AzTrials
AzTrials

Neuromuscular BlockadePhase 1NCT03579589

The Effect of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine During Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal

A Phase 1 study testing Sugammadex vs Neostigmine in people with Neuromuscular Blockade, run by Ohio State University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients who undergo surgery receive drugs called neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) that to block the activity of muscles. When the surgery is over, the block needs to be reversed. Suggammadex and neostigmine are examples of drugs that reverse blocks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Neuromuscular Blockade
What is being tested?
Sugammadex vs Neostigmine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Aug 2018to 15 Dec 2019
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects undergoing outpatient surgeries (laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic hernia repair, laparoscopic appendectomy) under general anesthesia requiring rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade
  • Male or female patient 18 years and older
  • Able to consent
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status of I, II, or III

Who cannot join

  • Participating in another interventional study drug within 30 days prior to their recruitment
  • Special population (Pregnant, Inmate, Breastfeeding)
  • History of allergy to sugammadex or rocuronium
  • Any medication known to interfere with NMBA or sugammadex
  • Presence of any clinical condition as determined by the investigator that exclude the patient from the trial such as COPD, CKD, and neuromuscular or neurodegenerative diseases

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine During Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal in Outpatient Surgeries - An Evaluation of Clinical and Associated Health Care Cost

Patients who undergo surgery receive drugs called neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) that to block the activity of muscles. When the surgery is over, the block needs to be reversed. Suggammadex and neostigmine are examples of drugs that reverse blocks. This study aims to investigate if sugammadex is associated with a significantly reduced time to discharge from the operating room to the postoperative unit when compared to neostigmine.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, randomized, double arm prospective clinical trial involving adult patients undergoing outpatient surgeries at The OSUWMC. Institutional review board (Office of Responsible Research practices) approval is mandatory preceding the start of the clinical trial. Written informed consent will be obtained from all eligible patients participating in this trial, and signed prior to the initiation of any study-related procedures. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice and will be approved by the appropriate institutional review boards at OSUWMC. An individual with appropriate human subjects protection and HIPAA education will undertake the consent process in the surgeon's office or other appropriate location (e.g. preoperative clinics). Researchers will utilize the electronic medical record (EMR) to screen and identify surgical cases based on study inclusion criteria. These cases will be reviewed together with the surgical team to determine whether all inclusion and exclusion criteria are met, prior to approaching the patient. Prior surgery, a study-team investigator will approach the patient to discuss the nature of the study, its requirements, and potential risks. Written informed consent will be obtained from every subject prior to the start any study related procedures and enough time will be allowed for the subject to ask questions and receive answers. The inclusion and exclusion criteria will be reviewed in order to ascertain whether a patient qualifies for this study. Subjects must meet all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria to qualify for the study.

  • All medication taken 7 days prior surgery will be recorded. Demographic information, previous medical history, vital signs, urine pregnancy test, and a physical examination will be performed at this time as a standard of care and results will be recorded.
  • Study medication dosages will be calculated prior to surgery by using total body weight (TBW) by the research team, following standard operational procedures.

II.4.B. Intraoperative phase

  • Pre-induction: intravenous midazolam (2 - 4 mg) if required.
  • Induction of general anesthesia: anesthesia will follow the standard of care protocols set by our center. Therefore, preoxygenation will be achieved with 100% oxygenation for at least 5 full Tidal Volume and suggested dosage of anesthetic drugs will be as follows: propofol 1-2 mg/kg, lidocaine IV 40-100 mg, fentanyl IV 1-2 μg/Kg, and sevoflurane 0.5-1 MAC (if needed). Additionally, rocuronium (0.3-0.7 mg/kg) will be used for neuromuscular blockade in all patients.
  • Maintenance of general anesthesia: balanced anesthesia will be administered for maintenance at the anesthesiologists' discretion. We suggest the following regimen: sevoflurane (0.5-1 MAC), remifentanil IV 0.05-0.25 μg/kg/min, and propofol IV 20-75 μg/kg/min. In accordance with guidelines for Good Clinical Practices in pharmacodynamic studies of NMBA, neuromuscular monitoring will be assessed via the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. TOF device will be placed on the ulnar nerve to illicit twitches in the adductor pollicis. The response to TOF stimulation will be assessed by the anesthesiologist every 30 minutes, starting at intubation. If second response reappears in the TOF stimulation, supplemental doses of rocuronium will be administered at anesthesiologists' discretion.
  • Neuromuscular blockade reversal: after peritoneal (port sites) closure, TOF will be assessed. Exact doses of the study medications (previously determined by total body weight) will be administered as following:
  • Sugammadex:
  • If spontaneous recovery has reached second twitch after TOF: 2 mg/kg
  • If spontaneous recovery has reached between 1-2 post-tetanic counts but no twitch responses to TOF: 4 mg/kg
  • When there is a clinical need to reverse NMB within 3 min of a single dose of rocuronium (1.2 mg/kg): 16 mg/kg
  • Neostigmine: 50 µg. Kg-1 will be administered after spontaneous recovery has reached fourth twitch after TOF in accordance with our institutional standard procedures and published literature [10, 11]
  • After IP administration, TOF will be assessed every 30 seconds during the first 3 minutes and every minute afterwards to TOF value ≥ 0.9
  • The following variables will be collected:
  • Time from peritoneal closure (port sites) to anesthesia readiness for OR discharge to PACU
  • Time from IP administration to extubation
  • Time from IP administration to TOF ≥ 0.9
  • Time from IP administration to anesthesia readiness for OR discharge to PACU II.4.C. Postoperative phase (Postoperative Care Unit)
  • The modified Aldrete score will be documented in the EMR.
  • Time to discharge-readiness from the OR to PACU, admission time to PACU, and time to discharge from the hospital will be recorded.
  • Perioperative incidence of IP related adverse events (i.e. bradycardia, anaphylaxis, nausea and vomiting, and hypotension) Summary statistics will be calculated and reported as means (standard deviations) or medians [inter-quartile ranges] for continuous variables and as frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables. Study groups will be compared using Student's t-tests or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests for continuous variables and chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables where appropriate. Primary hypotheses comparing time from peritoneal closure (port sites) to anesthesia readiness for OR discharge to PACU between study groups will be tested using Student's unpaired t-tests (on the natural log transformed outcomes if necessary) at the 5% type I error rate. All analyses will be conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.) The study will last approximately one year including recruitment, analysis of the data and writing of the manuscript.
Being tested
Sugammadex vs Neostigmine
Keywords
Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal, Outpatient Surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sugammadex vs NeostigmineDrug

    Patients will be randomized into either Sugammadex or Neostigmine neuromuscular blockade reversal.

Study groups in NCT03579589
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SugammadexActive comparator* If spontaneous recovery has reached second twitch after TOF: 2 mg/kg * If spontaneous recovery has reached between 1-2 post-tetanic counts but no twitch responses to TOF: 4 mg/kg * When there is a clinical need to reverse NMB within 3 min of a single dose of rocuronium (1.2 mg/kg): 16 mg/kg
Receives: Drug: Sugammadex vs Neostigmine
NeostigmineActive comparator50 µg. Kg-1 will be administered after spontaneous recovery has reached fourth twitch after TOF in accordance with our institutional standard procedures and published literature.
Receives: Drug: Sugammadex vs Neostigmine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Sugammadex blockade reversal reduce discharge to PACU.

    Time from peritoneal closure (port sites) to anesthesia readiness for OR discharge to PACU

    Measured: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Extubation time

    Time from IP administration to extubation

    Measured: 1 hour

  2. TOF less than 0.9

    Time from IP administration to TOF ≥ 0.9

    Measured: 1 hour

  3. PACU

    Time from IP administration to anesthesia readiness for OR discharge to PACU

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jul 2018
  2. Study start15 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion15 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Sugammadex vs Neostigmine
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03579589
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018H0102
Status last verified
Aug 2021
First submitted
3 Apr 2018
Last updated
11 Aug 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sokol-Kobielska E. Sugammadex - indications and clinical use. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2013 Apr-Jun;45(2):106-10. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2013.0023.

    PubMed 23877905
  • Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray C. Stimulus frequency in the detection of neuromuscular block in humans. Br J Anaesth. 1970 Nov;42(11):967-78. doi: 10.1093/bja/42.11.967. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5488360
  • Sundman E, Witt H, Olsson R, Ekberg O, Kuylenstierna R, Eriksson LI. The incidence and mechanisms of pharyngeal and upper esophageal dysfunction in partially paralyzed humans: pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry after atracurium. Anesthesiology. 2000 Apr;92(4):977-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200004000-00014.

    PubMed 10754616
  • Keating GM. Sugammadex: A Review of Neuromuscular Blockade Reversal. Drugs. 2016 Jul;76(10):1041-52. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0604-1.

    PubMed 27324403
  • Nag K, Singh DR, Shetti AN, Kumar H, Sivashanmugam T, Parthasarathy S. Sugammadex: A revolutionary drug in neuromuscular pharmacology. Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Sep-Dec;7(3):302-6. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.123211.

    PubMed 25885973
  • Co, M. Bridion® (sugammadex) injection, for intravenous use: US prescribing information. 2015. 2015 [cited 2016 10 OCT ]; http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/. ].

  • Grintescu, I., et al., Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of sugammadex and neostigmine during general anaesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. BJA: The British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2009. 103(6).

  • Carron M, Zarantonello F, Tellaroli P, Ori C. Efficacy and safety of sugammadex compared to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.06.018. Epub 2016 Aug 4.

    PubMed 27871504
  • Paton F, Paulden M, Chambers D, Heirs M, Duffy S, Hunter JM, Sculpher M, Woolacott N. Sugammadex compared with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for routine reversal of neuromuscular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Nov;105(5):558-67. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq269. Epub 2010 Oct 8.

    PubMed 20935005
  • Donati F. Residual paralysis: a real problem or did we invent a new disease? Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;60(7):714-29. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9932-8. Epub 2013 Apr 27.

    PubMed 23625545
  • Hunter JM. Reversal of residual neuromuscular block: complications associated with perioperative management of muscle relaxation. Br J Anaesth. 2017 Dec 1;119(suppl_1):i53-i62. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex318.

    PubMed 29161387
  • Fiorda Diaz J, Echeverria-Villalobos M, Esparza Gutierrez A, Dada O, Stoicea N, Ackermann W, Abdel-Rasoul M, Heard J, Uribe A, Bergese SD. Sugammadex versus neostigmine for neuromuscular blockade reversal in outpatient surgeries: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and associated healthcare cost in an academic center. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 8;9:1072711. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1072711. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 36569123

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Sugammadex vs Neostigmine in people with Neuromuscular Blockade, run by Ohio State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Sugammadex blockade reversal reduce discharge to PACU. (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03579589, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in