AzTrials
AzTrials

Carpal Tunnel SyndromeNCT03671473

Comparison of Focused and Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

A study testing Extracorporeal shock wave in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH) at 1 site in Taiwan.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Extracorporeal shock wave is a novel treatment for peripheral nerve entrapment. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of focused and radial extracorporeal shock wave for carpal tunnel syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
What is being tested?
Extracorporeal shock wave
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
1 Jan 2019to 31 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical and electrophysiological diagnosis of CTS

Who cannot join

  • Cervical radiculopathy
  • Polyneuropathy
  • Brachial plexopathy
  • Thoracic outlet syndrome
  • Previous wrist surgery or steroid injection for CTS

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital

    Taipei, Neihu District, 886

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Extracorporeal shock wave is a novel treatment for peripheral nerve entrapment. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of focused and radial extracorporeal shock wave for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Both focused and radial extracorporeal shock wave had been proved to treat carpal tunnel syndrome by several studies. However, there was no study comparing these two methods. Considering different mechanisms and costs, this randomized comparative trial would be conducted to compare the efficacy of focused and radial extracorporeal shock wave for carpal tunnel syndrome.

Being tested
Extracorporeal shock wave
Keywords
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Extracorporeal shock wave
Medical subject headings
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Extracorporeal shock waveDevice

    Shock waves are defined a sequence of acoustic pulse characterized by a high peak pressure (100 MPa), fast pressure rise (< 10 ns) and short duration (10 μs). Different studies and clinical experiments have demonstrated the efficacy of shock waves in the treatment of musculoskeletal system such as chronic tendinopathies or hypertrophic pseudoarthrosis.

Study groups in NCT03671473
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FocusedExperimentalfESWT (0.05-0.29 mJ/mm2, 2000 shocks, 5 Hz)
Receives: Device: Extracorporeal shock wave
RadialActive comparatorrESWT (2000shocks, 4 Bar, 5Hz)
Receives: Device: Extracorporeal shock wave

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline of Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) at 24th weeks after treatment

    Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire (BCTQ) is a frequently used patient-based questionnaire for measurement of carpal tunnel syndrome which encompasses two components. eleven questions and eight items were evaluated to rate the symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional status scale (FSS), respectively. Each question or item ranges from 1 to 5 with a higher score indicating severer symptom or a higher degree of disability. Total score of SSS ranges from 11-55 and FSS from 8-40. The mean of total SSS and FSS divided with each item score were used for further analysis.

    Measured: Change of the mean of total SSS and FSS from baseline at 24th weeks after treatment

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Digital pain severity or paresthesia/dysthesia within 1 week prior to evaluation was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS). Pain score scale ranged from 0 to 10, with 10 indicating the most severe pain.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks after treatment

  2. Nerve conduction velocity

    Change from baseline in conduction velocity of median nerve on 2nd, 4th, 8th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks after treatment

  3. Cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve

    Change from baseline in cross-sectional area of the median nerve on 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks after treatment.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks after treatment

  4. Nerve conduction amplitude

    Change from baseline in conduction amplitude of median nerve on 2nd, 4th, 8th,12th and 24th weeks after treatment.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th and 24th weeks after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Sep 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2020

Why it stopped: It is difficult to enroll patients

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03671473
Sponsor's protocol ID
TSGHIRB: 1-107-05-074
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
31 Jul 2018
Last updated
13 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Wu YT, Ke MJ, Chou YC, Chang CY, Lin CY, Li TY, Shih FM, Chen LC. Effect of radial shock wave therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Orthop Res. 2016 Jun;34(6):977-84. doi: 10.1002/jor.23113. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

    PubMed 26610183
  • Ke MJ, Chen LC, Chou YC, Li TY, Chu HY, Tsai CK, Wu YT. The dose-dependent efficiency of radial shock wave therapy for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 2;6:38344. doi: 10.1038/srep38344.

    PubMed 27910920
  • Paoloni M, Tavernese E, Cacchio A, D'orazi V, Ioppolo F, Fini M, Santilli V, Mangone M. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy and ultrasound therapy improve pain and function in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Oct;51(5):521-8. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

    PubMed 25697763

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Extracorporeal shock wave in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, run by Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH) at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline of Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) at 24th weeks after treatment (time frame: Change of the mean of total SSS and FSS from baseline at 24th weeks after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03671473, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in