AzTrials
AzTrials

Hidradenitis SuppurativaPhase 2NOVANCT03628924

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)

A Phase 2 study testing Guselkumab dose 1, Guselkumab dose 2 and Guselkumab dose 3 in people with Hidradenitis Suppurativa, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 45 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of guselkumab in adult participants with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
What is being tested?
Guselkumab dose 1, Guselkumab dose 2 and Guselkumab dose 3
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
184 participants
Where
45 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
4 Sep 2018to 22 May 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have moderate to severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) for at least 1 year (365 days) prior to the baseline visit as determined by the investigator through participant interview and/or review of the medical history
  • Have HS lesions present in at least 2 distinct anatomic areas (examples include but are not limited to left and right axilla; or left axilla and left inguinocrural fold)
  • Had an inadequate response to an adequate course of appropriate oral antibiotics for treatment of HS (or demonstrated intolerance to, or had a contraindication to oral antibiotics for treatment of their HS) in the investigator's opinion
  • Have a total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count of greater than or equal to (>=) 3 at the screening and baseline visit
  • Must agree to daily use (throughout the entirety of the study) of one of the following over-the-counter treatments to the body areas affected with HS lesions: either soap and water, or a topical antiseptic wash containing chlorhexidine gluconate, triclosan, or benzoyl peroxide, or a dilute bleach bath

Who cannot join

  • Any other active skin disease or condition (example, bacterial, fungal or viral infection) that could have interfered with assessment of HS
  • Has a draining fistula count of greater than (>) 20 at the baseline visit
  • Receipt of prescription topical therapies for the treatment of HS within 14 days prior to the baseline visit
  • Receipt of systemic non-biologic therapies for the treatment of HS less than (<) 4 Weeks prior to the baseline visit
  • Receipt of any oral antibiotic treatment for HS or inflammatory disorders within 4 Weeks prior to the baseline visit

Trial locations and contacts

45 sites in 6 countries.

45 sites in 6 countries

United States20 sites
  • University of Alabama Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Tufts Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02111

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Great Lakes Clinical Trials

    Chicago, Illinois, 60640

  • Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43215

  • Hamzavi Dermatology

    Fort Gratiot, Michigan, 48059

  • Clinical Studies Group

    Henderson, Nevada, 89052

  • Clinical Partners, LLC

    Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919

  • Olympian Clinical Research

    Largo, Florida, 33770

  • Renstar Medical Research

    Ocala, Florida, 34470

  • Park Avenue Dermatology

    Orange Park, Florida, 32073

  • University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Indiana Clinical Trial Center

    Plainfield, Indiana, 46168

  • Oregon Medical Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97223

  • Progressive Clinical Research

    San Antonio, Texas, 78213

  • Dermatology Associates of Seattle

    Seattle, Washington, 98101-1498

  • Central Dermatology

    St Louis, Missouri, 63117

  • Olympian Clinical Research

    Tampa, Florida, 33614

  • Forcare Clinical Research Inc

    Tampa, Florida, 33624

Other trials in United States

Germany9 sites
  • Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin (CCM)

    Berlin, 10117

  • Katholisches Klinikum Bochum gGmbH

    Bochum, 44791

  • Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH - Hautklinik

    Darmstadt, 64297

  • Stadtisches Klinikum Dresden

    Dresden, 01067

  • Universitaetsklinik Erlangen

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt, 60590

  • Haut- und Laserzentrum Freising

    Freising, 85354

  • Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Universitaetsmedizin Mainz

    Mainz, 55131

Other trials in Germany

France7 sites
  • Hopital Prive d'Antony

    Antony, 92160

  • Groupe Hospitalier La Rochelle - Re - Aunis

    La Rochelle, 17019

  • CHU de Nice

    Nice, 06200

  • Polyclinique de Courlancy

    Reims, 51100

  • Hopital Charles Nicolle

    Rouen, 76031

  • CHU Saint Etienne

    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270

  • Hopital Larrey CHU de Toulouse

    Toulouse, 31000

Other trials in France

Canada4 sites
  • Dr Wei Jing Loo Medicine Professional Corporation

    London, Ontario, N6H 5L5

  • Skin Centre for Dermatology

    Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 5K2

  • York Dermatology Clinic and Research Centre

    Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4C 9M7

  • Alliance Clinical Trials

    Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4

Other trials in Canada

Netherlands3 sites
  • University Medical Center Groningen

    Groningen, 9700 RB

  • Radboudumc

    Nijmegen, 6525GA

  • Erasmus Medisch Centrum

    Rotterdam, 3015 CE

Other trials in Netherlands

Denmark2 sites
  • Bispebjerg Hospital

    København NV, DK-2400

  • Sjaellands University Hospital

    Roskilde, DK-4000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Proof-of-Concept Study to Evaluate Guselkumab for the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of guselkumab in adult participants with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).

Being tested
Guselkumab dose 1, Guselkumab dose 2, Guselkumab dose 3, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Hidradenitis Suppurativa

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Guselkumab dose 1Drug

    Also called CNTO 1959

    Participants will receive guselkumab dose 1 IV.

  • Guselkumab dose 2Drug

    Also called CNTO 1959

    Participants will receive guselkumab dose 2 SC in Group 1, 2 and Group 3.

  • Guselkumab dose 3Drug

    Also called CNTO 1959

    Participants will receive guselkumab dose 3 SC in Group 3.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Participants will receive matched placebo SC and IV in group 1, 2 and 3 with an additional placebo SC dose in Group 3.

Study groups in NCT03628924
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1: Guselkumab Regimen 1ExperimentalParticipants will receive guselkumab dose 1 administered Intravenously (IV) followed by guselkumab dose 2 administered subcutaneously.
Receives: Drug: Guselkumab dose 1; Drug: Guselkumab dose 2; Drug: Placebo
Group 2: Guselkumab Regimen 2ExperimentalParticipants will receive guselkumab dose 2 subcutaneously.
Receives: Drug: Guselkumab dose 2; Drug: Placebo
Group 3: Placebo then GuselkumabExperimentalParticipants will receive placebo IV and SC and an additional SC placebo dose at Week 12 then cross over at Week 16 to receive guselkumab dose 2 and dose 3 SC and placebo SC.
Receives: Drug: Guselkumab dose 2; Drug: Guselkumab dose 3; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16

    HiSCR is defined as at least 50 percent (%) reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count with no increase in abscess count and no increase in draining fistula count relative to baseline.

    Measured: Week 16

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Change From Baseline in Participant's Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule (AN) Count at Week 16

    Change from baseline in total AN count at Week 16 was reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  2. Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 16

    DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. The participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from "Very Much" (score 3) to "Not at All" or "Not relevant" (score 0). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best. A lower score (that is, negative change score) indicates improvement in the Quality of Life.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  3. Change From Baseline in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)-Related Pain Symptom Score in the Past 24 Hours Based on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Symptom Diary (HSSD) Questionnaire at Week 16

    HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours with a score range from 0 (no symptom experience) to 10 (worst possible symptom experience). A total symptom score also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period. Change from baseline in HS-related pain symptom score based on HSSD was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 50 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved at least 50 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.

    Measured: Week 16

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 75 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved at least 75 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.

    Measured: Week 16

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 90 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved at least 90 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.

    Measured: Week 16

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 100 Percent Reduction in Total Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved 100 percent reduction in total AN count at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.

    Measured: Week 16

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Abscess and Inflammatory Nodule Count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16

    Percentage of participants who achieved an AN count of 0/1 and AN Count of 0/1/2 at Week 16 were reported. Abscess and inflammatory nodule were counted for the HS affected anatomical regions. The AN count is the sum of number of abscess and inflammatory nodules across anatomical regions.

    Measured: Week 16

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Abscess Count of 0 at Week 16 For Participants With Baseline Abscess Count Greater Than 0

    Percentage of participants who achieved abscess count of 0 at Week 16 for participants with baseline abscess count greater than (>) 0 were reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  10. Change From Baseline in the Number of Abscesses at Week 16

    Change from baseline in number of abscesses at Week 16 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  11. Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Total Score at Week 16

    HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours. A total symptom score, also ranged from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst possible symptom), was derived by averaging the 5 individual scale scores that utilize the past 7-day recall period.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  12. Change From Baseline in HSSD Symptom Scale Score (Other Than Pain in the Past 24 Hours) at Week 16

    HSSD is a 7-item patient self-reported questionnaire that assesses 5 HS-related symptoms including pain, tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor, and itchiness. The participants were asked to rate the severity of each symptom on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale, with 0 indicating no symptom experience and 10 indicating the worst possible symptom experience. All 5 symptoms have a recall period of the past 7 days, except for 2 additional questions on pain which evaluate current pain and pain in the past 24 hours. Change from baseline in each individual HSSD component scale (other than pain in the past 24 hours) tenderness, hot skin feeling, odor and itchiness symptom, pain, and current pain score (rated on a scale of 0 [no symptom experience] to 10 [worst possible symptom experience]) were reported.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  13. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Draining Fistula Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Draining Fistula Count Greater Than 0

    Percentage of participants who achieved draining fistulas count of 0 at Week 16 for participants with baseline draining fistula count >0 were reported. Draining fistula were defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.

    Measured: Week 16

  14. Change From Baseline in Number of Draining Fistulas at Week 16

    Change from baseline in number of draining fistulas at Week 16 was reported. Draining fistula are defined as fistulas that drain serous or purulent fluid, either spontaneously or by gentle palpation.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  15. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Inflammatory Nodules Count of 0 at Week 16 for Participants With Baseline Inflammatory Nodule Count Greater Than 0

    Percentage of participants who achieved inflammatory nodules count of 0 at Week 16 in participants with baseline inflammatory nodules count >0 were reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  16. Change From Baseline in Number of Inflammatory Nodules at Week 16

    Change from baseline in number of inflammatory nodules at Week 16 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  17. Percentage of Participants With Hidradenitis Suppurativa-investigator's Global Assessment (HS-IGA) Score of Inactive (0), Almost Inactive (1), or Mild Activity (2) and With at Least 2-Grade Improvement Relative to Baseline at Week 16

    The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. The participant's HS is assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1), or mild activity (2) and with at least 2-grade improvement relative to baseline at Week 16 were reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  18. Percentage of Participants With HS-IGA Score of Inactive (0) or Almost Inactive (1) at Week 16 Among Participants With HS-IGA Score of Moderate Activity (3) or Severe Activity (4) at Baseline

    The HS-IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's HS at a given timepoint. The anatomic region with the most severe HS activity at the baseline was evaluated for erythema, drainage, and pain and/or tenderness to palpation for each participant. Among participants with score of moderate activity (3) or severe activity (4) at baseline, the same anatomic site selected for evaluation at the baseline were re-evaluated at Week 16. The participant's HS is assessed as inactive (0), almost inactive (1), mild activity (2), moderate activity (3), or severe activity (4). A higher score indicates more severe disease. Percentage of participants with HS-IGA score of inactive (0), almost inactive (1) at Week 16 among participants with HS-IGA score of moderate activity (3) or severe activity (4) at baseline were reported.

    Measured: Week 16

  19. Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Total Score at Week 16

    The HADS has been developed to identify symptoms of anxiety and depression in hospitalized participants and in outpatients. It comprises 14 items, seven to assess anxiety (HADS-A), namely items 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13; and seven to assess depression (HADS-D), namely items 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14. Each item receives a score from 0 to 3 on a Likert Scale. The total score for each HADS-A and HADS-D scale is obtained by adding the individual scores for each item, with the maximum score 21. The presence or absence of depression and anxiety was defined, for each respective scale, based on the following cutoff values: HADS (anxiety): 0-8 equal to (=) no anxiety; greater than (>) 9 = anxiety; HADS (depression): 0-8 = no depression; >9 = depression.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  20. Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Week 16

    Change from baseline in hs-CRP at Week 16 was reported. Serum samples were collected and analyzed for hsCRP. Change from Baseline was calculated as: ([hs-CRP value at Week 16 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline value]).

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  21. Number of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scale Score at Week 16

    The PGIC of HS Severity is a questionnaire that measures participants' perceived change (improvement or deterioration) in severity of their HS. Participants rated how his/her HS has changed since the beginning of the study using a 7-point scale ranging from 1 which indicates "a lot better now" to 7 which indicates "a lot worse now" with a neutral center point 4 which indicates ("neither better nor worse"). Participants' PGIC of HS Severity scale score at Week 16 were reported

    Measured: Week 16

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2018
  2. Study start4 Sep 2018
  3. Primary completion22 May 2020
  4. Study completion22 May 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
184 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03628924
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR108500
Other IDs
2018-001176-38, CNTO1959HDS2001, 2018
Acronym
NOVA
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
9 Aug 2018
Last updated
4 Feb 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Kimball AB, Podda M, Alavi A, Miller M, Shen YK, Li S, Xu Y, Han C, Fakharzadeh S, Yang YW, DePrimo S, Munoz E, Chen Y, Passeron T, Papp K. Guselkumab for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: A phase 2 randomized study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Oct;37(10):2098-2108. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19252. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

    PubMed 37317022

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Guselkumab dose 1, Guselkumab dose 2 and Guselkumab dose 3 in people with Hidradenitis Suppurativa, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 45 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 45 sites in United States, Germany, France, Canada, Netherlands and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jun 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) at Week 16 (time frame: Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03628924, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in