AzTrials
AzTrials

Depressive SymptomsTRUSTNCT03599141

Testing TRUST Depression Management Intervention

A study testing Trust-building Self-management Together and Depression Management in people with Depressive Symptoms and Quality of Life, run by Case Western Reserve University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a novel depression self-management intervention in adolescents with depression. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Depressive Symptoms, Quality of Life
What is being tested?
Trust-building Self-management Together and Depression Management
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Oct 2018to 30 Nov 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Lives in the Cleveland metro area
  • Ages 14-17 years old
  • Reports moderate depressive symptoms
  • Able to read, speak, and understand the English language

Who cannot join

  • Current suicide risk
  • Diagnosis with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or a personality disorder
  • Severe behavioral problems that preclude group participation (as reported by parent)
  • Family plans to move from the region within 6 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Case Western Reserve University

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pilot RCT to Evaluate the Effects of a Trust-Building Depression Management Intervention on Moderate Depressive Symptoms in Low-Income Adolescents

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a novel depression self-management intervention in adolescents with depression.

Read the detailed description

Half of participants will receive a traditional depression self-management intervention, while the other half will receive the novel depression self-management intervention. In an exploratory, pilot 2-group randomized controlled trial (RCT), 16 adolescents were followed over 6 months. Data were collected at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.

Being tested
Trust-building Self-management Together, Depression Management
Keywords
adolescent, parent
Medical subject headings
Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Trust-building Self-management TogetherBehavioural

    Trust building plus depression self-management

  • Depression ManagementBehavioural

    Traditional depression self-management

Study groups in NCT03599141
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Depression ManagementActive comparator8 weekly group sessions
Receives: Behavioral: Depression Management
Trust-building Self-management TogetherExperimental8 weekly group sessions
Receives: Behavioral: Trust-building Self-management Together

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire-8 Adolescent

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) Adolescent has 8 items scored on a 4 point Likert scale summed for a total score ranging from 0-24. Higher scores indicate greater levels of depressive symptoms with a score of 10 indicating a moderate level of depressive symptoms. The population mean = 5.6 (SD = 1.0).

    Measured: 3 months and 6 months post baseline

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Youth Quality of Life Scale

    The Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Short Form has 15 items measured on a 10 point Likert scale that are summed and t-scored, with higher scores indicating greater QoL. This is a continuously distributed scale without clinical cutoff scores. The quality of life mean t-score in the youth without depression (M= 81.0, SD= 11.7) is greater than the mean t-score in youth diagnosed with depression (M= 58.6, SD= 14.2).

    Measured: 3 and 6 months post baseline

  2. Adolescent Sleep Hygiene Scale

    The Adolescent Sleep Hygiene Scale-revised has 8 subscales with 24 items scored on a 6 point Likert scale. Each subscale total is the mean of the items contained within. The mean of the subscale scores indicates the overall sleep score, with higher scores indicating greater sleep hygiene. The range is 1-6, with poor sleep hygiene indicated by the lowest quintile scores, which is ≤ 3.8 and good sleep hygiene is indicated by the highest quintile score, which is ≥ 4.9.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months post baseline

  3. Stress Management

    The Adolescent Lifestyle Questionnaire Stress Management Subscale has four items on a 5 point Likert scale that are summed for a total score. The range is 5-20. Higher scores indicate greater stress management behavior. This is a continuously distributed scale without clinical cutoff scores. The population mean = 13.0 (SD = 3.6).

    Measured: 3 and 6 months post baseline

  4. Medication Adherence

    The Extent of Non-Adherence Scale has 3 items measured on a 5-point Likert scale. A total score reflecting non-adherence is calculated by the mean of item responses, with a range of 1-5. Higher scores indicate greater levels of non-adherence and lower scores indicate greater adherence. The population mean = 1.8 (SD = 1.0).

    Measured: 3 and 6 months post baseline

  5. Appointment Keeping

    The Hill-Bone Compliance Appointment Keeping Scale has 3 items measured on a four-point Likert scale. One item is reverse scored and then the three items are summed, resulting in a score ranging from 3-12. This is a continuously distributed scale without clinical cutoff scores. Lower scores indicate greater appointment keeping (M = 5.27 ± 0.93).

    Measured: 3 and 6 months post baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2018
  2. Study start1 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2021
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03599141
Sponsor's protocol ID
20180519
Other IDs
U54MD002265-11
Acronym
TRUST
Status last verified
Dec 2023
First submitted
5 Jun 2018
Last updated
9 Jan 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified data will be shared for further analysis after main results are published.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Trust-building Self-management Together and Depression Management in people with Depressive Symptoms and Quality of Life, run by Case Western Reserve University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Jan 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Health Questionnaire-8 Adolescent (time frame: 3 months and 6 months post baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in