Root CariesNCT03654820
Effectiveness on SDF Solution and PVP-I Combined NaF Varnish in Preventing Root Caries in Elders
A study testing PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish and SDF solution in people with Root Caries, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 4-monthly application of 10% povidone iodine solution followed by 5% sodium fluoride varnish with those of annual application of 38% silver diammine fluoride solution on the prevention of new dental root caries in elders. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Root Caries
- What is being tested?
- PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish and SDF solution
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 353 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 3 Aug 2017to 15 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- have at least 6 teeth which are not indicated for extraction, and
- have basic self-care ability.
Who cannot join
- have serious debilitating health/medical conditions, and
- have cognitive problems or major problems in communication.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Using Silver Diammine Fluoride Solution and Combination of Povidone Iodine and Sodium Fluoride Varnish in Preventing Dental Root Caries in Elders: a Randomized, Double-blind, Non-inferiority Trial
The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 4-monthly application of 10% povidone iodine solution followed by 5% sodium fluoride varnish with those of annual application of 38% silver diammine fluoride solution on the prevention of new dental root caries in elders. A secondary objective is to compare the effectiveness of the two interventions mentioned above on arresting (halting the progression) active root surface caries in the elders, thus avoiding the need for placing dental restorations.
This proposed study is a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial with 24-month follow-up. A total of 353 elders aged 60 years or above living in residential homes or attending long-term care facilities in different districts in Hong Kong were recruited. Baseline clinical examination will be conducted by two calibrated examiners in the homes using an intra-oral LED light, dental mirrors and probes. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of the two study groups:
- positive control - received annual application of 38% silver diammine fluoride solution; and 2) test - received application of 10% povidone iodine solution followed by application of 5% sodium fluoride varnish every 4 months. Follow-up examinations will be carried out after 12 and 24 months by the same blinded examiners to assess the clinical outcomes, i.e. whether new dental caries has developed and whether the active root surface caries lesions found at baseline have become arrested (hardened).
Read the detailed description
The study population of this proposed clinical trial is adults aged 60 years and above living in residential care homes or attending long-term care facilities in Hong Kong. Totally, 10 residential care homes or long-term care institutions served by NGO dental outreach teams in various districts with different background were selected by the PI in consultation with the NGOs. All elders living in the selected residential homes were invited to attend a free dental examination. Elders fulfilling the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in this study and informed written consent will be obtained before commencement of the study. Dental treatments other than the study interventions were provided by dentists from the NGOs which serve the residential homes.
Totally, 353 elder adults enrolled in the trial. The baseline examination was carried out in the residential home by two calibrated examiners, and so will be as follow-up examinations after 12 and 24 months. A portable dental chair, an intra-oral LED light, disposable dental mirrors and CPI probes were used in the examination.
For each tooth that was not indicated for extraction, status of its crown and its root were assessed and recorded separately. Caries diagnosis was based on visual and tactile inspection. No radiograph was taken. Plaque and food debris that obscures visual inspection of the tooth surfaces were removed. Four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) per tooth were examined and the status were recorded using the following codes which basically follow the criteria recommended by the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) Coordinating Committee (2009).
The oral hygiene status of the subject was assessed and recorded by using the Visible Plaque Index (Ainamo \& Bay, 1975). The presence or absence of visible plaque were recorded on four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) per tooth.
The gingival status of the subject was assessed and recorded using the Gingival Bleeding Index (Ainamo \& Bay, 1975). The presence or absence of bleeding within 10 seconds after running a probe across the gingival margin was recorded on four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) per tooth.
Other information that was recorded included whether the subject normally wears a removable partial denture or not, and the subject's general health status and medications that affect the saliva flow rate.
The same calibrated two examiners were blinded by the assignment of the participants. A random sample of 10% of the subjects were re-examined during each examination to monitor intra-examiner reproducibility.
At the examinations, the subjects were asked to report on their oral hygiene practices, use of fluoridated toothpaste and other topical fluoride agents, and use of dental services during the study period.
Oral health education talk and instructions on how to keep good oral hygiene were provided at baseline and every year to all the elders in the selected residential homes. Standard fluoride toothpastes with 1000-1500 ppm fluoride were provided free to all the elders in the selected residential homes over the 24-month study period.
After the baseline examination, subjects satisfying the inclusion criteria of the study were stratified into two groups according to the number of natural teeth with exposed root surfaces in their mouth, those with 12 or fewer teeth and those with 13 or more teeth. The subjects were assigned to one of the two study groups by a research assistant using a block randomization method with a block size of 6. The stratified randomization procedure will help to ensure that the numbers of teeth involved in the two study groups are balanced. The interventions for the two study groups were provided by other dentists and are described below:
Group 1 - plaque on the root surfaces of all teeth in the subject's mouth was removed and a 38% SDF solution (Saforide, Toyo Chemical, Japan ) was applied onto the root surfaces using a microbrush/applicator. This will be repeated every year.
Group 2 - plaque on the root surfaces of all teeth in the subject's mouth was removed and a 10% povidone iodine solution (Betadine, Mundipharma, Switzerland) was applied, then followed by application of a 5% sodium fluoride varnish (Duraflor, Medicom, Canada) using a microbrush/applicator. This will be repeated every 4 months.
- Conditions
- Root Caries
- Being tested
- PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish, SDF solution
- Medical subject headings
- Root Caries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnishDevice
4-monthly application of 10% povidone-iodine solution and 5% sodium fluoride varnish
SDF solutionDevice
Annual application of 38% SDF solution
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish | Experimental | 4-monthly application of 10% povidone-iodine solution and 5% sodium fluoride varnish Receives: Device: PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish |
| SDF treated | Active comparator | Annual application of 38% SDF solution Receives: Device: SDF solution |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
new root caries found in clinical examination
development of new carious lesion on exposed tooth root as assessed in clinical examination where there is a soft decayed root surface on gentle probing with a blunt probe
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
arrested root caries found in clinical examination
in the follow-up clinical examination, there is arrest of active caries lesions that were present at baseline and found to be a hard root surface upon gentle probing with a blunt probe
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2018
- Study start3 Aug 2017
- Primary completion15 Jan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jan 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Root CariesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 353 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03654820
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UW 16-162
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 29 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Using Silver Diammine Fluoride Solution and Combination of Povidone Iodine and Sodium Fluoride Varnish in Preventing Dental Root Caries in Elders: a Randomized, Double-blind, Non-inferiority Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03654820
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UW 16-162
- Conditions
- Root Caries
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 353 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jan 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 4-monthly application of 10% povidone iodine solution followed by 5% sodium fluoride varnish with those of annual application of 38% silver diammine fluoride solution on the prevention of new dental root caries in elders. A secondary objective is to compare the effectiveness of the two interventions mentioned above on arresting (halting the progression) active root surface caries in the elders, thus avoiding the need for placing dental restorations.
This proposed study is a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial with 24-month follow-up. A total of 353 elders aged 60 years or above living in residential homes or attending long-term care facilities in different districts in Hong Kong were recruited. Baseline clinical examination will be conducted by two calibrated examiners in the homes using an intra-oral LED light, dental mirrors and probes. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of the two study groups:
- positive control - received annual application of 38% silver diammine fluoride solution; and 2) test - received application of 10% povidone iodine solution followed by application of 5% sodium fluoride varnish every 4 months. Follow-up examinations will be carried out after 12 and 24 months by the same blinded examiners to assess the clinical outcomes, i.e. whether new dental caries has developed and whether the active root surface caries lesions found at baseline have become arrested (hardened).
Detailed description
The study population of this proposed clinical trial is adults aged 60 years and above living in residential care homes or attending long-term care facilities in Hong Kong. Totally, 10 residential care homes or long-term care institutions served by NGO dental outreach teams in various districts with different background were selected by the PI in consultation with the NGOs. All elders living in the selected residential homes were invited to attend a free dental examination. Elders fulfilling the inclusion criteria were invited to participate in this study and informed written consent will be obtained before commencement of the study. Dental treatments other than the study interventions were provided by dentists from the NGOs which serve the residential homes.
Totally, 353 elder adults enrolled in the trial. The baseline examination was carried out in the residential home by two calibrated examiners, and so will be as follow-up examinations after 12 and 24 months. A portable dental chair, an intra-oral LED light, disposable dental mirrors and CPI probes were used in the examination.
For each tooth that was not indicated for extraction, status of its crown and its root were assessed and recorded separately. Caries diagnosis was based on visual and tactile inspection. No radiograph was taken. Plaque and food debris that obscures visual inspection of the tooth surfaces were removed. Four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) per tooth were examined and the status were recorded using the following codes which basically follow the criteria recommended by the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) Coordinating Committee (2009).
The oral hygiene status of the subject was assessed and recorded by using the Visible Plaque Index (Ainamo \& Bay, 1975). The presence or absence of visible plaque were recorded on four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) per tooth.
The gingival status of the subject was assessed and recorded using the Gingival Bleeding Index (Ainamo \& Bay, 1975). The presence or absence of bleeding within 10 seconds after running a probe across the gingival margin was recorded on four surfaces (mesial, distal, buccal and lingual) per tooth.
Other information that was recorded included whether the subject normally wears a removable partial denture or not, and the subject's general health status and medications that affect the saliva flow rate.
The same calibrated two examiners were blinded by the assignment of the participants. A random sample of 10% of the subjects were re-examined during each examination to monitor intra-examiner reproducibility.
At the examinations, the subjects were asked to report on their oral hygiene practices, use of fluoridated toothpaste and other topical fluoride agents, and use of dental services during the study period.
Oral health education talk and instructions on how to keep good oral hygiene were provided at baseline and every year to all the elders in the selected residential homes. Standard fluoride toothpastes with 1000-1500 ppm fluoride were provided free to all the elders in the selected residential homes over the 24-month study period.
After the baseline examination, subjects satisfying the inclusion criteria of the study were stratified into two groups according to the number of natural teeth with exposed root surfaces in their mouth, those with 12 or fewer teeth and those with 13 or more teeth. The subjects were assigned to one of the two study groups by a research assistant using a block randomization method with a block size of 6. The stratified randomization procedure will help to ensure that the numbers of teeth involved in the two study groups are balanced. The interventions for the two study groups were provided by other dentists and are described below:
Group 1 - plaque on the root surfaces of all teeth in the subject's mouth was removed and a 38% SDF solution (Saforide, Toyo Chemical, Japan ) was applied onto the root surfaces using a microbrush/applicator. This will be repeated every year.
Group 2 - plaque on the root surfaces of all teeth in the subject's mouth was removed and a 10% povidone iodine solution (Betadine, Mundipharma, Switzerland) was applied, then followed by application of a 5% sodium fluoride varnish (Duraflor, Medicom, Canada) using a microbrush/applicator. This will be repeated every 4 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish | Experimental | Device: PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish4-monthly application of 10% povidone-iodine solution and 5% sodium fluoride varnish |
| SDF treated | Active comparator | Device: SDF solutionAnnual application of 38% SDF solution |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- have at least 6 teeth which are not indicated for extraction, and
- have basic self-care ability.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- have serious debilitating health/medical conditions, and
- have cognitive problems or major problems in communication.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish4-monthly application of 10% povidone-iodine solution and 5% sodium fluoride varnish | Device | PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish |
| SDF solutionAnnual application of 38% SDF solution | Device | SDF treated |
Primary outcome
new root caries found in clinical examination
Time frame: 24 months
development of new carious lesion on exposed tooth root as assessed in clinical examination where there is a soft decayed root surface on gentle probing with a blunt probe
1 secondary outcome
arrested root caries found in clinical examination
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Sep 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Root Caries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance of High Viscous Glass Ionomer Cervical Restorations With Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Technique (SMART) Versus Conventional Treatment in Elderly Cancer Patients. (A 12-month Randomized Clinical Trial)
Dental Caries, Cervical Caries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance of Two HEMA-Free Universal Adhesive Systems
Cervical Caries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Corrective Surgery Versus Dental Implants in Compromised Mandibular Molars
Root Caries, Vertical Root Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Corrective Surgery Versus Dental Implants in Compromised Upper Molars
Root Caries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer With and Without Selective Enamel Etching
Cervical Caries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PVP-I solution combined with NaF varnish and SDF solution in people with Root Caries, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
new root caries found in clinical examination (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.