Osteoarthritis, KneeNCT03676790
Ultrasound and Exercises in Knee Osteoarthritis
A study testing Group I, Group II and Group III in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital.
Trial summary
The aim of this investigation is to compare the effects of continuous (CUS) and pulsed (PUS) ultrasound associated with a program of exercises on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, functionality, mobility and activity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- What is being tested?
- Group I, Group II and Group III
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2015to 1 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- To be included in the study, participants needed to suffer knee osteoarthritis with osteoarthritis levels 2 - 4 according to Kellgren-Lawrence grade12, be aged between 50 and 75 years and suffer knee pain and functional disability for at least three months, according to the criteria of the American College for Rheumatology (ACR)13. Participants from both genders were included. The Kellgren and Lawrence grading of knee osteoarthritis is as follows: none (0), doubtful (1), minimal (2), moderate (3) and severe (4).
- The ACR criteria of knee osteoarthritis are as follows:
- Using history and physical examination: knee pain and three of the following - over 50 years old; less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness; bone tenderness; bone enlargement; no palpable warmth of synovial.
- Using history, physical examination and radiographic findings: knee pain and one of the following - over 50 years old; less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness; crepitus on active motion; and osteophytes.
- Using history, physical examination and laboratory findings: knee pain and five of the following - over 50 years old; less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness; bone tenderness; bone enlargement; no palpable warmth of synovial; crepitus on active motion; ESR <40 mm/h; rheumatoid factor <1: 40; synovial fluid sign of osteoarthritis.
Who cannot join
- Participants were excluded if they had cancer, diabetes, symptomatic hip osteoarthritis, or used antidepressants, anti-inflammatory medications or anxiolytics during six months prior to enrollment.
About this study
Official title: Effect of Ultrasound Associated to Exercises in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
The aim of this investigation is to compare the effects of continuous (CUS) and pulsed (PUS) ultrasound associated with a program of exercises on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, functionality, mobility and activity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Participants were randomized into five groups: Group I (in the first month, continuous ultrasound was applied), Group II (in the first month, pulsed ultrasound was applied), Group III (in the first and second month, the continuous ultrasound was applied), Group IV (in the first and second month, the pulsed ultrasound was applied) and Group V (patients received only exercise sessions for eight weeks).
Read the detailed description
Strong evidence suggests that joint exercises reduce pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis. There is evidence that exercise is responsible for muscular strengthening and better flexibility, improved global function as well as better performance in activities of daily living (ADL).
There are two modes of US, continuous and pulsed. Continuous US (CUS) generates thermal effects by stimulating the process of tissue regeneration, changing cell membrane permeability and increasing intracellular calcium, while pulsed US (PUS) mainly produces non-thermal effects to increase tissue metabolism, enhance fibrous tissue extensibility and elevate pain threshold
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Being tested
- Group I, Group II, Group III, Group IV, Group V
- Keywords
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Ultrasonic Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Randomized controlled trial.
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group IOther
Group I In the first month, continuous ultrasound was applied three times a week. In the second month, patients performed only exercise sessions three times a week. In the ultrasound treatment, the following parameters were used: frequency of 1 MHz, intensity of 1.5 W/cm2 (temporal and spatial mean SATA), duty cycle of 100%, with application time of 5 minutes on the medial side and 5 minutes on lateral side of knee.
Exercises
The intervention was divided into three phases: P-1, P-2 and P-3 during eight weeks with three sessions a week. Each session lasted 45 minutes:
- 10 minutes warming-up (treadmill, ergometer bike or rowing machine);
- 30 minutes 2-3 sets with P-1, P-2 or P-3;
- 5 minutes stretching (hamstrings, quadriceps, adductors, and gastrocmenius).
Group IIOther
Group II In the first month, pulsed ultrasound was applied three times a week. In the second month, patients performed only exercise sessions three times a week. In the treatment with the US, the following parameters were used: 1 MHz frequency, 2.5 w / cm2 intensity (temporal and spatial mean SATA), pulsed mode (25%), 5 minutes on the medial side and 5 minutes on the lateral side of the knee.
Exercises
The intervention was divided into three phases: P-1, P-2 and P-3 during eight weeks with three sessions a week. Each session lasted 45 minutes:
- 10 minutes warming-up (treadmill, ergometer bike or rowing machine);
- 30 minutes 2-3 sets with P-1, P-2 or P-3;
- 5 minutes stretching (hamstrings, quadriceps, adductors, and gastrocmenius).
Group IIIOther
Group III In the first month, the continuous ultrasound was applied 3 times a week. In the second month, 3 times a week, the continuous ultrasound was applied associated with exercises. The parameters were used: frequency of 1 MHz, intensity of 1.5 w / cm2 (temporal and spatial mean SATA), continuous mode (100%), with application time of 5 minutes on the medial side and 5 minutes on lateral side of knee.
Exercises
The intervention was divided into three phases: P-1, P-2 and P-3 during eight weeks with three sessions a week. Each session lasted 45 minutes:
- 10 minutes warming-up (treadmill, ergometer bike or rowing machine);
- 30 minutes 2-3 sets with P-1, P-2 or P-3;
- 5 minutes stretching (hamstrings, quadriceps, adductors, and gastrocmenius).
Group IVOther
Group IV In the first month, the pulsed ultrasound was applied three times a week. In the second month, three times a week, the pulsed ultrasound associated with exercises was applied. In the treatment with the US, the following parameters were used: 1 MHz frequency, 2.5 w / cm2 intensity (temporal and spatial mean SATA), pulsed mode (25%), 5 minutes on the medial side and 5 Minutes on the lateral side of the knee.
Exercises
The intervention was divided into three phases: P-1, P-2 and P-3 during eight weeks with three sessions a week. Each session lasted 45 minutes:
- 10 minutes warming-up (treadmill, ergometer bike or rowing machine);
- 30 minutes 2-3 sets with P-1, P-2 or P-3;
- 5 minutes stretching (hamstrings, quadriceps, adductors, and gastrocmenius).
Group VOther
Group V Patients received only exercise sessions three times a week for two months.
Exercises
The intervention was divided into three phases: P-1, P-2 and P-3 during eight weeks with three sessions a week. Each session lasted 45 minutes:
- 10 minutes warming-up (treadmill, ergometer bike or rowing machine);
- 30 minutes 2-3 sets with P-1, P-2 or P-3;
- 5 minutes stretching (hamstrings, quadriceps, adductors, and gastrocmenius).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group I | Experimental | (in the first month, continuous ultrasound was applied three times a week and in the second month patients performed only exercise sessions three times a week) Receives: Other: Group I |
| Group II | Experimental | (in the first month, pulsed ultrasound was applied three times a week and in the second month patients performed only exercise sessions three times a week) Receives: Other: Group II |
| Group III | Experimental | (in the first month, the continuous ultrasound was applied three times a week and in the second month, three times a week, the continuous ultrasound associated with exercises was applied) Receives: Other: Group III |
| Group IV | Experimental | (in the first month, the pulsed ultrasound was applied three times a week and in the second month, three times a week, the pulsed ultrasound associated with exercises was applied) Receives: Other: Group IV |
| Group V | Experimental | (patients received only exercise sessions three times a week for eight weeks) Receives: Other: Group V |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Intensity Measure
Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS)14 consisting of a 10 cm rule (without numbers). At the left side, 'no pain' is written, while on the right side, 'unbearable pain'. Patients were instructed to mark on the rule what their level of pain was.
Measured: eight weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
Functionality Measure
Functionality was measured using the Lequesne questionnaire,14 which consists of 11 questions about pain, discomfort and function. Scores range from 0 to 24 (from 'no' to 'extremely severe' dysfunction).
Measured: eight weeks
Range of motion
Range of motion for flexion of the knees was measured with the universal goniometer (AESCULAP), according to the methods described by Marques.
Measured: eight weeks
Muscular strength
Muscular strength was estimated at maximal isometric force for the quadriceps, using a portable dynamometer (Lafayette, USA). Under stabilized conditions, patients, sitting with knees flexed at 10o, 60o and 90o (measured by a goniometer),16 were asked to extend the legs as far as they could. Three trials were conducted and the mean value was obtained.
Measured: eight weeks
Activity
Activity was measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) questionnaire,17 which is self-administered and measures pain, frozen joints and physical activity. Increased scores indicate decreased activity.
Measured: eight weeks
Mobility and balance
Mobility and balance are evaluated by Timed Get Up and Go (TGUG)18 and 8 meters Test19. The TGUG quantifies in seconds the functional mobility through the time that the individual needs to perform the task of getting up from a chair, walking three meters, turning back towards the chair and sitting again. The 8-meter test measures the time and number of steps required for a person to walk for 8 meters.
Measured: eight weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2015
- Primary completion1 Jan 2016
- Study completion1 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis, KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Sao Paulo General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Raquel A. Casarotto, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Investigators
- Raquel A Casarotto, PhD, Principal investigator, São Paulo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03676790
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAAE: 47955315.7.0000.0065
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 18 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Ultrasound Associated to Exercises in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03676790
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CAAE: 47955315.7.0000.0065
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Keywords
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Ultrasonic Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Randomized controlled trial.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this investigation is to compare the effects of continuous (CUS) and pulsed (PUS) ultrasound associated with a program of exercises on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, functionality, mobility and activity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Participants were randomized into five groups: Group I (in the first month, continuous ultrasound was applied), Group II (in the first month, pulsed ultrasound was applied), Group III (in the first and second month, the continuous ultrasound was applied), Group IV (in the first and second month, the pulsed ultrasound was applied) and Group V (patients received only exercise sessions for eight weeks).
Detailed description
Strong evidence suggests that joint exercises reduce pain and disability in patients with osteoarthritis. There is evidence that exercise is responsible for muscular strengthening and better flexibility, improved global function as well as better performance in activities of daily living (ADL).
There are two modes of US, continuous and pulsed. Continuous US (CUS) generates thermal effects by stimulating the process of tissue regeneration, changing cell membrane permeability and increasing intracellular calcium, while pulsed US (PUS) mainly produces non-thermal effects to increase tissue metabolism, enhance fibrous tissue extensibility and elevate pain threshold
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group I | Experimental | Other: Group I(in the first month, continuous ultrasound was applied three times a week and in the second month patients performed only exercise sessions three times a week) |
| Group II | Experimental | Other: Group II(in the first month, pulsed ultrasound was applied three times a week and in the second month patients performed only exercise sessions three times a week) |
| Group III | Experimental | Other: Group III(in the first month, the continuous ultrasound was applied three times a week and in the second month, three times a week, the continuous ultrasound associated with exercises was applied) |
| Group IV | Experimental | Other: Group IV(in the first month, the pulsed ultrasound was applied three times a week and in the second month, three times a week, the pulsed ultrasound associated with exercises was applied) |
| Group V | Experimental | Other: Group V(patients received only exercise sessions three times a week for eight weeks) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- To be included in the study, participants needed to suffer knee osteoarthritis with osteoarthritis levels 2 - 4 according to Kellgren-Lawrence grade12, be aged between 50 and 75 years and suffer knee pain and functional disability for at least three months, according to the criteria of the American College for Rheumatology (ACR)13. Participants from both genders were included. The Kellgren and Lawrence grading of knee osteoarthritis is as follows: none (0), doubtful (1), minimal (2), moderate (3) and severe (4).
- Using history and physical examination: knee pain and three of the following - over 50 years old; less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness; bone tenderness; bone enlargement; no palpable warmth of synovial.
- Using history, physical examination and radiographic findings: knee pain and one of the following - over 50 years old; less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness; crepitus on active motion; and osteophytes.
- Using history, physical examination and laboratory findings: knee pain and five of the following - over 50 years old; less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness; bone tenderness; bone enlargement; no palpable warmth of synovial; crepitus on active motion; ESR <40 mm/h; rheumatoid factor <1: 40; synovial fluid sign of osteoarthritis.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants were excluded if they had cancer, diabetes, symptomatic hip osteoarthritis, or used antidepressants, anti-inflammatory medications or anxiolytics during six months prior to enrollment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group IGroup I In the first month, continuous ultrasound was applied three times a week. In the second month, patients performed only exercise sessions three times a week. In the ultrasound treatment, the following parameters were used: frequency of 1 MHz, intensity of 1.5 W/cm2 (temporal and spatial mean SATA), duty cycle of 100%, with application time of 5 minutes on the medial side and 5 minutes on lateral side of knee. Exercises The intervention was divided into three phases: P-1, P-2 and P-3 during eight weeks with three sessions a week. Each session lasted 45 minutes: * 10 minutes warming-up (treadmill, ergometer bike or rowing machine); * 30 minutes 2-3 sets with P-1, P-2 or P-3; * 5 minutes stretching (hamstrings, quadriceps, adductors, and gastrocmenius). | Other | Group I |
| Group IIGroup II In the first month, pulsed ultrasound was applied three times a week. In the second month, patients performed only exercise sessions three times a week. In the treatment with the US, the following parameters were used: 1 MHz frequency, 2.5 w / cm2 intensity (temporal and spatial mean SATA), pulsed mode (25%), 5 minutes on the medial side and 5 minutes on the lateral side of the knee. Exercises The intervention was divided into three phases: P-1, P-2 and P-3 during eight weeks with three sessions a week. Each session lasted 45 minutes: * 10 minutes warming-up (treadmill, ergometer bike or rowing machine); * 30 minutes 2-3 sets with P-1, P-2 or P-3; * 5 minutes stretching (hamstrings, quadriceps, adductors, and gastrocmenius). | Other | Group II |
| Group IIIGroup III In the first month, the continuous ultrasound was applied 3 times a week. In the second month, 3 times a week, the continuous ultrasound was applied associated with exercises. The parameters were used: frequency of 1 MHz, intensity of 1.5 w / cm2 (temporal and spatial mean SATA), continuous mode (100%), with application time of 5 minutes on the medial side and 5 minutes on lateral side of knee. Exercises The intervention was divided into three phases: P-1, P-2 and P-3 during eight weeks with three sessions a week. Each session lasted 45 minutes: * 10 minutes warming-up (treadmill, ergometer bike or rowing machine); * 30 minutes 2-3 sets with P-1, P-2 or P-3; * 5 minutes stretching (hamstrings, quadriceps, adductors, and gastrocmenius). | Other | Group III |
| Group IVGroup IV In the first month, the pulsed ultrasound was applied three times a week. In the second month, three times a week, the pulsed ultrasound associated with exercises was applied. In the treatment with the US, the following parameters were used: 1 MHz frequency, 2.5 w / cm2 intensity (temporal and spatial mean SATA), pulsed mode (25%), 5 minutes on the medial side and 5 Minutes on the lateral side of the knee. Exercises The intervention was divided into three phases: P-1, P-2 and P-3 during eight weeks with three sessions a week. Each session lasted 45 minutes: * 10 minutes warming-up (treadmill, ergometer bike or rowing machine); * 30 minutes 2-3 sets with P-1, P-2 or P-3; * 5 minutes stretching (hamstrings, quadriceps, adductors, and gastrocmenius). | Other | Group IV |
| Group VGroup V Patients received only exercise sessions three times a week for two months. Exercises The intervention was divided into three phases: P-1, P-2 and P-3 during eight weeks with three sessions a week. Each session lasted 45 minutes: * 10 minutes warming-up (treadmill, ergometer bike or rowing machine); * 30 minutes 2-3 sets with P-1, P-2 or P-3; * 5 minutes stretching (hamstrings, quadriceps, adductors, and gastrocmenius). | Other | Group V |
Primary outcome
Pain Intensity Measure
Time frame: eight weeks
Pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS)14 consisting of a 10 cm rule (without numbers). At the left side, 'no pain' is written, while on the right side, 'unbearable pain'. Patients were instructed to mark on the rule what their level of pain was.
5 secondary outcomes
Functionality Measure
Time frame: eight weeks
Range of motion
Time frame: eight weeks
Muscular strength
Time frame: eight weeks
Activity
Time frame: eight weeks
Mobility and balance
Time frame: eight weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jul 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Raquel A Casarotto, PhD principal investigator
São Paulo University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Group I, Group II and Group III in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Intensity Measure (time frame: eight weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2019; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.