AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic ProstatitisNCT03641807

Different Modes of Assessment on Acupuncture Effect on Patients With Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

A study testing Acupuncture in people with Chronic Prostatitis and Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome, run by Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences at 4 sites in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a common disorder. Some studies have indicated that acupuncture may ameliorate the symptoms of CP/CPPS. However, results are varied and range widely, perhaps due to different modes of assessment including timepoints, places of assessment, and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, men only
What is being tested?
Acupuncture
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
4 sitesChina
Study dates
1 Nov 2018to 30 Oct 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • meet the diagnostic criteria according to the NIH CP/CPPS consensus: discomfort or pain in the pelvic region for at least 3 months in the previous 6 months
  • 18-50 years
  • NIH-CPSI total score ≥15

Who cannot join

  • Urologic disease
  • Residual urine volume ≥100 milliliter (mL)
  • Qmax ≤15mL/s
  • Use 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, alpha-blockers, antibiotics or any other prostatitis-specific medication during previous 1 month
  • Diseases that influence urologic symptoms are multiple sclerosis, multiple system atrophy, stroke, Alzheimer disease, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, cauda equina injury, and sexually transmitted disease
  • Any acute disease or severe disease requiring treatment

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

Jing Zhou, Master contact

86-010-15650729586

zjinbj@sina.com

China4 sites, 4 recruiting
  • The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine

    Changsha, Hunan

    Wei Zhang

    Recruiting
  • West China Hospital of Sichuan University

    Chengdu, Sichuan

    Ning Li

    Recruiting
  • Hengyang Hospital Affiliated to Hunan University of Chinese Medicine

    Hengyang, Hunan

    Zenghui Yue

    Recruiting
  • Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

    Yantai, Shandong

    Zhiwei Zang

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: The Comparison of Three Different Modes of Assessment on Acupuncture Effect on Patients With Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: a Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a common disorder. Some studies have indicated that acupuncture may ameliorate the symptoms of CP/CPPS. However, results are varied and range widely, perhaps due to different modes of assessment including timepoints, places of assessment, and especially subjective scales. We propose to determine the efficacy of acupuncture relative to sham acupuncture for patients with CP/CPPS, and compare different modes of assessment regarding the therapeutic effects of acupuncture.

Methods: Sixty patients with CP/CPPS will be randomly assigned to receive either acupuncture or sham-acupuncture (30 patients, each). Treatment will be conducted 3 times/week, for 4 weeks. The primary outcomes will each be the change from baseline of the total NIH (National Institutes of Health) CPSI (Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index) score associated with 3 modes of assessment: Mode 1, the scale recorded at the hospital within 10minutes after the last session of 4 weeks of acupuncture treatment, in the company of the outcome assessors; Mode 2, the scale recorded the same day, but not at the hospital; and Mode 3, the scale recorded at the hospital 1 to 3 days after the last acupuncture session. The 3 key secondary outcomes include will be the 3 modes assessment of the changes from baseline of the NIH-CPSI total scores in the acupuncture group at week 4 after treatment. Analysis was by intention-to-treat, and multiplicity was controlled for with a step-down closed-testing procedure.

Being tested
Acupuncture, Sham acupuncture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AcupunctureOther

    Bilateral BL23, BL33, BL35 and SP6 will be inserted using Hwato-brand disposable acupuncture needles. With patients prone, after routine sterilization, bilateralBL33 will be inserted to a depth of 50 to 60mm with a 30° to 45° angle in an inferomedial direction using needles (0.30mm in diameter, 75mm in length). Bilateral BL35 will be inserted to a depth of 50 to 60mm with a slightly superolateral direction using needles (0.30mm in diameter, 75mm in length). BL23 and SP6 will be inserted vertically to a depth of 25 to 30mm using needles (0.30mm in diameter, 40mm in length). Manipulation of the needles by lifting and thrusting combined with twirling and rotating evenly will be performed until deqi occurs, defined as a sensation of soreness, numbness, heaviness, and ache. Manipulations will be applied every 10minutes and each session will last for 30minutes.

  • Sham acupunctureOther

    Bilateral sham BL 23, BL 33, BL 35 (15mmto BL23, BL33, and BL35) and SP6 (10mmto SP6) will be inserted by needles (0.20mm in diameter, 25mm in length) to a depth of 2 to 3mm without manipulation.

Study groups in NCT03641807
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AcupunctureExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Acupuncture
Sham acupunctureSham comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Sham acupuncture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The change from baseline in total score of National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) measured by the assessment of mode 1

    The National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) has a total score range from 0 to 43 and higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The 9 items of this scale are stratified into 3 domains which are pain/discomfort (location/type, frequency and severity, 0-21 points), urinary symptoms (10 points) and quality of life (0-12 points). Mode 1, the scale is recorded at the hospital within 10minutes after the twelfth (last) treatment of the 4-week treatment period, in the company of the outcome assessors.

    Measured: week 4

  2. The change from baseline in total score of National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) measured by the assessment of mode 2

    The National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) has a total score range from 0 to 43 and higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The 9 items of this scale are stratified into 3 domains which are pain/discomfort (location/type, frequency and severity, 0-21 points), urinary symptoms (10 points) and quality of life (0-12 points). Mode 2, the scale is recorded the same day, but not at the hospital.

    Measured: week 4

  3. The change from baseline in total score of National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) measured by the assessment of mode 3

    The National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) has a total score range from 0 to 43 and higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The 9 items of this scale are stratified into 3 domains which are pain/discomfort (location/type, frequency and severity, 0-21 points), urinary symptoms (10 points) and quality of life (0-12 points). Mode 3, the scale is recorded at the hospital 1 to 3 days after the last acupuncture session.

    Measured: 1 to 3 days after the last acupuncture session

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Mode 1 of assessment of the changes from baseline of NIH-CPSI total score in the acupuncture group

    The National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) has a total score range from 0 to 43 and higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The 9 items of this scale are stratified into 3 domains which are pain/discomfort (location/type, frequency and severity, 0-21 points), urinary symptoms (10 points) and quality of life (0-12 points). Mode 1, the scale is recorded at the hospital within 10minutes after the twelfth (last) treatment of the 4-week treatment period, in the company of the outcome assessors.

    Measured: week 4

  2. Mode 2 of assessment of the changes from baseline of NIH-CPSI total score in the acupuncture group

    The National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) has a total score range from 0 to 43 and higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The 9 items of this scale are stratified into 3 domains which are pain/discomfort (location/type, frequency and severity, 0-21 points), urinary symptoms (10 points) and quality of life (0-12 points). Mode 2, the scale is recorded the same day, but not at the hospital.

    Measured: week 4

  3. Mode 3 of assessment of the changes from baseline of NIH-CPSI total score in the acupuncture group

    The National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) has a total score range from 0 to 43 and higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The 9 items of this scale are stratified into 3 domains which are pain/discomfort (location/type, frequency and severity, 0-21 points), urinary symptoms (10 points) and quality of life (0-12 points). Mode 3, the scale is recorded at the hospital 1 to 3 days after the last acupuncture session.

    Measured: 1 to 3 days after the last acupuncture session

  4. The change from baseline of subscales scores of NIH-CPSI

    The National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) has a total score range from 0 to 43 and higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The 9 items of this scale are stratified into 3 domains which are pain/discomfort (location/type, frequency and severity, 0-21 points), urinary symptoms (10 points) and quality of life (0-12 points).

    Measured: week 4

  5. The change from baseline of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

    International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (Hong Kong Chinese version 2) is a valid, reliable and sensitive measure to assess Chinese males with 7 questions concerning urinary symptoms and 1 question concerning quality of life [34]. Total score of IPSS ranges from 0-35 (asymptomatic to very symptomatic). Symptoms evaluated by IPSS are categorized as mild (0-7), moderate (8-19) and severe (20-35).

    Measured: week 4

  6. The proportions of participants in each response category of the Global Response Assessment (GRA)

    Global Response Assessment (GRA) which is composed of 7 response categories: markedly worsened, moderately worsened, slightly worsened, no change, slightly improved, moderately improved, and markedly improved.

    Measured: week 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Aug 2018
  2. Study start1 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03641807
Sponsor's protocol ID
2018-098-KY
Status last verified
Sep 2020
First submitted
14 Aug 2018
Last updated
9 Sep 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Acupuncture in people with Chronic Prostatitis and Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome, run by Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences at 4 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jing Zhou, Master (86-010-15650729586, zjinbj@sina.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The change from baseline in total score of National Institutes of Health-chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI) measured by the assessment of mode 1 (time frame: week 4). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in