AsthmaNCT03655392
Clinical, Functional and Inflammatory Evaluation in Asthmatic Patients After a Simple Short-Term Educational Program
A study testing Individualized educational program, Induced sputum collection and Spirometry in people with Asthma and Inflammation, run by University of Sao Paulo.
Trial summary
Background: Patient education is one of the pillars of asthma treatment according to GINA guidelines. It has considered essential for adherence to treatment and for correct technique of inhaled devices. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 69 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma, Inflammation, Patient Relations, Nurse
- What is being tested?
- Individualized educational program, Induced sputum collection and Spirometry
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2015to 12 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 69 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Non-smokers or those who stopped smoking more than five years ago
- Age between 18-69 years
- Be legally capable
- Response to the short-acting bronchodilator FEV1> 12% and> 200 mL
- Absence of upper airway infection during 30 days and associated systemic diseases
Who cannot join
- Smokers
- Over 70 years old
- Airway infection
- Legally incapable persons
- Diseases that may affect respiratory function
About this study
Background: Patient education is one of the pillars of asthma treatment according to GINA guidelines. It has considered essential for adherence to treatment and for correct technique of inhaled devices.
Read the detailed description
Objective: analyze clinical, functional and inflammatory features of adult patients with partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma, before and after an educational intervention. Methods: 58 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse in 3 visits with a one-month interval. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, collecting exhaled condensed (cytokine analysis) air and it's ph measure, Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and answered a symptoms diary, Statistical analysis: repeated measures (Sigma Plot Software 3.0).
- Conditions
- Asthma, Inflammation, Patient Relations, Nurse, Spirometry
- Being tested
- Individualized educational program, Induced sputum collection, Spirometry, Nitric oxide measure, Questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDI
- Keywords
- asthma, inflammation, patients education, spirometry
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma, Inflammation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Individualized educational programBehavioural
Also called Short term educational program
IG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a individualized shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse, were given explanations about general aspects of the disease, prevention methods and about the importance and correct use of inhaled corticosteroids, with an educational video showing the use of the device
Induced sputum collectionDiagnostic test
Also called Induced sputum
All participants performed induced sputum collection
SpirometryDiagnostic test
Also called Lung function test
All participants performed spirometry test using a Koko spirometer. Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry prebronchodilator, after withholding short-acting beta-agonists for ≥ 6 hours and long-acting beta-agonist for ≥ 24hours. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) % predicted was used as a proxy variable for overall lung function.
Nitric oxide measureDiagnostic test
Also called NO measure
All participants performed nitric oxide measure in three Mylar bags and measure was performed in a NOA280 Sievers equipment. For collection the patients blew in the balloons through a sterile nozzle in the equipment collector without prejudice or damage to the patient.
Questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDIOther
All participants answered standardized questionnaires about asthma symptoms and depression: Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Symptoms DiaryOther
All participants were instructed to note in the morning and evening before the use of routine inhaled corticosteroids, asthma symptoms (coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, use of emergency inhaled corticosteroids) and three measures of peak expiratory flow (individual, provided to patients) and to return this completed diary at each study visit
Peak flow measureDiagnostic test
Also called Peak flow
All participants registered three peak flow measures in the symptoms diary by morning and night before the use of routine inhaled corticosteroids. Peak flow was measured by the electronic peak flow meter (Mini-Wright).
Exhaled breath condensate air measurementDiagnostic test
Also called EBC collection
Exhaled breath condensate was collect during 15 to 20 minutes in a Turbo DECCS equipment (Medivac SRL, Italy) in a sterile buccal of the own apparatus with the aid of a nasal clip with the participant breathing normally without any effort or damage.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | 64 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to a individualized educational program: three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse at 3 monthly visits. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, exhaled breath condensate air measurement, and answered the questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDI: Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). All participants also answered a symptoms diary about asthma symptoms and peak flow measure. Receives: Behavioral: Individualized educational program; Diagnostic Test: Induced sputum collection; Diagnostic Test: Spirometry; Diagnostic Test: Nitric oxide measure; Other: Questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDI; Other: Symptoms Diary; Diagnostic Test: Peak flow measure; Diagnostic Test: Exhaled breath condensate air measurement |
| Control Group | Experimental | 64 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse at 3 montly visits. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, exhaled breath condensate air measurement, and answered the questionnaires: Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). All participants also answered a symptoms diary about asthma symptoms and peak flow measure. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Induced sputum collection; Diagnostic Test: Spirometry; Diagnostic Test: Nitric oxide measure; Other: Questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDI; Other: Symptoms Diary; Diagnostic Test: Peak flow measure; Diagnostic Test: Exhaled breath condensate air measurement |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Induced sputum samples to assess airway inflammation
Induced sputum samples were collected in 3 visits with a one-month interval to assess the degree of airway inflammation. Markers of inflammation included eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages, lymphocytes and total cell counts, as well as cytokines in the sputum supernatant. In the processing performed the subjects received up to three nebulizations with 3% hypertonic saline, the aerosol was generated by an ultrasonic nebulizer (Ultraneb 99; DeVilbiss, Somerset, PA) each challenge was monitored with peak flow before, after and between nebulizations.
Measured: One day
Pulmonary function by spirometry
Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry pre and after bronchodilator (Salbutamol, short action beta-agonist), according to ATS guidelines, in 3 visits with a one-month interval after withholding short-acting beta-agonists for ≥ 6 hours and long-acting betaagonist for ≥ 24hours. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) % predicted was used as a proxy variable for overall lung function
Measured: One day
Asthma control by Asthma Control Test (ACT)
Asthma Control Test (ACT) was used to assess clinical control of asthma in the last month; is a questionnaire composed of five questions (score varying from 5 to 25 points) assessing asthma in relation to physical activity limitation, nocturnal and diurnal symptoms, shortness of breath and use of rescue medication. The higher the overall score, the greater the asthma control, and a 3-point difference in the mean ACT score is considered a clinically relevant change.
Measured: One day
Depression symptoms by Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI II)
To evaluate the symptoms of depression reported in the last 30 days, BDI II was used, a questionnaire composed of 21 items with scores ranging from 0 to 63 points, the higher the score the worse the severity of the symptoms
Measured: One day
Asthma quality of life by Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
Asthma quality of life was assessed using the AQLQ, which has four domains: activity limitations, symptoms, emotional function and environmental stimuli. A higher AQLQ score indicates a better quality of life.
Measured: One day
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)
FeNO was collected also to assess airway inflammation in acoordance with the ATS recommendations; all measurements were determinad by chemiluminscence (Sievers 280). This analysis procedure was performed by a blinded investigator. The patients were advised to blow into a Mylar bag, with a breath pressure of 12 cmH20, monitored by the pressure gauge, reaching a flow rate of 200 mL/s.
Measured: One day
Exhaled breath condensate (EBC)
A Turbo DECCS® condenser (Medivac SRL, Italy) (29) was used which was cooled to -20øC for at least thirty minutes prior to use. The subjects were instructed to perform oral breathing using the mouthpiece of the equipment and with the aid of a nasal clip. The EBC (exhaled breath condensate) was collected for 15 to 20 minutes in tidal volume for pH analysis and cytokine dosing.
Measured: One day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2018
- Study start1 Jul 2015
- Primary completion1 Aug 2016
- Study completion12 Dec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Sao PauloThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 64 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse at 3 mensal intervals. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, collecting exhaled condensed (cytokine analysis) air and it's ph measure, Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and answered a symptoms diary, Statistical analysis: repeated measures (Sigma Plot Software 3.0).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estadual, Sao Paulo, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Beatriz Mangueira Saraiva Romanholo, University of Sao Paulo
- Investigators
- Soraia N Felix, Master, Principal investigator, IAMPSE
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03655392
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IAMSPE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 28 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Felix SN, Agondi RC, Aun MV, Olivo CR, de Almeida FM, Amorim TS, Cezario JC, Giavina-Bianchi P, Tiberio IFLC, de Martins MA, Romanholo BMS. Clinical, functional and inflammatory evaluation in asthmatic patients after a simple short-term educational program: a randomized trial. Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):18267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97846-8.
PubMed 34521963
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical, Functional and Inflammatory Evaluation in Asthmatic Patients After a Simple Short-Term Educational Program
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03655392
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IAMSPE
- Conditions
- Asthma, Inflammation, Patient Relations, Nurse, Spirometry
- Keywords
- asthma, inflammation, patients education, spirometry
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao PauloUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estadual, Sao Paulo, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Patient education is one of the pillars of asthma treatment according to GINA guidelines. It has considered essential for adherence to treatment and for correct technique of inhaled devices.
Detailed description
Objective: analyze clinical, functional and inflammatory features of adult patients with partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma, before and after an educational intervention. Methods: 58 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse in 3 visits with a one-month interval. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, collecting exhaled condensed (cytokine analysis) air and it's ph measure, Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and answered a symptoms diary, Statistical analysis: repeated measures (Sigma Plot Software 3.0).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- 64 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse at 3 mensal intervals. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, collecting exhaled condensed (cytokine analysis) air and it's ph measure, Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and answered a symptoms diary, Statistical analysis: repeated measures (Sigma Plot Software 3.0).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Individualized educational program, Diagnostic Test: Induced sputum collection, Diagnostic Test: Spirometry, Diagnostic Test: Nitric oxide measure, Other: Questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDI, Other: Symptoms Diary, Diagnostic Test: Peak flow measure, Diagnostic Test: Exhaled breath condensate air measurement64 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to a individualized educational program: three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse at 3 monthly visits. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, exhaled breath condensate air measurement, and answered the questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDI: Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). All participants also answered a symptoms diary about asthma symptoms and peak flow measure. |
| Control Group | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Induced sputum collection, Diagnostic Test: Spirometry, Diagnostic Test: Nitric oxide measure, Other: Questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDI, Other: Symptoms Diary, Diagnostic Test: Peak flow measure, Diagnostic Test: Exhaled breath condensate air measurement64 adult asthmatic patients (18-70 years old) were randomized into two groups: intervention group (IG) (n=38) or control group (CG) (n=26). IG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse at 3 montly visits. CG group did not receive educational intervention. All patients were submitted to a spirometry, induced sputum collection, nitric oxide measure, exhaled breath condensate air measurement, and answered the questionnaires: Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). All participants also answered a symptoms diary about asthma symptoms and peak flow measure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 69 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Non-smokers or those who stopped smoking more than five years ago
- Age between 18-69 years
- Be legally capable
- Response to the short-acting bronchodilator FEV1> 12% and> 200 mL
- Absence of upper airway infection during 30 days and associated systemic diseases
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Smokers
- Over 70 years old
- Airway infection
- Legally incapable persons
- Diseases that may affect respiratory function
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized educational programAlso: Short term educational programIG patients were submitted to three 30-minutes intervention of a individualized shortterm educational program delivered by a nurse, were given explanations about general aspects of the disease, prevention methods and about the importance and correct use of inhaled corticosteroids, with an educational video showing the use of the device | Behavioural | Intervention Group |
| Induced sputum collectionAlso: Induced sputumAll participants performed induced sputum collection | Diagnostic test | Control Group, Intervention Group |
| SpirometryAlso: Lung function testAll participants performed spirometry test using a Koko spirometer. Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry prebronchodilator, after withholding short-acting beta-agonists for ≥ 6 hours and long-acting beta-agonist for ≥ 24hours. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) % predicted was used as a proxy variable for overall lung function. | Diagnostic test | Control Group, Intervention Group |
| Nitric oxide measureAlso: NO measureAll participants performed nitric oxide measure in three Mylar bags and measure was performed in a NOA280 Sievers equipment. For collection the patients blew in the balloons through a sterile nozzle in the equipment collector without prejudice or damage to the patient. | Diagnostic test | Control Group, Intervention Group |
| Questionnaires ACT, ACQ, AQLQ, BDIAll participants answered standardized questionnaires about asthma symptoms and depression: Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Quality Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | Other | Control Group, Intervention Group |
| Symptoms DiaryAll participants were instructed to note in the morning and evening before the use of routine inhaled corticosteroids, asthma symptoms (coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, use of emergency inhaled corticosteroids) and three measures of peak expiratory flow (individual, provided to patients) and to return this completed diary at each study visit | Other | Control Group, Intervention Group |
| Peak flow measureAlso: Peak flowAll participants registered three peak flow measures in the symptoms diary by morning and night before the use of routine inhaled corticosteroids. Peak flow was measured by the electronic peak flow meter (Mini-Wright). | Diagnostic test | Control Group, Intervention Group |
| Exhaled breath condensate air measurementAlso: EBC collectionExhaled breath condensate was collect during 15 to 20 minutes in a Turbo DECCS equipment (Medivac SRL, Italy) in a sterile buccal of the own apparatus with the aid of a nasal clip with the participant breathing normally without any effort or damage. | Diagnostic test | Control Group, Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Induced sputum samples to assess airway inflammation
Time frame: One day
Induced sputum samples were collected in 3 visits with a one-month interval to assess the degree of airway inflammation. Markers of inflammation included eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages, lymphocytes and total cell counts, as well as cytokines in the sputum supernatant. In the processing performed the subjects received up to three nebulizations with 3% hypertonic saline, the aerosol was generated by an ultrasonic nebulizer (Ultraneb 99; DeVilbiss, Somerset, PA) each challenge was monitored with peak flow before, after and between nebulizations.
Pulmonary function by spirometry
Time frame: One day
Pulmonary function was assessed by spirometry pre and after bronchodilator (Salbutamol, short action beta-agonist), according to ATS guidelines, in 3 visits with a one-month interval after withholding short-acting beta-agonists for ≥ 6 hours and long-acting betaagonist for ≥ 24hours. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) % predicted was used as a proxy variable for overall lung function
Asthma control by Asthma Control Test (ACT)
Time frame: One day
Asthma Control Test (ACT) was used to assess clinical control of asthma in the last month; is a questionnaire composed of five questions (score varying from 5 to 25 points) assessing asthma in relation to physical activity limitation, nocturnal and diurnal symptoms, shortness of breath and use of rescue medication. The higher the overall score, the greater the asthma control, and a 3-point difference in the mean ACT score is considered a clinically relevant change.
Depression symptoms by Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI II)
Time frame: One day
To evaluate the symptoms of depression reported in the last 30 days, BDI II was used, a questionnaire composed of 21 items with scores ranging from 0 to 63 points, the higher the score the worse the severity of the symptoms
Asthma quality of life by Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ)
Time frame: One day
Asthma quality of life was assessed using the AQLQ, which has four domains: activity limitations, symptoms, emotional function and environmental stimuli. A higher AQLQ score indicates a better quality of life.
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)
Time frame: One day
FeNO was collected also to assess airway inflammation in acoordance with the ATS recommendations; all measurements were determinad by chemiluminscence (Sievers 280). This analysis procedure was performed by a blinded investigator. The patients were advised to blow into a Mylar bag, with a breath pressure of 12 cmH20, monitored by the pressure gauge, reaching a flow rate of 200 mL/s.
Exhaled breath condensate (EBC)
Time frame: One day
A Turbo DECCS® condenser (Medivac SRL, Italy) (29) was used which was cooled to -20øC for at least thirty minutes prior to use. The subjects were instructed to perform oral breathing using the mouthpiece of the equipment and with the aid of a nasal clip. The EBC (exhaled breath condensate) was collected for 15 to 20 minutes in tidal volume for pH analysis and cytokine dosing.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Sep 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34521963Felix SN, Agondi RC, Aun MV, Olivo CR, de Almeida FM, Amorim TS, Cezario JC, Giavina-Bianchi P, Tiberio IFLC, de Martins MA, Romanholo BMS. Clinical, functional and inflammatory evaluation in asthmatic patients after a simple short-term educational program: a randomized trial. Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):18267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97846-8.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
Pilot Study to Identify the Mediators and Inflammatory Cell Surface Receptors Involved in Allergic Airway Inflammation
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Compare the Relative Potency of Salbutamol Administered Via Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Containing Propellants HFA-152a to HFA-134a in Mild Asthmatics Aged 18 to 65 Inclusive
Asthma, Mild Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Assessing the Effect of Dupilumab on Inducing Clinical Remission in Asthma
Asthma Control
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Local Antibiotic Delivery for Community Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-07275315 in People With Moderate-To-Severe Asthma
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Soraia N Felix, Master principal investigator
IAMPSE
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Individualized educational program, Induced sputum collection and Spirometry in people with Asthma and Inflammation, run by University of Sao Paulo.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Induced sputum samples to assess airway inflammation (time frame: One day). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03655392, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2018.