Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4RAMBANCT03652961
Rheumatoid Arthritis Memory B Cells and Abatacept
A Phase 4 study testing Abatacept and DMARDs in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by NYU Langone Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Single-Open Label Study to Assess Changes in the Immune Profile in Response to Treatment with Intravenous Abatacept Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis who are Naive to Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Abatacept and DMARDs
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Jun 2019to 27 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed Written Informed Consent
- 1. Subject is willing to participate in the study and has signed the informed consent.
- Target Population
- Men or women (not nursing or pregnant) over 18 years old who have active Rheumatoid Arthritis, defined as symptoms of Rheumatoid Arthritis prior to screening and have satisfied the American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism 2010 criteria for the classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis prior to signing t the informed consent.
- Subjects must have a Disease Activity Score 28-joint count C reactive protein (CRP) or Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) assessment at screening and have at least 3 tender and at least 3 swollen joints (excluding distal interphalangeal joints) at screening and at Day 1. Patients must have at least moderate disease activity {CDAI>16); Disease Activity Score and C-reactive protein test (DAS28CRP (>4.0 )].
- Subjects must be naive to biologic Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
Show all 41Show fewer
- Subjects must be naive to targeted synthetic DMARDs such as tofacitinib, baricitinib, and investigational therapies for RA.
- Subjects receiving oral corticosteroids must be on a stable dose and at the equivalent of 10 mg prednisone daily for at least 4 weeks. Subjects may not receive an intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) or intra-arterial (IA) administration of a corticosteroid within 4 weeks prior to screening visit or initiation of therapy
- Patients with prior (including discontinued) therapy with Methotrexate and/or Hydroxychloroquine are permitted as long as they meet other inclusionary criteria.
- Subjects must have a DAS28CRP and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at screening and have at least 3 tender and at least 3 swollen joints (excluding distal interphalangeal joints) at screening and at Day 1.
- Age and Reproductive Status
- Men and women, age's 18 years (or age of majority)
- Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum or urine
- pregnancy test (minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of HCG) within
- 24 hours prior to the start of study drug.
- Women must not be breastfeeding and must agree not to breastfeed during the study and for 100 days thereafter
- WOCBP must agree to follow instructions for method(s) of contraception for the duration of treatment with study drug plus 5 half-lives of study drug (70 days) plus 30 days (duration of ovulatory cycle) for a total of 100 days post-treatment completion.
- Males who are sexually active with WOCBP must agree to follow instructions for method(s) of contraception for the duration of treatment with study drug, plus 5 half- lives of the study drug (70 days) plus 90 days (duration of sperm turnover) for a total of 160 days post-treatment completion.
- Azoospermic males and WOCBP who are continuously not heterosexually active are exempt from contraceptive requirements. However they must still undergo pregnancy testing as described in this section. Investigators shall counsel WOCBP and male subjects who are sexually active with WOCBP on the importance of pregnancy prevention and the implications of an unexpected pregnancy.
- Investigators shall advise WOCBP and male subjects who are sexually active with WOCBP on the use of highly effective methods of contraception. Highly effective methods of contraception have a failure rate of < 1% when used consistently and correctly.
- At a minimum, subjects must agree to use one highly effective method of contraception as listed below.
- Highly effective methods of contraception
- Highly effective methods of contraception have a failure rate of < 1% when used consistently and correctly. WOCBP and female partners of male subjects, who are WOCBP, are expected to use one of the highly effective methods of contraception listed below. Male subjects must inform their female partners who are WOCBP of the contraceptive requirements of the protocol and are expected to adhere to using contraception with their partner.
- Progestogen only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation.
- Hormonal methods of contraception including oral contraceptive pills containing estrogen + progesterone, vaginal ring, injectables, implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs) such as Mirena
- Nonhormonal IUDs, such as ParaGard
- Bilateral Tubal occlusion
- Vasectomized partner with documented azoospermia 90 days after procedure
- Vasectomized partner is a highly effective birth control method provided that partner is the sole sexual partner of the WOCBP trial participant and that the vasectomized partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success.
- Intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS)
- Complete abstinence- Complete abstinence is defined as the complete avoidance of heterosexual intercourse
- complete abstinence is an acceptable form of contraception for all study drugs and must be used throughout the duration of the study treatment (plus 5 half-lives of the investigational drug plus 30 days).
- It is not necessary to use any other method of contraception when complete abstinence is elected.
- Subjects who choose complete abstinence must continue to have pregnancy tests
- Acceptable alternate methods of highly effective contraception must be discussed in the event that the subject chooses to forego complete abstinence.
- The reliability of sexual abstinence needs to be evaluated in relation to the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject.
- Unacceptable methods of contraception
- Periodic abstinence (calendar, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods)
- Withdrawal (coitus interruptus)
- Spermicide only
- Lactation amenorrhea method (LAM)
Who cannot join
- Target Disease Exceptions
- Subjects with autoimmune disease other than RA [e.g., psoriasis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), vasculitis, seronegative spondyloarthritis, Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Sjogren's syndrome] or currently active fibromyalgia.
- Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA (such as psoriatic arthritis, gout, reactive arthritis, Lyme disease).
- Medical History and Concurrent Diseases 1.Subjects at risk for tuberculosis (TB) defined as follows:
- Current clinical, radiographic or laboratory evidence of active TB. Chest x-rays (posterior anterior and lateral) obtained within the 3 months prior to obtaining written informed consent will be permitted but the images must be available and reviewed by the investigator. TB testing (IFN-gamma release assay or PPD) performed in the past month prior to Screening will be accepted; however, a copy of the report must be placed in the subject binder.
- A history of active TB
Show all 14Show fewer
- Subjects with a positive TB screening test indicative of latent TB will not be eligible for the study unless they:
- Have no evidence of current TB based on chest x-ray performed And they are actively being treated for TB or the site has documentation of successful prior treatment of latent TB. Treatment regimens should be dictated by local guidelines as long as the treatment dose and duration meet or exceed local health authority guidelines. 2.Subjects with recent acute infection defined as:
- <!-- -->
- Any acute infection within 60 days prior to randomization that required hospitalization or treatment with parenteral antibiotics.
- Any acute infection within 30 days prior to randomization that required oral antimicrobial or antiviral therapy. 3. Subjects with history of chronic or recurrent bacterial infection (such as chronic pyelonephritis, osteomyelitis, and bronchiectasis etc.). 4. Subjects with any history of infection of a joint prosthesis or artificial joint.
- 5. Subjects who have a history of systemic fungal infections (such as histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, or coccidiomycosis). 6. Subjects with history of recurrent herpes zoster (more than 1 episode) or disseminated (more than 1 dermatome) herpes zoster or disseminated herpes simplex, or ophthalmic zoster will be excluded. Symptoms of herpes zoster or herpes simplex must have resolved more than 60 days prior to screening. 7. Subjects with history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection or who tested positive for HIV 8. Subjects with history of primary immunodeficiency
- <!-- -->
- Subjects who have a present malignancy or previous malignancy within the last 5 years prior to screening (except documented history of cured non-metastatic squamous or basal cell skin carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ). Subjects who had a screening procedure that is suspicious for malignancy, and in whom the possibility of malignancy cannot be reasonably excluded following additional clinical, laboratory or other diagnostic evaluations. 10. Current clinical findings or a history of a demyelinating disorder 11. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure 12. Any previous or current medical conditions that are warnings against the use of TNF inhibitor agents. 13. Current clinical findings of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, psychiatric, cardiac, endocrine, neurological, or cerebral disease including severe and uncontrolled infections, such as sepsis and opportunistic infections. Concomitant medical conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, might place the subject at unacceptable risk for participation in this study. 14. Subjects who have received any live vaccines within 3 months of the study drug administration or are scheduled to receive live vaccines during the study. Study subjects should not be administered a live virus vaccine for a minimum of 3 months f following the last dose of study medication. Subjects who are in close contact with others who have received a live vaccine may be enrolled at the investigator's discretion. 15. Subjects who have undergone a major surgical procedure within the 60 days prior to randomization. 16. Subjects for whom 5 or more joints cannot be assessed for tenderness or swelling (i.e. due to surgery, fusion, amputation, etc.). 17.Subjects who are prisoners, or compulsory detained.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
About this study
Official title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Memory B Cells and Abatacept (RAMBA)
Single-Open Label Study to Assess Changes in the Immune Profile in Response to Treatment with Intravenous Abatacept Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis who are Naive to Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
Read the detailed description
The immune system of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is different from that of people who do not have RA. The purpose of this study is to examine participants' immune cells and proteins before initiation of study medication and after initiation of treatment with an approved therapy for RA, abatacept that will be given in combination with Methotrexate and/or anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDS) that are approved for the treatment of RA. This study will assess whether participants have clinically responded to these medications. This assessment will also include a study of whether characteristics of participants' immune systems were changed by therapy with the study drug, abatacept.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Abatacept, DMARDs
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AbataceptDrug
Abatacept for reconstitution and dilution prior to intravenous (IV) administration. Each single-use vial of Abatacept for injection provides 250-mg Abatacept, maltose (500 mg), monobasic sodium phosphate (17.2 mg), and sodium chloride (14.6 mg) for administration.
DMARDsDrug
Patients will receive methotrexate or remain on pre-existing conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) if already prescribed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Abatacept plus DMARD | Experimental | Abatacept will be used concomitantly with standard of care disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), other than tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors.
Intravenous (IV) Abatacept will be administered as a 30-minute IV infusion utilizing weight range-based dosing:
1. Less than 60 kg: 500 mg
2. 60 to 100 kg: 750 mg
3. More than 100 kg: 1000 mg
Following the initial IV Abatacept administration, an IV infusion will be given at Weeks 2 and 4 after the first infusion and every 4 weeks thereafter for a total of 7 Abatacept doses.
Abatacept will be discontinued after 6 months in all patients. Patients who have flared or failed to achieve low disease activity at 6 months will exit the trial except for one post-study visit for lab work at 9 months. In patients who have achieved low disease activity, Abatacept will be held for 6 months or until a flare results while DMARD use is continued. Receives: Drug: Abatacept; Drug: DMARDs |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CDAI Score
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity.
The CDAI score is the sum of the Swollen 28-Joint Count (SJC28) + Tender 28-Joint Count (TJC) + Patient Global disease Activity (PGA, patient's assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 1-10 where 10 is maximal activity) + Evaluator's Global disease Activity (EGA, evaluator's assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 1-10 where 10 is maximal activity). The total score range is 2-76; higher scores (CDAI > 22) indicate HIgh Disease Activity.
Measured: Day 1
CDAI Score
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity.
The CDAI score is the sum of the Swollen 28-Joint Count (SJC28) + Tender 28-Joint Count (TJC) + Patient Global disease Activity (PGA, patient's assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 1-10 where 10 is maximal activity) + Evaluator's Global disease Activity (EGA, evaluator's assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 1-10 where 10 is maximal activity). The total score range is 2-76; higher scores (CDAI > 22) indicate HIgh Disease Activity.
Measured: Month 6
DAS-28 CRP Score
Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with CRP (DAS28-CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity.
The DAS-28 CRP score is calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on 11-point Likert scale from 0 [no disease activity] to 10 [maximum disease activity]), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (in mg/L). DAS28-CRP Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more active disease.
Measured: Month 3
DAS-28 CRP Score
Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with CRP (DAS28-CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity.
The DAS-28 CRP score is calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on 11-point Likert scale from 0 [no disease activity] to 10 [maximum disease activity]), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (in mg/L). DAS28-CRP Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more active disease.
Measured: Month 6
Secondary outcomes (2)
DAS-28 CRP Score After Abatacept Hold
Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with CRP (DAS28-CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity.
The DAS-28 CRP score is calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on 11-point Likert scale from 0 [no disease activity] to 10 [maximum disease activity]), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (in mg/L). DAS28-CRP Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more active disease.
Measured: Month 9
CDAI Score After Abatacept Hold
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity.
The CDAI score is the sum of the Swollen 28-Joint Count (SJC28) + Tender 28-Joint Count (TJC) + Patient Global disease Activity (PGA, patient's assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 1-10 where 10 is maximal activity) + Evaluator's Global disease Activity (EGA, evaluator's assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 1-10 where 10 is maximal activity). The total score range is 2-76; higher scores (CDAI > 22) indicate HIgh Disease Activity.
Measured: Month 9
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2018
- Study start2 Jun 2019
- Primary completion27 Sep 2021
- Study completion27 Sep 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by NYU Langone HealthThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NYU Langone Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gregg Silverman, MD, Principal investigator, NYU Langone HealthWilliam Rigby, MD, Principal investigator, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03652961
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- s18-01164
- Acronym
- RAMBA
- Status last verified
- Jun 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 3 Jul 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wolfe F. The epidemiology of drug treatment failure in rheumatoid arthritis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1995 Nov;9(4):619-32. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(05)80305-x.
PubMed 8591645Hochberg MC, Spector TD. Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis: update. Epidemiol Rev. 1990;12:247-52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036058.
PubMed 2286222Markenson JA. Worldwide trends in the socioeconomic impact and long-term prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Oct;21(2 Suppl 1):4-12. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(91)90046-3.
PubMed 1836280Spector TD. Rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1990 Aug;16(3):513-37.
PubMed 2217956Zvaifler NJ. Etiology and pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. In: Arthritis and Allied Conditions. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger;1993:723-736.
Lindqvist E, Jonsson K, Saxne T, Eberhardt K. Course of radiographic damage over 10 years in a cohort with early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Jul;62(7):611-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.7.611.
PubMed 12810421Boissier MC, Semerano L, Challal S, Saidenberg-Kermanac'h N, Falgarone G. Rheumatoid arthritis: from autoimmunity to synovitis and joint destruction. J Autoimmun. 2012 Sep;39(3):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
PubMed 22704962Bristol-Myers Squibb Abatacept Investigator Brochure, version 18, version date 13-Nov-2014
Schiff M. Co-stimulation Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Today and Tomorrow. Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol. 2015;1(4):334-349. doi: 10.1007/s40674-015-0029-0. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
PubMed 28936386Emery P, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Combe BG, Furst DE, Barre E, Karyekar CS, Wong DA, Huizinga TW. Evaluating drug-free remission with abatacept in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the phase 3b, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled AVERT study of 24 months, with a 12-month, double-blind treatment period. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jan;74(1):19-26. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206106. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
PubMed 25367713Pelzek AJ, Gronwall C, Rosenthal P, Greenberg JD, McGeachy M, Moreland L, Rigby WFC, Silverman GJ. Persistence of Disease-Associated Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody-Expressing Memory B Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Remission. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;69(6):1176-1186. doi: 10.1002/art.40053. Epub 2017 May 3.
PubMed 28118534Kanbe K, Chiba J, Nakamura A. Immunohistological analysis of synovium treated with abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2013 Jul;33(7):1883-7. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2326-8. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
PubMed 22212411Gazeau P, Alegria GC, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Jamin C, Lemerle J, Bendaoud B, Brooks WH, Saraux A, Cornec D, Renaudineau Y. Memory B Cells and Response to Abatacept in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2017 Oct;53(2):166-176. doi: 10.1007/s12016-017-8603-x.
PubMed 28477078Marasco E, Aquilani A, Cascioli S, Moneta GM, Caiello I, Farroni C, Giorda E, D'Oria V, Marafon DP, Magni-Manzoni S, Carsetti R, De Benedetti F. Switched Memory B Cells Are Increased in Oligoarticular and Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Their Change Over Time Is Related to Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Apr;70(4):606-615. doi: 10.1002/art.40410. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
PubMed 29316374Westhovens R, Robles M, Ximenes AC, Nayiager S, Wollenhaupt J, Durez P, Gomez-Reino J, Grassi W, Haraoui B, Shergy W, Park SH, Genant H, Peterfy C, Becker JC, Covucci A, Helfrick R, Bathon J. Clinical efficacy and safety of abatacept in methotrexate-naive patients with early rheumatoid arthritis and poor prognostic factors. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1870-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.101121. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
PubMed 19124524
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Jul 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Rheumatoid Arthritis Memory B Cells and Abatacept (RAMBA)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03652961
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RAMBA / s18-01164
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NYU Langone HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Study start
- 2 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 Feb 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Single-Open Label Study to Assess Changes in the Immune Profile in Response to Treatment with Intravenous Abatacept Adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis who are Naive to Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs
Detailed description
The immune system of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is different from that of people who do not have RA. The purpose of this study is to examine participants' immune cells and proteins before initiation of study medication and after initiation of treatment with an approved therapy for RA, abatacept that will be given in combination with Methotrexate and/or anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDS) that are approved for the treatment of RA. This study will assess whether participants have clinically responded to these medications. This assessment will also include a study of whether characteristics of participants' immune systems were changed by therapy with the study drug, abatacept.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Abatacept plus DMARD | Experimental | Drug: Abatacept, Drug: DMARDsAbatacept will be used concomitantly with standard of care disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), other than tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Intravenous (IV) Abatacept will be administered as a 30-minute IV infusion utilizing weight range-based dosing: 1. Less than 60 kg: 500 mg 2. 60 to 100 kg: 750 mg 3. More than 100 kg: 1000 mg Following the initial IV Abatacept administration, an IV infusion will be given at Weeks 2 and 4 after the first infusion and every 4 weeks thereafter for a total of 7 Abatacept doses. Abatacept will be discontinued after 6 months in all patients. Patients who have flared or failed to achieve low disease activity at 6 months will exit the trial except for one post-study visit for lab work at 9 months. In patients who have achieved low disease activity, Abatacept will be held for 6 months or until a flare results while DMARD use is continued. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (41 listed)
- Signed Written Informed Consent
- 1. Subject is willing to participate in the study and has signed the informed consent.
- Target Population
- Age and Reproductive Status
- Highly effective methods of contraception
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Target Disease Exceptions
- Medical History and Concurrent Diseases 1.Subjects at risk for tuberculosis (TB) defined as follows:
- <!-- -->
- 5. Subjects who have a history of systemic fungal infections (such as histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, or coccidiomycosis). 6. Subjects with history of recurrent herpes zoster (more than 1 episode) or disseminated (more than 1 dermatome) herpes zoster or disseminated herpes simplex, or ophthalmic zoster will be excluded. Symptoms of herpes zoster or herpes simplex must have resolved more than 60 days prior to screening. 7. Subjects with history of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection or who tested positive for HIV 8. Subjects with history of primary immunodeficiency
- <!-- -->
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AbataceptAbatacept for reconstitution and dilution prior to intravenous (IV) administration. Each single-use vial of Abatacept for injection provides 250-mg Abatacept, maltose (500 mg), monobasic sodium phosphate (17.2 mg), and sodium chloride (14.6 mg) for administration. | Drug | Abatacept plus DMARD |
| DMARDsPatients will receive methotrexate or remain on pre-existing conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) if already prescribed. | Drug | Abatacept plus DMARD |
Primary outcome
CDAI Score
Time frame: Day 1
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. The CDAI score is the sum of the Swollen 28-Joint Count (SJC28) + Tender 28-Joint Count (TJC) + Patient Global disease Activity (PGA, patient's assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 1-10 where 10 is maximal activity) + Evaluator's Global disease Activity (EGA, evaluator's assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 1-10 where 10 is maximal activity). The total score range is 2-76; higher scores (CDAI > 22) indicate HIgh Disease Activity.
CDAI Score
Time frame: Month 6
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. The CDAI score is the sum of the Swollen 28-Joint Count (SJC28) + Tender 28-Joint Count (TJC) + Patient Global disease Activity (PGA, patient's assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 1-10 where 10 is maximal activity) + Evaluator's Global disease Activity (EGA, evaluator's assessment of overall RA disease activity on a scale 1-10 where 10 is maximal activity). The total score range is 2-76; higher scores (CDAI > 22) indicate HIgh Disease Activity.
DAS-28 CRP Score
Time frame: Month 3
Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with CRP (DAS28-CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. The DAS-28 CRP score is calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on 11-point Likert scale from 0 [no disease activity] to 10 [maximum disease activity]), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (in mg/L). DAS28-CRP Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more active disease.
DAS-28 CRP Score
Time frame: Month 6
Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with CRP (DAS28-CRP) is a composite index used to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. The DAS-28 CRP score is calculated based on the tender joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), swollen joint count (out of 28 evaluated joints), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (scored on 11-point Likert scale from 0 [no disease activity] to 10 [maximum disease activity]), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels (in mg/L). DAS28-CRP Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate more active disease.
2 secondary outcomes
DAS-28 CRP Score After Abatacept Hold
Time frame: Month 9
CDAI Score After Abatacept Hold
Time frame: Month 9
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Jul 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 8591645Wolfe F. The epidemiology of drug treatment failure in rheumatoid arthritis. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1995 Nov;9(4):619-32. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3579(05)80305-x.
- Background: PubMed 2286222Hochberg MC, Spector TD. Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis: update. Epidemiol Rev. 1990;12:247-52. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036058.
- Background: PubMed 1836280Markenson JA. Worldwide trends in the socioeconomic impact and long-term prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Oct;21(2 Suppl 1):4-12. doi: 10.1016/0049-0172(91)90046-3.
- Background: PubMed 2217956Spector TD. Rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1990 Aug;16(3):513-37.
- BackgroundZvaifler NJ. Etiology and pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. In: Arthritis and Allied Conditions. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger;1993:723-736.
- Background: PubMed 12810421Lindqvist E, Jonsson K, Saxne T, Eberhardt K. Course of radiographic damage over 10 years in a cohort with early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Jul;62(7):611-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.7.611.
- Background: PubMed 22704962Boissier MC, Semerano L, Challal S, Saidenberg-Kermanac'h N, Falgarone G. Rheumatoid arthritis: from autoimmunity to synovitis and joint destruction. J Autoimmun. 2012 Sep;39(3):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
- BackgroundBristol-Myers Squibb Abatacept Investigator Brochure, version 18, version date 13-Nov-2014
- Background: PubMed 28936386Schiff M. Co-stimulation Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Today and Tomorrow. Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol. 2015;1(4):334-349. doi: 10.1007/s40674-015-0029-0. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
- Background: PubMed 25367713Emery P, Burmester GR, Bykerk VP, Combe BG, Furst DE, Barre E, Karyekar CS, Wong DA, Huizinga TW. Evaluating drug-free remission with abatacept in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the phase 3b, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled AVERT study of 24 months, with a 12-month, double-blind treatment period. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jan;74(1):19-26. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206106. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
- Background: PubMed 28118534Pelzek AJ, Gronwall C, Rosenthal P, Greenberg JD, McGeachy M, Moreland L, Rigby WFC, Silverman GJ. Persistence of Disease-Associated Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody-Expressing Memory B Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Remission. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;69(6):1176-1186. doi: 10.1002/art.40053. Epub 2017 May 3.
- Background: PubMed 22212411Kanbe K, Chiba J, Nakamura A. Immunohistological analysis of synovium treated with abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2013 Jul;33(7):1883-7. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2326-8. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gregg Silverman, MD principal investigator
NYU Langone Health
William Rigby, MD principal investigator
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Abatacept and DMARDs in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by NYU Langone Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 41 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Feb 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CDAI Score (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03652961, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2024.