AzTrials
AzTrials

Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyNCT03609996

Retrospective Review of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Patients

An observational study of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Elman Retina Group at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of the protocol is to determine if intravitreal ranibizumab alone decreases retinal neovascularization from Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) with deferred panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and/or vitrectomy at one year after treatment with ranibizumab has been initiated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
What is being tested?
Panretinal Photocoagulation and Lucentis
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2018to 1 Dec 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Approximately 160 eyes that have been diagnosed with PDR that have been treated with ranibizumab will be looked at retrospectively.

Who may be able to join

  • Age >= 18 years Individuals <18 years old are not being included because PDR is so rare in this age group that the diagnosis of PDR may be questionable.
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2)
  • Any one of the following will be considered to be sufficient evidence that diabetes is present:
  • Current regular use of insulin for the treatment of diabetes
  • Current regular use of oral anti-hyperglycemia agents for the treatment of diabetes
  • Documented diabetes by ADA and/or WHO criteria (see Procedures Manual for definitions
  • Presence of PDR which the investigator has treated the study eye(s) with ranibizumab

Who cannot join

  • History of prior panretinal photocoagulation prior to initiating ranibizumab
  • Tractional retinal detachment involving the macula.
  • A tractional retinal detachment is not an exclusion if it is outside of the posterior pole (not threatening the macula)
  • History of vitrectomy prior to initiating ranibizumab
  • Treatment with Ranibizumab within six months of treatment regimen

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Elman Retina Group

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21237

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Retrospective Review of Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Regression of PDR After Treatment With Ranibizumab

The primary objective of the protocol is to determine if intravitreal ranibizumab alone decreases retinal neovascularization from Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) with deferred panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) and/or vitrectomy at one year after treatment with ranibizumab has been initiated.

Read the detailed description

Current standard treatment for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) is panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), but this treatment is inherently destructive and has several potential adverse effects on aspects of visual function, including constriction of peripheral visual fields and decreases in night vision, contrast sensitivity and color perception. Thus, therapeutic alternatives that might delay or obviate the need for PRP are desirable. It has been demonstrated that retinal neovascularization from PDR is highly responsive to anti-VEGF therapy, but it is unclear how long regression of retinal neovascularization is sustained after anti- VEGF therapy is halted in clinical practice.

It is possible that intravitreal ranibizumab treatment could prevent laser-associated vision loss by precluding the need for PRP as long as the eye continued to receive ranibizumab. Even if ranibizumab treatment was discontinued, it is possible that initial treatment with anti-VEGF therapy might improve visual outcomes substantially by delaying or preventing the need for PRP, and the infrequent frequency of administration of ranibizumab for DME (median 2 to 3 times in the second year of treatment) after the DME initially has resolved on anti-VEGF therapy suggests that monthly ranibizumab might not be needed to achieve control of PDR.

The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR network) is currently evaluating intravitreal ranibizumab treatment to see if can prevent laser-associated vision loss by precluding the need for PRP as long as the eye continued to receive ranibizumab. However, intravitreal injections carry the risk of serious complications. Ophthalmic complications include endophthalmitis in 2% of all injected patients cumulatively. Endophthalmitis is a vision threatening and can cause severe and permanent vision loss and even loss of the eye. Other complications include vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, uveitis and glaucoma. This study will evaluate ranibizumab usage as the primary treatment for PDR in a busy private clinical practice.

Being tested
Panretinal Photocoagulation, Lucentis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Panretinal PhotocoagulationDevice

    Laser treatment for PDR

  • LucentisDrug

    Intraviteral injection

Study groups in NCT03609996
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PDR treated with LaserNot described
Receives: Device: Panretinal Photocoagulation; Drug: Lucentis
PDR treated with LucentisNot described
Receives: Device: Panretinal Photocoagulation; Drug: Lucentis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical regression of neovascularization not requiring further treatment beyond RBZ

    Clinical regression of neovascularization not requiring further treatment beyond RBZ

    Measured: 2009-2018

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Aug 2018
  2. Study start1 Jun 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2018
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03609996
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML29652
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
24 Jul 2018
Last updated
7 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Elman Retina Group at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical regression of neovascularization not requiring further treatment beyond RBZ (time frame: 2009-2018). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in