set

Study groups in NCT03575039
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single arm clinical investigationExperimentalSubjects in experimental group will be implanted the VitaFlow II Transcatheter Aortic Valve System.
Receives: Device: VitaFlow II Transcatheter Aortic Valve System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of all-cause mortality at 12 months post implantation

    all-cause mortality including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular

    Measured: 12 months post implantation

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Rate of Composite of all-cause mortality and disabling stroke

    defined as the ratio of all-cause dead and disabled subjects to total subjects at each time point

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 months,12 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post implantation

  2. Rate of stroke (disabling and non-disabling)

    defined as the ratio of stroke subjects (disabling and non-disabling) to total subjects at each time point

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 months,12 months, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-implantation

  3. Initial success

    defined as absence of procedural mortality AND correct positioning of a single VitaFlowTM Aortic Valve into the proper anatomical location AND absence of patient / VitaFlowTM Aortic Valve mismatch AND mean aortic valve gradient less than (<) 20 mmHg or peak velocity less than (<) 3m/s, AND absence of moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation

    Measured: within 30 days post-implantation

  4. Recapture success rate (when attempted)

    defined as VitaFlowTM Aortic Valve is fully re-sheathed into the VitaFlowTM II delivery system, as verified by fluoroscopy

    Measured: at 1st day post-implantation

  5. Successful insertion

    navigation and functioning of ALL features for the VitaFlowTM II delivery system, deployment and implantation of the VitaFlowTM aortic valve and subsequent retrieval of the VitaFlowTM II delivery system

    Measured: at 1st day post-implantation

  6. Valve function

    Evaluating valva function(including valve position, morphology, function and rate of valvular stenosis, valve regurgitation, orifice area and pressure gradient and paravalvular leakage) at each time point.

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 and 12 months and 2, 3, 4, 5 years post-implantation

  7. Changes in quality of life KCCQ

    an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 and 12 months and 2, 3, 4, 5 years post-implantation compared to baseline

  8. Changes in quality of life EQ-5D-5L

    Use the questions and score system to evaluate life quality of subjects at each The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 and 12 months and 2, 3, 4, 5 years post-implantation compared to baseline

  9. Changes in frailty (KATZ questionnaire)

    Assesses the ability of patients to conduct activities of daily living by questions in KATZ questionnaire. We use dependent(0 points) and independent(1 points) to evaluate bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, contience and feeding activities of subjects. Total score is 6 points, the higher the score, the more indepent of subjects.

    Measured: at 30 days, 12 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-implantation compared to baseline

  10. Changes in cardiac function

    defined as changes in cardiac function at each time point according to the NYHA Classification Scheme compared to baseline

    Measured: at discharge, 30 days, 6 and 12 months and 2, 3, 4, 5 years post-implantation

  11. Rate of all-cause mortality

    all-cause mortality including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 months and 2, 3, 4, 5 years post-implantation

  12. Rate of main adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE)

    Rate of main adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) including disabling stroke, myocardial infarction, open surgery, and new permanent pacemaker at each time point

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 and 12 months and 2, 3, 4, 5 years post-implantation

  13. Rate of life-threatening, disabling or severe bleeding (BARC 3 to 5)

    BARC 3 to 5 defined as in BARC definition in annex of the protocol

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 and 12 months and 2, 3, 4, 5 years post-implantation

  14. Rate of acute kidney injury network stage 2 and 3 or renal alternation therapy

    renal alternation therapy including haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and hemofiltration

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 and 12 months and 2 to 5 years

  15. Rate of implant related new and/or worsened conduction disturbances and arrhythmias, and occurrence of new permanent pacemaker implantation

    Rate of implant related new and/or worsened conduction disturbances and arrhythmias, and occurrence of new permanent pacemaker implantation

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 and 12 months and 2, 3, 4, 5 years post-implantation

  16. Rate of major vascular complications

    vascular complications defined according to VARC2 definitions

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 and 12 months and 2, 3, 4, 5 years post-implantation

  17. Rate of the occurrence of hospitalization

    Rate of the occurrence of hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure

    Measured: at 6, 12 months, and 2, 3, 4, 5 years post-implantation

  18. Rate of other TAVI-related adverse events

    Rate of other TAVI-related adverse events (conversion to open surgery, unplanned used of cardiopulmonary bypass, coronary obstruction requiring intervention, ventricular septal perforation, mitral valve apparatus damage or dysfunction, cardiac tamponade, endocarditis, valve thrombosis, valve mal-positioning, TAV-in-TAV deployment, structural valve deterioration, valve related dysfunction or events requiring repeat procedure [BAV, TAVR, SAVR]

    Measured: at 30 days, 6 and 12 months and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post implantation.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jul 2018
  2. Study startAug 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
178 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03575039
Sponsor's protocol ID
Valve-2018-01
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
31 May 2018
Last updated
2 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: This is an internal clinical research, the detail data won't be shared with other researcher before our product come into the market.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing VitaFlow II Transcatheter Aortic Valve System in people with Aortic Valve Stenosis, run by Shanghai MicroPort CardioFlow Medtech Co., Ltd..

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 32 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ada Wang (86-021-38954600-7814, wanglu2@microport.comwajin), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of all-cause mortality at 12 months post implantation (time frame: 12 months post implantation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in