AzTrials
AzTrials

PolytraumaPhase 1NCT03671746

Inflammatory Markers in Trauma Patient Outcomes

A Phase 1 study testing Ketorolac and Saline Solution in people with Polytrauma, run by Arun Aneja at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

It is unknown whether early modulation of inflammatory cytokines is associated with improved patient outcomes, reduced narcotic requirements in orthopaedic patient population, and improved patient subjective pain after hospital discharge. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Polytrauma
What is being tested?
Ketorolac and Saline Solution
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
28 Feb 2019to 20 Jun 2023
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients age 18 to 75
  • New Injury Severity Score (NISS) > 9, with musculoskeletal injury requiring surgical treatment

Who cannot join

  • Patient age < 18 or > 75
  • Patients who presented more than 24 hours after time of injury
  • Patients with contraindications to NSAID therapy (i.e., patients with active hemorrhage, received blood products, traumatic brain injury (TBI), active gastrointestinal bleeding or ulceration, NSAID allergy, thromboembolism, or coagulopathy)
  • Patients with pre-existing inflammatory condition (e.g., inflammatory arthropathy or bowel disease)
  • Patients with preexisting immunocompromised/immunosuppressed condition or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)
  • Patients with pre-existing comorbidities (e.g., coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, chronic organ failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, asthma, etc.)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients with chronic use of steroids, immuno-modulating drugs, or history of organ transplantation
  • Patients receiving chronic opioid therapy or treatment for opioid use disorder
  • Patients who are pregnant
  • Patients with thermal injury

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Kentucky

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40536

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Inflammatory Response to Trauma - Does Early Cytokine Modulation Improve Patient Outcome

It is unknown whether early modulation of inflammatory cytokines is associated with improved patient outcomes, reduced narcotic requirements in orthopaedic patient population, and improved patient subjective pain after hospital discharge. Preliminary animal and clinical studies have shown correlation between elevated blood cytokine concentrations during the acute phase of trauma and the development of post-traumatic complications. Early administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in animals significantly reduced inflammatory profiles, improved pulmonary edema, and enhanced arteriole vasoconstriction in response to hemorrhage. The ability to modify post-traumatic physiologic response via short-term administration of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) may lead to improved patient outcome. In addition, given the current landscape for opioid epidemic in the United States, alternative non-opioid pain management during acute trauma has the potential to reduce opioid consumption and represents a pivotal component of multimodal analgesia strategy.

By doing this study, the investigators hope to learn how to provide the best care for all patients in the state of Kentucky. Patient participation in this research will last about 1 year.

Read the detailed description

Accidental trauma is the 4th leading cause of death in the United States, and it is associated with a complex inflammatory response. This response is associated with post-traumatic complications such as; multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), bacterial pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and post-traumatic pain (PTP). It is unknown whether early modulation of inflammatory cytokines is associated with improved patient outcomes, reduced narcotic requirements, and improved patient subjective pain after hospital discharge.

Preliminary data has shown: (1) elevated blood cytokine concentrations during the acute phase of trauma are correlated with the development of fatal post-traumatic complications, (2) that early administration of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) resulted in decreased blood serum levels of interleukin (IL-6), Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), improved pulmonary edema, and enhanced arterioles ability to vasoconstrict in response to hemorrhage in animal models, and (3) that the addition of the internal physiologic parameters (inflammatory cytokines) to New Injury Severity Score (NISS - a marker of the external anatomical insult) significantly improves the ability to predict hospital length of stay of trauma patients when compared to NISS alone. The investigator's group is the first to use an integrative approach that combines the external anatomic injury data with the internal physiologic response for accurate prediction of a patient's clinical outcome. Therefore, if the investigators apply this same mindset to treatment, the investigators can improve the trauma patients' care by addressing both parameters as opposed to solely focusing on the external injury as done in the past. The ability to modify post-traumatic physiologic response via short-term administration of an NSAID may lead to improved patient outcomes.

Over the last decade, clinicians have remained puzzled over the safety of NSAID administration after fracture in terms of bone union. In addition, given the current landscape for the opioid epidemic in the United States, alternative non-opioid pain management during acute trauma has the potential to reduce opioid consumption and represents a pivotal component of multimodal analgesia strategy.

Conditions
Polytrauma
Being tested
Ketorolac, Saline Solution
Keywords
Inflammatory cytokine, inflammation, trauma, opioid
Medical subject headings
Multiple Trauma, Inflammation, Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • KetorolacDrug

    Also called Toradol

    Participants will receive Ketorolac at 15 mg IV every 6 hours for their first 5 days of hospitalization

  • Saline SolutionDrug

    Also called Normal Saline

    Participants will receive 1 ml of saline solution IV every 6 hours for their first 5 days of hospitalization

Study groups in NCT03671746
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of Care without NSAIDPlacebo comparatorPolytrauma participants will receive standard of care in addition to saline solution according to standard Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and standard ICU routine medical care.
Receives: Drug: Saline Solution
Standard of Care with NSAIDExperimentalParticipants in the group will receive Ketorolac in addition to standard of care for the standard Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) and standard ICU routine medical care.
Receives: Drug: Ketorolac

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Length of Hospital Stay

    Duration of the hospital stay will be calculated from electronic health record

    Measured: Up to 30 days

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Morphine Milligram Equivalents in House

    The the morphine milligram equivalents (MME) will be recorded throughout the course of the hospital stay. These will be reported as daily totals.

    Measured: Hospital Day 0 (Enrollment), Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5

  2. Change in Patient Pain Scores

    The patient reported pain scores (visual analogue pain scores) will be recorded throughout the course of the hospital stay. The scores are reported by the patients and range from 0 indicating no pain to 100 meaning the worst pain imaginable. These will be reported as daily averages.

    Measured: Hospital Day 0 (Enrollment), Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5

  3. Change in Interleukin 1a

    Daily blood collections during the first 5 days of hospitalization. Interleukin 1a will be measured by the sandwich ELISA, and data will be presented as change in the baseline level of Interleukin 1 from presentation to the emergency room to day 5 of hospitalization.

    Measured: Hospital Day 0 (Enrollment), Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5

  4. Change in Interleukin 1b

    Daily blood collections during the first 5 days of hospitalization. Interleukin 1b will be measured by the sandwich ELISA, and data will be presented as change in the baseline level of Interleukin 1 from presentation to the emergency room to day 5 of hospitalization.

    Measured: Hospital Day 0 (Enrollment), Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5

  5. Change in Interleukin 6

    Daily blood collections during the first 5 days of hospitalization. Interleukin 6 will be measured by the sandwich ELISA, and data will be presented as change in the baseline level of Interleukin 6 from presentation to the emergency room to day 5 of hospitalization.

    Measured: Hospital Day 0 (Enrollment), Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5

  6. Change in Interleukin 10

    Daily blood collections during the first 5 days of hospitalization. Interleukin 10 will be measured by the sandwich ELISA, and data will be presented as change in the baseline level of Interleukin 10 from presentation to the emergency room to day 5 of hospitalization.

    Measured: Hospital Day 0 (Enrollment), Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5

  7. Change in Prostaglandin E-2

    Blood will be collected over the course of 5 days of hospitalization. Prostaglandin E-2 will be measured by the sandwich ELISA, and data will be presented as change in the baseline level of Prostaglandin E-2 from presentation to the emergency room to day 5 of hospitalization

    Measured: Hospital Day 0 (Enrollment), Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5

  8. Post Traumatic Complications

    The Incidence of post-traumatic complications in the patients which includes, but is not limited to the occurrence of pulmonary complications (i.e., bacterial pneumonia, pulmonary edema, acute respiratory failure) and AKI will be recorded throughout the duration of the hospital stay, usually up to 30 days. Data will be presented as the percentage of participants with a diagnosed post-traumatic complication.

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  9. Mortality

    The Incidence of death related to the initial trauma/traumatic complications will be recorded for the first 30 days.

    Measured: Up to 30 days

  10. Change in Inpatient Subjective Pain Reports

    The patient reported pain scores (visual analogue pain scores) will be recorded throughout the course of the hospital stay. The scores are reported by the patients and range from 0 indicating no pain to 100 meaning the worst pain imaginable. These will be reported as daily averages.

    Measured: Hospital Day 0 (Enrollment), Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5

  11. Change in Outpatient Subjective Pain Reports

    Patient reports of level of pain and how much it inhibits their daily activities will be recorded in the outpatient setting. The scores are reported by the patients (visual analogue scale) and range from 0 indicating no pain to 100 meaning the worst pain imaginable. This will be reported for each patient follow-up visit. Several visits are possible and data will only be collected for the first year of follow-up. Data presented as the change in subject pain from baseline to 365 days.

    Measured: up to 365 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Sep 2018
  2. Study start28 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion20 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion20 Jun 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Compare the effectiveness of a NSAID to placebo in acute trauma setting.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03671746
Sponsor's protocol ID
43611
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
12 Sep 2018
Last updated
5 Jun 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Braden JB, Fan MY, Edlund MJ, Martin BC, DeVries A, Sullivan MD. Trends in use of opioids by noncancer pain type 2000-2005 among Arkansas Medicaid and HealthCore enrollees: results from the TROUP study. J Pain. 2008 Nov;9(11):1026-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Jul 26.

    PubMed 18676205
  • Lawal OD, Gold J, Murthy A, Ruchi R, Bavry E, Hume AL, Lewkowitz AK, Brothers T, Wen X. Rate and Risk Factors Associated With Prolonged Opioid Use After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207367. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7367.

    PubMed 32584407
  • Mohamadi A, Chan JJ, Lian J, Wright CL, Marin AM, Rodriguez EK, von Keudell A, Nazarian A. Risk Factors and Pooled Rate of Prolonged Opioid Use Following Trauma or Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-(Regression) Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Aug 1;100(15):1332-1340. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01239.

    PubMed 30063596
  • Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Kellam JF, Burgess AR, Webb LX, Swiontkowski MF, Sanders RW, Jones AL, McAndrew MP, Patterson BM, McCarthy ML, Travison TG, Castillo RC. An analysis of outcomes of reconstruction or amputation after leg-threatening injuries. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 12;347(24):1924-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012604.

    PubMed 12477942
  • Castillo RC, MacKenzie EJ, Webb LX, Bosse MJ, Avery J; LEAP Study Group. Use and perceived need of physical therapy following severe lower-extremity trauma. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;86(9):1722-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.005.

    PubMed 16181933
  • O'Toole RV, Castillo RC, Pollak AN, MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ; LEAP Study Group. Determinants of patient satisfaction after severe lower-extremity injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun;90(6):1206-11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00492.

    PubMed 18519312
  • Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.

    PubMed 12873949
  • Sherwood GD, McNeill JA, Starck PL, Disnard G. Changing acute pain management outcomes in surgical patients. AORN J. 2003 Feb;77(2):374, 377-80, 384-90 passim. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)61206-4.

    PubMed 12619852
  • Hsu JR, Mir H, Wally MK, Seymour RB; Orthopaedic Trauma Association Musculoskeletal Pain Task Force. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pain Management in Acute Musculoskeletal Injury. J Orthop Trauma. 2019 May;33(5):e158-e182. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001430.

    PubMed 30681429
  • Oyler DR, Slade E, Slavova S, Matuszewski PE, Lei F, Herndon B, Johnson S, Moghadamian ES. Effect of a Multimodal Analgesic Protocol on Short-Term and Long-Term Opioid Use After Orthopaedic Trauma. J Orthop Trauma. 2022 Aug 1;36(8):326-331. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002346. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

    PubMed 34999625
  • Mir HR, Miller AN, Obremskey WT, Jahangir AA, Hsu JR. Confronting the Opioid Crisis: Practical Pain Management and Strategies: AOA 2018 Critical Issues Symposium. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Dec 4;101(23):e126. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00285.

    PubMed 31800430
  • Castillo RC, Raja SN, Frey KP, Vallier HA, Tornetta P 3rd, Jaeblon T, Goff BJ, Gottschalk A, Scharfstein DO, O'Toole RV; METRC. Improving Pain Management and Long-Term Outcomes Following High-Energy Orthopaedic Trauma (Pain Study). J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Apr;31 Suppl 1:S71-S77. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000793.

    PubMed 28323806
  • Marquez-Lara A, Hutchinson ID, Nunez F Jr, Smith TL, Miller AN. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Bone-Healing: A Systematic Review of Research Quality. JBJS Rev. 2016 Mar 15;4(3):e4. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.O.00055.

    PubMed 27500434
  • Cepeda MS, Carr DB, Miranda N, Diaz A, Silva C, Morales O. Comparison of morphine, ketorolac, and their combination for postoperative pain: results from a large, randomized, double-blind trial. Anesthesiology. 2005 Dec;103(6):1225-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200512000-00018.

    PubMed 16306736
  • McDonald EL, Daniel JN, Rogero RG, Shakked RJ, Nicholson K, Pedowitz DI, Raikin SM, Bilolikar V, Winters BS. How Does Perioperative Ketorolac Affect Opioid Consumption and Pain Management After Ankle Fracture Surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jan;478(1):144-151. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000978.

    PubMed 31567579

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Ketorolac and Saline Solution in people with Polytrauma, run by Arun Aneja at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Length of Hospital Stay (time frame: Up to 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03671746, which also lists 104 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in