InfluenzaPhase 2/3STOP-FLUNCT03699839
Reducing the Burden of Influenza After Solid-Organ Transplantation
A Phase 2/3 study testing High-dose influenza vaccine, MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine and Standard intramuscular influenza vaccine in people with Influenza and Organ Transplantation, run by Oriol Manuel at 9 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Influenza is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients and it is mainly prevented by seasonal influenza vaccination. Unfortunately, the immunogenicity of standard influenza vaccine is suboptimal in this population. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza, Organ Transplantation
- What is being tested?
- High-dose influenza vaccine, MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine and Standard intramuscular influenza vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 619 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Oct 2018to 15 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Provision of written, informed consent
- Age ≥18 years
- Stable outpatients based on clinical judgement
- ≥ 3 months after solid organ transplantation
Who cannot join
- Known hypersensitivity to any component (antigen, adjuvant, excipient or preservative) of study vaccines; the composition of the study vaccines is as follows:
- VaxigripTetra®: hemagglutinin, egg protein, formaldehyde, octylphenol ethoxylate/octoxynol 9 (Triton® X-100), neomycin
- Fluad®: hemagglutinin, neuraminidase, egg protein, squalene, polysorbate 80, sorbitan trioleate, sodium citrate, citric acid, kanamycin sulphate, neomycin sulphate, barium sulphate, formaldehyde, cetyl trimethylammonium bromide
- Fluzone-HD®: hemagglutinin, egg protein, formaldehyde, octylphenol ethoxylate/octoxynol 9 (Triton® X-100)
- Previous life-threatening reaction to influenza vaccine (i.e. Guillain Barré Syndrome)
- Ongoing therapy for rejection (including steroid pulse or prednisone > 2mg/kg/day over more than 14 days)
Show all 11Show fewer
- Ongoing therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and/or eculizumab
- Current or past (within 6 months) therapy with rituximab
- Abo incompatible transplantation
- Unable to comply with study protocol
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 2 countries.
9 sites in 2 countries
Switzerland8 sites
University Hospital Basel
Basel, 4031
University Hospital Bern
Bern, 3010
Cantonal Hospital Chur
Chur, Kanton Graubünden, 7000
Hopitaux Universitaires de Genève
Geneva, 1205
CHUV
Lausanne, 1011
Epatocentro Ticino
Lugano, 6900
Canton Hospital St-Gallen
Sankt Gallen, 9007
UniversitätsSpital Zürich
Zurich, 8091
Spain1 site
Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocio
Seville, Andalusia, 41013
About this study
Official title: Reducing the Burden of Influenza After Solid-Organ Transplantation: the STOP-FLU Trial [Swiss Trial in Solid Organ Transplantation on Prevention of Influenza]
Influenza is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients and it is mainly prevented by seasonal influenza vaccination. Unfortunately, the immunogenicity of standard influenza vaccine is suboptimal in this population. Vaccination with a high-dose (HD) influenza vaccine or an MF59-adjuvanted (MF59a) vaccine have significantly reduced the incidence of influenza and increased the immunogenicity of influenza vaccine in the elderly. The investigators will compare the immunogenicity and efficacy of two new vaccination strategies, consisting in vaccination with a HD influenza vaccine or an MF59a influenza vaccine, to the standard-dose non-adjuvanted vaccination (standard of care) in a population of SOT recipients.
Read the detailed description
Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to compare the immunogenicity of two novel vaccination strategies, consisting in vaccination with a HD influenza vaccine or an MF59a influenza vaccine, to the standard-dose non-adjuvanted vaccination (standard of care) in a population of SOT recipients.
The main secondary objectives are to evaluate the efficacy of the novel vaccination strategies in reducing the incidence of influenza, to correlate the humoral responses to vaccination with protection from influenza and to assess the influence of immunosuppression on influenza vaccine responses.
Safety objectives include the assessment of the reactogenicity of the different vaccines and to describe the incidence of acute rejection and the development of anti-Human Leucocyte Antigens (HLA) antibodies after vaccination.
Study design: Prospective double-blinded randomized controlled three-arm parallel group superiority multicenter trial.
Inclusion / Exclusion criteria: Study participants will be enrolled among ≥18-year old stable SOT recipients ≥3 months after transplantation, regularly followed at their respective outpatient clinic at the 7 transplant centers and scheduled to receive the annual influenza vaccine. Candidates will be excluded in case of previous severe reaction or allergy to one of the study vaccines or in case of treatment for acute rejection, among others.
Measurements and procedures: At day 0, after giving informed consent, eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into 3 arms: standard quadrivalent intramuscular vaccine (control), HD trivalent vaccine and MF59a trivalent vaccine. After vaccination participants will be followed for a period of 6 months. Safety will be assessed immediately after vaccination and 7, 28 and 180 days after vaccination, and blood sampling for immunogenicity analysis will be performed at baseline, 7, 28 and 180 days after vaccination. Additionally to evaluate the vaccine safety, anti-HLA antibodies will be measured at baseline and at days 28 and 180 after vaccination. Hemagglutinin titers will be determined by hemagglutination inhibition assay (HIA) according to standardized methods. During the influenza season, the development of influenza will be systematically assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by surveillance nasopharyngeal swab.
Study Product / Intervention: The study intervention consists in the intramuscular administration of either a HD vaccine (containing 60 µg of antigen of each of the three viral strains) [Fluzone-HD®] or a MF59a vaccine (containing 15 µg of antigen of each of the three viral strains with a MF59 adjuvant) [Fluad®].
Control Intervention: The control intervention consists in the administration of the standard quadrivalent non-adjuvanted intramuscular influenza vaccine (VaxigripTetra®), containing 15 µg of each of the four viral strains.
Number of Participants with Rationale: The investigators plan to enroll 780 patients (260 patients per study group). Sample size was calculated to find a significant difference between the three groups for the primary endpoint. The lowest seroconversion rate of 46% for standard dose, a mid seroconversion rate of 59% with MF59a vaccine, and the highest seroconversion rate of 70% with HD vaccine has been assumed. A 10% drop out rate is assumed and the number of patients has been rounded up to get balanced groups. In each group 260 patients are required which amounts to 780 patients.
- Conditions
- Influenza, Organ Transplantation
- Being tested
- High-dose influenza vaccine, MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine, Standard intramuscular influenza vaccine
- Keywords
- Vaccination, Adjuvanted vaccine, High-dose vaccine
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High-dose influenza vaccineBiological
The experimental intervention consists in an intramuscular injection of a MF59-adjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine containing 15 µg of antigen per strain (Fluad®) or an intramuscular injection of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine containing 60 µg of antigen per strain (Fluzone-HD®) and will be performed at day 0.
MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccineBiological
The experimental intervention consists in an intramuscular injection of a MF59-adjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine containing 15 µg of antigen per strain (Fluad®) or an intramuscular injection of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine containing 60 µg of antigen per strain (Fluzone-HD®) and will be performed at day 0.
Standard intramuscular influenza vaccineBiological
The control intervention consists in an intramuscular injection of one dose of VaxigripTetra®, the standard non-adjuvanted intramuscular influenza vaccine (as routinely done).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| High dose influenza vaccine | Experimental | Administration of high-dose influenza vaccine Receives: Biological: High-dose influenza vaccine |
| MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine | Experimental | Administration of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine Receives: Biological: MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine |
| Standard influenza vaccine | Active comparator | Administration of standard intramuscular influenza vaccine Receives: Biological: Standard intramuscular influenza vaccine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Vaccine response rate
Seroconversion rate for at least one viral antigen
Measured: day 28 after vaccination
Secondary outcomes (4)
Influenza infection
PCR positive for influenza in a nasopharyngeal swab or other clinical specimen
Measured: Within 6 month after vaccination
Seroprotection rates
Antibody levels >40 after vaccination
Measured: At day 28 and month 6 after vaccination
Reactogenicity
Self-collected adverse events
Measured: within 28 days after vaccination
Development of anti-HLA antibodies
De novo anti-HLA antibodies measured by Luminex
Measured: Within 6 months post vaccination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2018
- Study start26 Oct 2018
- Primary completion15 Aug 2020
- Study completion15 Aug 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 619 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oriol Manuel
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, University of Bern, University Hospital, Geneva, University of Zurich, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Fondazione Epatocentro Ticino, Cantonal Hospital Chur, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Oriol Manuel, University of Lausanne Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03699839
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017-01922
- Other IDs
- 2017
- Acronym
- STOP-FLU
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 17 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Kumar D, Michaels MG, Morris MI, Green M, Avery RK, Liu C, Danziger-Isakov L, Stosor V, Estabrook M, Gantt S, Marr KA, Martin S, Silveira FP, Razonable RR, Allen UD, Levi ME, Lyon GM, Bell LE, Huprikar S, Patel G, Gregg KS, Pursell K, Helmersen D, Julian KG, Shiley K, Bono B, Dharnidharka VR, Alavi G, Kalpoe JS, Shoham S, Reid GE, Humar A; American Society of Transplantation H1N1 Collaborative Study Group. Outcomes from pandemic influenza A H1N1 infection in recipients of solid-organ transplants: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Aug;10(8):521-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70133-X. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
PubMed 20620116Manuel O, Estabrook M; AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. RNA respiratory viruses in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013 Mar;13 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):212-9. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12113. No abstract available.
PubMed 23465014Mombelli M, Rettby N, Perreau M, Pascual M, Pantaleo G, Manuel O. Immunogenicity and safety of double versus standard dose of the seasonal influenza vaccine in solid-organ transplant recipients: A randomized controlled trial. Vaccine. 2018 Oct 1;36(41):6163-6169. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.08.057. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
PubMed 30181045Kumar D, Campbell P, Hoschler K, Hidalgo L, Al-Dabbagh M, Wilson L, Humar A. Randomized Controlled Trial of Adjuvanted Versus Nonadjuvanted Influenza Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplantation. 2016 Mar;100(3):662-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000861.
PubMed 26335915Koller MT, van Delden C, Muller NJ, Baumann P, Lovis C, Marti HP, Fehr T, Binet I, De Geest S, Bucher HC, Meylan P, Pascual M, Steiger J. Design and methodology of the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS): a comprehensive prospective nationwide long-term follow-up cohort. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;28(4):347-55. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9754-y. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
PubMed 23546766Mombelli M, Neofytos D, Huynh-Do U, Sanchez-Cespedes J, Stampf S, Golshayan D, Dahdal S, Stirnimann G, Schnyder A, Garzoni C, Venzin RM, Magenta L, Schonenberger M, Walti L, Hirzel C, Munting A, Dickenmann M, Koller M, Aubert JD, Steiger J, Pascual M, Mueller TF, Schuurmans M, Berger C, Binet I, Villard J, Mueller NJ, Egli A, Cordero E, van Delden C, Manuel O. Immunogenicity of High-Dose Versus MF59-Adjuvanted Versus Standard Influenza Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: The Swiss/Spanish Trial in Solid Organ Transplantation on Prevention of Influenza (STOP-FLU Trial). Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 25;78(1):48-56. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad477.
PubMed 37584344
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reducing the Burden of Influenza After Solid-Organ Transplantation: the STOP-FLU Trial [Swiss Trial in Solid Organ Transplantation on Prevention of Influenza]
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03699839
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STOP-FLU / 2017-01922
- Conditions
- Influenza, Organ Transplantation
- Keywords
- Vaccination, Adjuvanted vaccine, High-dose vaccine
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 619 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oriol ManuelUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, University of Bern, University Hospital, Geneva, University of Zurich, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Fondazione Epatocentro Ticino, Cantonal Hospital Chur, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
- Study start
- 26 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Aug 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Influenza is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients and it is mainly prevented by seasonal influenza vaccination. Unfortunately, the immunogenicity of standard influenza vaccine is suboptimal in this population. Vaccination with a high-dose (HD) influenza vaccine or an MF59-adjuvanted (MF59a) vaccine have significantly reduced the incidence of influenza and increased the immunogenicity of influenza vaccine in the elderly. The investigators will compare the immunogenicity and efficacy of two new vaccination strategies, consisting in vaccination with a HD influenza vaccine or an MF59a influenza vaccine, to the standard-dose non-adjuvanted vaccination (standard of care) in a population of SOT recipients.
Detailed description
Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to compare the immunogenicity of two novel vaccination strategies, consisting in vaccination with a HD influenza vaccine or an MF59a influenza vaccine, to the standard-dose non-adjuvanted vaccination (standard of care) in a population of SOT recipients.
The main secondary objectives are to evaluate the efficacy of the novel vaccination strategies in reducing the incidence of influenza, to correlate the humoral responses to vaccination with protection from influenza and to assess the influence of immunosuppression on influenza vaccine responses.
Safety objectives include the assessment of the reactogenicity of the different vaccines and to describe the incidence of acute rejection and the development of anti-Human Leucocyte Antigens (HLA) antibodies after vaccination.
Study design: Prospective double-blinded randomized controlled three-arm parallel group superiority multicenter trial.
Inclusion / Exclusion criteria: Study participants will be enrolled among ≥18-year old stable SOT recipients ≥3 months after transplantation, regularly followed at their respective outpatient clinic at the 7 transplant centers and scheduled to receive the annual influenza vaccine. Candidates will be excluded in case of previous severe reaction or allergy to one of the study vaccines or in case of treatment for acute rejection, among others.
Measurements and procedures: At day 0, after giving informed consent, eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into 3 arms: standard quadrivalent intramuscular vaccine (control), HD trivalent vaccine and MF59a trivalent vaccine. After vaccination participants will be followed for a period of 6 months. Safety will be assessed immediately after vaccination and 7, 28 and 180 days after vaccination, and blood sampling for immunogenicity analysis will be performed at baseline, 7, 28 and 180 days after vaccination. Additionally to evaluate the vaccine safety, anti-HLA antibodies will be measured at baseline and at days 28 and 180 after vaccination. Hemagglutinin titers will be determined by hemagglutination inhibition assay (HIA) according to standardized methods. During the influenza season, the development of influenza will be systematically assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by surveillance nasopharyngeal swab.
Study Product / Intervention: The study intervention consists in the intramuscular administration of either a HD vaccine (containing 60 µg of antigen of each of the three viral strains) [Fluzone-HD®] or a MF59a vaccine (containing 15 µg of antigen of each of the three viral strains with a MF59 adjuvant) [Fluad®].
Control Intervention: The control intervention consists in the administration of the standard quadrivalent non-adjuvanted intramuscular influenza vaccine (VaxigripTetra®), containing 15 µg of each of the four viral strains.
Number of Participants with Rationale: The investigators plan to enroll 780 patients (260 patients per study group). Sample size was calculated to find a significant difference between the three groups for the primary endpoint. The lowest seroconversion rate of 46% for standard dose, a mid seroconversion rate of 59% with MF59a vaccine, and the highest seroconversion rate of 70% with HD vaccine has been assumed. A 10% drop out rate is assumed and the number of patients has been rounded up to get balanced groups. In each group 260 patients are required which amounts to 780 patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| High dose influenza vaccine | Experimental | Biological: High-dose influenza vaccineAdministration of high-dose influenza vaccine |
| MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine | Experimental | Biological: MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccineAdministration of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine |
| Standard influenza vaccine | Active comparator | Biological: Standard intramuscular influenza vaccineAdministration of standard intramuscular influenza vaccine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Provision of written, informed consent
- Age ≥18 years
- Stable outpatients based on clinical judgement
- ≥ 3 months after solid organ transplantation
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Known hypersensitivity to any component (antigen, adjuvant, excipient or preservative) of study vaccines; the composition of the study vaccines is as follows:
- Previous life-threatening reaction to influenza vaccine (i.e. Guillain Barré Syndrome)
- Ongoing therapy for rejection (including steroid pulse or prednisone > 2mg/kg/day over more than 14 days)
- Ongoing therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and/or eculizumab
- Current or past (within 6 months) therapy with rituximab
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High-dose influenza vaccineThe experimental intervention consists in an intramuscular injection of a MF59-adjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine containing 15 µg of antigen per strain (Fluad®) or an intramuscular injection of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine containing 60 µg of antigen per strain (Fluzone-HD®) and will be performed at day 0. | Biological | High dose influenza vaccine |
| MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccineThe experimental intervention consists in an intramuscular injection of a MF59-adjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine containing 15 µg of antigen per strain (Fluad®) or an intramuscular injection of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine containing 60 µg of antigen per strain (Fluzone-HD®) and will be performed at day 0. | Biological | MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine |
| Standard intramuscular influenza vaccineThe control intervention consists in an intramuscular injection of one dose of VaxigripTetra®, the standard non-adjuvanted intramuscular influenza vaccine (as routinely done). | Biological | Standard influenza vaccine |
Primary outcome
Vaccine response rate
Time frame: day 28 after vaccination
Seroconversion rate for at least one viral antigen
4 secondary outcomes
Influenza infection
Time frame: Within 6 month after vaccination
Seroprotection rates
Time frame: At day 28 and month 6 after vaccination
Reactogenicity
Time frame: within 28 days after vaccination
Development of anti-HLA antibodies
Time frame: Within 6 months post vaccination
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Dec 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 20620116Kumar D, Michaels MG, Morris MI, Green M, Avery RK, Liu C, Danziger-Isakov L, Stosor V, Estabrook M, Gantt S, Marr KA, Martin S, Silveira FP, Razonable RR, Allen UD, Levi ME, Lyon GM, Bell LE, Huprikar S, Patel G, Gregg KS, Pursell K, Helmersen D, Julian KG, Shiley K, Bono B, Dharnidharka VR, Alavi G, Kalpoe JS, Shoham S, Reid GE, Humar A; American Society of Transplantation H1N1 Collaborative Study Group. Outcomes from pandemic influenza A H1N1 infection in recipients of solid-organ transplants: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010 Aug;10(8):521-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70133-X. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 23465014Manuel O, Estabrook M; AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. RNA respiratory viruses in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013 Mar;13 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):212-9. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12113. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 30181045Mombelli M, Rettby N, Perreau M, Pascual M, Pantaleo G, Manuel O. Immunogenicity and safety of double versus standard dose of the seasonal influenza vaccine in solid-organ transplant recipients: A randomized controlled trial. Vaccine. 2018 Oct 1;36(41):6163-6169. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.08.057. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 26335915Kumar D, Campbell P, Hoschler K, Hidalgo L, Al-Dabbagh M, Wilson L, Humar A. Randomized Controlled Trial of Adjuvanted Versus Nonadjuvanted Influenza Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplantation. 2016 Mar;100(3):662-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000861.
- Results publication: PubMed 23546766Koller MT, van Delden C, Muller NJ, Baumann P, Lovis C, Marti HP, Fehr T, Binet I, De Geest S, Bucher HC, Meylan P, Pascual M, Steiger J. Design and methodology of the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (STCS): a comprehensive prospective nationwide long-term follow-up cohort. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;28(4):347-55. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9754-y. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37584344Mombelli M, Neofytos D, Huynh-Do U, Sanchez-Cespedes J, Stampf S, Golshayan D, Dahdal S, Stirnimann G, Schnyder A, Garzoni C, Venzin RM, Magenta L, Schonenberger M, Walti L, Hirzel C, Munting A, Dickenmann M, Koller M, Aubert JD, Steiger J, Pascual M, Mueller TF, Schuurmans M, Berger C, Binet I, Villard J, Mueller NJ, Egli A, Cordero E, van Delden C, Manuel O. Immunogenicity of High-Dose Versus MF59-Adjuvanted Versus Standard Influenza Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: The Swiss/Spanish Trial in Solid Organ Transplantation on Prevention of Influenza (STOP-FLU Trial). Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 25;78(1):48-56. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad477.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Influenza
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Vaccine Pandemic Preparedness Through Airway Immunology Characterization
Influenza, Human
RecruitingPhase 1
pH1N1 Blinded Challenge Study
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1406/CD388 for Prevention of Influenza (MK-1406-005/CD388.SQ.3.06)
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
9 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing High-dose influenza vaccine, MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine and Standard intramuscular influenza vaccine in people with Influenza and Organ Transplantation, run by Oriol Manuel at 9 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in Switzerland, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Vaccine response rate (time frame: day 28 after vaccination). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03699839, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.