superDimension™ Navigation System Version 7.2 With Fluoroscopic Navigation Technology

Technical success was defined as successful completion of local registration utilizing fluoroscopic navigation technology.

By device design, if the local registration algorithm determines that the correction distance is greater than 3.0 cm the location of the virtual target will not be updated. These cases are not considered technically successful according to the clinical study definitions, even though the device performed as designed.

Investigator confirmation that the catheter was in an "adequate periprocedural location" (the location of the extended working channel when the proceduralist made the decision that placement was adequate and clinically acceptable to proceed with tissue sampling). Adequate periprocedural location is reported with use of local registration.

Total time from the first entry of the bronchoscope to the final removal of the bronchoscope. This includes all study-specific fluoroscopy and CBCT steps which would not normally occur in standard practice

ENB procedure time captured in the electronic data capture database being utilized for the study defined as the total time from the first entry of the extended working channel or locatable guide until the last exit of the extended working channel. This includes all study-specific fluoroscopy and CBCT steps which would not normally occur in standard practice

Total fluoroscopy time captured in the electronic data capture database being utilized for the study was determined to not be clinically relevant. Instead, the fluoroscopic navigation time is presented. Fluoroscopic Navigation Time: Two sweeps pooled. Encompasses c-arm sweep, target marking, and algorithm computational time, inclusive of the initiation of the local registration applet to the time the updated catheter location was ready and on screen (not including CBCT), as measured by the system software

Adequacy of the ENB-aided tissue sample for rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of cytologic samples by pathology (when applicable). This will be captured in the electronic data capture database.ROSE results could be reported as "Benign", "Inconclusive", "Malignant", "Inadequate Tissue for ROSE", or "N/A". If all ROSE diagnoses were report as "Inadequate Tissue for ROSE", for a participant, then the case was considered as "Inadequate Tissue".

Histopathological call based on ROSE of the ENB-aided tissue sample (when applicable) captured in the electronic data capture database being utilized for the study. Only malignant results are presented, as adequate follow-up to confirm the benign/inconclusive results was not part of the study design.

Final pathology results of the ENB-aided tissue sample captured in the electronic data capture database being utilized for the study. Only malignant results are presented, as adequate follow-up to confirm the benign/inconclusive results was not part of the study design.

Biopsy tools used was captured in the electronic data capture database being utilized for the study on all subjects with local registration attempted. If subject use same tool more than once, only counts once.

Tool order analysis reports the number of times that a tool was used first in a patient.

An analysis of the number of passes for each tool was planned, but it was determined that it wouldn't be clinically meaningful to go into that level of detail for the analysis and instead focused on the number of passes for only the first tool used.

The "tool-specific accuracy for malignancy" is calculated out of only the malignant cases using that tool. Only malignant results are presented, as adequate follow-up to confirm the benign/inconclusive results was not a part of the study design.

The "tool-specific accuracy for malignancy" is calculated out of only the malignant cases using that tool. Only malignant results are presented, as adequate follow-up to confirm the benign/inconclusive results was not a part of the study design.

In technically successful cases (local registration complete) the percentage of cases in which the intended lesion is correctly identified (as opposed to a non-target lesion or normal lung tissue) as indicated by the system software.

In Technically successful cases (local registration complete) with evaluable videos the relational accuracy in cases in which the intended lesion is targeted was assessed. Relational accuracy is defined as the three-dimensional percentage overlap between the virtual target and the actual lesion in CBCT before (FNAV/CBCT 1) and after (FNAV/CBCT 2) correction of the catheter location.