Hidradenitis SuppurativaPhase 2NOVANCT03628924
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
A Phase 2 study testing Guselkumab dose 1, Guselkumab dose 2 and Guselkumab dose 3 in people with Hidradenitis Suppurativa, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 45 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of guselkumab in adult participants with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- What is being tested?
- Guselkumab dose 1, Guselkumab dose 2 and Guselkumab dose 3
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 184 participants
- Where
- 45 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 4 Sep 2018to 22 May 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have moderate to severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) for at least 1 year (365 days) prior to the baseline visit as determined by the investigator through participant interview and/or review of the medical history
- Have HS lesions present in at least 2 distinct anatomic areas (examples include but are not limited to left and right axilla; or left axilla and left inguinocrural fold)
- Had an inadequate response to an adequate course of appropriate oral antibiotics for treatment of HS (or demonstrated intolerance to, or had a contraindication to oral antibiotics for treatment of their HS) in the investigator's opinion
- Have a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of greater than or equal to (>=) 3 at the screening and baseline visit
- Must agree to daily use (throughout the entirety of the study) of one of the following over-the-counter treatments to the body areas affected with HS lesions: either soap and water, or a topical antiseptic wash containing chlorhexidine gluconate, triclosan, or benzoyl peroxide, or a dilute bleach bath
Who cannot join
- Any other active skin disease or condition (example, bacterial, fungal or viral infection) that could have interfered with assessment of HS
- Has a draining fistula count of greater than (>) 20 at the baseline visit
- Receipt of prescription topical therapies for the treatment of HS within 14 days prior to the baseline visit
- Receipt of systemic non-biologic therapies for the treatment of HS less than (<) 4 Weeks prior to the baseline visit
- Receipt of any oral antibiotic treatment for HS or inflammatory disorders within 4 Weeks prior to the baseline visit
Trial locations and contacts
45 sites in 6 countries.
45 sites in 6 countries
United States20 sites
University of Alabama Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Great Lakes Clinical Trials
Chicago, Illinois, 60640
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Hamzavi Dermatology
Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059
Clinical Studies Group
Henderson, Nevada, 89052
Clinical Partners, LLC
Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919
Olympian Clinical Research
Largo, Florida, 33770
Renstar Medical Research
Ocala, Florida, 34470
Park Avenue Dermatology
Orange Park, Florida, 32073
University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Indiana Clinical Trial Center
Plainfield, Indiana, 46168
Oregon Medical Research Center
Portland, Oregon, 97223
Progressive Clinical Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78213
Dermatology Associates of Seattle
Seattle, Washington, 98101-1498
Central Dermatology
St Louis, Missouri, 63117
Olympian Clinical Research
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Forcare Clinical Research Inc
Tampa, Florida, 33624
Germany9 sites
Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin (CCM)
Berlin, 10117
Katholisches Klinikum Bochum gGmbH
Bochum, 44791
Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH - Hautklinik
Darmstadt, 64297
Stadtisches Klinikum Dresden
Dresden, 01067
Universitaetsklinik Erlangen
Erlangen, 91054
Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt, 60590
Haut- und Laserzentrum Freising
Freising, 85354
Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
Universitaetsmedizin Mainz
Mainz, 55131
France7 sites
Hopital Prive d'Antony
Antony, 92160
Groupe Hospitalier La Rochelle - Re - Aunis
La Rochelle, 17019
CHU de Nice
Nice, 06200
Polyclinique de Courlancy
Reims, 51100
Hopital Charles Nicolle
Rouen, 76031
CHU Saint Etienne
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270
Hopital Larrey CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, 31000
Canada4 sites
Dr Wei Jing Loo Medicine Professional Corporation
London, Ontario, N6H 5L5
Skin Centre for Dermatology
Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 5K2
York Dermatology Clinic and Research Centre
Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4C 9M7
Alliance Clinical Trials
Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4
Netherlands3 sites
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, 9700 RB
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, 6525GA
Erasmus Medisch Centrum
Rotterdam, 3015 CE
Denmark2 sites
Bispebjerg Hospital
København NV, DK-2400
Sjaellands University Hospital
Roskilde, DK-4000
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate Guselkumab for the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of guselkumab in adult participants with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).
- Conditions
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- Being tested
- Guselkumab dose 1, Guselkumab dose 2, Guselkumab dose 3, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Guselkumab dose 1Drug
Also called CNTO 1959
Participants will receive guselkumab dose 1 IV.
Guselkumab dose 2Drug
Also called CNTO 1959
Participants will receive guselkumab dose 2 SC in Group 1, 2 and Group 3.
Guselkumab dose 3Drug
Also called CNTO 1959
Participants will receive guselkumab dose 3 SC in Group 3.
PlaceboDrug
Participants will receive matched placebo SC and IV in group 1, 2 and 3 with an additional placebo SC dose in Group 3.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Guselkumab Regimen 1 | Experimental | Participants will receive guselkumab dose 1 administered Intravenously (IV) followed by guselkumab dose 2 administered subcutaneously. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab dose 1; Drug: Guselkumab dose 2; Drug: Placebo |
| Group 2: Guselkumab Regimen 2 | Experimental | Participants will receive guselkumab dose 2 subcutaneously. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab dose 2; Drug: Placebo |
| Group 3: Placebo then Guselkumab | Experimental | Participants will receive placebo IV and SC and an additional SC placebo dose at Week 12 then cross over at Week 16 to receive guselkumab dose 2 and dose 3 SC and placebo SC. Receives: Drug: Guselkumab dose 2; Drug: Guselkumab dose 3; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16
HiSCR is defined as at least 50 percent (%) reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
Measured: Week 16
Secondary outcomes (21)
Change From Baseline in Participant's Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16
Change from baseline in total AN count at Week 16 was reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16
DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. The participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from "Very Much" (score 3) to "Not at All" or "Not relevant" (score 0). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best. A lower score (that is, negative change score) indicates improvement in the Quality of Life.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Week 16
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours with a score range from 0 (no symptom experience) to 10 (worst possible symptom experience). A total symptom score also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period. Change from baseline in HS-related pain symptom score based on HSSD was reported.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 50 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 75 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved at least 90 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved 100 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16
Percentage of participants who achieved an AN count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Abscess Count of 0 at Week 16 For Participants With Baseline Abscess Count Greater Than 0
Percentage of participants who achieved abscess count of 0 at Week 16 for participants with baseline abscess count greater than (>) 0 were reported.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Number of Abscesses at Week 16
Change from baseline in number of abscesses at Week 16 was reported.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Total Score at Week 16
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours. A total symptom score, also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Score (Other Than Pain in the Past 24 Hours) at Week 16
HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours. Change from baseline in each individual HSSD component scale (other than pain in the past 24 hours) tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor and itchiness symptom, pain, and current pain score (rated on a scale of 0 [no symptom experience] to 10 [worst possible symptom experience]) were reported.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Draining Fistula Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Draining Fistula Count Greater Than 0
Percentage of participants who achieved draining fistulas count of 0 at Week 16 for participants with baseline draining fistula count >0 were reported. Draining fistula were defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistulas at Week 16
Change from baseline in number of draining fistulas at Week 16 was reported. Draining fistula are defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Inflammatory Nodules Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Inflammatory Nodule Count Greater Than 0
Percentage of participants who achieved inflammatory nodules count of 0 at Week 16 in participants with baseline inflammatory nodules count >0 were reported.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Number of Inflammatory Nodules at Week 16
Change from baseline in number of inflammatory nodules at Week 16 was reported.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-Grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16
The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. The participant's HS is assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1), or mild activity (2) and with at least 2-grade improvement relative to baseline at Week 16 were reported.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With HS-IGA Score of Inactive (0) or Almost Inactive (1) at Week 16 Among Participants With HS-IGA Score of Moderate Activity (3) or Severe Activity (4) at Baseline
The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. Among participants with score of moderate activity (3) or severe activity (4) at baseline, the same anatomic site selected for evaluation at the baseline were re-evaluated at Week 16. The participant's HS is assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1) at Week 16 among participants with HS-IGA score of moderate activity (3) or severe activity (4) at baseline were reported.
Measured: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Week 16
The HADS has been developed to identify symptoms of anxiety and depression in hospitalized participants and in outpatients. It comprises 14 items, seven to assess anxiety (HADS-A), namely items 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13; and seven to assess depression (HADS-D), namely items 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14. Each item receives a score from 0 to 3 on a Likert Scale. The total score for each HADS-A and HADS-D scale is obtained by adding the individual scores for each item, with the maximum score 21. The presence or absence of depression and anxiety was defined, for each respective scale, based on the following cutoff values: HADS (anxiety): 0-8 equal to (=) no anxiety; greater than (>) 9 = anxiety; HADS (depression): 0-8 = no depression; >9 = depression.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Week 16
Change from baseline in hs-CRP at Week 16 was reported. Serum samples were collected and analyzed for hsCRP. Change from Baseline was calculated as: ([hs-CRP value at Week 16 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline value]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16
The PGIC of HS Severity is a questionnaire that measures participants' perceived change (improvement or deterioration) in severity of their HS. Participants rated how his/her HS has changed since the beginning of the study using a 7-point scale ranging from 1 which indicates "a lot better now" to 7 which indicates "a lot worse now" with a neutral center point 4 which indicates ("neither better nor worse"). Participants' PGIC of HS Severity scale score at Week 16 were reported
Measured: Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Aug 2018
- Study start4 Sep 2018
- Primary completion22 May 2020
- Study completion22 May 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hidradenitis SuppurativaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Janssen Research & Development, LLCThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 184 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03628924
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR108500
- Other IDs
- 2018-001176-38, CNTO1959HDS2001, 2018
- Acronym
- NOVA
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 9 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Kimball AB, Podda M, Alavi A, Miller M, Shen YK, Li S, Xu Y, Han C, Fakharzadeh S, Yang YW, DePrimo S, Munoz E, Chen Y, Passeron T, Papp K. Guselkumab for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A phase 2 randomized study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Oct;37(10):2098-2108. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19252. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
PubMed 37317022
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate Guselkumab for the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03628924
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NOVA / CR108500
- Conditions
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 184 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 4 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 14 Jun 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of guselkumab in adult participants with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: Guselkumab Regimen 1 | Experimental | Drug: Guselkumab dose 1, Drug: Guselkumab dose 2, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive guselkumab dose 1 administered Intravenously (IV) followed by guselkumab dose 2 administered subcutaneously. |
| Group 2: Guselkumab Regimen 2 | Experimental | Drug: Guselkumab dose 2, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive guselkumab dose 2 subcutaneously. |
| Group 3: Placebo then Guselkumab | Experimental | Drug: Guselkumab dose 2, Drug: Guselkumab dose 3, Drug: PlaceboParticipants will receive placebo IV and SC and an additional SC placebo dose at Week 12 then cross over at Week 16 to receive guselkumab dose 2 and dose 3 SC and placebo SC. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Have moderate to severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) for at least 1 year (365 days) prior to the baseline visit as determined by the investigator through participant interview and/or review of the medical history
- Have HS lesions present in at least 2 distinct anatomic areas (examples include but are not limited to left and right axilla; or left axilla and left inguinocrural fold)
- Had an inadequate response to an adequate course of appropriate oral antibiotics for treatment of HS (or demonstrated intolerance to, or had a contraindication to oral antibiotics for treatment of their HS) in the investigator's opinion
- Have a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of greater than or equal to (>=) 3 at the screening and baseline visit
- Must agree to daily use (throughout the entirety of the study) of one of the following over-the-counter treatments to the body areas affected with HS lesions: either soap and water, or a topical antiseptic wash containing chlorhexidine gluconate, triclosan, or benzoyl peroxide, or a dilute bleach bath
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Any other active skin disease or condition (example, bacterial, fungal or viral infection) that could have interfered with assessment of HS
- Has a draining fistula count of greater than (>) 20 at the baseline visit
- Receipt of prescription topical therapies for the treatment of HS within 14 days prior to the baseline visit
- Receipt of systemic non-biologic therapies for the treatment of HS less than (<) 4 Weeks prior to the baseline visit
- Receipt of any oral antibiotic treatment for HS or inflammatory disorders within 4 Weeks prior to the baseline visit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Guselkumab dose 1Also: CNTO 1959Participants will receive guselkumab dose 1 IV. | Drug | Group 1: Guselkumab Regimen 1 |
| Guselkumab dose 2Also: CNTO 1959Participants will receive guselkumab dose 2 SC in Group 1, 2 and Group 3. | Drug | Group 1: Guselkumab Regimen 1, Group 2: Guselkumab Regimen 2, Group 3: Placebo then Guselkumab |
| Guselkumab dose 3Also: CNTO 1959Participants will receive guselkumab dose 3 SC in Group 3. | Drug | Group 3: Placebo then Guselkumab |
| PlaceboParticipants will receive matched placebo SC and IV in group 1, 2 and 3 with an additional placebo SC dose in Group 3. | Drug | Group 1: Guselkumab Regimen 1, Group 2: Guselkumab Regimen 2, Group 3: Placebo then Guselkumab |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
HiSCR is defined as at least 50 percent (%) reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.
21 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Participant's Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Abscess Count of 0 at Week 16 For Participants With Baseline Abscess Count Greater Than 0
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Number of Abscesses at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Score (Other Than Pain in the Past 24 Hours) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Draining Fistula Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Draining Fistula Count Greater Than 0
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistulas at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Inflammatory Nodules Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Inflammatory Nodule Count Greater Than 0
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Number of Inflammatory Nodules at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-Grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants With HS-IGA Score of Inactive (0) or Almost Inactive (1) at Week 16 Among Participants With HS-IGA Score of Moderate Activity (3) or Severe Activity (4) at Baseline
Time frame: Week 16
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37317022Kimball AB, Podda M, Alavi A, Miller M, Shen YK, Li S, Xu Y, Han C, Fakharzadeh S, Yang YW, DePrimo S, Munoz E, Chen Y, Passeron T, Papp K. Guselkumab for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A phase 2 randomized study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Oct;37(10):2098-2108. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19252. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
Related trials for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
RecruitingPhase 3
Rollover Study for Participants Previously Enrolled in Clinical Trials of Povorcitinib
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
Active, not recruiting
Pilot MBSR for People With HS
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
RecruitingPhase 2
ORKA-002 Versus Placebo in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Samples From Subjects With Various Skin Conditions and Healthy Volunteers
Acne, Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingPhase 1
SAR447971 First-in-human Study
Hidradenitis, Healthy Volunteers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial study director
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
45 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Guselkumab dose 1, Guselkumab dose 2 and Guselkumab dose 3 in people with Hidradenitis Suppurativa, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 45 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 45 sites in United States, Germany, France, Canada, Netherlands and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jun 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03628924, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2025.