AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental FatigueNCT03578289

A Tele-mental Health Intervention to Support Parents Caring for a Technology-dependent Child at Home

A study testing Telemental Health - CBT in people with Mental Fatigue, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The need for assisted-technology at home reflects some of the most serious health-related conditions faced by children with physical and developmental disabilities. 'Technology-dependent' is often used in the literature to describe children "who need both a medical device to compensate for the loss of a vital body… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Mental Fatigue
What is being tested?
Telemental Health - CBT
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2017to 20 Apr 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Parent of child cared for in the CAPE Program
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Lack of active mental health counseling
  • English or Spanish speaking

Who cannot join

  • History of psychosis in the past six months
  • Receipt of any mental health treatment within the 3 months prior to study enrollment
  • Future appointment with a mental health provider within the next two months and evidence of suicidal thoughts

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Boston Childrens Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Feasibility of a Tele-mental Health Intervention to Support Parents Caring for a Technology-dependent Child at Home

The need for assisted-technology at home reflects some of the most serious health-related conditions faced by children with physical and developmental disabilities. 'Technology-dependent' is often used in the literature to describe children "who need both a medical device to compensate for the loss of a vital body function and substantial and ongoing nursing care to avert death or further disability". Parenting a child is stressful and challenging, and even under ideal circumstances the care of a child with complex needs requires greater than normal parenting skills. Studies have showed that parents of children whose illness require assisted-technology experience significant emotional stress, potential gaps in social support, and social isolation leading to lower quality of life, unhealthy family functioning, and negative psychological consequences.

This study intends to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a tele-psychotherapy (Tele-P) intervention as a way to promote the emotional functioning of parents and to help increase the quality of life of children that are technology-dependent in the Greater Boston Area. It is hypothesized that parents who adhere to psychotherapy sessions via videoconferencing (Tele-P) will demonstrate significant reductions in symptoms of depression, anxiety and social isolation. Children of parents in the (Tele-P) condition will show significantly greater improvements in their quality of life including their physical health, mental health, family life, free time, and general life enjoyment.

Read more

A randomized controlled trial is proposed in order to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a tele-psychotherapy intervention for parents of technology-dependent children at the Critical Care, Anesthesia and Perioperative Extension (CAPE) program in Boston Children's Hospital.

This study will serve as model for social workers to perform an intervention for parent's raising technology-dependent children. This study proposes that tele-psychotherapy be a means of advocating for this underserved population.

Read the detailed description

Efficacy and Feasibility of a tele-psychotherapy intervention to support parents caring for a technology-dependent child at home.

Caring for a technology-dependent child at home is a challenging experience for parents. Global family functioning, lifestyles changes and vocational decisions are affected. Parents of children whose chronic illness require assisted-technology experience significant emotional stress, potential gaps in social support, and social isolation leading to lower quality of life, unhealthy family functioning, and negative psychological consequences.

This study intends to evaluate a tele-psychotherapy (Tele-P) intervention as a way to promote the emotional functioning of parents and secondarily increase the quality of life of children that are home technology-dependent in the Greater Boston Area. The sample will consist of parents of children that are technology-dependent in the Critical Care, Anesthesia and Perioperative Extension (CAPE) Program at Boston Children's Hospital.

Specific Aim 1) To assess the feasibility of delivering a cognitive behavioral Tele-P intervention for parents of children that are technology-dependent in the Critical Care, Anesthesia and Perioperative Extension (CAPE) Program at Boston Children's Hospital.

Hypothesis 1: Parents and therapist will adhere to 8 psychotherapy sessions via videoconferencing.

Hypothesis 2: Cost analysis evaluation will validate the feasibility of the intervention vs. usual care (UC) and standard face-to-face therapy sessions.

Specific Aim 2) To evaluate the efficacy of a Tele-P intervention relative to UC in management of mental health conditions amongst parents of children with chronic respiratory failure.

Hypothesis 1: Relative to parents assigned to the UC condition, those in the (Tele-P) condition will: a) demonstrate significant reductions in symptoms of depression, b) significant reductions in symptoms of anxiety and c) significantly less social isolation.

Hypothesis 2: Improvement in mental health symptoms will be sustained for the duration of therapy.

Specific Aim 3) To assess whether a Tele-P intervention increases the quality of life of children in the Critical Care, Anesthesia and Perioperative Extension (CAPE) Program at Boston Children's Hospital.

Hypothesis 1: Children of parents participating in Tele-P will show significantly greater improvements in their quality of life relative to their UC counterparts on outcomes of a) physical health, b) mental health (happiness, wellbeing), c) family life, d) free time, and e) general life enjoyment.

Background and Significance

'Technology-dependent' is often used in the literature to describe children "who need both a medical device to compensate for the loss of a vital body function and substantial and ongoing nursing care to avert death or further disability". Approximately 1.2 million children and adolescents in the United States require durable medical equipment to survive. In the early 1990's, surveys estimated that over 2,200 children in Massachusetts were dependent upon some degree of assisted medical technology. The number of ventilator-dependent children in the Boston community had since increased threefold, representing increased survival of low birth weight infants and those with chronic life-limiting illnesses. Recent studies have shown that technology-dependent children comprise 20% of all pediatric patients discharged from the hospital to home, yet they account for 61% of all healthcare resources used by children. While advances in medical care have brought children with chronic health conditions life-saving and sustaining advances, healthcare systems are inadequately structured to meet their ongoing comprehensive needs. Most of these children are cared for at home by parents and have substantial functional limitations including: self-care, self-direction, capacity for independent living and economic self-sufficiency.

The need for assisted technology at home reflects some of the most serious health-related conditions faced by children with physical and developmental disabilities and their parents. Parenting a child is stressful and challenging, and even under ideal circumstances the care of a child with complex needs requires greater than normal parenting skills. Parents assume an altered parental role, serving as parent, care coordinator, respiratory therapist, nurse, and any other function that is required for 24 hour a day care. The cost of medical care, prescriptions, and durable medical equipment effects families independent of their employment and insurance states. This causes an even greater burden on these already financially, emotionally, and physically stressed parents. Prospects of independence, self-care, self-direction with growth are not viable for some of these children, contributing to an indeterminate need for parental effort. Cumulative toll impacts all members of the family and may also impact medical outcomes

The investigators previous work showed that the parents of children whose chronic illness require assisted-technology experience significant emotional stress, potential gaps in social support, and social isolation leading to lower quality of life, unhealthy family functioning, and negative psychological consequences. Approximately 36-45% of mothers caring for technology dependent children have an escalated risk for clinical depression. Sleep deprivation due to anxiety about a child's condition, false monitor alarms, and the need to remain vigilant over the child during the night is a common theme for parents of technology dependent children. Data suggests sleep disruption places family caregivers at risk for poor health and related outcomes that may impair their daytime function and long term capacity for caregiving. Raising a technology-dependent child significantly impacts family functioning and hence the quality of life outcomes for the family. Depression and anxiety in parents negatively affects the quality of care a parent can provide their child. Young children exposed to depressed parents run a risk for delay in language, personal social gross motor, and fine motor development. Increase perceived parental burden and consequent family impact may result in negative implications on their own and their children's health related quality of life. Support for parents is crucial not only for the course of the disease of the child but also for the parents' health.

In the Greater Boston area there are limited specialized mental health resources and it is increasingly difficult for parents of children that are technology-dependent to obtain appropriate mental health treatment. Social workers currently have few evidence-based inventions tested on families with chronically ill children. Immediate action is necessary to provide resources to parents to help them feel motivated, confident and capable of caring for a child. These children are extremely vulnerable and it is imperative to their quality of life that their parents are capable of providing appropriate care. This proposal intends to address this gap in parental care through Tele-P, a unique therapy via video conference, to help parents cope with these daily stressors. As feelings of depression, anxiety and social isolation decrease, parents should feel more confident and capable of caring for their child. Technology dependent children fully rely on their caregivers in order to not only improve their health but to survive. As Tele-P improves the mental health of the parent, the child's care and quality of life will also greatly improve.

Tele-P can be successfully used in several therapeutic formats, has similar outcomes as face to face treatment, and is considered satisfactory by most patients and therapist. There are proven to be a number of benefits to home based tele-mental health including better adherence to appointments, overcoming social isolation, access to contextual information such as the patient's home situation, improved patient and practitioner safety and removal of fears and stigma attached to attending a mental health clinic. Providing therapy through videoconferencing relieves the parents from the stress of traveling with their technology dependent children, which often requires time, resources, (such as an ambulance) and money. For some technology-dependent children it is also dangerous for them to travel due to their severe diagnosis. Tele-P allows for the parents to be at home with their child, but at the same time be part of a social interaction. Studies have shown that "facing a high burden of care but still being able to have sufficient social and familial contacts seems to be somewhat protective regarding the mental health of these parents, pointing even stronger towards the importance of social integration". Tele-P is a unique acceptable and sustainable approach to address the gap in access to services for underserved populations. Feasibility remains a question. The investigators experience with survey completion in this population suggests that time and care demands may be a limiting factor. Given the option of electronic paper survey in a previous study, the majority completed the latter despite computer access. Paper was easier to interrupt and resume if the child's care was needed.

There is an urgent need for support of parents with technology-dependent children. Although researchers have identified a plethora of risks, stressors, and needs of the families with chronically ill child, there is a scarcity of evidence based interventions that address the mental health needs of parents or caregivers of children with developmental disabilities. Providing Tele-P is a well-suited approach for these parents and caregivers, who may be overwhelmed by their children's situation, anticipating future challenges and reliving past traumas. The results of the Tele-P sessions could also be a valuable tool to guide intervention with policies, resources and services that may improve family quality of life and outcomes for families who are raising children with developmental disabilities.

Conditions
Mental Fatigue
Being tested
Telemental Health - CBT
Keywords
Parents of children with disabilities, emotional functioning
Medical subject headings
Mental Fatigue

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Telemental Health - CBTBehavioural

    The experimental group will received cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) via TMH for 8 sessions.

Study groups in NCT03578289
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental Group (telemental health_ExperimentalThe experimental group will received cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) via TMH for 8 sessions.
Receives: Behavioral: Telemental Health - CBT
Waiting Control Group (usual care)ExperimentalParticipants randomly assigned to the control group will receive routine care for three months followed by the 8-week CBT intervention
Receives: Behavioral: Telemental Health - CBT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants in the intervention

    Number of participants who complete the intervention

    Measured: 12 Months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) Global Scale

    Change in PROMIS Global Scale from baseline to post intervention. This is a 10 item scale. Higher scores will correspond to better feasibility and acceptability.

    Measured: 12 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jul 2018
  2. Study start1 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion20 Apr 2019
  4. Study completion20 Apr 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03578289
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB-P00023319
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
8 Nov 2016
Last updated
22 Nov 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Telemental Health - CBT in people with Mental Fatigue, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants in the intervention (time frame: 12 Months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in