AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailurePhase 1PACEMAN-HFNCT03655496

Patient-centred Home-based Management of Heart Failure

A Phase 1 study testing Home-based tool in people with Heart Failure, run by CareLigo AB.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A novel home-based tool for self-management is to be evaluated for heart failure patients. The tool assists the patient with symptom monitoring, education and titration of diuretics. Patients who were recently hospitalized for heart failure will be randomized to receiving the tool or standard care for six months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Home-based tool
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
82 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
22 Feb 2013to 18 Dec 2013
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • admitted due to acute heart failure
  • diagnosed heart failure according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines 2012
  • prescribed loop-diuretics
  • Signed letter of consent

Who cannot join

  • more than mild cognitive impairment
  • pregnancy
  • having attended nurse-led heart failure clinic the past 12 months, or referred to one following this current hospitalization
  • life-expectancy of less than 6 months

About this study

A novel home-based tool for self-management is to be evaluated for heart failure patients. The tool assists the patient with symptom monitoring, education and titration of diuretics. Patients who were recently hospitalized for heart failure will be randomized to receiving the tool or standard care for six months. The primary end-point will be self-care behaviour, as measured with the validated instrument the European Heart failure self-care behaviour Scale 9-item questionnaire (Jaarsma et al). Secondary end-points are in-hospital days due to heart failure, quality of life (general and disease-specific) as measured by the SF-36 and KCCQ questionnaires, and finally knowledge about heart failure, assessed by the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale.

Read the detailed description

Patients who are admitted to the emergency unit for decompensated heart failure at the three largest clinics in Stockholm, Sweden, are screened for recruitment. For patients to be eligible for study participation, they shall be discharged from the hospital to the general practitioner without being referred to a nurse led heart failure clinic, which is considered the gold standard in terms of improving patients' self-care behaviour. At the point of discharge, patients are approached about study participation and those who accept will be provided study information and forced to provide a written consent to participate. Continuous sampling is employed. Baseline characteristics are noted, as well as baseline data collected for the following end-points: Self-care, using the European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale (EHFScB), general quality of life using the SF-36 questionnaire, disease-specific quality of life using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and knowledge about heart failure using the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale (DHFKS). After this data is collected patients will be randomized, using sealed envelopes, to either receive standard care or receive the home-based tool that constitutes the intervention investigated. Within one week after discharge, the patients randomized to the intervention group will have he tool installed in their home.

The tool consists of a tablet computer locked to a specialized software, and a Bluetooth connected weight scale. Every day the patient is encouraged by the tablet computer to step up on the weight scale. The weight is wirelessly transferred to the tablet computer and today's dose of diuretics is shown on screen together with a short tip about how to improve living with heart failure. Every five days the patient assess their self-perceived symptoms, as prompted on the tablet computer. For every patient equipped with the tool, a patient-specific normal dose of diuretics, as well as a high dose is input in the tool at the point of randomization. If the weight increases by 2kg or more in 3 days or less, the high dose is recommended for two days, after which the effect on the weight is assessed. If the weight was decreased back to where it was prior to the rapid weight gain, the dose is returned to normal and if it is still elevated, the patient will be encouraged to call his/her health care provider at the number presented on the table computer. If the self-assessed symptoms deteriorate, the same type of warning will appear on screen, urging the patient to contact the health care provider. Both the intervention patients and the control patients will be given the same discharge information in writing, describing the most important parts of self-management for heart failure patients. The data collected at baseline will be collected again after 3 months and 6 months after randomization. After 6 months data about hospitalizations will be retrieved from the medical records and adjudicated as either heart failure-hospitalization or not. The adjudication will be done by the cardiologists participating in the study and as the focus of the study is in estimating the net/marginal incidence rate ratio of in-patient hospitalization, absorbing competing events (e.g. death) will be handled by censoring.

Conditions
Heart Failure
Being tested
Home-based tool
Keywords
patient centred, m-health, e-health, home-based, self-care
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Home-based toolDevice

    The tool consists of a tablet computer and a Bluetooth connected weight scale. The patient is encouraged to use the tool daily. The weight is titrates the dose of diuretics and a short tip about how to improve living with heart failure, this is presented on the screen. Every five days the patient assess their self-perceived symptoms on the tablet computer. If the weight increases by 2kg or more in 3 days or less, the high dose is recommended for two days, after which the effect on the weight is assessed. If the weight increased was reverted, the dose is returned to normal and if it is still elevated, an alert on the table computer. If the self-assessed symptoms deteriorate, the same type of alert will appear on screen, urging the patient to contact the health care provider.

Study groups in NCT03655496
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control groupNo interventionSubject to standard care.
Intervention groupExperimentalExposed to the home-based tool.
Receives: Device: Home-based tool

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Self-care behaviour

    Assessed by the validated instrument European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour Scale. It measures how well the patient adheres to advice provided from the health care professional. It si made up of nine questions to which the patient answers between "completely agree" and "completely disagree", corresponding to a score of 1 or 5 respectively. The possible scores on the questionnaire range from 9 to 45, where 9 corresponds to the most desireable self-care behaviour and 45 to the least favourable.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. In-hospital days due to heart failure

    Data retrieved from the medical records after the intervention period is completed. All hospitalizations analyzed and adjudicated as either heart failure related or not.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Quality of life (general)

    Assessed by the 36-item Short Form survey (SF-36). The instrument includes 8 multi-item scales plus a single-item scale to compare the patient's current health with that 1 year ago. The 8 domains are physical functioning, physical role, bodily pain, general health vitality, social functioning, role of emotional health and role of mental health. SF-36 also consists of two summary scores: mental and physical. The scores range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Quality of life (disease-specific)

    Assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). KCCQ is a 23-item (15 questions), self-administrating,disease-specifi c instrument that quantifi es 6 domains (scales) and 2 summary scores of patients' health status. The 6 domains are physical limitations, symptom score, symptom change, self-effi cacy, social interference and QoL. The 2 summary scores are labelled: clinical summary scores and overall summary scores. All scale scores are transformed to 0 - 100 scale, in which a higher score indicates better health related quality of life (HRQoL).

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Knowledge about heart failure

    Assessed by the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale (DHFKS), which consists of 15 multiple-choice items (0 - 15). It measures knowledge in HF in general, symptom recognition and treatment. Higher scores indicate more knowledge.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Aug 2018
  2. Study start22 Feb 2013
  3. Primary completion18 Dec 2013
  4. Study completion18 Dec 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized controlled parallel trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
82 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03655496
Sponsor's protocol ID
PACEMAN-HF
Acronym
PACEMAN-HF
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
30 Aug 2018
Last updated
4 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hagglund E, Lynga P, Frie F, Ullman B, Persson H, Melin M, Hagerman I. Patient-centred home-based management of heart failure. Findings from a randomised clinical trial evaluating a tablet computer for self-care, quality of life and effects on knowledge. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2015 Aug;49(4):193-9. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2015.1035319. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

    PubMed 25968968
  • Melin M, Hagglund E, Ullman B, Persson H, Hagerman I. Effects of a Tablet Computer on Self-care, Quality of Life, and Knowledge: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):336-343. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000462.

    PubMed 29369123
  • Hovland-Tanneryd A, Melin M, Hagglund E, Hagerman I, Persson HE. From randomised controlled trial to real world implementation of a novel home-based heart failure tool: pooled and comparative analyses of two clinical controlled trials. Open Heart. 2019 May 28;6(1):e000954. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000954. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31217992

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Home-based tool in people with Heart Failure, run by CareLigo AB.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Self-care behaviour (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03655496, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in