Diabetic Neuropathy PeripheralPhase 1/2NiRiDNCT03685253
Nicotinamide Riboside for Diabetic Neuropathy
A Phase 1/2 study testing Niagen in people with Diabetic Neuropathy Peripheral, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
At the current time there is no effective disease modifying therapy for diabetic neuropathy (DN). The proposed study design employs a quantifiable early measure of DN, intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD), allowing for accurate assessment of actual nerve fiber density. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Neuropathy Peripheral
- What is being tested?
- Niagen
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Jan 2019to 1 May 2022
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Impaired glucose tolerance or controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at the time of screening or within three months of screening*.
- The hemoglobin A1c may be normal, but should be less than 9%.
- If diabetic participants are on medication, they should be stable on medication for at least 3 months prior to entering the study. Addition or change in antidiabetic medication (if on medication) after enrollment does not affect participation or group assignment.
- Impaired glucose regulation is the most likely cause of the neuropathy.
- Mild diabetic polyneuropathy as defined by the Toronto Diabetic Neuropathy Expert Group consensus criteria.
- Age 30 (to exclude patients with type 1 diabetes) to 80 years inclusive.
- Medically stable at the time of enrollment.
- Willing to accept randomization assignment and compliance with the study procedures.
Who cannot join
- Women of childbearing potential must be using an acceptable method of contraception to prevent pregnancy when they are enrolled in the study.
- Patient must agree to take an alternative medication to Warfarin or Factor X inhibitors when undergoing a skin biopsy.
- Neuropathy due to factors other than type 2 diabetes mellitus based on careful clinical and laboratory evaluation by the study physicians.
- Abnormal liver function tests, including alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin.
- Current severe medical conditions that are active on the day of screening.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Nicotinamide Riboside in Diabetic Polyneuropathy
At the current time there is no effective disease modifying therapy for diabetic neuropathy (DN). The proposed study design employs a quantifiable early measure of DN, intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD), allowing for accurate assessment of actual nerve fiber density. Preclinical data supports the use of Niagen® (3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chloride - NR) as a potential therapy for diabetic neuropathy. Phase I data indicates safety in humans. This study seeks to investigate the use of Niagen® (NR) as a potential treatment for diabetic neuropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance over a 6 month period. The endpoint measures in addition to the IENFD with determine changes in clinical and electrophysiological outcomes, quality of life and biochemical measures.
Read the detailed description
At the current time there is no effective disease modifying therapy for diabetic neuropathy (DN). Previous failed trials of therapy have often targeted individuals with advanced, severe neuropathy. There is a particularly strong incentive to treat neuropathy early in its course while the severity is still mild and to target participants who have impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or who have well controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The proposed study design employs a quantifiable early measure of DN, intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) of the thigh, allowing for accurate assessment of actual nerve fiber density over time, while also incorporating measures of pain and quality of life. Preclinical data supports the use of NR as a potential therapy for diabetic neuropathy. Phase I data indicates safety in humans.
The most common form of diabetes mellitus, T2DM, is projected to affect an estimated 366 million people worldwide by 2030. The lifetime incidence of polyneuropathy is approximately 45% and neuropathy of any type approximately 59% of in patients with T2DM. Studies of nerve conduction tests performed at the time of diabetes mellitus diagnosis demonstrate that neuropathy is already present in patients when the neuropathy is still subclinical. Furthermore, DN leads to severe morbidity, high mortality, major physical disability, poor quality of life, and high cost with estimated total annual costs of $22 billion (www.diabetes.org). Due to the complex structure and anatomy of the peripheral nervous system, DN presents with a very broad spectrum of clinical symptoms and deficits, including severe pain, sensory deficits, foot ulcers and amputations. Despite the high morbidity associated with DN, most randomized clinical trials evaluating therapies for established DN have been disappointing. To date there is no pathogenetic treatment for this condition. Currently, tight glycemic control is the only convincing strategy to prevent or delay the development of DN in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. There is less convincing evidence that tight glycemic control improves neuropathy with T2DM.
DN is a diffuse, symmetrical injury to the entire peripheral nervous system. The smallest Aδ thinly-myelinated fibers and the unmyelinated C-fibers are likely the earliest to undergo damage in the natural history of DN. These fibers mediate pain, temperature discrimination, touch perception and autonomic responses, and constitute over 80% of peripheral nerve fibers. When determining the effect of a therapeutic intervention in DN it is important to utilize outcome measures that best identify change in disease. Although both large and small fiber neuropathy occur in T2DM, a small-fiber neuropathy is more common. Importantly, developing appropriate endpoints has been a problem in DN because many of the endpoints have proved too insensitive in clinical trials. For example, there is a need to establish content validity in clinical scales. IENFD is a sensitive and reliable measure in determining change in early DN. Furthermore, IENFD directly correlates with increasing DN severity, and is safe as easy to perform and IENFD currently represents a gold standard in measuring change in small fiber neuropathy. Thus, IENFD was selected as the most appropriate endpoint measure in this clinical trial. The morphometric quantification of IENFD is easily measured from a skin biopsy and this is used as part of routine clinical practice. The skin biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure and less than 1% of participants have mild adverse events such as bleeding, infection, or delayed healing. Inter-observer variability for the assessment of IENFD demonstrates good agreement, especially with assessment at the thigh. Patient refusal rate for this procedure is minimal (less than 1 %).
This is a phase II, single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effect of NR compared to placebo on measures of small fiber neuropathy in participants with IGT or T2DM and mild DN. Participants with be randomly assigned to either NR 0.5 grams twice a day (total 1 gram/day) or matched placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Participants in the active group will start with a 1 gram/day dose because of the very low risk of adverse events with NR. The 1 gram/day dose will be taken continuously for 6 months. In addition (if they have not already received this information) all participants will be given general diabetic nutritional advice and general advice to exercise for approximately 150 minutes per week. This represents current standard of care information provided to all patients with impaired glucose regulation and DN.
Primary efficacy measure: change in the thigh IENFD at 6 months compared to baseline. Secondary efficacy measure: change in the distal leg IENFD at 6 months compared to baseline.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Neuropathy Peripheral
- Being tested
- Niagen, Placebo
- Keywords
- diabetes, neuropathy, treatment, drug
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NiagenDrug
Also called Nicotinamide Riboside, 3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chloride
Niagen® (3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chloride - NR) will be the experimental treatment, at a dose of 1000 mg/day taken as two 250 mg capsules twice daily for 6 months.
PlaceboDrug
Placebo capsules matched to the experimental drug and taken orally as 2 capsules twice daily for 6 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants randomized to placebo will take 2 capsules by mouth twice a day for 6 months. The placebo capsules are matched to the NR capsules. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Niagen® | Experimental | Participants randomized to Niagen® (3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chloride - NR) will take 250 mg capsules. Participants will take 2 capsules by mouth twice a day (1000 mg) for 6 months Receives: Drug: Niagen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Thigh Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density
Change in the proximal thigh Intra-Epidermal Nerve Fiber Density as assessed by skin biopsy. Smaller values indicate worse neuropathy. Normative ranges depend on age and gender.
Measured: 6 months.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Distal lower limb intraepidermal nerve fiber density
Change in the distal leg Intra-epidermal Nerve Fiber Density as assessed by biopsy. Smaller values indicate worse neuropathy. Normative ranges depend on age and gender.
Measured: 6 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Sep 2018
- Study start24 Jan 2019
- Primary completion1 May 2022
- Study completion1 May 2022
Why it stopped: Completed the pilot study and grant funding not obtained to continue to the main phase 2 study. The pilot study did not show a statistical significance in the primary or secondary outcome measures.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic Neuropathy PeripheralStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Maryland, BaltimoreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- US Department of Veterans Affairs
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, James W. Russell, MD, MS, University of Maryland, Baltimore
- Investigators
- James W Russell, MD, Principal investigator, University of Maryland School of Medicine & Department of Veterans' Affairs
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03685253
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HP-00080331
- Acronym
- NiRiD
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nicotinamide Riboside in Diabetic Polyneuropathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03685253
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NiRiD / HP-00080331
- Conditions
- Diabetic Neuropathy Peripheral
- Keywords
- diabetes, neuropathy, treatment, drug
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Completed the pilot study and grant funding not obtained to continue to the main phase 2 study. The pilot study did not show a statistical significance in the primary or secondary outcome measures.
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Maryland, BaltimoreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- US Department of Veterans Affairs
- Study start
- 24 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
At the current time there is no effective disease modifying therapy for diabetic neuropathy (DN). The proposed study design employs a quantifiable early measure of DN, intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD), allowing for accurate assessment of actual nerve fiber density. Preclinical data supports the use of Niagen® (3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chloride - NR) as a potential therapy for diabetic neuropathy. Phase I data indicates safety in humans. This study seeks to investigate the use of Niagen® (NR) as a potential treatment for diabetic neuropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance over a 6 month period. The endpoint measures in addition to the IENFD with determine changes in clinical and electrophysiological outcomes, quality of life and biochemical measures.
Detailed description
At the current time there is no effective disease modifying therapy for diabetic neuropathy (DN). Previous failed trials of therapy have often targeted individuals with advanced, severe neuropathy. There is a particularly strong incentive to treat neuropathy early in its course while the severity is still mild and to target participants who have impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or who have well controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The proposed study design employs a quantifiable early measure of DN, intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) of the thigh, allowing for accurate assessment of actual nerve fiber density over time, while also incorporating measures of pain and quality of life. Preclinical data supports the use of NR as a potential therapy for diabetic neuropathy. Phase I data indicates safety in humans.
The most common form of diabetes mellitus, T2DM, is projected to affect an estimated 366 million people worldwide by 2030. The lifetime incidence of polyneuropathy is approximately 45% and neuropathy of any type approximately 59% of in patients with T2DM. Studies of nerve conduction tests performed at the time of diabetes mellitus diagnosis demonstrate that neuropathy is already present in patients when the neuropathy is still subclinical. Furthermore, DN leads to severe morbidity, high mortality, major physical disability, poor quality of life, and high cost with estimated total annual costs of $22 billion (www.diabetes.org). Due to the complex structure and anatomy of the peripheral nervous system, DN presents with a very broad spectrum of clinical symptoms and deficits, including severe pain, sensory deficits, foot ulcers and amputations. Despite the high morbidity associated with DN, most randomized clinical trials evaluating therapies for established DN have been disappointing. To date there is no pathogenetic treatment for this condition. Currently, tight glycemic control is the only convincing strategy to prevent or delay the development of DN in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. There is less convincing evidence that tight glycemic control improves neuropathy with T2DM.
DN is a diffuse, symmetrical injury to the entire peripheral nervous system. The smallest Aδ thinly-myelinated fibers and the unmyelinated C-fibers are likely the earliest to undergo damage in the natural history of DN. These fibers mediate pain, temperature discrimination, touch perception and autonomic responses, and constitute over 80% of peripheral nerve fibers. When determining the effect of a therapeutic intervention in DN it is important to utilize outcome measures that best identify change in disease. Although both large and small fiber neuropathy occur in T2DM, a small-fiber neuropathy is more common. Importantly, developing appropriate endpoints has been a problem in DN because many of the endpoints have proved too insensitive in clinical trials. For example, there is a need to establish content validity in clinical scales. IENFD is a sensitive and reliable measure in determining change in early DN. Furthermore, IENFD directly correlates with increasing DN severity, and is safe as easy to perform and IENFD currently represents a gold standard in measuring change in small fiber neuropathy. Thus, IENFD was selected as the most appropriate endpoint measure in this clinical trial. The morphometric quantification of IENFD is easily measured from a skin biopsy and this is used as part of routine clinical practice. The skin biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure and less than 1% of participants have mild adverse events such as bleeding, infection, or delayed healing. Inter-observer variability for the assessment of IENFD demonstrates good agreement, especially with assessment at the thigh. Patient refusal rate for this procedure is minimal (less than 1 %).
This is a phase II, single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effect of NR compared to placebo on measures of small fiber neuropathy in participants with IGT or T2DM and mild DN. Participants with be randomly assigned to either NR 0.5 grams twice a day (total 1 gram/day) or matched placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Participants in the active group will start with a 1 gram/day dose because of the very low risk of adverse events with NR. The 1 gram/day dose will be taken continuously for 6 months. In addition (if they have not already received this information) all participants will be given general diabetic nutritional advice and general advice to exercise for approximately 150 minutes per week. This represents current standard of care information provided to all patients with impaired glucose regulation and DN.
Primary efficacy measure: change in the thigh IENFD at 6 months compared to baseline. Secondary efficacy measure: change in the distal leg IENFD at 6 months compared to baseline.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants randomized to placebo will take 2 capsules by mouth twice a day for 6 months. The placebo capsules are matched to the NR capsules. |
| Niagen® | Experimental | Drug: NiagenParticipants randomized to Niagen® (3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chloride - NR) will take 250 mg capsules. Participants will take 2 capsules by mouth twice a day (1000 mg) for 6 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Impaired glucose tolerance or controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at the time of screening or within three months of screening*.
- The hemoglobin A1c may be normal, but should be less than 9%.
- If diabetic participants are on medication, they should be stable on medication for at least 3 months prior to entering the study. Addition or change in antidiabetic medication (if on medication) after enrollment does not affect participation or group assignment.
- Impaired glucose regulation is the most likely cause of the neuropathy.
- Mild diabetic polyneuropathy as defined by the Toronto Diabetic Neuropathy Expert Group consensus criteria.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Women of childbearing potential must be using an acceptable method of contraception to prevent pregnancy when they are enrolled in the study.
- Patient must agree to take an alternative medication to Warfarin or Factor X inhibitors when undergoing a skin biopsy.
- Neuropathy due to factors other than type 2 diabetes mellitus based on careful clinical and laboratory evaluation by the study physicians.
- Abnormal liver function tests, including alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin.
- Current severe medical conditions that are active on the day of screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NiagenAlso: Nicotinamide Riboside, 3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chlorideNiagen® (3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chloride - NR) will be the experimental treatment, at a dose of 1000 mg/day taken as two 250 mg capsules twice daily for 6 months. | Drug | Niagen® |
| PlaceboPlacebo capsules matched to the experimental drug and taken orally as 2 capsules twice daily for 6 months. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Thigh Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density
Time frame: 6 months.
Change in the proximal thigh Intra-Epidermal Nerve Fiber Density as assessed by skin biopsy. Smaller values indicate worse neuropathy. Normative ranges depend on age and gender.
1 secondary outcome
Distal lower limb intraepidermal nerve fiber density
Time frame: 6 months.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Completed the pilot study and grant funding not obtained to continue to the main phase 2 study. The pilot study did not show a statistical significance in the primary or secondary outcome measures.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetic Neuropathy Peripheral
Not yet recruiting
Adaptive Gamified Sensory Training on Sensory Function and Limb-Specific Functional Performance in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of the Long-term Safety and Effectiveness of Suzetrigine (SUZ) in Participants With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Recruiting
Acupuncture Plus Mecobalamin for Diabetic Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy
Diabetic Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of tDCS and tACS on Pain, Dexterity, and Strength in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Screening and Multicomponent Exercise on Fall Rates, Fractures, and Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes, Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
James W Russell, MD principal investigator
University of Maryland School of Medicine & Department of Veterans' Affairs
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Niagen in people with Diabetic Neuropathy Peripheral, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Completed the pilot study and grant funding not obtained to continue to the main phase 2 study. The pilot study did not show a statistical significance in the primary or secondary outcome measures.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Thigh Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density (time frame: 6 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2026.