Lumbar Degenerative Disc DiseaseNCT03647501
Lumbar Fusion With Nexxt Spine 3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Cages
A study testing Interbody cage (titanium) and Interbody cage (PEEK) in people with Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, run by Ohio State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to assess and compare radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients who are to undergo combined interbody/posterolateral lumbar fusion procedures, supplemented with pedicle screw instrumentation, using one of the following interbody cages; the Nexxt Spine Nexxt… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
- What is being tested?
- Interbody cage (titanium) and Interbody cage (PEEK)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Aug 2018to 16 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is scheduled to undergo combined interbody and posterolateral spinal fusion surgery using either the Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or HonourTM PEEK cage in conjunction with local autograft bone, and supplementation with a pedicle screw system.
- Subject must be over the age of 18 years old.
- Subject has been unresponsive to conservative care for a minimum of 6 months.
- The subject must in the investigator's opinion, be psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to fully comply with this protocol including the required follow-up visits, the filling out of required forms, and have the ability to understand and give written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with previous lumbar arthrodesis surgery.
- Subjects requiring additional bone grafting materials other than local autograft bone.
- Subject has inadequate tissue coverage over the operative site.
- Subject has an open wound local to the operative area, or rapid joint disease, bone absorption, or osteoporosis.
- Subject has a condition requiring medications that may interfere with bone or soft tissue healing (i.e., oral or parenteral glucocorticoids, immunosuppressives, methotrexate, etc.).
- Subject has an active local or systemic infection.
Show all 14Show fewer
- Subject has a metal sensitivity/foreign body sensitivity.
- Subject is morbidly obese, defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40.
- Subject has any medical condition or extenuating circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study.
- Subject is currently involved in another investigational drug or device study that could confound study data.
- Subject has a history (present or past) of substance abuse (recreational drugs, prescription drugs or alcohol) that in the investigator's opinion may interfere with protocol assessments and/or with the subject's ability to complete the protocol required follow-up.
- Subjects who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant in the next 12 months or who are lactating.
- Subject is involved in or planning to engage in litigation or receiving Worker's Compensation related to neck or back pain.
- Subject is a prisoner.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Lumbar Fusion With 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Interbody Cages - A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Nexxt Matrixx(TM) Versus PEEK Cages
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to assess and compare radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients who are to undergo combined interbody/posterolateral lumbar fusion procedures, supplemented with pedicle screw instrumentation, using one of the following interbody cages; the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or the HonourTM poly-ether-ether-ketone cage.
Read the detailed description
This randomized controlled trial will prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Nexxt MatrixxTM System titanium implant supplemented with a pedicle screw system as compared to a representative PEEK cage currently used in routine fashion for lumbar interbody fusion procedures. This study will capture clinical and radiographic outcomes on patients up to 2 years post operatively. Both cages will be used in conjunction with milled local autograft bone generated as part of the spinal fusion procedure (no iliac crest autograft will be utilized).
This single centered study will enroll up to 70 subjects (n = 35 per group), with subjects followed for 24 months post-surgery. All subjects enrolled in the study will be recruited from a pool of subjects eligible for combined interbody/posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery.
Subjects will be randomized in the trial to receive either the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or the HonourTM PEEK cage supplemented with a pedicle screw system and milled local autograft bone. Subject randomization will be stratified according to smoking status. Subjects will be blinded to their group status for the duration of the study assessments and procedures (24 months post-operatively). Subject study data will be collected preoperatively, intra-operatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.
- Conditions
- Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Lumbar Spinal Deformity, Lumbar Spondylosis
- Being tested
- Interbody cage (titanium), Interbody cage (PEEK)
- Keywords
- lumbar spinal arthrodesis, interbody cage, 3D-printing
- Medical subject headings
- Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Spinal Stenosis, Spondylolisthesis, Spondylosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Interbody cage (titanium)Device
Subject will be implanted with a 3D-printed titanium cage during their lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
Interbody cage (PEEK)Device
Subject will be implanted with a poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage during their lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 3D-printed titanium cage | Active comparator | Subjects enrolled in this arm will have the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage (interbody cage) implanted at each level of 1 or 2-level lumbar arthrodesis procedures. All constructs will be supplemented with a pedicle screw system (Depuy Synthes Expedium) cleared for lumbar spinal fusion. Receives: Device: Interbody cage (titanium) |
| Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage | Active comparator | Subjects enrolled in this arm will have the HonourTM poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage (interbody cage) implanted at each level of 1 or 2-level lumbar arthrodesis procedures. All constructs will be supplemented with a pedicle screw system (Depuy Synthes Expedium) cleared for lumbar spinal fusion. Receives: Device: Interbody cage (PEEK) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Interbody Radiographic Fusion Rate
Interbody fusion will be graded using the Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser (BSF) Scale which classifies fusion between the interbody cage and adjacent bone on a scale of 1-3 where a higher score indicates a better outcome. The grades are defined as follows: Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser-Grade 1 (BSF-1) indicates radiographical pseudarthrosis, Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser-Grade 2 (BSF-2) is defined by radiographical locked pseudarthrosis, and Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser-Grade 3 (BSF-3) is radiographical fusion, indicating the best outcome. The subject will be considered a success if fusion is a Grade BSF-3 at 6 months.
Measured: 6 months post-operatively
Secondary outcomes (1)
Post-operative Timing of Fusion
Secondary measures of effectiveness will be determined by timing of fusion observed in X-rays post-operatively. Fusion at one year was defined as a difference in cobb angle of the operated levels between flexion and extension views. More than 2 degrees of change between views indicated non-union at one year.
Measured: 12 months post-operatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2018
- Study start22 Aug 2018
- Primary completion16 Mar 2022
- Study completion16 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lumbar Degenerative Disc DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ohio State UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- All subjects will be randomized in the trial to receive either the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or the HonourTM PEEK cage supplemented with a pedicle screw system and milled local autograft bone. Subject randomization will be stratified according to smoking status.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ohio State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nexxt Spine, LLC
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrew Grossbach, Ohio State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03647501
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018H0008
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 21 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Anjarwalla NK, Morcom RK, Fraser RD. Supplementary stabilization with anterior lumbar intervertebral fusion--a radiologic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 15;31(11):1281-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000217692.90624.ab.
PubMed 16688045Fernyhough JC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC, Edwards CC, Levine AM. Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Dec;17(12):1474-80. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199212000-00006.
PubMed 1471005Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1131-41. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00002.
PubMed 12045508Gotz HE, Muller M, Emmel A, Holzwarth U, Erben RG, Stangl R. Effect of surface finish on the osseointegration of laser-treated titanium alloy implants. Biomaterials. 2004 Aug;25(18):4057-64. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.002.
PubMed 15046896Hangai M, Kaneoka K, Kuno S, Hinotsu S, Sakane M, Mamizuka N, Sakai S, Ochiai N. Factors associated with lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in the elderly. Spine J. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):732-40. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.07.392. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
PubMed 18037353Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005 Sep;26(27):5474-91. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002.
PubMed 15860204Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007 Nov;28(32):4845-69. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
PubMed 17686513Laurencin C, Khan Y, El-Amin SF. Bone graft substitutes. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006 Jan;3(1):49-57. doi: 10.1586/17434440.3.1.49.
PubMed 16359252Laurie SW, Kaban LB, Mulliken JB, Murray JE. Donor-site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984 Jun;73(6):933-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198406000-00014.
PubMed 6374708Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lee DH, Kim YT, Lee HS. Fusion rates of instrumented lumbar spinal arthrodesis according to surgical approach: a systematic review of randomized trials. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Mar;3(1):39-47. doi: 10.4055/cios.2011.3.1.39. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
PubMed 21369477Li JP, Habibovic P, van den Doel M, Wilson CE, de Wijn JR, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K. Bone ingrowth in porous titanium implants produced by 3D fiber deposition. Biomaterials. 2007 Jun;28(18):2810-20. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.020. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
PubMed 17367852Millennium Research Group (MRG) US Markets for Spinal Implants 2013
Nakada H, Sakae T, LeGeros RZ, LeGeros JP, Suwa T, Numata Y, Kobayashi K. Early tissue response to modified implant surfaces using back scattered imaging. Implant Dent. 2007 Sep;16(3):281-9. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3180e92a78.
PubMed 17846544Nemoto O, Asazuma T, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Yasuoka H, Fujikawa A. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation. Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2150-5. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3466-9. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
PubMed 25015180Olivares-Navarrete R, Hyzy SL, Gittens RA 1st, Schneider JM, Haithcock DA, Ullrich PF, Slosar PJ, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Rough titanium alloys regulate osteoblast production of angiogenic factors. Spine J. 2013 Nov;13(11):1563-70. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.047. Epub 2013 May 14.
PubMed 23684238
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lumbar Fusion With 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Interbody Cages - A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Nexxt Matrixx(TM) Versus PEEK Cages
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03647501
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2018H0008
- Conditions
- Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Lumbar Spinal Deformity, Lumbar Spondylosis
- Keywords
- lumbar spinal arthrodesis, interbody cage, 3D-printing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ohio State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Nexxt Spine, LLC
- Study start
- 22 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Jun 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to assess and compare radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients who are to undergo combined interbody/posterolateral lumbar fusion procedures, supplemented with pedicle screw instrumentation, using one of the following interbody cages; the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or the HonourTM poly-ether-ether-ketone cage.
Detailed description
This randomized controlled trial will prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Nexxt MatrixxTM System titanium implant supplemented with a pedicle screw system as compared to a representative PEEK cage currently used in routine fashion for lumbar interbody fusion procedures. This study will capture clinical and radiographic outcomes on patients up to 2 years post operatively. Both cages will be used in conjunction with milled local autograft bone generated as part of the spinal fusion procedure (no iliac crest autograft will be utilized).
This single centered study will enroll up to 70 subjects (n = 35 per group), with subjects followed for 24 months post-surgery. All subjects enrolled in the study will be recruited from a pool of subjects eligible for combined interbody/posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery.
Subjects will be randomized in the trial to receive either the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or the HonourTM PEEK cage supplemented with a pedicle screw system and milled local autograft bone. Subject randomization will be stratified according to smoking status. Subjects will be blinded to their group status for the duration of the study assessments and procedures (24 months post-operatively). Subject study data will be collected preoperatively, intra-operatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- All subjects will be randomized in the trial to receive either the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or the HonourTM PEEK cage supplemented with a pedicle screw system and milled local autograft bone. Subject randomization will be stratified according to smoking status.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 3D-printed titanium cage | Active comparator | Device: Interbody cage (titanium)Subjects enrolled in this arm will have the Nexxt Spine Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage (interbody cage) implanted at each level of 1 or 2-level lumbar arthrodesis procedures. All constructs will be supplemented with a pedicle screw system (Depuy Synthes Expedium) cleared for lumbar spinal fusion. |
| Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage | Active comparator | Device: Interbody cage (PEEK)Subjects enrolled in this arm will have the HonourTM poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage (interbody cage) implanted at each level of 1 or 2-level lumbar arthrodesis procedures. All constructs will be supplemented with a pedicle screw system (Depuy Synthes Expedium) cleared for lumbar spinal fusion. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subject is scheduled to undergo combined interbody and posterolateral spinal fusion surgery using either the Nexxt MatrixxTM 3D-printed titanium cage or HonourTM PEEK cage in conjunction with local autograft bone, and supplementation with a pedicle screw system.
- Subject must be over the age of 18 years old.
- Subject has been unresponsive to conservative care for a minimum of 6 months.
- The subject must in the investigator's opinion, be psychosocially, mentally, and physically able to fully comply with this protocol including the required follow-up visits, the filling out of required forms, and have the ability to understand and give written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Subjects with previous lumbar arthrodesis surgery.
- Subjects requiring additional bone grafting materials other than local autograft bone.
- Subject has inadequate tissue coverage over the operative site.
- Subject has an open wound local to the operative area, or rapid joint disease, bone absorption, or osteoporosis.
- Subject has a condition requiring medications that may interfere with bone or soft tissue healing (i.e., oral or parenteral glucocorticoids, immunosuppressives, methotrexate, etc.).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Interbody cage (titanium)Subject will be implanted with a 3D-printed titanium cage during their lumbar interbody fusion surgery. | Device | 3D-printed titanium cage |
| Interbody cage (PEEK)Subject will be implanted with a poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage during their lumbar interbody fusion surgery. | Device | Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage |
Primary outcome
Interbody Radiographic Fusion Rate
Time frame: 6 months post-operatively
Interbody fusion will be graded using the Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser (BSF) Scale which classifies fusion between the interbody cage and adjacent bone on a scale of 1-3 where a higher score indicates a better outcome. The grades are defined as follows: Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser-Grade 1 (BSF-1) indicates radiographical pseudarthrosis, Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser-Grade 2 (BSF-2) is defined by radiographical locked pseudarthrosis, and Brantigan, Steffee, Fraser-Grade 3 (BSF-3) is radiographical fusion, indicating the best outcome. The subject will be considered a success if fusion is a Grade BSF-3 at 6 months.
1 secondary outcome
Post-operative Timing of Fusion
Time frame: 12 months post-operatively
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16688045Anjarwalla NK, Morcom RK, Fraser RD. Supplementary stabilization with anterior lumbar intervertebral fusion--a radiologic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 May 15;31(11):1281-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000217692.90624.ab.
- Background: PubMed 1471005Fernyhough JC, Schimandle JJ, Weigel MC, Edwards CC, Levine AM. Chronic donor site pain complicating bone graft harvesting from the posterior iliac crest for spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Dec;17(12):1474-80. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199212000-00006.
- Background: PubMed 12045508Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1131-41. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00002.
- Background: PubMed 15046896Gotz HE, Muller M, Emmel A, Holzwarth U, Erben RG, Stangl R. Effect of surface finish on the osseointegration of laser-treated titanium alloy implants. Biomaterials. 2004 Aug;25(18):4057-64. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.002.
- Background: PubMed 18037353Hangai M, Kaneoka K, Kuno S, Hinotsu S, Sakane M, Mamizuka N, Sakai S, Ochiai N. Factors associated with lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in the elderly. Spine J. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):732-40. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.07.392. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 15860204Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005 Sep;26(27):5474-91. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002.
- Background: PubMed 17686513Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007 Nov;28(32):4845-69. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
- Background: PubMed 16359252Laurencin C, Khan Y, El-Amin SF. Bone graft substitutes. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006 Jan;3(1):49-57. doi: 10.1586/17434440.3.1.49.
- Background: PubMed 6374708Laurie SW, Kaban LB, Mulliken JB, Murray JE. Donor-site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984 Jun;73(6):933-8. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198406000-00014.
- Background: PubMed 21369477Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lee DH, Kim YT, Lee HS. Fusion rates of instrumented lumbar spinal arthrodesis according to surgical approach: a systematic review of randomized trials. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011 Mar;3(1):39-47. doi: 10.4055/cios.2011.3.1.39. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
- Background: PubMed 17367852Li JP, Habibovic P, van den Doel M, Wilson CE, de Wijn JR, van Blitterswijk CA, de Groot K. Bone ingrowth in porous titanium implants produced by 3D fiber deposition. Biomaterials. 2007 Jun;28(18):2810-20. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.020. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
- BackgroundMillennium Research Group (MRG) US Markets for Spinal Implants 2013
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
Active, not recruiting
Post Marketing Study of MagnetOs Easypack Putty Standalone Compared to Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers Mixed With Autograft in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
Degenerative Disc Disease, Spine Fusion
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Relationship Between Disability, Flexibility, Back Muscles, and Thoracolumbar Fascia in Patients With Lumbar Disc Degeneration
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Active, not recruiting
ASCEND: A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of VIA Disc NP, a Supplement for Degenerated Intervertebral Discs
Degenerative Disc Disease, Disc Degeneration
Not yet recruiting
Kore Fiber PLF Study
Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases, Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
Recruiting
MagnetOs Flex Matrix Compared to Trinity Elite Mixed With Local Autograft in Patients Undergoing up to Four-level Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion
Degenerative Disc Disease, Spine Fusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Interbody cage (titanium) and Interbody cage (PEEK) in people with Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, run by Ohio State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jun 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Interbody Radiographic Fusion Rate (time frame: 6 months post-operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03647501, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2023.