Breast CancerYO-HAI5NCT03677427
Comparing 5 and 15 Fractions for Whole Breast Irradiation After Breast Conserving Surgery
A study testing Radiation in people with Breast Cancer, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer reduces the risk of locoregional relapse and ensures better overall survival. In recent years it has been found that hypofractionation in which the number of radiation sessions is reduced with a higher dose per session offers advantages for breast… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Radiation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 488 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 16 Oct 2017to 23 Jun 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- female patients with non-metastatic breast cancer,
- age ≥ 18 years,
- breast conserving surgery,
- multidisciplinary decision of adjuvant breast irradiation,
- informed consent obtained, signed and dated before specific protocol procedures
Who cannot join
- distant metastases,
- bilateral breast irradiation,
- history of previous radiation treatment to the same region
- life expectancy of less than 2 years,
- planned reconstructive surgery,
- conditions making toxicity evaluation difficult (e.g. skin disorders),
- patients unlikely to comply with the protocol (e.g. inability to return for follow-up visits or unlikely to complete the study).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Trial Comparing 5 and 15 Fractions for Whole Breast Irradiation After Breast Conserving Surgery
Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer reduces the risk of locoregional relapse and ensures better overall survival. In recent years it has been found that hypofractionation in which the number of radiation sessions is reduced with a higher dose per session offers advantages for breast irradiation. Randomized studies showed that moderate hypofraction regimens in 15 or 16 fractions have the same effect in tumor control and toxicity, although the total dose is lower than the traditional 50 Gy in 25 fractions. In a randomized study from the United Kingdom (START-B trial) even a better disease-free survival was seen with 15 sessions than with 25 sessions and the long-term side effects were also less with the short schedule.
This project proposes a clinical trial with an accelerated radiotherapy schedule in 5 sessions. It is expected that the accelerated schedule of 5 sessions over 10-12 days will have a number of radiobiological benefits: since a higher dose per session is given over a shorter period of time, it is expected that tumor control and survival will be higher. By reducing the total treatment time, the total dose is reduced, which may result in fewer radiation-related side effects and thus improve the quality of life. Apart from these radiobiological benefits, the shorter radiotherapy program reduces the number of treatment days from 15 to 5. This is not only more comfortable for the patients, but also increases the treatment capacity of the radiotherapy department. This opens up a possibility for the use of more complex techniques with fewer side effects such as radiation in the prone position.
This project includes a randomized study comparing the accelerated schedule in 5 sessions with a hypofraction schedule of 15 sessions in patients who are irradiated on the entire breast after breast-conserving surgery. The primary endpoint is breast retraction (loss of volume) 2 years after radiotherapy.
Read the detailed description
Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer reduces the locoregional recurrence rate and improves overall survival. In recent years, it has become clear that breast cancer cells are more sensitive to fraction dose than originally presumed. Large randomized trials confirm this hypothesis: moderate hypofractionation schemes in 15 or 16 fractions are at least equivalent in tumor control and toxicity although the total dose is lower than the traditional 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Further acceleration to 5 fractions is expected to have an even larger radiobiological advantage regarding tumor control. Additional advantages are patient comfort and a better use of radiotherapy resources. Due to capacity problems some radiotherapy departments are faced with waiting lists which not only delay the time between surgery and radiotherapy, but also interfere with the introduction of more sophisticated treatment techniques like prone whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Prone WBI has several advantages over supine WBI: less acute skin toxicity and improved breast cosmesis and reduced doses to heart and lung leading to less radiation-induced heart diseases and secondary lung cancer induction.
Hypofractionation and acceleration (shorter radiotherapy schemes with less fractions and a higher dose per fraction) are attractive both for the patient (less treatment sessions) and for the hospital (more treatment capacity and shorter waiting lists). Moderate hypofractionation in 15 or 16 fractions has been generally accepted as a valid alternative for the historical schedules of 25-30 fractions for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS). With a median follow-up of 9.9 years, the UK START-B trial showed no significant difference in locoregional control between a hypofractionated schedule of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions and a normofractionation scheme of 50 Gy in 25 fractions1. The Canadian schedule of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions was also not inferior to the 50 Gy/25 fractions after 10 years of follow-up2. Aside from the obvious advantage of shortening the overall treatment time from 5 weeks to 3 weeks, both for the patient and the radiotherapy department, there might be some radiobiological advantages too. In the START-B trial, breast shrinkage, telangiectasia and breast oedema were significantly less frequent in the hypofractionation group. Better disease free survival and overall survival were also reported in the 15 fractions group, due to less distant relapses. The superiority of hypofractionation on survival and cosmesis was not observed in the Canadian trial.
While Belgium is a country with extensive health care facilities, some countries have a limited number of radiotherapy departments and patients have to travel a long distance for radiation. In those countries the pressure to evolve to even more retracted radiotherapy schemes is high. WBI in 5 fractions of 5.7 Gy over 5 weeks was tested in the FAST trial. A first analysis after 3 years demonstrated equivalence in toxicity and tumor control in comparison with the standard prescription of 25 x 2 Gy3. This accelerated schedule is in particular attractive for older patients since they often face logistic problems (frailty, impaired mobility, transportation difficulties). This sometimes leads to omission of radiotherapy leading to a reduced breast cancer specific survival4,5. For this reason, at UZ Gent a feasibility trial was started testing a highly accelerated schedule in 5 fractions over 10-12 days in patients of 65 years or older. The investigators used the FAST-scheme for WBI (5 x 5.7 Gy), however, fractions were delivered on alternate weekdays resulting in an overall treatment time of 10 to 12 days instead of five weeks. The trial also included patients requiring a boost (5 x 6.5 Gy). With patient inclusion nearly finished, an interim analysis shows <10% grade 2-3 erythema, with only one case of moist desquamation, located at a skin fold6. In this study the investigators propose a multi-center randomized trial comparing our accelerated schedule in 5 fractions with a moderate hypofractionation scheme of 15 fractions in patients treated with WBI, and allowing a simultaneously integrated boost and regional nodal irradiation in both treatment arms. The primary endpoint is breast retraction 2 years after radiotherapy.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Radiation
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RadiationRadiation
Radiation in breast cancer
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 5 fractions | Experimental | Not described Receives: Radiation: Radiation |
| 15 fractions | Experimental | Not described Receives: Radiation: Radiation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
radiation-induced breast retraction
The primary endpoint of the randomized trial is radiation-induced breast retraction (volume loss) measured 2 years after radiotherapy.$
Measured: 4 years
Secondary outcomes (21)
Acute breast toxicity: dermatitis
Dermatitis, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03
Measured: 2 years
Acute breast toxicity: desquamation
Desquamation, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03
Measured: 2 years
Acute breast toxicity: breast oedema
Oedema, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03
Measured: 2 years
Acute breast toxicity: breast symptoms
pain, sense of heaviness, itching
Measured: 2 years
Acute breast toxicity: dyspnoea
Dyspnoea, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03
Measured: 2 years
Acute breast toxicity: cough
Cough, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03
Measured: 2 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: breast oedema
Breast oedema, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03
Measured: 5 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: telangiectasia
Telangiectasia, Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA) scales
Measured: 5 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: colour changes
Colour changes, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03
Measured: 5 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: fibrosis
Fibrosis, Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA) scales
Measured: 5 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: breast symptoms
Pain, sense of heaviness, itching, color change
Measured: 5 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: dyspnoe
Dyspnoe, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03
Measured: 5 years
Patient reported outcome measure: physical and social functioning, insomnia, pain, dyspnea and global health status from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30
One is equivalent to not at all and 4 indicates very much. For the global health status, 7 is equivalent to an excellent health status and 1 indicates a very poor health status.
Measured: 5 years
Patient reported outcome measure: breast and arm symptoms, future perspective from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BR23
One is equivalent to not at all and 4 indicates the very much.
Measured: 5 years
Patient reported outcome measure: Breast Q: Adverse effects of radiation
Four is equivalent to no problems and 1 indicates having the problem and the problem bothers the patients a lot.
Measured: 5 years
Patient reported outcome measure: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression (EQ-5D-3L: descriptive system)
Level 1 is equivalent to no problems, and level 3 indicates extreme problems
Measured: 5 years
Locoregional tumor control
Defined as metastases in the ipsilateral or contralateral breast, axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes.
Measured: 10 years
Distant tumor control
Any metastases outside the ipsilateral or contralateral breast, axillary and supraclavicular lymph nodes.
Measured: 10 years
Dose/volume parameters of targets: D02, D05, D50, D95, D100, Dmean (Gray)
Extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and associated DVH planning files.
Measured: 5 years
Dose/volume parameters of organs at risk: D02, D05, Dmean, V5, V10, V20, V30 (Gray)
Extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and associated DVH planning files.
Measured: 5 years
Additional dose/volume parameters of skin: V105% (cc), V107% (cc)
Extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and associated DVH planning files.
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2018
- Study start16 Oct 2017
- Primary completion23 Jun 2023
- Study completion23 Jun 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GhentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 488 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Ghent
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kom Op Tegen Kanker
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03677427
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EC/2017/0974 (BC-01085)
- Acronym
- YO-HAI5
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Trial Comparing 5 and 15 Fractions for Whole Breast Irradiation After Breast Conserving Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03677427
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- YO-HAI5 / EC/2017/0974 (BC-01085)
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 488 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GhentUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Kom Op Tegen Kanker
- Study start
- 16 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Jun 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer reduces the risk of locoregional relapse and ensures better overall survival. In recent years it has been found that hypofractionation in which the number of radiation sessions is reduced with a higher dose per session offers advantages for breast irradiation. Randomized studies showed that moderate hypofraction regimens in 15 or 16 fractions have the same effect in tumor control and toxicity, although the total dose is lower than the traditional 50 Gy in 25 fractions. In a randomized study from the United Kingdom (START-B trial) even a better disease-free survival was seen with 15 sessions than with 25 sessions and the long-term side effects were also less with the short schedule.
This project proposes a clinical trial with an accelerated radiotherapy schedule in 5 sessions. It is expected that the accelerated schedule of 5 sessions over 10-12 days will have a number of radiobiological benefits: since a higher dose per session is given over a shorter period of time, it is expected that tumor control and survival will be higher. By reducing the total treatment time, the total dose is reduced, which may result in fewer radiation-related side effects and thus improve the quality of life. Apart from these radiobiological benefits, the shorter radiotherapy program reduces the number of treatment days from 15 to 5. This is not only more comfortable for the patients, but also increases the treatment capacity of the radiotherapy department. This opens up a possibility for the use of more complex techniques with fewer side effects such as radiation in the prone position.
This project includes a randomized study comparing the accelerated schedule in 5 sessions with a hypofraction schedule of 15 sessions in patients who are irradiated on the entire breast after breast-conserving surgery. The primary endpoint is breast retraction (loss of volume) 2 years after radiotherapy.
Detailed description
Adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer reduces the locoregional recurrence rate and improves overall survival. In recent years, it has become clear that breast cancer cells are more sensitive to fraction dose than originally presumed. Large randomized trials confirm this hypothesis: moderate hypofractionation schemes in 15 or 16 fractions are at least equivalent in tumor control and toxicity although the total dose is lower than the traditional 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Further acceleration to 5 fractions is expected to have an even larger radiobiological advantage regarding tumor control. Additional advantages are patient comfort and a better use of radiotherapy resources. Due to capacity problems some radiotherapy departments are faced with waiting lists which not only delay the time between surgery and radiotherapy, but also interfere with the introduction of more sophisticated treatment techniques like prone whole-breast irradiation (WBI). Prone WBI has several advantages over supine WBI: less acute skin toxicity and improved breast cosmesis and reduced doses to heart and lung leading to less radiation-induced heart diseases and secondary lung cancer induction.
Hypofractionation and acceleration (shorter radiotherapy schemes with less fractions and a higher dose per fraction) are attractive both for the patient (less treatment sessions) and for the hospital (more treatment capacity and shorter waiting lists). Moderate hypofractionation in 15 or 16 fractions has been generally accepted as a valid alternative for the historical schedules of 25-30 fractions for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS). With a median follow-up of 9.9 years, the UK START-B trial showed no significant difference in locoregional control between a hypofractionated schedule of 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions and a normofractionation scheme of 50 Gy in 25 fractions1. The Canadian schedule of 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions was also not inferior to the 50 Gy/25 fractions after 10 years of follow-up2. Aside from the obvious advantage of shortening the overall treatment time from 5 weeks to 3 weeks, both for the patient and the radiotherapy department, there might be some radiobiological advantages too. In the START-B trial, breast shrinkage, telangiectasia and breast oedema were significantly less frequent in the hypofractionation group. Better disease free survival and overall survival were also reported in the 15 fractions group, due to less distant relapses. The superiority of hypofractionation on survival and cosmesis was not observed in the Canadian trial.
While Belgium is a country with extensive health care facilities, some countries have a limited number of radiotherapy departments and patients have to travel a long distance for radiation. In those countries the pressure to evolve to even more retracted radiotherapy schemes is high. WBI in 5 fractions of 5.7 Gy over 5 weeks was tested in the FAST trial. A first analysis after 3 years demonstrated equivalence in toxicity and tumor control in comparison with the standard prescription of 25 x 2 Gy3. This accelerated schedule is in particular attractive for older patients since they often face logistic problems (frailty, impaired mobility, transportation difficulties). This sometimes leads to omission of radiotherapy leading to a reduced breast cancer specific survival4,5. For this reason, at UZ Gent a feasibility trial was started testing a highly accelerated schedule in 5 fractions over 10-12 days in patients of 65 years or older. The investigators used the FAST-scheme for WBI (5 x 5.7 Gy), however, fractions were delivered on alternate weekdays resulting in an overall treatment time of 10 to 12 days instead of five weeks. The trial also included patients requiring a boost (5 x 6.5 Gy). With patient inclusion nearly finished, an interim analysis shows <10% grade 2-3 erythema, with only one case of moist desquamation, located at a skin fold6. In this study the investigators propose a multi-center randomized trial comparing our accelerated schedule in 5 fractions with a moderate hypofractionation scheme of 15 fractions in patients treated with WBI, and allowing a simultaneously integrated boost and regional nodal irradiation in both treatment arms. The primary endpoint is breast retraction 2 years after radiotherapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 5 fractions | Experimental | Radiation: Radiation |
| 15 fractions | Experimental | Radiation: Radiation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- female patients with non-metastatic breast cancer,
- age ≥ 18 years,
- breast conserving surgery,
- multidisciplinary decision of adjuvant breast irradiation,
- informed consent obtained, signed and dated before specific protocol procedures
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- distant metastases,
- bilateral breast irradiation,
- history of previous radiation treatment to the same region
- life expectancy of less than 2 years,
- planned reconstructive surgery,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RadiationRadiation in breast cancer | Radiation | 15 fractions, 5 fractions |
Primary outcome
radiation-induced breast retraction
Time frame: 4 years
The primary endpoint of the randomized trial is radiation-induced breast retraction (volume loss) measured 2 years after radiotherapy.$
21 secondary outcomes
Acute breast toxicity: dermatitis
Time frame: 2 years
Acute breast toxicity: desquamation
Time frame: 2 years
Acute breast toxicity: breast oedema
Time frame: 2 years
Acute breast toxicity: breast symptoms
Time frame: 2 years
Acute breast toxicity: dyspnoea
Time frame: 2 years
Acute breast toxicity: cough
Time frame: 2 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: breast oedema
Time frame: 5 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: telangiectasia
Time frame: 5 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: colour changes
Time frame: 5 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: fibrosis
Time frame: 5 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: breast symptoms
Time frame: 5 years
Late toxicity other than breast retraction: dyspnoe
Time frame: 5 years
Patient reported outcome measure: physical and social functioning, insomnia, pain, dyspnea and global health status from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30
Time frame: 5 years
Patient reported outcome measure: breast and arm symptoms, future perspective from European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BR23
Time frame: 5 years
Patient reported outcome measure: Breast Q: Adverse effects of radiation
Time frame: 5 years
Patient reported outcome measure: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression (EQ-5D-3L: descriptive system)
Time frame: 5 years
Locoregional tumor control
Time frame: 10 years
Distant tumor control
Time frame: 10 years
Dose/volume parameters of targets: D02, D05, D50, D95, D100, Dmean (Gray)
Time frame: 5 years
Dose/volume parameters of organs at risk: D02, D05, Dmean, V5, V10, V20, V30 (Gray)
Time frame: 5 years
Additional dose/volume parameters of skin: V105% (cc), V107% (cc)
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Radiation in people with Breast Cancer, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
radiation-induced breast retraction (time frame: 4 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2026.