AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerYO-HAI5NCT03677427

Comparing 5 and 15 Fractions for Whole Breast Irradiation After Breast Conserving Surgery

A study testing Radiation in people with Breast Cancer, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer reduces the risk of locoregional relapse and ensures better overall survival. In recent years it has been found that hypofractionation in which the number of radiation sessions is reduced with a higher dose per session offers advantages for breast… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Radiation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
488 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
16 Oct 2017to 23 Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • female patients with non-metastatic breast cancer,
  • age ≥ 18 years,
  • breast conserving surgery,
  • multidisciplinary decision of adjuvant breast irradiation,
  • informed consent obtained, signed and dated before specific protocol procedures

Who cannot join

  • distant metastases,
  • bilateral breast irradiation,
  • history of previous radiation treatment to the same region
  • life expectancy of less than 2 years,
  • planned reconstructive surgery,
  • conditions making toxicity evaluation difficult (e.g. skin disorders),
  • patients unlikely to comply with the protocol (e.g. inability to return for follow-up visits or unlikely to complete the study).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Radiotherapie UZ Gent

    Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial Comparing 5 and 15 Fractions for Whole Breast Irradiation After Breast Conserving Surgery

Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer reduces the risk of locoregional relapse and ensures better overall survival. In recent years it has been found that hypofractionation in which the number of radiation sessions is reduced with a higher dose per session offers advantages for breast irradiation. Randomized studies showed that moderate hypofraction regimens in 15 or 16 fractions have the same effect in tumor control and toxicity, although the total dose is lower than the traditional 50 Gy in 25 fractions. In a randomized study from the United Kingdom (START-B trial) even a better disease-free survival was seen with 15 sessions than with 25 sessions and the long-term side effects were also less with the short schedule.

This project proposes a clinical trial with an accelerated radiotherapy schedule in 5 sessions. It is expected that the accelerated schedule of 5 sessions over 10-12 days will have a number of radiobiological benefits: since a higher dose per session is given over a shorter period of time, it is expected that tumor control and survival will be higher. By reducing the total treatment time, the total dose is reduced, which may result in fewer radiation-related side effects and thus improve the quality of life. Apart from these radiobiological benefits, the shorter radiotherapy program reduces the number of treatment days from 15 to 5. This is not only more comfortable for the patients, but also increases the treatment capacity of the radiotherapy department. This opens up a possibility for the use of more complex techniques with fewer side effects such as radiation in the prone position.

This project includes a randomized study comparing the accelerated schedule in 5 sessions with a hypofraction schedule of 15 sessions in patients who are irradiated on the entire breast after breast-conserving surgery. The primary endpoint is breast retraction (loss of volume) 2 years after radiotherapy.

Read the detailed description

Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer reduces the locoregional recurrence rate and improves overall survival. In recent years, it has become clear that breast cancer cells are more sensitive to fraction dose than originally presumed. Large randomized trials confirm this hypothesis: moderate hypofractionation schemes in 15 or 16 fractions are at least equivalent in tumor control and toxicity although the total dose is lower than the traditional 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Further acceleration to 5 fractions is expected to have an even larger radiobiological advantage regarding tumor control. Additional advantages are patient comfort and a better use of radiotherapy resources. Due to capacity problems some radiotherapy departments are faced with waiting lists which not only delay the time between surgery and radiotherapy, but also interfere with the introduction of more sophisticated treatment techniques like prone whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Prone WBI has several advantages over supine WBI: less acute skin toxicity and improved breast cosmesis and reduced doses to heart and lung leading to less radiation-induced heart diseases and secondary lung cancer induction.

Hypofractionation and acceleration (shorter radiotherapy schemes with less fractions and a higher dose per fraction) are attractive both for the patient (less treatment sessions) and for the hospital (more treatment capacity and shorter waiting lists). Moderate hypofractionation in 15 or 16 fractions has been generally accepted as a valid alternative for the historical schedules of 25-30 fractions for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS). With a median follow-up of 9.9 years, the UK START-B trial showed no significant difference in locoregional control between a hypofractionated schedule of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions and a normofractionation scheme of 50 Gy in 25 fractions1. The Canadian schedule of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions was also not inferior to the 50 Gy/25 fractions after 10 years of follow-up2. Aside from the obvious advantage of shortening the overall treatment time from 5 weeks to 3 weeks, both for the patient and the radiotherapy department, there might be some radiobiological advantages too. In the START-B trial, breast shrinkage, telangiectasia and breast oedema were significantly less frequent in the hypofractionation group. Better disease free survival and overall survival were also reported in the 15 fractions group, due to less distant relapses. The superiority of hypofractionation on survival and cosmesis was not observed in the Canadian trial.

While Belgium is a country with extensive health care facilities, some countries have a limited number of radiotherapy departments and patients have to travel a long distance for radiation. In those countries the pressure to evolve to even more retracted radiotherapy schemes is high. WBI in 5 fractions of 5.7 Gy over 5 weeks was tested in the FAST trial. A first analysis after 3 years demonstrated equivalence in toxicity and tumor control in comparison with the standard prescription of 25 x 2 Gy3. This accelerated schedule is in particular attractive for older patients since they often face logistic problems (frailty, impaired mobility, transportation difficulties). This sometimes leads to omission of radiotherapy leading to a reduced breast cancer specific survival4,5. For this reason, at UZ Gent a feasibility trial was started testing a highly accelerated schedule in 5 fractions over 10-12 days in patients of 65 years or older. The investigators used the FAST-scheme for WBI (5 x 5.7 Gy), however, fractions were delivered on alternate weekdays resulting in an overall treatment time of 10 to 12 days instead of five weeks. The trial also included patients requiring a boost (5 x 6.5 Gy). With patient inclusion nearly finished, an interim analysis shows <10% grade 2-3 erythema, with only one case of moist desquamation, located at a skin fold6. In this study the investigators propose a multi-center randomized trial comparing our accelerated schedule in 5 fractions with a moderate hypofractionation scheme of 15 fractions in patients treated with WBI, and allowing a simultaneously integrated boost and regional nodal irradiation in both treatment arms. The primary endpoint is breast retraction 2 years after radiotherapy.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
Radiation
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03677427
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
5 fractionsExperimentalNot described
Receives: Radiation: Radiation
15 fractionsExperimentalNot described
Receives: Radiation: Radiation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. radiation-induced breast retraction

    The primary endpoint of the randomized trial is radiation-induced breast retraction (volume loss) measured 2 years after radiotherapy.$

    Measured: 4 years

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Acute breast toxicity: dermatitis

    Dermatitis, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Acute breast toxicity: desquamation

    Desquamation, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Acute breast toxicity: breast oedema

    Oedema, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

    Measured: 2 years

  4. Acute breast toxicity: breast symptoms

    pain, sense of heaviness, itching

    Measured: 2 years

  5. Acute breast toxicity: dyspnoea

    Dyspnoea, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

    Measured: 2 years

  6. Acute breast toxicity: cough

    Cough, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

    Measured: 2 years

  7. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: breast oedema

    Breast oedema, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

    Measured: 5 years

  8. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: telangiectasia

    Telangiectasia, Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA) scales

    Measured: 5 years

  9. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: colour changes

    Colour changes, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

    Measured: 5 years

  10. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: fibrosis

    Fibrosis, Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA) scales

    Measured: 5 years

  11. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: breast symptoms

    Pain, sense of heaviness, itching, color change

    Measured: 5 years

  12. Late toxicity other than breast retraction: dyspnoe

    Dyspnoe, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03

    Measured: 5 years

  13. Patient reported outcome measure: physical and social functioning, insomnia, pain, dyspnea and global health status from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30

    One is equivalent to not at all and 4 indicates very much. For the global health status, 7 is equivalent to an excellent health status and 1 indicates a very poor health status.

    Measured: 5 years

  14. Patient reported outcome measure: breast and arm symptoms, future perspective from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BR23

    One is equivalent to not at all and 4 indicates the very much.

    Measured: 5 years

  15. Patient reported outcome measure: Breast Q: Adverse effects of radiation

    Four is equivalent to no problems and 1 indicates having the problem and the problem bothers the patients a lot.

    Measured: 5 years

  16. Patient reported outcome measure: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression (EQ-5D-3L: descriptive system)

    Level 1 is equivalent to no problems, and level 3 indicates extreme problems

    Measured: 5 years

  17. Locoregional tumor control

    Defined as metastases in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast, axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes.

    Measured: 10 years

  18. Distant tumor control

    Any metastases outside the ipsilateral or contralateral breast, axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes.

    Measured: 10 years

  19. Dose/volume parameters of targets: D02, D05, D50, D95, D100, Dmean (Gray)

    Extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and associated DVH planning files.

    Measured: 5 years

  20. Dose/volume parameters of organs at risk: D02, D05, Dmean, V5, V10, V20, V30 (Gray)

    Extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and associated DVH planning files.

    Measured: 5 years

  21. Additional dose/volume parameters of skin: V105% (cc), V107% (cc)

    Extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and associated DVH planning files.

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2018
  2. Study start16 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion23 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion23 Jun 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
488 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03677427
Sponsor's protocol ID
EC/2017/0974 (BC-01085)
Acronym
YO-HAI5
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
22 Dec 2017
Last updated
21 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Radiation in people with Breast Cancer, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

radiation-induced breast retraction (time frame: 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in