Hand SurgeryNCT03632304
Local Anesthesia With Minimal Sedation and Brachial Plexus Block in Hand Surgery
A study testing Local anesthesia with minimal sedation in people with Hand Surgery and Quality of Recovery, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 2 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
A major innovation in hand surgery in the last decade is the popularization of Wide Awake Hand Surgery (WAHS). This technique consists of numbing the surgical area with local anesthesia with epinephrine and allowing the patient to actively move their hand intra-operatively to assess the strength and quality of repairs… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hand Surgery, Quality of Recovery, Hand Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Local anesthesia with minimal sedation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 105 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- 17 Aug 2018to 30 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient age 18 and older
- Hand surgeries distal to carpal bones
- Trauma and elective cases
- Under 2 hours estimated surgical duration
- Consents to research
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal
- Allergy to local anesthetics
- Surgery proximal to the carpal bones
- BMI > 40 kg/m2
- Non-compressive neurological disease of the upper extremity
- Daily use of opioids for greater than 2 weeks prior to surgery
- History of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)
- Patients with high anxiety or severe post-traumatic stress disorder
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Canada2 sites
Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4
St-Mary's Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4
About this study
Official title: The Quality of Recovery of Local Anesthesia With Minimal Sedation and Brachial Plexus Block in Hand Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study
A major innovation in hand surgery in the last decade is the popularization of Wide Awake Hand Surgery (WAHS). This technique consists of numbing the surgical area with local anesthesia with epinephrine and allowing the patient to actively move their hand intra-operatively to assess the strength and quality of repairs or fixations. Despite its theoretical advantages, the application in clinical practice has seldom spread further than simple hand operations, such as carpal tunnel and trigger finger releases. In many institutions, the current standard of care for hand surgery is the brachial plexus block. The primary objective of the study to directly compare the effects of local anesthesia with minimal sedation, performed by the surgeon, and the brachial plexus block, performed by the anesthesiologist, on patient-reported quality of recovery.
Currently, there are no studies in the surgical literature directly comparing patient-reported quality of recovery, post-operative pain control, or time efficiency between local anesthesia and the brachial plexus block in hand surgery. This lack of information is a major impediment to the acceptance and adoption of a simple yet effective anesthesia technique that may increase patient satisfaction and time efficiency in the operating room. This proposed prospective randomized controlled study will quantitatively compare local anesthesia and brachial plexus block on three fronts: 1) patient-reported recovery at 24-hours post-surgery using the validated Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15), 2) post-operative pain and opioid use at 24-hours post-surgery, and 3) nonsurgical time (defined as the time elapsed from one surgery's end time to the next surgery's start time) as a metric for turnover efficiency. The investigators hypothesize that patients randomized to the local anesthesia group will have a more positive recovery experience, a similar pain profile compared to the brachial plexus block despite common beliefs, and a shorter anesthesia-related and nonsurgical time.
The importance of patient-centered care cannot be understated in a successful and high-quality health care system. The results of this study will provide valuable information regarding the patient experience during their post- operative recovery.
Read the detailed description
In many hospitals, the widely-accepted benefits of local anesthesia have moved minor hand operations such as carpal tunnel and trigger finger release outside of the main operating room. The proven benefits of local anesthesia include increased efficiency, convenience and patient comfort, reduced costs, lack of pre-operative tests, and decreased operative time. Multiple complex hand operations have been described using lidocaine and epinephrine only, with the patient wide awake during surgery. These include K-wire fixation, flexor tendon repair, tendon transfers, and tendon grafting. For those unfamiliar with this technique, the main concerns are that it is poorly tolerated, does not prevent patient movement, and inadequately controls post-operative pain, which all negatively influence a surgeon's comfort and adoption of this technique. Thus, despite its many advantages, local anesthesia in complex hand surgery is still not widely practiced in North America.
Alternatively, the brachial plexus block is a common method of regional anesthesia used in hand surgery, consisting of anesthetizing the entire upper limb via local anesthesia infiltration of the brachial plexus. This reliable sensorimotor blockade is performed under ultrasound guidance by an anesthesiologist approximately 30 minutes prior to surgery. Although safe and effective to use, its long duration of action, increased need for operating room resources, and unpleasant sensation of a flaccid and insensate upper extremity has prompted research into alternative ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in hand surgery.
Despite prior published data on the use of local anesthesia with epinephrine and brachial plexus blocks in hand surgery, there is a paucity of randomized-controlled, prospective, patient-reported outcome studies comparing these two methods of anesthesia. This study aims to capture patient-reported quality of recovery using a validated, psychometrically tested questionnaire, the Quality-of-Recovery 15. A recent systematic review of the measurement properties of QoR-15 showed good content validity and internal consistency, and concluded that it fulfills requirements for outcome measurement instruments in clinical trials.
Preliminary data was obtained from a pilot study of 11 hand surgery patients who underwent a brachial plexus block and were called 24 hours after surgery to answer the QoR-15 questionnaire. The computed mean QoR score was 118/150 +/- 15, consistent with values reported in the literature. This pilot study allowed for the calculation of a projected sample size for this study, outlined below.
This is a prospective single institution randomized controlled study taking place at the Montreal General Hospital, in Montreal, Canada. The institution is a level I trauma center which performs a minimum of 250 upper extremity surgeries yearly. The study participants are trauma or elective hand surgery patients above 18 years undergoing surgery less than 2 hours in duration distal to the carpal bones.
Patients who consent to the study will be randomized to receive local anesthesia with minimal sedation (intervention group) or a brachial plexus block (control group) using www.random.org, a random number generating website. The local anesthesia in the intervention group will be administered by the operating hand surgeon or a senior resident under the surgeon's direct supervision as a wrist block and/or digital block. The regional blocks in the control group will be performed as an infraclavicular brachial plexus block by a staff anesthesiologist with extensive experience in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.
This study is designed as a prospective non-inferiority study using an alpha of 0.05 for statistical significance and a power of 80%. Using QoR-15 values derived from the pilot study with effect size of 0.54, a power analysis was conducted, yielding a sample size of 44 patients per group, for a total of 88 patients. All quantitative outcome parameters will be evaluated for normal distribution and reported as mean +/- SD or median (IQR). Differences between two groups will be evaluated using unpaired Student's T-Test (if parametric) or Mann-Whitney-U test (if non-parametric).
The patients will be called on the first post-operative day, at least 24 hours after the end of their surgery, by a research assistant blinded to the randomization. As a primary outcome measure, the patient will be asked to answer the questions on the QoR-15 without revealing their surgery or method of anesthesia. The dosage of the medications used and the number of times an opioid medication was taken will be recorded. The nonsurgical time for the local anesthesia and brachial plexus groups will also be directly compared. Nonsurgical time is defined as the time elapsed between the completion of surgical closure on one case until the surgical incision on the next case.
The study will be conducted in accord with the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (2014) as well as in respect of the requirements set out by the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board.
- Conditions
- Hand Surgery, Quality of Recovery, Hand Injuries, Hand Fracture, Hand Tendon Injury, Anesthesia, Local
- Being tested
- Local anesthesia with minimal sedation
- Keywords
- hand surgery, quality of recovery, local anesthesia, regional anesthesia, QoR-15
- Medical subject headings
- Hand Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Local anesthesia with minimal sedationProcedure or surgery
The operating surgeon will perform a digital or wrist block to numb the surgical area prior to the surgery, instead of using a brachial plexus block.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Brachial plexus block (infraclavicular) | No intervention | The standard of care at our institution. Performed by experienced regional anesthetists. |
| Local anesthesia with minimal sedation | Active comparator | The comparison group. Performed by the operating surgeon. Receives: Procedure: Local anesthesia with minimal sedation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of Recovery 15 Questionnaire (QoR-15)
This psychometrically tested and validated 15-items questionnaire measures patient-reported quality of recovery from surgery and anesthesia on the first post-operative day. Each item consists of a question related to the patient's post-operative recovery and is rated by the patient on a 10-point scale, where 0 means "none of the time" and 10 means "all of the time". The total combined score is obtained from the summation of 15 sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 150, and is used to assess and compare the patient's quality of recovery quantitatively between different interventions. A higher number on the score indicates an improved patient recovery experience. This scale has been validated in the ambulatory surgery setting.
Measured: At 24 hours post-surgery
Secondary outcomes (2)
Block performance time, onset time, and nonsurgical time
To compare local anesthesia to brachial plexus block in hand surgery with respect to performance time, onset time, and nonsurgical time.
Measured: Within 24 hours of surgery
Opioid use at 24 hours after surgery
To evaluate patient-reported 24-hours post-operative pain and use of opioid analgesia following local anesthesia versus brachial plexus block.
Measured: At 24 hours post-surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Aug 2018
- Study start17 Aug 2018
- Primary completion30 Jun 2020
- Study completion30 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hand SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fanyi Meng, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- Investigators
- Fanyi Meng, MD, Principal investigator, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03632304
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-3814
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 8 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 21 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There will be no need to share individual participant data based on the objectives set out by our research.
Publications
Lalonde DH. Reconstruction of the hand with wide awake surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;38(4):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2011.07.005.
PubMed 22032599Lalonde D. Minimally invasive anesthesia in wide awake hand surgery. Hand Clin. 2014 Feb;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
PubMed 24286736Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.
PubMed 23411725Soberon JR Jr, Crookshank JW 3rd, Nossaman BD, Elliott CE, Sisco-Wise LE, Duncan SF. Distal Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Forearm as an Alternative to Proximal Brachial Plexus Blockade in Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery: A Prospective and Randomized Pilot Study. J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Oct;41(10):969-977. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.092. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
PubMed 27524691Meng F, Baradaran A, Jaberi MM, Tran QH, Finlayson R, Luc M, Xu L, Thibaudeau S. Patient-Reported Quality of Recovery after Local Anesthesia versus Brachial Plexus Block in Hand Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Dec 1;152(6):1287-1296. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010688. Epub 2023 May 16.
PubMed 37189224
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Quality of Recovery of Local Anesthesia With Minimal Sedation and Brachial Plexus Block in Hand Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03632304
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2018-3814
- Conditions
- Hand Surgery, Quality of Recovery, Hand Injuries, Hand Fracture, Hand Tendon Injury, Anesthesia, Local
- Keywords
- hand surgery, quality of recovery, local anesthesia, regional anesthesia, QoR-15
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A major innovation in hand surgery in the last decade is the popularization of Wide Awake Hand Surgery (WAHS). This technique consists of numbing the surgical area with local anesthesia with epinephrine and allowing the patient to actively move their hand intra-operatively to assess the strength and quality of repairs or fixations. Despite its theoretical advantages, the application in clinical practice has seldom spread further than simple hand operations, such as carpal tunnel and trigger finger releases. In many institutions, the current standard of care for hand surgery is the brachial plexus block. The primary objective of the study to directly compare the effects of local anesthesia with minimal sedation, performed by the surgeon, and the brachial plexus block, performed by the anesthesiologist, on patient-reported quality of recovery.
Currently, there are no studies in the surgical literature directly comparing patient-reported quality of recovery, post-operative pain control, or time efficiency between local anesthesia and the brachial plexus block in hand surgery. This lack of information is a major impediment to the acceptance and adoption of a simple yet effective anesthesia technique that may increase patient satisfaction and time efficiency in the operating room. This proposed prospective randomized controlled study will quantitatively compare local anesthesia and brachial plexus block on three fronts: 1) patient-reported recovery at 24-hours post-surgery using the validated Quality of Recovery 15 score (QoR-15), 2) post-operative pain and opioid use at 24-hours post-surgery, and 3) nonsurgical time (defined as the time elapsed from one surgery's end time to the next surgery's start time) as a metric for turnover efficiency. The investigators hypothesize that patients randomized to the local anesthesia group will have a more positive recovery experience, a similar pain profile compared to the brachial plexus block despite common beliefs, and a shorter anesthesia-related and nonsurgical time.
The importance of patient-centered care cannot be understated in a successful and high-quality health care system. The results of this study will provide valuable information regarding the patient experience during their post- operative recovery.
Detailed description
In many hospitals, the widely-accepted benefits of local anesthesia have moved minor hand operations such as carpal tunnel and trigger finger release outside of the main operating room. The proven benefits of local anesthesia include increased efficiency, convenience and patient comfort, reduced costs, lack of pre-operative tests, and decreased operative time. Multiple complex hand operations have been described using lidocaine and epinephrine only, with the patient wide awake during surgery. These include K-wire fixation, flexor tendon repair, tendon transfers, and tendon grafting. For those unfamiliar with this technique, the main concerns are that it is poorly tolerated, does not prevent patient movement, and inadequately controls post-operative pain, which all negatively influence a surgeon's comfort and adoption of this technique. Thus, despite its many advantages, local anesthesia in complex hand surgery is still not widely practiced in North America.
Alternatively, the brachial plexus block is a common method of regional anesthesia used in hand surgery, consisting of anesthetizing the entire upper limb via local anesthesia infiltration of the brachial plexus. This reliable sensorimotor blockade is performed under ultrasound guidance by an anesthesiologist approximately 30 minutes prior to surgery. Although safe and effective to use, its long duration of action, increased need for operating room resources, and unpleasant sensation of a flaccid and insensate upper extremity has prompted research into alternative ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in hand surgery.
Despite prior published data on the use of local anesthesia with epinephrine and brachial plexus blocks in hand surgery, there is a paucity of randomized-controlled, prospective, patient-reported outcome studies comparing these two methods of anesthesia. This study aims to capture patient-reported quality of recovery using a validated, psychometrically tested questionnaire, the Quality-of-Recovery 15. A recent systematic review of the measurement properties of QoR-15 showed good content validity and internal consistency, and concluded that it fulfills requirements for outcome measurement instruments in clinical trials.
Preliminary data was obtained from a pilot study of 11 hand surgery patients who underwent a brachial plexus block and were called 24 hours after surgery to answer the QoR-15 questionnaire. The computed mean QoR score was 118/150 +/- 15, consistent with values reported in the literature. This pilot study allowed for the calculation of a projected sample size for this study, outlined below.
This is a prospective single institution randomized controlled study taking place at the Montreal General Hospital, in Montreal, Canada. The institution is a level I trauma center which performs a minimum of 250 upper extremity surgeries yearly. The study participants are trauma or elective hand surgery patients above 18 years undergoing surgery less than 2 hours in duration distal to the carpal bones.
Patients who consent to the study will be randomized to receive local anesthesia with minimal sedation (intervention group) or a brachial plexus block (control group) using www.random.org, a random number generating website. The local anesthesia in the intervention group will be administered by the operating hand surgeon or a senior resident under the surgeon's direct supervision as a wrist block and/or digital block. The regional blocks in the control group will be performed as an infraclavicular brachial plexus block by a staff anesthesiologist with extensive experience in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.
This study is designed as a prospective non-inferiority study using an alpha of 0.05 for statistical significance and a power of 80%. Using QoR-15 values derived from the pilot study with effect size of 0.54, a power analysis was conducted, yielding a sample size of 44 patients per group, for a total of 88 patients. All quantitative outcome parameters will be evaluated for normal distribution and reported as mean +/- SD or median (IQR). Differences between two groups will be evaluated using unpaired Student's T-Test (if parametric) or Mann-Whitney-U test (if non-parametric).
The patients will be called on the first post-operative day, at least 24 hours after the end of their surgery, by a research assistant blinded to the randomization. As a primary outcome measure, the patient will be asked to answer the questions on the QoR-15 without revealing their surgery or method of anesthesia. The dosage of the medications used and the number of times an opioid medication was taken will be recorded. The nonsurgical time for the local anesthesia and brachial plexus groups will also be directly compared. Nonsurgical time is defined as the time elapsed between the completion of surgical closure on one case until the surgical incision on the next case.
The study will be conducted in accord with the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (2014) as well as in respect of the requirements set out by the McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Brachial plexus block (infraclavicular) | No intervention | –The standard of care at our institution. Performed by experienced regional anesthetists. |
| Local anesthesia with minimal sedation | Active comparator | Procedure: Local anesthesia with minimal sedationThe comparison group. Performed by the operating surgeon. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient age 18 and older
- Hand surgeries distal to carpal bones
- Trauma and elective cases
- Under 2 hours estimated surgical duration
- Consents to research
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient refusal
- Allergy to local anesthetics
- Surgery proximal to the carpal bones
- BMI > 40 kg/m2
- Non-compressive neurological disease of the upper extremity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Local anesthesia with minimal sedationThe operating surgeon will perform a digital or wrist block to numb the surgical area prior to the surgery, instead of using a brachial plexus block. | Procedure or surgery | Local anesthesia with minimal sedation |
Primary outcome
Quality of Recovery 15 Questionnaire (QoR-15)
Time frame: At 24 hours post-surgery
This psychometrically tested and validated 15-items questionnaire measures patient-reported quality of recovery from surgery and anesthesia on the first post-operative day. Each item consists of a question related to the patient's post-operative recovery and is rated by the patient on a 10-point scale, where 0 means "none of the time" and 10 means "all of the time". The total combined score is obtained from the summation of 15 sub-scores and ranges from 0 to 150, and is used to assess and compare the patient's quality of recovery quantitatively between different interventions. A higher number on the score indicates an improved patient recovery experience. This scale has been validated in the ambulatory surgery setting.
2 secondary outcomes
Block performance time, onset time, and nonsurgical time
Time frame: Within 24 hours of surgery
Opioid use at 24 hours after surgery
Time frame: At 24 hours post-surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 22032599Lalonde DH. Reconstruction of the hand with wide awake surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;38(4):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2011.07.005.
- Background: PubMed 24286736Lalonde D. Minimally invasive anesthesia in wide awake hand surgery. Hand Clin. 2014 Feb;30(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
- Background: PubMed 23411725Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.
- Background: PubMed 27524691Soberon JR Jr, Crookshank JW 3rd, Nossaman BD, Elliott CE, Sisco-Wise LE, Duncan SF. Distal Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Forearm as an Alternative to Proximal Brachial Plexus Blockade in Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery: A Prospective and Randomized Pilot Study. J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Oct;41(10):969-977. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.092. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37189224Meng F, Baradaran A, Jaberi MM, Tran QH, Finlayson R, Luc M, Xu L, Thibaudeau S. Patient-Reported Quality of Recovery after Local Anesthesia versus Brachial Plexus Block in Hand Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Dec 1;152(6):1287-1296. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010688. Epub 2023 May 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There will be no need to share individual participant data based on the objectives set out by our research.
Related trials for Hand Surgery
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Focal Hand Dystonia
Dystonia, Focal Dystonia
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Progressive Gamified Motor Rehabilitation After Carpal Tunnel Release
Carpal Tunnel Surgery
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Muscle MRI Fat Fraction Before Surgery to Predict Strength Recovery After Foot-Drop Surgery in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease
Foot Drop, Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1A
Recruiting
Music Interventions During Wide-Awake Hand Surgery
Anxiety, Surgery
RecruitingObservational study
Functional Benefits of Multisite Upper Limb Surgery in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (RETRO-CHIRc)
Cerebral Palsy, Hemiplegia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fanyi Meng, MD principal investigator
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Local anesthesia with minimal sedation in people with Hand Surgery and Quality of Recovery, run by McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre at 2 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of Recovery 15 Questionnaire (QoR-15) (time frame: At 24 hours post-surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03632304, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2021.