Nutritional SupportENPICNCT03634943
Evaluation of Nutritional Practices in the Critical Care
An observational study of Nutritional Support and Intensive Care Unit, run by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge at 43 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Background: The adequacy of the artificial Nutritional Support (NS) in the critical care patient has implications in morbidity and prognosis. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are an important tool for healthcare professionals in their daily practice and a method of consultation for the correct treatment of patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nutritional Support, Intensive Care Unit, Critical Illness
- What is being tested?
- Patients with Nutritional Support
- How many people
- 642 participants
- Where
- 43 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 23 Apr 2018to 22 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult Critical Care patients needing Artificial Nutritional Support
Who may be able to join
- Age >18 years old.
- Need of ICU admission >72h.
- Need of Artificial Nutrional Support (Enteral Nutrition or Parenteral Nutrition or both).
Who cannot join
- Not specific exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
43 sites in 1 country.
43 sites in 1 country
Spain43 sites
Hospital Universitario de A Coruña
A Coruña, 15006
Hospital Príncipe de Asturias
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28805
Hospital Quirón Sur
Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
Alicante, 03010
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, 08916
Hospital de Barbastro
Barbastro, Huesca, 22300
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
Hospital Plató
Barcelona, 08006
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau.
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital Universitario de Burgos
Burgos, 09006
Hospital General Universitario de Castellón
Castellon, Castellón, 12004
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28942
Hospital Universitario de Getafe
Getafe, Madrid, 28905
Hospital Universitari Josep Trueta
Girona, 17007
H. General de Granollers
Granollers, Barcelona, 08402
Hospital General San Jorge
Huesca, 22004
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge (Cardiology Unit)
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907
Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa
Leganés, Madrid, 28911
Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova
Lleida, 25198
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (Trauma Unit)
Madrid
Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya
Málaga, 29010
H. Manacor
Manacor, Balearic Islands, 07500
Hospital de Mataró
Mataró, Barcelona, 08304
Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofia
Murcia, 30003
Hosptial General Universitario Morales Meseguer
Murcia, 30008
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Hospital Infanta Cristina
Parla, Madrid, 28981
Hospital Universitario de Puerto Real
Puerto Real, Cádiz, 11510
Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía
San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, 28703
Hospital Sant Joan d' Alacant
Sant Joan d'Alacant, Alicante, 03550
Hospital Mutua Terrasa.
Terrassa, Barcelona, 08221
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46010
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46010
Hospital Universitari Doctor Peset
Valencia, 46017
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
Valladolid, 47003
Hospital Rio Hortega
Valladolid, 47012
Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro
Vigo, Pontevedra, 36312
Hospital Virgen de la Concha
Zamora, 49022
Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, 50009
Hospital Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, 50009
Hospital Royo Villanova
Zaragoza, 50015
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Nutritional Practices in the Critical Care Patient at the Intensive Care Unit
Background: The adequacy of the artificial Nutritional Support (NS) in the critical care patient has implications in morbidity and prognosis. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are an important tool for healthcare professionals in their daily practice and a method of consultation for the correct treatment of patients. Also, the evidence remains low and there are important controversies regarding the NS in the critical care patient.
Hypothesis: The NS generates great controversy in the professionals involved in the care of critical care patients due to the contradictory results in literature. Despite this, the CPG should serve to standardize the treatment of patients and provide a better adherence to current knowledge in this setting. The importance of NS is underestimated and there is a need to perform proper evaluation of the impact of nutrition.
Read more
Objectives: To evaluate and analyze NS practices in critically ill patients in different ICUs and assess the adherence to CPGs. To evaluate the relationship of nutrition and outcomes in the ICU.
Methodology: Prospective multicenter observational study. Collection of variables from different participating ICUs and the characteristics of the NS of the different admitted patients. Monitoring of nutritional practices and complications. Evaluation of outcomes (e.g. mortality, ICU complications, etc.) with NS.
Expected results: Better understanding of the NS and its impact on morbidity and mortality; development of strategies to reduce low adherence to CPGs, improving the quality of care associated with this field in critical care patients; obtain clinical information that will serve as a basis for conducting intervention studies.
Read the detailed description
Methods (additional information): The NS (Nutritional Support) in the ICUs will be administered according to the usual practice of the medical and nursing staff and to the protocols established in each unit. The rate of initiation, the dose of macronutrients and the increase in contributions will be made according to the criteria of each participating ICU and the responsible physician (including the use of prokinetics or parenteral nutrition).
All the complications described associated with the artificial Nutritional support and others related to the critical patient will be evaluated daily by the research team and reflected in the electronic data collection form (eCRF).
The eCRF has been carried out through the REDCAP ™ platform and designed by the Department of Information Technology of Lleida of the Universitari Arnau de Vilanova Hospital, under the supervision of Dr. Lluís Servià, principal investigator of the present project. The responsible of the computer centre is Joan Escobar-Ortiz. The data will be stored in a server of the center and will be coded to comply with the confidentiality of the same and for a correct anonymization of patients based on Regulatory Laws.
The study has the approval of each ethics committee of each participating centre.
Statistical analyses will be performed by the department of statistics of University of Lleida under close supervision of Javier Trujillano-Cabello and the principal investigators of the present study.
- Conditions
- Nutritional Support, Intensive Care Unit, Critical Illness
- Being tested
- Patients with Nutritional Support
- Keywords
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Medical subject headings
- Critical Illness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patients with Nutritional SupportOther
Evaluation of Enteral Nutrition or Parenteral Nutrition or both administered to the patients needing artificial Nutritional Support
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Nutritional Support | Patients expected to be admitted >72h at the Intensive Care Unit with the need of artificial Nutritional Support Receives: Other: Patients with Nutritional Support |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Kilocalories delivered by enteral and/or parenteral route and Energy balance
Kilocalories delivered by nutritional support - (minus) nutritional support target in Kilocalories
Measured: Daily to a maximum of 14 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
gram of proteins delivered by enteral and/or parenteral route
Proteins delivered by nutritional support - (minus) nutritional support target in gram of proteins
Measured: Daily to a maximum of 14 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Rate of complications related with nutritional support (Enteral and/or Parenteral route)
Main artificial nutritional support serious complications (i.e. constipation, higher residual gastric volume, vomiting, diarrhea associated with enteral nutrition, meseteric ischemia) requiring a therapeutical intervention or modification of the nutritional support - safety related variable
Measured: Daily to a maximum of 14 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Rate of 28-day mortality associated with the characteristics of nutritional support (e.g., gram of proteins, etc.)
Influence of nutritional support or any nutrition-related variable on mortality during ICU admission
Measured: Daily to a maximum of 28 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Secondary outcomes (3)
Time from Intensive Care Unit admission to the start of enteral nutrition
Time frame in hours from Intensive Care Unit admission to the start of enteral nutrition
Measured: Up to 120 hours after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Dose of vasoactive drugs
Dose of vasoactive drugs (highest daily), in μg/kg/min
Measured: Daily to a maximum of 14 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Glycaemic control
Daily measurement of maximum and minimum glucose
Measured: Daily to a maximum of 14 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2018
- Study start23 Apr 2018
- Primary completion15 Sep 2018
- Study completion22 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nutritional SupportStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 642 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Juan Carlos Lopez-Delgado, PhD, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
- Investigators
- Teodoro Grau-Carmona, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Hospital 12 de OctubreLluís Servia-Goixart, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova / Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida (IRBLleida) Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de LleidaJuan Carlos Lopez-Delgado, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03634943
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PR401/17
- Acronym
- ENPIC
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 12 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data will be analyzed by the principal investigators of each participating hospital. Share IPD is not allowed in the present study to other researchers.
Publications
Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2001 Dec;29(12):2264-70. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200112000-00005.
PubMed 11801821Heyland D, Cook DJ, Winder B, Brylowski L, Van deMark H, Guyatt G. Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a prospective survey. Crit Care Med. 1995 Jun;23(6):1055-60. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199506000-00010.
PubMed 7774216Correia MI, Waitzberg DL. The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clin Nutr. 2003 Jun;22(3):235-9. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(02)00215-7.
PubMed 12765661Dvir D, Cohen J, Singer P. Computerized energy balance and complications in critically ill patients: an observational study. Clin Nutr. 2006 Feb;25(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.10.010.
PubMed 16321459Deitch EA. Role of the gut lymphatic system in multiple organ failure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001 Apr;7(2):92-8. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200104000-00007.
PubMed 11373517Harvey SE, Parrott F, Harrison DA, Bear DE, Segaran E, Beale R, Bellingan G, Leonard R, Mythen MG, Rowan KM; CALORIES Trial Investigators. Trial of the route of early nutritional support in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 30;371(18):1673-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409860. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
PubMed 25271389Patel JJ, Codner P. Controversies in Critical Care Nutrition Support. Crit Care Clin. 2016 Apr;32(2):173-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2015.11.002. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
PubMed 27016160Artinian V, Krayem H, DiGiovine B. Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients. Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):960-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.4.960.
PubMed 16608945Flordelis Lasierra JL, Perez-Vela JL, Montejo Gonzalez JC. Enteral nutrition in the hemodynamically unstable critically ill patient. Med Intensiva. 2015 Jan-Feb;39(1):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Jun 4. English, Spanish.
PubMed 24907000Arabi YM, Aldawood AS, Haddad SH, Al-Dorzi HM, Tamim HM, Jones G, Mehta S, McIntyre L, Solaiman O, Sakkijha MH, Sadat M, Afesh L; PermiT Trial Group. Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2398-408. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1502826. Epub 2015 May 20.
PubMed 25992505National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network; Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, Hite RD, Moss M, Morris A, Dong N, Rock P. Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Feb 22;307(8):795-803. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.137. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
PubMed 22307571Wischmeyer PE. Are we creating survivors...or victims in critical care? Delivering targeted nutrition to improve outcomes. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016 Aug;22(4):279-84. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000332. No abstract available.
PubMed 27327244Wei X, Day AG, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Heyland DK. The Association Between Nutritional Adequacy and Long-Term Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1569-79. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001000.
PubMed 25855901Lopez-Delgado JC, Servia-Goixart L, Grau-Carmona T, Bordeje-Laguna L, Portugal-Rodriguez E, Lorencio-Cardenas C, Vera-Artazcoz P, Macaya-Redin L, Martinez-Carmona JF, Marin Corral J, Flordelis-Lasierra JL, Seron-Arbeloa C, Alcazar-Espin MLN, Navas-Moya E, Aldunate-Calvo S, Nieto Martino B, Martinez de Lagran I. Factors associated with the need of parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients after the initiation of enteral nutrition therapy. Front Nutr. 2023 Aug 24;10:1250305. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1250305. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 37693244Servia-Goixart L, Lopez-Delgado JC, Grau-Carmona T, Trujillano-Cabello J, Bordeje-Laguna ML, Mor-Marco E, Portugal-Rodriguez E, Lorencio-Cardenas C, Montejo-Gonzalez JC, Vera-Artazcoz P, Macaya-Redin L, Martinez-Carmona JF, Iglesias-Rodriguez R, Monge-Donaire D, Flordelis-Lasierra JL, Llorente-Ruiz B, Menor-Fernandez EM, Martinez de Lagran I, Yebenes-Reyes JC; ENPIC Study Investigators. Evaluation of Nutritional Practices in the Critical Care patient (The ENPIC study): Does nutrition really affect ICU mortality? Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Feb;47:325-332. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.11.018. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
PubMed 35063222
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Nutritional Practices in the Critical Care Patient at the Intensive Care Unit
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03634943
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ENPIC / PR401/17
- Conditions
- Nutritional Support, Intensive Care Unit, Critical Illness
- Keywords
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 642 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitari de BellvitgeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
- Study start
- 23 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: The adequacy of the artificial Nutritional Support (NS) in the critical care patient has implications in morbidity and prognosis. Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are an important tool for healthcare professionals in their daily practice and a method of consultation for the correct treatment of patients. Also, the evidence remains low and there are important controversies regarding the NS in the critical care patient.
Hypothesis: The NS generates great controversy in the professionals involved in the care of critical care patients due to the contradictory results in literature. Despite this, the CPG should serve to standardize the treatment of patients and provide a better adherence to current knowledge in this setting. The importance of NS is underestimated and there is a need to perform proper evaluation of the impact of nutrition.
Objectives: To evaluate and analyze NS practices in critically ill patients in different ICUs and assess the adherence to CPGs. To evaluate the relationship of nutrition and outcomes in the ICU.
Methodology: Prospective multicenter observational study. Collection of variables from different participating ICUs and the characteristics of the NS of the different admitted patients. Monitoring of nutritional practices and complications. Evaluation of outcomes (e.g. mortality, ICU complications, etc.) with NS.
Expected results: Better understanding of the NS and its impact on morbidity and mortality; development of strategies to reduce low adherence to CPGs, improving the quality of care associated with this field in critical care patients; obtain clinical information that will serve as a basis for conducting intervention studies.
Detailed description
Methods (additional information): The NS (Nutritional Support) in the ICUs will be administered according to the usual practice of the medical and nursing staff and to the protocols established in each unit. The rate of initiation, the dose of macronutrients and the increase in contributions will be made according to the criteria of each participating ICU and the responsible physician (including the use of prokinetics or parenteral nutrition).
All the complications described associated with the artificial Nutritional support and others related to the critical patient will be evaluated daily by the research team and reflected in the electronic data collection form (eCRF).
The eCRF has been carried out through the REDCAP ™ platform and designed by the Department of Information Technology of Lleida of the Universitari Arnau de Vilanova Hospital, under the supervision of Dr. Lluís Servià, principal investigator of the present project. The responsible of the computer centre is Joan Escobar-Ortiz. The data will be stored in a server of the center and will be coded to comply with the confidentiality of the same and for a correct anonymization of patients based on Regulatory Laws.
The study has the approval of each ethics committee of each participating centre.
Statistical analyses will be performed by the department of statistics of University of Lleida under close supervision of Javier Trujillano-Cabello and the principal investigators of the present study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Nutritional Support | – | Other: Patients with Nutritional SupportPatients expected to be admitted >72h at the Intensive Care Unit with the need of artificial Nutritional Support |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult Critical Care patients needing Artificial Nutritional Support
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age >18 years old.
- Need of ICU admission >72h.
- Need of Artificial Nutrional Support (Enteral Nutrition or Parenteral Nutrition or both).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Not specific exclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with Nutritional SupportEvaluation of Enteral Nutrition or Parenteral Nutrition or both administered to the patients needing artificial Nutritional Support | Other | Patients with Nutritional Support |
Primary outcome
Kilocalories delivered by enteral and/or parenteral route and Energy balance
Time frame: Daily to a maximum of 14 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Kilocalories delivered by nutritional support - (minus) nutritional support target in Kilocalories
gram of proteins delivered by enteral and/or parenteral route
Time frame: Daily to a maximum of 14 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Proteins delivered by nutritional support - (minus) nutritional support target in gram of proteins
Rate of complications related with nutritional support (Enteral and/or Parenteral route)
Time frame: Daily to a maximum of 14 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Main artificial nutritional support serious complications (i.e. constipation, higher residual gastric volume, vomiting, diarrhea associated with enteral nutrition, meseteric ischemia) requiring a therapeutical intervention or modification of the nutritional support - safety related variable
Rate of 28-day mortality associated with the characteristics of nutritional support (e.g., gram of proteins, etc.)
Time frame: Daily to a maximum of 28 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Influence of nutritional support or any nutrition-related variable on mortality during ICU admission
3 secondary outcomes
Time from Intensive Care Unit admission to the start of enteral nutrition
Time frame: Up to 120 hours after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Dose of vasoactive drugs
Time frame: Daily to a maximum of 14 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Glycaemic control
Time frame: Daily to a maximum of 14 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 11801821Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Early enteral nutrition in acutely ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care Med. 2001 Dec;29(12):2264-70. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200112000-00005.
- Results publication: PubMed 7774216Heyland D, Cook DJ, Winder B, Brylowski L, Van deMark H, Guyatt G. Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: a prospective survey. Crit Care Med. 1995 Jun;23(6):1055-60. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199506000-00010.
- Results publication: PubMed 12765661Correia MI, Waitzberg DL. The impact of malnutrition on morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and costs evaluated through a multivariate model analysis. Clin Nutr. 2003 Jun;22(3):235-9. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(02)00215-7.
- Results publication: PubMed 16321459Dvir D, Cohen J, Singer P. Computerized energy balance and complications in critically ill patients: an observational study. Clin Nutr. 2006 Feb;25(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.10.010.
- Results publication: PubMed 11373517Deitch EA. Role of the gut lymphatic system in multiple organ failure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001 Apr;7(2):92-8. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200104000-00007.
- Results publication: PubMed 25271389Harvey SE, Parrott F, Harrison DA, Bear DE, Segaran E, Beale R, Bellingan G, Leonard R, Mythen MG, Rowan KM; CALORIES Trial Investigators. Trial of the route of early nutritional support in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 30;371(18):1673-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409860. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 27016160Patel JJ, Codner P. Controversies in Critical Care Nutrition Support. Crit Care Clin. 2016 Apr;32(2):173-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2015.11.002. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 16608945Artinian V, Krayem H, DiGiovine B. Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients. Chest. 2006 Apr;129(4):960-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.4.960.
- Results publication: PubMed 24907000Flordelis Lasierra JL, Perez-Vela JL, Montejo Gonzalez JC. Enteral nutrition in the hemodynamically unstable critically ill patient. Med Intensiva. 2015 Jan-Feb;39(1):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Jun 4. English, Spanish.
- Results publication: PubMed 25992505Arabi YM, Aldawood AS, Haddad SH, Al-Dorzi HM, Tamim HM, Jones G, Mehta S, McIntyre L, Solaiman O, Sakkijha MH, Sadat M, Afesh L; PermiT Trial Group. Permissive Underfeeding or Standard Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2398-408. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1502826. Epub 2015 May 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 22307571National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network; Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, Hite RD, Moss M, Morris A, Dong N, Rock P. Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury: the EDEN randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Feb 22;307(8):795-803. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.137. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 27327244Wischmeyer PE. Are we creating survivors...or victims in critical care? Delivering targeted nutrition to improve outcomes. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016 Aug;22(4):279-84. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000332. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data will be analyzed by the principal investigators of each participating hospital. Share IPD is not allowed in the present study to other researchers.
Related trials for Nutritional Support
Not yet recruiting
Tailored Nutrition vs. Exercise Prehabilitation Before Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms
Recruiting
An Online Intuitive Eating Program for Pregnant Women With Obesity to Support Well-Being
Excessive Gestational Weight Gain, Pregnancy
Active, not recruiting
NYUCI-ES: Psychosocial Intervention to Improve Health Outcomes for Chinese and Korean ADRD Caregivers
Dementia Caregivers, Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
AI-Supported Mobile High-Impact and Strengthening Exercise Program in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Density
Osteopenia
Recruiting
Linking Education, Produce Provision, and Community Referrals to Improve Diabetes Care (LINK)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Nutrition Poor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Teodoro Grau-Carmona, Ph.D. principal investigator
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Lluís Servia-Goixart, Ph.D. principal investigator
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova / Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida (IRBLleida) Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida
Juan Carlos Lopez-Delgado, Ph.D principal investigator
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
43 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Nutritional Support and Intensive Care Unit, run by Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge at 43 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 43 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Kilocalories delivered by enteral and/or parenteral route and Energy balance (time frame: Daily to a maximum of 14 days after Intensive Care Unit Admission). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03634943, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2022.