AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriasis VulgarisPhase 2Microbiome&PsoNCT03584360

Role of Topical Treatments in the Modulation of Skin Microbiome in Psoriatic Skin

A Phase 2 study testing Betamethasone-Calcipotriene Topical in people with Psoriasis Vulgaris, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Changes in microbiome have been reported recently in psoriasis lesions compared to healthy surround skin. Preliminary data showed that systemic treatments of psoriasis induce modification of the skin microbiome that becomes similar to healthy individuals after successful treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Psoriasis Vulgaris
What is being tested?
Betamethasone-Calcipotriene Topical
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
24 Sep 2018to 7 Mar 2019
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years of age who have signed and dated an informed information and consent form,
  • Subject presenting psoriasis vulgaris with lesions symmetrical in size and severity, localized on the elbows and the knees and having a severity score (PASI) <=10. The lesions must have an area of at least 4 cm²,

Who cannot join

  • Psoriasis in gout, erythrodermic, exfoliative or pustular
  • Subject who has received systemic treatment and has a potential action on psoriasis vulgaris
  • Subject who received topical treatments or neutral emollients within 4 weeks
  • Subject who received antibiotic treatment in the three months preceding the randomization visit
  • Subject with known or suspected hypersensitivity to any of the constituents of the products in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU de Nice

    Nice, 06000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Study Role of the Local Treatments on the Microbiome Modulation in the Psoriatic Skin. Study Monocentric, Interventional, Randomized and Single-blind

Changes in microbiome have been reported recently in psoriasis lesions compared to healthy surround skin. Preliminary data showed that systemic treatments of psoriasis induce modification of the skin microbiome that becomes similar to healthy individuals after successful treatment. The causative role of microbiome in psoriasis remains in debate. The modification of skin microbiome is suspected to be able to activate the innate immune response, namely natural killers (NKs) and immune lymphoid cells (ILCs). Three types of ILCs have been reported. ILC1 (immune lymphoid cells1) that trigger a Th1 response, ILC2 (immune lymphoid cells 2) that stimulate Th2 response and ILC3 (immune lymphoid cells 3) that induce Th17 response. Interestingly, ILC2 have been reported to be increased in atopic dermatitis while ILC3 are increased in psoriasis.

Read the detailed description

To date, there is no data on the impact of topical treatments in skin microbiome and in innate cells in psoriasis lesions. However, topical treatments remain in most cases the first and the more widely used option for mild psoriasis which represent the more prevalent form of psoriasis. Thus, it appears of great interest to assess the effect of topical psoriasis treatments on skin microbiome. To this respect, topical steroids by their action both on the inflammation but also potentially on bacteria are suspected to induce potent changes in the microbiome in treated psoriasis lesions. calcipotriol has been demonstrated to have a beneficial effect on psoriasis thanks to its action on keratinocyte differentiation and its combination with topical steroids has been shown to be superior in treating psoriasis as compared to topical steroids alone. It could be hypothesized that calcipotriol could also modify the skin microbiome.

The main objective of this study intra individual prospective study is to compare the respective effect of betamethasone associated with calcipotriol foam and placebo foam in one hand and betamethasone with calcipotriol foam to betamethasone ointment on the other hand, on skin microbiome after 4 weeks of treatments on knee or elbow lesions.

Secondary objectives are to study the impact of the treatments on ILCs (numbers and relative proportion in the 3 types) and NK in the lesions and their potential correlation with the modification of the microbiome (of note ILC can be detected and characterized in situ in skin.) To compare the relative effectiveness of the two products on targets psoriasis lesions. Tolerance and potential side effects will be also studied.

Main endpoint: quantitative and qualitative assessment of microbes on psoriasis lesions before and after the treatments compared to surrounding healthy skin control.

Secondary endpoints: Presence and types of ILCs and NK in the lesional psoriatic skin before and after treatment compared with control healthy skin assessed using immunohistofluorescence. Targeted PASI or PGA (physician Global Assessment) for the efficacy. Potential side effects.

Patients: 30 with mild psoriasis (PASI <10) affecting elbows and knees in a symmetrical manner aged of at least 18.

Being tested
Betamethasone-Calcipotriene Topical

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Betamethasone-Calcipotriene TopicalDrug

    Comparison between betamethasone-calcipotriol and placebo

  • Betamethasone-Calcipotriene TopicalDrug

    Comparison between betamethasone-calcipotriol and betamethasone

  • Betamethasone-Calcipotriene TopicalDrug

    Comparison between betamethasone-calcipotriol and propionate de clobetasol

Study groups in NCT03584360
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
betamethasone-calcipotriol versus placeboExperimentalIn this arm we will compared the application association of betamethasone-calcipotriol foam in an area versus a placebo foam in an other area during 4 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Betamethasone-Calcipotriene Topical
betamethasone-calcipotriol versus betamethasoneExperimentalIn this arm we will compared the application association of betamethasone-calcipotriol foam in an area versus a betamethasone pomade in an other area during 4 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Betamethasone-Calcipotriene Topical
betamethasone-calcipotriol versus propionate of clobetasolExperimentalIn this arm we will compared the application association of betamethasone-calcipotriol foam in an area versus a propionate of clobetasol pomade in an other area during 4 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Betamethasone-Calcipotriene Topical

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quantitative evaluation of bacterial microbiota on psoriasis lesions and surrounding healthy skin by 16S rRNA (ribosomal ribonucleic acid 16S) amplification coupled with high throughput sequencing

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

  2. Qualitative evaluation of bacterial microbiota on psoriasis lesions and surrounding healthy skin by 16S rRNA (ribosomal ribonucleic acid 16S) amplification coupled with high throughput sequencing

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Targetted Psoriasis Area and Severity Index for the effectiveness of the products tested.

    Evaluated by PASI score (PASI= Psoriasis Area Severity Index) minimum = 0 = Absence of psoriasis maximum = 4 = very severe psoriasis

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

  2. Number of ILCs and NKs on skin biopsies using immunohistochemistry

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

  3. Types of ILCs and NKs on skin biopsies using immunohistochemistry

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

  4. Score of overall evaluation of the investigator's treatment

    Evaluated by physician global assessment (PGA) score PGA = physician global assessment minimum = 0 = healing maximum = 5 = very severe psoriasis

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

  5. Evaluation of tolerance

    evaluated numbers of serious adverse events

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

  6. Occurrence of possible adverse effects

    Measured: after 4 weeks of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jul 2018
  2. Study start24 Sep 2018
  3. Primary completion24 Sep 2018
  4. Study completion7 Mar 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
patients apply different treatment to two areas with psoriasis
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03584360
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-PP-03
Acronym
Microbiome&Pso
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
18 Jun 2018
Last updated
18 Apr 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Javitz HS, Ward MM, Farber E, Nail L, Vallow SG. The direct cost of care for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Jun;46(6):850-60. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.119669.

    PubMed 12063481
  • Schmitt JM, Ford DE. Work limitations and productivity loss are associated with health-related quality of life but not with clinical severity in patients with psoriasis. Dermatology. 2006;213(2):102-10. doi: 10.1159/000093848.

    PubMed 16902286
  • Wong VW, Martindale RG, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC. From germ theory to germ therapy: skin microbiota, chronic wounds, and probiotics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):854e-861e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a3c11e.

    PubMed 24165637
  • Mathieu A, Vogel TM, Simonet P. The future of skin metagenomics. Res Microbiol. 2014 Feb-Mar;165(2):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

    PubMed 24361423
  • Kong HH, Andersson B, Clavel T, Common JE, Jackson SA, Olson ND, Segre JA, Traidl-Hoffmann C. Performing Skin Microbiome Research: A Method to the Madness. J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Mar;137(3):561-568. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.10.033. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

    PubMed 28063650
  • Kong HH, Segre JA. The Molecular Revolution in Cutaneous Biology: Investigating the Skin Microbiome. J Invest Dermatol. 2017 May;137(5):e119-e122. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.07.045.

    PubMed 28411842
  • Naldi L, Svensson A, Diepgen T, Elsner P, Grob JJ, Coenraads PJ, Bavinck JN, Williams H; European Dermato-Epidemiology Network. Randomized clinical trials for psoriasis 1977-2000: the EDEN survey. J Invest Dermatol. 2003 May;120(5):738-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12145.x.

    PubMed 12713574

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Betamethasone-Calcipotriene Topical in people with Psoriasis Vulgaris, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quantitative evaluation of bacterial microbiota on psoriasis lesions and surrounding healthy skin by 16S rRNA (ribosomal ribonucleic acid 16S) amplification coupled with high throughput sequencing (time frame: after 4 weeks of treatment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03584360, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in