Stroke, AcuteNCT03633422
Evaluation of Stroke Patient Screening
An observational study of Stroke, Acute, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Background and Rationale: Traditionally, stroke rehabilitation studies have been performed in stroke patients beyond the first one to three months poststroke [Stinear et al. 2013; Veerbeek et al. 2014]. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Acute
- How many people
- 845 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 25 Sep 2017to 31 Jul 2019
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Day
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All stroke patients admitted to the University Hospital Zurich, Department of Neurology, Switzerland.
Who may be able to join
- First-ever unilateral ischemic stroke <48 hours, confirmed by MRI-DWI and/or CT
- Age 18 years or older
- Able to follow one-staged commands
- NIHSS arm score ≥1
- Informed consent after participants' information
Who cannot join
- Modified Rankin Scale score >2 before stroke
- Neurological or other diseases affecting the upper limb(s) before stroke
- Intravenous line in the upper limb(s) which limits assessment
- Contra-indications on ethical grounds
- Expected or known non-compliance to participate in the observational study, severe drug or/and alcohol abuse
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Stroke Patient Screening in an Acute Stroke Setting
Background and Rationale:
Traditionally, stroke rehabilitation studies have been performed in stroke patients beyond the first one to three months poststroke [Stinear et al. 2013; Veerbeek et al. 2014]. Acknowledging that early stroke rehabilitation should be initiated soon after stroke onset to optimize stroke outcomes, it is has been stressed that stroke rehabilitation trials should be initiated within the first month [Stinear 2013].
Read more
Early stroke rehabilitation trials face difficulties regarding patient recruitment with corresponding low enrollment rates [AVERT 2015; Winters 2015]. Explanations are for example priority given to (sub)acute medical interventions, highly dynamic situation at a stroke unit, and a more rapid change in patients' abilities when compared to patients in later stages poststroke. With the low enrollment rates (~7%), the generalizability of study results is questionable.
Participant screening methods and procedures for research eligibility are part of the patient selection and recruitment process in clinical trials. However, no information is available regarding screening procedures and methods for these early initiated stroke rehabilitation trials, including reasons for not enrolling patients. This knowledge is essential to improve screening procedures and methods, in order to optimize patient enrollment and with that, increase the generalizability of study results.
Objective:
The objective of this project is to evaluate screening methods and procedures for stroke rehabilitation research.
Study Design:
Observational study
Read the detailed description
Objective:
The objective of this project is to evaluate screening methods and procedures for stroke rehabilitation research in the Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich.
Outcome:
Enrollment rates (defined as the number of patients enrolled per month of recruitment), reasons for non-enrollment, and estimated costs for screening for early stroke rehabilitation studies.
Study Design:
Observational study
- Conditions
- Stroke, Acute
- Keywords
- Rehabilitation, Screening, Enrollment
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reasons why participants are not eligible for an early rehabilitation trial
The reasons for non-enrollment will be measured by counting, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the aRISE study
Measured: 1 Day
Secondary outcomes (2)
Enrolment rate
Defined as the number of patients enrolled per month of screening
Measured: 1 Month
Estimated personnel expenses in Swiss Francs for screening
Swiss Francs associated with screening in the hospital
Measured: 1 Month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Aug 2018
- Study start25 Sep 2017
- Primary completion31 Jul 2019
- Study completion31 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stroke, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ZurichThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 845 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 1 Day
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Zurich
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03633422
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Req-2017-00844
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 24 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 7 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
AVERT Trial Collaboration group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):46-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60690-0. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
PubMed 25892679Stinear C, Ackerley S, Byblow W. Rehabilitation is initiated early after stroke, but most motor rehabilitation trials are not: a systematic review. Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2039-45. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000968. Epub 2013 May 28. No abstract available.
PubMed 23715959Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24505342Winters C, van Wegen EE, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G. Generalizability of the Proportional Recovery Model for the Upper Extremity After an Ischemic Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Aug;29(7):614-22. doi: 10.1177/1545968314562115. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
PubMed 25505223Held JPO, van Duinen J, Luft AR, Veerbeek JM. Eligibility Screening for an Early Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation Study. Front Neurol. 2019 Jul 2;10:683. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00683. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31312170
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Stroke Patient Screening in an Acute Stroke Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03633422
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Req-2017-00844
- Conditions
- Stroke, Acute
- Keywords
- Rehabilitation, Screening, Enrollment
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 845 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ZurichUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background and Rationale:
Traditionally, stroke rehabilitation studies have been performed in stroke patients beyond the first one to three months poststroke [Stinear et al. 2013; Veerbeek et al. 2014]. Acknowledging that early stroke rehabilitation should be initiated soon after stroke onset to optimize stroke outcomes, it is has been stressed that stroke rehabilitation trials should be initiated within the first month [Stinear 2013].
Early stroke rehabilitation trials face difficulties regarding patient recruitment with corresponding low enrollment rates [AVERT 2015; Winters 2015]. Explanations are for example priority given to (sub)acute medical interventions, highly dynamic situation at a stroke unit, and a more rapid change in patients' abilities when compared to patients in later stages poststroke. With the low enrollment rates (~7%), the generalizability of study results is questionable.
Participant screening methods and procedures for research eligibility are part of the patient selection and recruitment process in clinical trials. However, no information is available regarding screening procedures and methods for these early initiated stroke rehabilitation trials, including reasons for not enrolling patients. This knowledge is essential to improve screening procedures and methods, in order to optimize patient enrollment and with that, increase the generalizability of study results.
Objective:
The objective of this project is to evaluate screening methods and procedures for stroke rehabilitation research.
Study Design:
Observational study
Detailed description
Objective:
The objective of this project is to evaluate screening methods and procedures for stroke rehabilitation research in the Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich.
Outcome:
Enrollment rates (defined as the number of patients enrolled per month of recruitment), reasons for non-enrollment, and estimated costs for screening for early stroke rehabilitation studies.
Study Design:
Observational study
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Target follow-up
- 1 Day
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All stroke patients admitted to the University Hospital Zurich, Department of Neurology, Switzerland.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- First-ever unilateral ischemic stroke <48 hours, confirmed by MRI-DWI and/or CT
- Age 18 years or older
- Able to follow one-staged commands
- NIHSS arm score ≥1
- Informed consent after participants' information
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Modified Rankin Scale score >2 before stroke
- Neurological or other diseases affecting the upper limb(s) before stroke
- Intravenous line in the upper limb(s) which limits assessment
- Contra-indications on ethical grounds
- Expected or known non-compliance to participate in the observational study, severe drug or/and alcohol abuse
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Reasons why participants are not eligible for an early rehabilitation trial
Time frame: 1 Day
The reasons for non-enrollment will be measured by counting, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the aRISE study
2 secondary outcomes
Enrolment rate
Time frame: 1 Month
Estimated personnel expenses in Swiss Francs for screening
Time frame: 1 Month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Feb 2020.
- Background: PubMed 25892679AVERT Trial Collaboration group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):46-55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60690-0. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
- Background: PubMed 23715959Stinear C, Ackerley S, Byblow W. Rehabilitation is initiated early after stroke, but most motor rehabilitation trials are not: a systematic review. Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2039-45. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000968. Epub 2013 May 28. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24505342Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, Kwakkel G. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087987. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 25505223Winters C, van Wegen EE, Daffertshofer A, Kwakkel G. Generalizability of the Proportional Recovery Model for the Upper Extremity After an Ischemic Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Aug;29(7):614-22. doi: 10.1177/1545968314562115. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 31312170Held JPO, van Duinen J, Luft AR, Veerbeek JM. Eligibility Screening for an Early Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation Study. Front Neurol. 2019 Jul 2;10:683. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00683. eCollection 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Stroke, Acute
Recruiting
A Pivotal Study Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of Adaptative Tip Catheter in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Role of EEG in Differentiation Between Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Acute Haemorrhagic Stroke
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
The Efficacy and Safety of HRS-4029 in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of iNstroke 5F Aspiration Catheter for Thrombectomy
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Stroke, Acute, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reasons why participants are not eligible for an early rehabilitation trial (time frame: 1 Day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03633422, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Feb 2020.