AzTrials
AzTrials

Musculoskeletal InjuryDCU RISCNCT03671395

The DCU Running Injury Surveillance Centre Study: A Prospective Investigation of Factors Relating to Running Injuries

An observational study of Musculoskeletal Injury, run by Dublin City University at 1 site in Ireland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to prospectively investigate the relationship between a number of clinical and biomechanical variables and running-related injuries among a group of novice and recreational runners over a two year time period. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Musculoskeletal Injury
How many people
315 participants
Where
1 siteIreland
Study dates
1 Feb 2018to May 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Novice and recreation runners.

Who may be able to join

  • Runners aged 18-65
  • Run minimum once per week

Who cannot join

  • No lower limb injury within the last three months
  • An injury will be defined as:
  • Any muscle, bone, tendon or ligament pain in the lower back, hip, groin, thigh, leg, knee, foot, ankle and toe that caused the participant to stop or restrict their running.
  • The pain must last for at least 7 days or 3 consecutive scheduled training sessions, or require the participant to consult a physician or other health care professional.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Ireland1 site
  • Dublin City University

    Dublin, Leinster, D09 Y5N0

Other trials in Ireland

About this study

Official title: The DCU Running Injury Surveillance Centre (RISC) Study: A Prospective Investigation of Factors Relating to Running Injuries

This study aims to prospectively investigate the relationship between a number of clinical and biomechanical variables and running-related injuries among a group of novice and recreational runners over a two year time period. To date, the incidence of running injuries among runners is high, with a lack of prospective research investigating the factors related to injury. It is thought that loading in excess of the tissues capabilities may be be a contributing factor to sustaining a running related injury. As such, this study hypothesizes that biomechanical factors may be related to injury.

Healthy participants will perform a battery of clinical tests at baseline, as well as completing a survey that details their injury history and training habits. Kinematic and kinetic motion analysis will be used as participants perform a series of functional movements and a treadmill run. Enrolled participants will be monitored for the occurrence of running-related injuries via email for the duration of the study.

Read the detailed description

Recruitment:

Novice and recreational runners will be recruited via emails, posters and social media. A novice runner is defined as a person who has not been running on a regular basis during the last year and completed ≤10km total training volume per week during the preceding year. A recreational runner will be defined as a person who runs a minimum of 10km per week, for at least six months prior to inclusion in the study.

Study Protocol:

Upon screening for inclusion and exclusion, participants will complete a baseline evaluation. This will consist of 1.) A survey, 2.) A battery of clinical tests and 3.) Motion analysis testing. A description of each component is detailed below.

  1. Survey: This survey will be self-reported by each participant. The aim of this survey is to detail each participants history of injuries and training habits. Questions are deigned based on previous survey designs relating to running injuries.
  2. Battery of clinical tests: The battery of physical performance tests will include: The foot posture index, the navicular drop, goniometry of the hip and ankle, dynamometry of the hip abductors, hip extensors, knee extensors, knee flexors and plantar flexors.
  3. Motion analysis testing:

This will be broken into two components; a functional movement protocol and a treadmill run. During these components, motion will be tracked using wearable inertial sensors (Shimmer, Dublin, Ireland) and two forceplates (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA). A 17-camera 3D motion analysis system (Vicon, Oxford, United Kingdom) will capture data at a sampling rate of 200 Hz. Reflective markers will be applied to the skin using specific anatomical landmarks to map their location. The functional movement protocol will consist of a series of jumping and landing movements, including double leg and single leg counter movement jumps, unilateral hopping, single leg drop landings and single leg drop jumps. Following this, participants will complete a run to fatigue. Motion analysis data will be captured at the end and start of this run. Fatigue will be determined by a reported rate of perceived exertion score of 17 (very hard) on the BORG Scale and a heart rate of 85% of the heart rate max, as determined by the Karvonen Formula (220-age).

Participants will then resume their normal training regime. Participants will be tracked for injuries via email over the course of the study.

Keywords
Running Injuries, Motion Analysis, Biomechanics, Inertial Measurement Unit, Sensor Technology, Kinetic, Kinematic, Injury
Medical subject headings
Wounds and Injuries

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The occurrence of a running-related injury

    Participants will be followed up on a 6 week basis via email. A running-related injury will be defined as any muscle, bone, tendon or ligament pain in the lower back, hip, groin, thigh, leg, knee, foot, ankle and toe that caused the participant to stop or restrict their running. The pain must last for at least 7 days or 3 consecutive scheduled training sessions, or require the participant to consult a physician or other health care professional.

    Measured: 6 week intervals from enrollment in the study, up to the total study time period of 2 years.

  2. Peak loading (N/s) during running and jumping movements.

    This data will be derived from the inertial measurement units (Shimmer, Dublin, Ireland) attached to the legs and pelvis and using forceplate data (AMTI, Watertown, USA).

    Measured: One two hour session on day one of enrollment into the study.

  3. Rate of loading (N/s2) during running.

    This data will be derived from the inertial measurement units (Shimmer, Dublin, Ireland) attached to the legs and pelvis and using forceplate data (AMTI, Watertown, USA).

    Measured: One two hour session on day one of enrollment into the study

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Peak range of motion (degrees) at the knee, hip and ankle during running.

    Captured and extracted via Vicon Motion Analysis Software (Oxford, UK).

    Measured: During a 15 minute run during one two hour session on day 1 of enrollment into the study.

  2. Injury history in the past 2 years.

    Frequency, type and severity measured via online survey.

    Measured: 10 minute questionnaire on day one of enrollment into the study.

  3. Training history- type

    Typical type of training (Distance, interval, hill, speed), measured via online survey.

    Measured: 10 minute questionnaire on day one of enrollment into the study.

  4. Training history-frequency

    Typical frequency (sessions per week) measured via online survey.

    Measured: 10 minute questionnaire on day one of enrollment into the study.

  5. Training history- mileage

    Typical mileage (km/week) and duration (minutes/session) measured via online survey.

    Measured: 10 minute questionnaire on day one of enrollment into the study.

  6. Training history- duration

    Typical session duration (minutes/session) measured via online survey.

    Measured: 10 minute questionnaire on day one of enrollment into the study.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Sep 2018
  2. Study start1 Feb 2018
  3. Primary completionMay 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
315 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03671395
Sponsor's protocol ID
SFI12/RC/2289
Acronym
DCU RISC
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
2 May 2018
Last updated
22 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Anonymised data may be shared to allow future analysis by other researchers.

Publications

  • Bredeweg SW, Kluitenberg B, Bessem B, Buist I. Differences in kinetic variables between injured and noninjured novice runners: a prospective cohort study. J Sci Med Sport. 2013 May;16(3):205-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

    PubMed 22921763
  • Buist I, Bredeweg SW, Lemmink KA, van Mechelen W, Diercks RL. Predictors of running-related injuries in novice runners enrolled in a systematic training program: a prospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):273-80. doi: 10.1177/0363546509347985. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

    PubMed 19966104
  • Ghani Zadeh Hesar N, Van Ginckel A, Cools A, Peersman W, Roosen P, De Clercq D, Witvrouw E. A prospective study on gait-related intrinsic risk factors for lower leg overuse injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Dec;43(13):1057-61. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.055723. Epub 2009 Feb 18.

    PubMed 19228665
  • Hespanhol Junior LC, Pena Costa LO, Lopes AD. Previous injuries and some training characteristics predict running-related injuries in recreational runners: a prospective cohort study. J Physiother. 2013 Dec;59(4):263-9. doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70203-0.

    PubMed 24287220
  • Lun V, Meeuwisse WH, Stergiou P, Stefanyshyn D. Relation between running injury and static lower limb alignment in recreational runners. Br J Sports Med. 2004 Oct;38(5):576-80. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.005488.

    PubMed 15388542
  • Malisoux L, Nielsen RO, Urhausen A, Theisen D. A step towards understanding the mechanisms of running-related injuries. J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Sep;18(5):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

    PubMed 25174773
  • Nielsen RO, Buist I, Parner ET, Nohr EA, Sorensen H, Lind M, Rasmussen S. Predictors of Running-Related Injuries Among 930 Novice Runners: A 1-Year Prospective Follow-up Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013 May 2;1(1):2325967113487316. doi: 10.1177/2325967113487316. eCollection 2013 Jan-Jun.

    PubMed 26535228

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Musculoskeletal Injury, run by Dublin City University at 1 site in Ireland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The occurrence of a running-related injury (time frame: 6 week intervals from enrollment in the study, up to the total study time period of 2 years.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03671395, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in