AzTrials
AzTrials

Substance-Related DisordersNCT03705143

Behavioral Activation for Heroin Use in China: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing Treatment as usual and Chinese translated LETS ACT in people with Substance-Related Disorders and Mood Disorders, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a single-site two-arm parallel-group trial conducted in a Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) Clinic that provides medication service for 254 heroin users in Wuhan, China. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
Treatment as usual and Chinese translated LETS ACT
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
4 Jun 2018to 5 Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Currently receiving Methadone Maintenance Treatment
  • Between 18 and 65
  • No outstanding health conditions
  • Has received MMT treatment for more than three weeks
  • Will continue MMT treatment for at least four more weeks

Who cannot join

  • Reading level below 5th grade
  • Psychosis
  • PTSD
  • The inability to give informed, voluntary, written consent to participate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention

    Wuhan, Hubei

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: The Behavioral Activation for Chinese Substance Users (C-BA) Research Protocol

This was a single-site two-arm parallel-group trial conducted in a Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) Clinic that provides medication service for 254 heroin users in Wuhan, China. Once consented and completed the pre-treatment assessment, participants were randomized to receive either the Chinese translated behavioral activation treatment for substance use (C-BA) or treatment as usual (TAU). Research assessments occurred at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and 1- and 3-months follow-ups.

The primary purpose of this study is to:

Read more
  1. Evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of the Chinese-translated behavioral activation treatment for substance use (C-BA), an evidence based intervention developed to address the individual and psychological needs of Chinese substance users.

The secondary purpose of this study is to:

Examine the underlying mechanism of C-BA by studying the relationship between change in substance use related outcomes and associated psychological constructs (e.g. levels of behavioral activation and depression).

Read the detailed description

Over 83% registered drug users in China are primary heroin users. Heroin use is associated with numerous severe health consequences, including elevated risk for HIV, STDs, and fatal overdose. Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) has become the standard treatment approach for heroin use that show effectiveness in reducing drug injection, HIV transmission, and criminal activities associated with heroin use in China. Nevertheless, dropout rates among MMT seekers is high in China (50%-70% drop out rate three months post treatment initiation), and research suggests that it is important to provide psychosocial treatments for substance use along with MMT. The combined treatment may both increase treatment adherence and result in superior substance use treatment outcomes.

The Chinese-translated behavioral activation treatment (C-BA) for substance use was translated from the Life Enhancement Treatment for Substance Use (LETS ACT), an evidence based treatment for substance use in the United States. C-BA may fit the need in China because it is a cost-effective and low training-burden treatment designed to be implemented under settings with limited resources. Similar to LETS ACT, C-BA aims to improve substance use outcomes by helping the individuals engage in drug-free value based activities.

Recent studies reported that compared to participants in the supportive counseling group, individuals who received LETS ACT shows significantly higher abstinence rates at 3 months [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.3-3.7], 6 months (OR = 2.6, 95% CI= 1.3-5.0) and 12 months (OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.3-6.1) post-treatment. Additionally, LETS ACT participants reported significantly fewer adverse consequences from substance use at 12 months post-treatment [B = 4.50, standard error (SE) = 2.17, 95% CI = 0.22-8.78]. In another pilot study, the feasibility and acceptability of C-BA was evaluated among six Chinese international students in the United States. Results suggest that C-BA is associated with both statistical and clinical improvement in depressive symptoms and access to environmental rewards up until 1 month post treatment. The study has a 100% research and treatment retention rate, high homework completion rate (> 80% completion rate), and all participants reported that C-BA is highly culturally acceptable. These preliminary evidence support the feasibility of implementing C-BA among Chinese substance users.

Taken together, research suggests that C-BA could be a feasible treatment that has the potential to reduce substance use, alleviate depressive symptoms, and improve levels of behavioral activation among Chinese heroin users. To date, no study has investigated the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of C-BA among Chinese heroin users seeking MMT treatment. The present study aims to address this need by conducting a randomized controlled trial to examine the acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy of C-BA among 90 Chinese heroin users seeking MMT. In the current study, the investigators will examine the treatment specifically with regard to major depression, reinforcement, adherence to MMT, and abstinence from substance use. The investigators will also examine the underlying mechanism of C-BA by studying the relationship between change in substance use related outcomes and associated psychological constructs (e.g. levels of behavioral activation and depression).

Being tested
Treatment as usual, Chinese translated LETS ACT
Keywords
Disease, Depressive Disorder, Depression, Mood Disorders, Mental Disorders, Substance use Disorders, Chinese heroin user, Culture
Medical subject headings
Substance-Related Disorders, Mood Disorders, Mental Disorders, Disease, Depressive Disorder, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Treatment as usualBehavioural

    Also called TAU

    Treatment as Usual participants will receive the treatment typically provided to patients at the MMT clinic in Wuhan, China.

  • Chinese translated LETS ACTBehavioural

    Also called Chinese translated Behavioral Activation

    The Chinese translated Behavioral Activation (C-BA) will be provided in Mandarin. C-BA treatment includes psychoeducation regarding the link between mood and behavior, identification of values/goals/activities across life areas, planning and tracking of daily value driven activities.

Study groups in NCT03705143
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment as UsualPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive no additional intervention besides the services they are currently receiving at the MMT clinic.
Receives: Behavioral: Treatment as usual
Chinese translated LETS ACTExperimentalIn addition to services participants are currently receiving at the MMT clinic, individuals will attend six group-based one-hour behavioral activation treatment sessions.
Receives: Behavioral: Chinese translated LETS ACT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in the % substance use days over time

    The frequency of substance use over the past 30 days was measured by a Timeline Followback Interview (TLFB).The % was calculated by using the # of days participants used substance during the 30-day period prior to each assessment point divided by 30. Data was collected at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 1-month post treatment discontinuation and 3-month post treatment discontinuation. The exception is the post-treatment assessment which will only includes a 21 day period.

    The TLFB is a questionnaire in which the subject is asked to self-report types and frequency of substance use for the past 30 days. On the group level, statistical methods such as multi-level modeling (MLM) will be used to assess group differences in change in % of days using substance over the course of the study. On the individual level, statistical methods such as Reliable Change Index (RCI) will be used to assess change in % of days using substance that is clinically significant.

    Measured: Pretreatment through 3-month post treatment discontinuation

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Change in # of participants showing positive urinalysis results over the course of the study

    Urinalysis is a biological measure of substance use. Statistical methods such as multi-level modeling (MLM) will be used to assess group differences in change in # of participants showing positive urinalysis results over time. Data was collected at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 1-month post treatment discontinuation and 3-month post treatment discontinuation.

    Measured: Pretreatment through 3-month post treatment discontinuation

  2. Change in Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) Score over the course of the study

    The BDI-II is a 21-item self-report measure of depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 - 63, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. On the group level, statistical methods such as multi-level modeling (MLM) will be used to assess group differences in change in BDI-II total scores over time. On the individual level, statistical methods such as Reliable Change Index (RCI) will be used to assess change in BDI-II total scores that are clinically significant. Data was collected at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 1-month post treatment discontinuation and 3-month post treatment discontinuation.

    Measured: Pretreatment through 3-month post treatment discontinuation

  3. Change in Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) Scores over the course of the study

    The BADS is a 25-item self-report measure of overall level of activity involvement. Scores range from 25 - 175, with higher scores indicating greater levels of activity involvement. On the group level, statistical methods such as multi-level modeling (MLM) will be used to assess group differences in change in BADS total scores over time. On the individual level, statistical methods such as Reliable Change Index (RCI) will be used to assess change in BADS total scores that is clinically significant. Data was collected at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 1-month post treatment discontinuation and 3-month post treatment discontinuation.

    Measured: Pretreatment through 3-month post treatment discontinuation

  4. Change in Reward Probability Index (RPI) Scores over the course of the study

    The RPI is a 20-item self-report measure used to assess environmental reward and punishment. Scores range from 0 - 60, with higher scores indicating greater levels of access to environmental rewards. On the group level, statistical methods such as multi-level modeling (MLM) will be used to assess group differences in change in RPI total scores over time. On the individual level, statistical methods such as Reliable Change Index (RCI) will be used to assess change in RPI total scores that is clinically significant. Data was collected at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 1-month post treatment discontinuation and 3-month post treatment discontinuation.

    Measured: Pretreatment through 3-month post treatment discontinuation

  5. Change in % days participants take methadone at the clinic over the course of the study

    Methadone treatment adherence is measured by participant's % of days visiting MMT clinic during the course of the study. On the group level, statistical methods such as multi-level modeling (MLM) will be used to assess group differences in change in % days participants take methadone at the clinic over time. On the individual level, statistical methods such as Reliable Change Index (RCI) will be used to assess change in % days participants take methadone at the clinic that is clinically significant. Data was collected at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 1-month post treatment discontinuation and 3-month post treatment discontinuation.

    Measured: Pretreatment through 3-month post treatment discontinuation

  6. Change in % days participants engaged in Daily Goals Form over the course of the study

    The Daily Goals Form is used to measure Treatment Engagement. The % days participants engaged in Daily goals Form was calculated by dividing the total # of days participants completed the "Daily Goals Form" by the total # of days they were given the opportunity to complete the "Daily Goals Form." Data was collected at pre-treatment, post-treatment, 1-month post treatment discontinuation and 3-month post treatment discontinuation.

    Once the % is calculated, on the group level, statistical methods such as multi-level modeling (MLM) will be used to assess group differences in change in % days participants engaged in Daily Goals Form over time. On the individual level, statistical methods such as Reliable Change Index (RCI) will be used to assess change in % days participants engaged in Daily Goals Form that is clinically significant.

    Measured: Pretreatment through 3-month post treatment discontinuation

  7. Feasibility of the treatment

    Feasibility of the treatment was measured by the following outcomes: % of participated treatment sessions and scores of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI).

    WAI is a 12-item self-report measure of the quality of therapist-client alliance. Scores range from 12 to 48, with higher scores indicating stronger working alliance.

    Measured: Three weeks since pre-treatment assessment

  8. Acceptability o the treatment

    Acceptability of the treatment was measured scores of the Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire (TAQ).

    Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire (TAQ) is a 6-item self-report measure of patient's rating of the treatment's acceptability, ethics, effectiveness, negative side effects, therapist knowledge, and therapist trustworthiness. Score range between 6 and 42, with higher scores indicate greater treatment acceptability.

    Measured: Three weeks since pre-treatment assessment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Oct 2018
  2. Study start4 Jun 2018
  3. Primary completion5 Dec 2018
  4. Study completion5 Dec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03705143
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-0885
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
2 Oct 2018
Last updated
1 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Daughters SB, Braun AR, Sargeant MN, Reynolds EK, Hopko DR, Blanco C, Lejuez CW. Effectiveness of a brief behavioral treatment for inner-city illicit drug users with elevated depressive symptoms: the life enhancement treatment for substance use (LETS Act!). J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;69(1):122-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0116.

    PubMed 18312046
  • Daughters SB, Magidson JF, Anand D, Seitz-Brown CJ, Chen Y, Baker S. The effect of a behavioral activation treatment for substance use on post-treatment abstinence: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2018 Mar;113(3):535-544. doi: 10.1111/add.14049. Epub 2017 Nov 19.

    PubMed 28963853
  • Daughters, S. B., Magidson, J. F., Lejuez, C. W., & Chen, Y. (2016). LETS ACT: a behavioral activation treatment for substance use and depression. Advances in Dual Diagnosis, 9(2/3), 74-84.

  • Chawarski MC, Zhou W, Schottenfeld RS. Behavioral drug and HIV risk reduction counseling (BDRC) in MMT programs in Wuhan, China: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Jun 1;115(3):237-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.09.024. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

    PubMed 21159452
  • Wang L, Wang N, Wang L, Li D, Jia M, Gao X, Qu S, Qin Q, Wang Y, Smith K. The 2007 Estimates for People at Risk for and Living With HIV in China: Progress and Challenges. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Apr 1;50(4):414-8. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181958530.

    PubMed 19214116
  • Yin L, Qin G, Ruan Y, Qian HZ, Hao C, Xie L, Chen K, Zhang Y, Xia Y, Wu J, Lai S, Shao Y. Nonfatal overdose among heroin users in southwestern China. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2007;33(4):505-16. doi: 10.1080/00952990701407223.

    PubMed 17668336
  • Zhang L, Chow EP, Zhuang X, Liang Y, Wang Y, Tang C, Ling L, Tucker JD, Wilson DP. Methadone maintenance treatment participant retention and behavioural effectiveness in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 26;8(7):e68906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068906. Print 2013.

    PubMed 23922668
  • Feng Y, Wu Z, Detels R, Qin G, Liu L, Wang X, Wang J, Zhang L. HIV/STD prevalence among men who have sex with men in Chengdu, China and associated risk factors for HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Feb;53 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S74-80. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c7dd16.

    PubMed 20104114
  • Sun HM, Li XY, Chow EP, Li T, Xian Y, Lu YH, Tian T, Zhuang X, Zhang L. Methadone maintenance treatment programme reduces criminal activity and improves social well-being of drug users in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 8;5(1):e005997. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005997.

    PubMed 25573521
  • Marienfeld C, Liu P, Wang X, Schottenfeld R, Zhou W, Chawarski MC. Evaluation of an implementation of methadone maintenance treatment in China. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Dec 1;157:60-7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 8.

    PubMed 26601934
  • Lu L, Fang Y, Wang X. Drug abuse in China: past, present and future. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2008 Jun;28(4):479-90. doi: 10.1007/s10571-007-9225-2. Epub 2007 Nov 8.

    PubMed 17990098

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Treatment as usual and Chinese translated LETS ACT in people with Substance-Related Disorders and Mood Disorders, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in the % substance use days over time (time frame: Pretreatment through 3-month post treatment discontinuation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03705143, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in