AzTrials
AzTrials

Education, MedicalG4MERNCT03666468

The Gaming for Medical Education Research (G4MER) Program

A study testing PlayMed, Online Package and Paper Guidelines in people with Education, Medical, run by The University of New South Wales at 1 site in Australia.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The "G4MER" Program aims to investigate whether serious games add value to medical education in comparison to an online learning package or clinical practice guidelines. The investigators will perform a series of investigator-blinded randomised control trials on doctors, nurses, and medical students at Sydney… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Education, Medical
What is being tested?
PlayMed, Online Package and Paper Guidelines
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
264 participants
Where
1 siteAustralia
Study dates
3 Jul 2017to 30 Apr 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Studies 1A and 2A Phase 2 or 3 medical students at UNSW who are enrolled in the Children's Health Course will be eligible
  • Studies 1B and 2B Doctors and nurses employed at Sydney Children's Hospital.

Who cannot join

  • Studies 1A and 2A Medical students not actively enrolled at UNSW
  • Studies 1B and 2B Doctors and nurses not actively employed at Sydney Children's Hospital.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Michael J Coffey, BMed MD contact

011 61 2 9382 5574

michael.coffey@unsw.edu.au

Penelope Uther, MBBS DipPaed contact

011 61 2 9382 5560

penelope.uther@health.nsw.gov.au

Australia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Sydney Children's Hospital

    Randwick, New South Wales, 2031

    Michael J Coffey, 011 61 2 9382 5574, michael.coffey@unsw.edu.au

    Penelope Uther, 011 61 2 9382 5560, penelope.uther@health.nsw.edu.au

    Recruiting

Other trials in Australia

About this study

Official title: Gaming for Medical Education Research Program: An Investigator-blinded, Randomised Controlled Trial on Serious Games for Doctors, Nurses and Students.

The "G4MER" Program aims to investigate whether serious games add value to medical education in comparison to an online learning package or clinical practice guidelines. The investigators will perform a series of investigator-blinded randomised control trials on doctors, nurses, and medical students at Sydney Children's Hospital. Participants will be given access to their randomly allocated intervention for 8 weeks or 5 days, and will be assessed using multiple choice questions (MCQ) and two observed structure clinical examination (OSCE) stations. Participant attitudes will also be assessed through a mixed-methods questionnaire.

Read the detailed description

The "G4MER" Program aims to perform a series of randomised control trials on different groups at Sydney Children's Hospital:

  1. Study 1A (Formerly titled "Serious Games in Medical Education - a Randomised Control Trial") is already underway and involves Phase 3 medical students at UNSW having 8 weeks access to the game, an Online Package (OP) or NSW State Guidelines on Asthma and Seizure management. Students are then assessed using multiple choice questions (MCQ) and two observed structure clinical examination (OSCE) stations (detailed below).
  2. Study 1B is also a randomised control trial similar in design to Study 1A, however it will involve doctors and nurses employed at Sydney Children's Hospital. PlayMed will be compared against the HETI Learning Path Paediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines (Online Package for staff).
  3. Studies 2A and 2B are identical to Studies 1A and 1B respectively except participants will have 2 hours access to their educational tool. Participants will then immediately undergo the same assessment using multiple choice questions (MCQ) and two observed structure clinical examination (OSCE) stations The proposed study designs are all blinded randomised control trials. Participants may only be involved in Study 1 or Study 2, not both.

Administration

Studies 1A and 1B Participants allocated to the game and to the OP will be given the appropriate access for 8 weeks (instructions provided in the study envelope). Participants allocated to the guidelines will receive a print-out of the guidelines. Participants will be encouraged to engage with their additional educational tool as often as they wish during their eight weeks. In the 8th last week participants will have their knowledge and clinical performance assessed as outlined below.

Studies 2A and 2B Participants allocated to the game, OP and guidelines will be given 2 hours to utilise their assigned teaching tool. Two hours was selected as an appropriate time-frame in which participants would be able complete all cases of the game or online package, or read through the guidelines. Furthermore, it was chosen as it is more pragmatic and better at assessing short-term retention. Computers will be provided for participants to access the game and OP. The guidelines will be printed for participants to read. Participants will then immediately have their knowledge and clinical performance assess as outlined below.

Assessment

Studies 1A, 1B, 2A and 2B Participants will be assessed for knowledge acquisition and clinical performance. Participant knowledge will be assessed using 10 multiple choice questions (MCQ). Participant clinical skills will be assessed via an observed structured clinical examination (OSCE) administered in the simulation laboratory (immediately after the knowledge test); participants will be tested across two clinical scenarios. Strict marking criteria will be used to ensure standardisation.

Being tested
PlayMed, Online Package, Paper Guidelines

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlayMedOther

    A highly immersive role-playing computer game focused on Paediatric Asthma and Seizure management

  • Online PackageOther

    Online package (OP) of NSW Health Guidelines focused on Paediatric Asthma and Seizure management

  • Paper GuidelinesOther

    Paper NSW Health Guideline focused on Paediatric Asthma and Seizure management

Study groups in NCT03666468
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlayMedExperimentalPlayMed, a highly immersive role-playing computer game - Focus on Paediatric Asthma and Seizure management
Receives: Other: PlayMed
Online Package (OP)Active comparatorOnline package (OP) of NSW Health Guidelines - Focus on Paediatric Asthma and Seizure management
Receives: Other: Online Package
Paper GuidelinesPlacebo comparatorPaper NSW Health Guidelines - Focus on Paediatric Asthma and Seizure management
Receives: Other: Paper Guidelines

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Multiple choice quiz score

    A paper-based assessment using multiple choice questions designed to test knowledge acquisition for asthma and seizure management. For Studies 1A and 1B, scale 0 to 10, higher is better performance. Studies 2A and 2B, scale from 0 to 15, higher is better.

    Measured: Post-intervention assessment; 8 weeks (Study 1A and 1B) or 2 hours (Study 2A and 2B).

  2. Asthma observed structured clinical examination (OSCE) score

    An OSCE administered in a high-fidelity simulation lab. A child with an exacerbation of asthma will be presented and the management required will need to be implemented by the participant. For Studies 1A and 1B, subscale from 0 to 15, higher is better, with scores summed with Outcome 3. Studies 2A and 2B, subscale from 0 to 25, higher is better, with scores summed with Outcome 3.

    Measured: Post-intervention assessment; 8 weeks (Study 1A and 1B) or 2 hours (Study 2A and 2B).

  3. Seizure observed structured clinical examination (OSCE) scoresimulation lab)

    An OSCE administered in a high-fidelity simulation lab. A child with a seizure will be presented and the management required will need to be implemented by the participant. For Studies 1A and 1B, subscale from 0 to 15, higher is better, with scores summed with Outcome 3. Studies 2A and 2B, subscale from 0 to 25, higher is better, with scores summed with Outcome 2.

    Measured: Post-intervention assessment; 8 weeks (Study 1A and 1B) or 2 hours (Study 2A and 2B).

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Participant attitudes towards educational intervention

    Mixed-methods analysis survey. 5-point Likert scale from "Strongly Agree" to "Strongly Disagree".

    Measured: Post-intervention assessment; 8 weeks (Study 1A and 1B) or 2 hours (Study 2A and 2B).

  2. Time to specific actions in OSCE scenarios

    E.g. calling for help, oxygen supplementation, salbutamol, anti-epileptic drug

    Measured: Post-intervention assessment; 8 weeks (Study 1A and 1B) or 2 hours (Study 2A and 2B).

  3. Anti-epileptic medication(s) administered at correct time during OSCE scenario

    E.g. Midazolam or diazepam correctly administered at 5 minutes of seizure activity (yes/no).

    Measured: Post-intervention assessment; 8 weeks (Study 1A and 1B) or 2 hours (Study 2A and 2B).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Sep 2018
  2. Study start3 Jul 2017
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
3 groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
264 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03666468
Sponsor's protocol ID
HC17160-LNR/17/SCHN/194
Acronym
G4MER
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
14 Aug 2018
Last updated
31 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PlayMed, Online Package and Paper Guidelines in people with Education, Medical, run by The University of New South Wales at 1 site in Australia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Michael J Coffey, BMed MD (011 61 2 9382 5574, michael.coffey@unsw.edu.au), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Multiple choice quiz score (time frame: Post-intervention assessment; 8 weeks (Study 1A and 1B) or 2 hours (Study 2A and 2B).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in