Chest TubeNCT03598296
The Affection of Two Chest Management for Enhanced Recovery Program After Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.
A study testing Large size tube and Drainage ball in people with Chest Tube, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Comparing the influences of different chest tube managements for enhanced recovery program after video-Assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chest Tube
- What is being tested?
- Large size tube and Drainage ball
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 28 Jul 2018to 27 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Only single lesion on the targeted lobe
- Considered as invasive carcinoma by preoperative computed tomography (CT) or -diagnosed by intraoperative pathology
- Patients have signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients have critical basic disease(diabetes and hypertension).
- Patients who lung function cannot undertake the lobectomy.
- The lesion has the possibility of metastasis.
- Finding serious adhesion to pleura during operation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
First Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Results of Two Chest Tube Management During an Enhanced Recovery Program After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.
Comparing the influences of different chest tube managements for enhanced recovery program after video-Assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.
Read the detailed description
The Enhanced Recovery Program has a series of observation data contains hospitalization days, adverse events, drainage, extubation, visual analogue scale(VAS) scores and the number of analgesic using.The investigators plan to enroll 60 patients and divide them into two groups to compare the influences of different chest tube managements for enhanced recovery program after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.
- Conditions
- Chest Tube
- Being tested
- Large size tube, Drainage ball
- Keywords
- ERAS(Enhanced Recovery After Surgery), Video-assisted thoracoscope lobectomy, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Chest tube
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Large size tubeOther
Also called Upper tube
Patients in Group A are inserted the large size tube (28F).
Drainage ballOther
Also called Upper tube
Patients in Group B are inserted the small-bore tube connects with a negative pressure ball(drainage ball).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A:Group Tube | Experimental | Patients are inserted the large size tube (28F).Patients undergo upper lobectomy are inserted one additional large size tube(28F,we named this tube upper tube).This group is planned to enroll 30 patients. Receives: Other: Large size tube |
| Group B:Group Ball | Experimental | Patients are inserted the small size tube connects with a negative pressure ball(drainage ball).Patients undergo upper lobectomy are inserted one additional large size tube(28F,we named this tube upper tube).This group is planned to enroll 30 patients. Receives: Other: Drainage ball |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hospitalization days
The numbers of days of patients stay in the hospital after surgery
Measured: From the first days after surgery to discharge,up to 4 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (5)
VAS scores
VAS(Visual Analogue Score) is a method to value the degree of patient's pain after surgery.This method has a scale range from 1 to 10.Patient chose a number from it to represent his(her) pain.The "1" represents painless and the "10" represents sever pain which he(she) unable to bear. The pain is increasing with the increasing of number.
Measured: Pain is measured by VAS on the first 24 hours of after operation and the first 24 hours after tube removing.
Analgesics
The number of analgesics using after surgery.
Measured: Counting the total analgesics using times through study completion, an average of 3 months.
Drainage
The total volume of fluid.
Measured: Measure the volume every 24 hours,up to 4 weeks
Pulmonary recruitment
Chest X-Ray
Measured: The first 24 hours after surgery and 8 hours before leaving hospital.
Adverse event
Air-leakage or seepage from the surrounding of tube.
Measured: Counting the times of adverse events through study completion, an average of 3 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jul 2018
- Study start28 Jul 2018
- Primary completion30 Sep 2018
- Study completion27 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chest TubeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Total 60 patients accept video-Assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy are divided into two groups(Group A and Group B) equally and randomly.Different group takes different chest tube managements.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Zhao Jun, Study director, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityCui zihan, Principal investigator, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03598296
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201805
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 7 Jun 2018
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wisely JC, Barclay KL. Effects of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme on emergency surgical patients. ANZ J Surg. 2016 Nov;86(11):883-888. doi: 10.1111/ans.13465. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
PubMed 26990499Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman J, Chirieac LR, D'Amico TA, DeCamp MM, Dilling TJ, Dobelbower M, Doebele RC, Govindan R, Gubens MA, Hennon M, Horn L, Komaki R, Lackner RP, Lanuti M, Leal TA, Leisch LJ, Lilenbaum R, Lin J, Loo BW Jr, Martins R, Otterson GA, Reckamp K, Riely GJ, Schild SE, Shapiro TA, Stevenson J, Swanson SJ, Tauer K, Yang SC, Gregory K, Hughes M. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Apr;15(4):504-535. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0050.
PubMed 28404761Bertolaccini L, Rocco G, Crisci R, Solli P. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomies: the best is yet still to come? J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(Suppl 4):S493-S496. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.33. No abstract available.
PubMed 29629194Gottgens KW, Siebenga J, Belgers EH, van Huijstee PJ, Bollen EC. Early removal of the chest tube after complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Apr;39(4):575-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
PubMed 20833554Xie HY, Xu K, Tang JX, Bian W, Ma HT, Zhao J, Ni B. A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 ml/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Aug;21(2):200-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv115. Epub 2015 May 15.
PubMed 25979532Cui Z, Zhang Y, Xu C, Ding C, Chen J, Li C, Zhao J. Comparison of the results of two chest tube managements during an enhanced recovery program after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A randomized trial. Thorac Cancer. 2019 Oct;10(10):1993-1999. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13183. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
PubMed 31475791
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Results of Two Chest Tube Management During an Enhanced Recovery Program After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03598296
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201805
- Conditions
- Chest Tube
- Keywords
- ERAS(Enhanced Recovery After Surgery), Video-assisted thoracoscope lobectomy, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), Chest tube
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Comparing the influences of different chest tube managements for enhanced recovery program after video-Assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.
Detailed description
The Enhanced Recovery Program has a series of observation data contains hospitalization days, adverse events, drainage, extubation, visual analogue scale(VAS) scores and the number of analgesic using.The investigators plan to enroll 60 patients and divide them into two groups to compare the influences of different chest tube managements for enhanced recovery program after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Total 60 patients accept video-Assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy are divided into two groups(Group A and Group B) equally and randomly.Different group takes different chest tube managements.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A:Group Tube | Experimental | Other: Large size tubePatients are inserted the large size tube (28F).Patients undergo upper lobectomy are inserted one additional large size tube(28F,we named this tube upper tube).This group is planned to enroll 30 patients. |
| Group B:Group Ball | Experimental | Other: Drainage ballPatients are inserted the small size tube connects with a negative pressure ball(drainage ball).Patients undergo upper lobectomy are inserted one additional large size tube(28F,we named this tube upper tube).This group is planned to enroll 30 patients. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Only single lesion on the targeted lobe
- Considered as invasive carcinoma by preoperative computed tomography (CT) or -diagnosed by intraoperative pathology
- Patients have signed informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients have critical basic disease(diabetes and hypertension).
- Patients who lung function cannot undertake the lobectomy.
- The lesion has the possibility of metastasis.
- Finding serious adhesion to pleura during operation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Large size tubeAlso: Upper tubePatients in Group A are inserted the large size tube (28F). | Other | Group A:Group Tube |
| Drainage ballAlso: Upper tubePatients in Group B are inserted the small-bore tube connects with a negative pressure ball(drainage ball). | Other | Group B:Group Ball |
Primary outcome
Hospitalization days
Time frame: From the first days after surgery to discharge,up to 4 weeks.
The numbers of days of patients stay in the hospital after surgery
5 secondary outcomes
VAS scores
Time frame: Pain is measured by VAS on the first 24 hours of after operation and the first 24 hours after tube removing.
Analgesics
Time frame: Counting the total analgesics using times through study completion, an average of 3 months.
Drainage
Time frame: Measure the volume every 24 hours,up to 4 weeks
Pulmonary recruitment
Time frame: The first 24 hours after surgery and 8 hours before leaving hospital.
Adverse event
Time frame: Counting the times of adverse events through study completion, an average of 3 months.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 26990499Wisely JC, Barclay KL. Effects of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programme on emergency surgical patients. ANZ J Surg. 2016 Nov;86(11):883-888. doi: 10.1111/ans.13465. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
- Results publication: PubMed 28404761Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman J, Chirieac LR, D'Amico TA, DeCamp MM, Dilling TJ, Dobelbower M, Doebele RC, Govindan R, Gubens MA, Hennon M, Horn L, Komaki R, Lackner RP, Lanuti M, Leal TA, Leisch LJ, Lilenbaum R, Lin J, Loo BW Jr, Martins R, Otterson GA, Reckamp K, Riely GJ, Schild SE, Shapiro TA, Stevenson J, Swanson SJ, Tauer K, Yang SC, Gregory K, Hughes M. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 5.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Apr;15(4):504-535. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0050.
- Results publication: PubMed 29629194Bertolaccini L, Rocco G, Crisci R, Solli P. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomies: the best is yet still to come? J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(Suppl 4):S493-S496. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.33. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 20833554Gottgens KW, Siebenga J, Belgers EH, van Huijstee PJ, Bollen EC. Early removal of the chest tube after complete video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Apr;39(4):575-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 25979532Xie HY, Xu K, Tang JX, Bian W, Ma HT, Zhao J, Ni B. A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 ml/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Aug;21(2):200-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv115. Epub 2015 May 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31475791Cui Z, Zhang Y, Xu C, Ding C, Chen J, Li C, Zhao J. Comparison of the results of two chest tube managements during an enhanced recovery program after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A randomized trial. Thorac Cancer. 2019 Oct;10(10):1993-1999. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13183. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chest Tube
Recruiting
Effect of Box Breathing Before Chest Tube Removal After Open-Heart Surgery
Open-Heart Surgery
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Rinatabart Sesutecan (Rina-S, PRO1184, GEN1184) for Advanced Solid Tumors (GCT1184-01/ PRO1184-001)
High Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
Recruiting
Hyperangulated vs Standard Videolaryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Intubation
Endobronchial Intubation, Double Lumen Tube Intubation
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Compound Chamomile and Lidocaine Hydronchloride Gel as an Endotracheal Tube Lubricant on Postoperative Pharyngeal and Laryngeal Complications in Thoracic Surgery Patients
Postoperative Sore Throat
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zhao Jun study director
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
Cui zihan principal investigator
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Large size tube and Drainage ball in people with Chest Tube, run by The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hospitalization days (time frame: From the first days after surgery to discharge,up to 4 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03598296, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2019.