AzTrials
AzTrials

Task Performance and AnalysisNCT03685266

Efficiency of Task Switching and Multi-tasking

An observational study of Task Performance and Analysis and Efficiency, run by University of Hawaii at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will collect observational data on how well pediatric residents handle interruptions to their daily workflow. Residents will be directly observed during their work day and behaviors will be recorded using an electronic tool that will time-stamp their actions when faced with an interruption. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Task Performance and Analysis, Efficiency
What is being tested?
Observation
How many people
18 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2016to Mar 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All pediatric residents at the University of Hawai'i Pediatric Residency Program will be recruited as potential participants.

Who may be able to join

  • Consenting pediatric residents

Who cannot join

  • Non-consenting pediatric residents

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children

    Honolulu, Hawaii, 96826

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Efficiency of Task Switching and Multi-tasking: Observations of Pediatric Resident Behaviors When Managing Interruptions to Daily Workflow

This study will collect observational data on how well pediatric residents handle interruptions to their daily workflow. Residents will be directly observed during their work day and behaviors will be recorded using an electronic tool that will time-stamp their actions when faced with an interruption. The average time it takes for them to return to their original task(s) after faced with an interruption will be calculated, along with correlations made between their predicted multi-tasking ability, year of training, and additional factors.

Read the detailed description

Efficiency of Task Switching and Multi-tasking: Observations of Pediatric Resident Behaviors when Managing Interruptions to Daily Workflow

Jennifer R. Di Rocco, DO, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, JABSOM; Associate Program Director, UH Pediatric Residency Program; Master of Education Candidate, University of Cincinnati/Cincinnati Children's Hospital

Summary of Project Concept:

The daily practice of medicine is fraught with frequent interruptions that a busy clinician must manage appropriately in order to ensure the best patient care possible. Tasks that are urgent and time-sensitive must be prioritized, organized, and balanced with numerous other tasks requiring completion during the day. Physicians must also maintain the necessary flexibility required to adapt to unexpected events that inevitably surface regularly during a busy clinical workday. The ability to expertly manage interruptions may be considered under the umbrella of the "art of medicine," which is not found in textbooks and can be difficult to teach. Additional challenges in this era of limited duty hours include limited patient exposure with less time to develop the skills for effective management of interruptions. Some young clinicians seem to easily triage tasks as they are presented, while others struggle with this role.

Pediatric residents have graded autonomy as they progress through a program, with a steep learning curve in their first year. From an initial dependence on the senior resident and faculty when starting as a new intern to improved ability to independently practice as they near the start of their second year, each intern matures both clinically and professionally at various rates. The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has assigned 21 pediatric milestones that must be reported back to them twice yearly with a resident's progress along the continuum. Milestones describing the degree of medical knowledge, trustworthiness, leadership, teamwork and stress management skills are all required and applicable to the topic of one's ability to manage interruptions appropriately. The description of the "Patient Care 2" milestone, which reads "Organize and prioritize responsibilities to provide patient care that is safe, effective and efficient" addresses the concept of the "optimization of multitasking" in the milestone discussion. This is described as a higher level of clinical achievement in which a physician demonstrates concurrent task completion in a manner ends to a more efficient workflow without compromising patient safety. The complex set of behaviors described by this milestone can be best observed and assessed when a resident has increased responsibility and leadership roles including supervising a team, managing pager calls and admitting new patients simultaneously. Some residents in our program in recent years have struggled in supervisory roles, specifically with this milestone, but some have excelled, despite having less practice than prior decades of trainees. Understanding the factors contributing to how pediatric residents manage interruptions (from "novice" interns to "expert" third year residents) should be helpful towards designing curricula for mastery of these skills in our program and in others across the nation.

Many factors are involved in how physicians manage interruptions, and the positive or negative effects of their management decisions have implications on patient safety and medical errors in the clinical workplace. Observational studies of pediatric residents do not exist in the current literature, nor does a study exist that correlates physicians' ability and quality of interruption management with their overall wellness including their preferred learning styles, aptitudes in dealing with interruptions, sleep debt, and mental strain. Garnering such data and analyzing such variables could provide added guidance and understanding to those residency programs that are struggling to help learners improve in this arena, which is difficult to truly assess until a resident is in a supervisory position with multifactorial responsibilities. If there were a way of predicting aptitude in this skill set early, learners who may not easily manage interruptions could be targeted and practice exercises designed to strengthen this skill set. With this intervention, the transition from an intern to a senior supervising resident may be much smoother. The first step towards creating tools for augmenting performance in the area of managing interruptions gracefully and efficiently is to understand the current factors that are involved in a resident's decision process when faced with interruptions during the daily workflow. An observational study of residents in real time would provide such data and serve as a springboard for future work in creating tools and curricula to assist residents struggling with task management.

Project methods will include IRB approval and recruitment of pediatric residents. Participants will be asked to complete some baseline surveys (which include wellness and sleep inventories) and a multitasking exercise (called the Multitasking Assessment Tool or MTAT). Residents will then be observed multiple times over 1-2 hour time slots when rotating in both the general pediatric wards and emergency department settings by the study leader or by a trained observer, with all behaviors categorized and recorded with time stamps via a portable electronic database time-motion tool. On the day of observation, each participant will complete two short surveys regarding the degree of stress they are feeling that day as well as a log of their previous week's sleep habits.

Being tested
Observation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ObservationOther

    There are no specific interventions in this study; it is observational only. One could argue that the act of observing the participants may change their behavior (the Hawthorne effect).

Study groups in NCT03685266
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pediatric ResidentsParticipating pediatric residents from first postgraduate year (PGY-1) through third postgraduate year (PGY-3) will be observed over a 12 month timeframe.
Receives: Other: Observation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. MTAT score predicting residents who take the least time to return to an original task after an interrupting task

    Hypothesis: A lower, more efficient MTAT score will predict the most efficient residents, as defined by taking the least amount of time to manage interruptions as directly observed and recorded through a time-motion tool.

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 1 year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Time to return to task after interruption

    Hypothesis: Senior level pediatric residents will take less time to return to an original task following an interrupting task as compared to first year residents.

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 1 year

  2. Self-assigned level of personal wellness affects task-switching efficiency

    Hypothesis: Yes, low wellness scores, as individually self-reported on a scale of 0-10 negatively impact task-switching efficiency.

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Sep 2018
  2. Study startMay 2016
  3. Primary completionMar 2017
  4. Study completionMar 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
18 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03685266
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-107
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
17 May 2016
Last updated
26 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Carraccio C, Benson B, Burke A, Englander R, Guralnick S, Hicks P, Ludwig S, Schumacher D, Vasilias J. Pediatrics milestones. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Mar;5(1 Suppl 1):59-73. doi: 10.4300/JGME-05-01s1-06. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24404214

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Task Performance and Analysis and Efficiency, run by University of Hawaii at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

MTAT score predicting residents who take the least time to return to an original task after an interrupting task (time frame: Through study completion, up to 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03685266, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in