AzTrials
AzTrials

PainNCT03710954

Application and Comparison of Fuzzy Scale for the Evaluation of Pain Skeletal Muscle With the Numerical Pain Scale

A study testing Experimental Group in people with Pain, run by Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aimed to analyze the stratification of pain levels through a mathematical model built using the diffuse joint theory and to investigate the relationship between range of motion and pain related aspects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pain
What is being tested?
Experimental Group
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
535 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Mar 2016to 30 Jun 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Included in this study were male and female subjects
  • Age between 18 and 90 years
  • With complaint of skeletal muscle pain
  • Do not present cognitive deficit that makes the study impossible

Who cannot join

  • Individuals who did not agree to participate in the study
  • Volunteers with decreased range of motion
  • Volunteers without complaint of skeletal muscle pain

About this study

This study aimed to analyze the stratification of pain levels through a mathematical model built using the diffuse joint theory and to investigate the relationship between range of motion and pain related aspects.

Read the detailed description

The incidence of pain is due to traumatic actions, surgical interventions, new habits of life, increased longevity of the individuals and the reduction of the tolerance of the suffering by the man. Musculoskeletal pain is more evident in adult individuals, being the main cause of chronic pain throughout society, generating an impact on the quality of life, interfering in the daily activity of 30 to 50% of the patients. Pain measurement can be divided into four levels, which include the nominal, the ordinal, the interval and the ratio, with both one-dimensional and multidimensional versions. In the health area, diagnosis and treatment of diseases involve various levels of imprecision and uncertainties. A single disease or symptom may manifest totally differently in different patients and with varying degrees of severity. These effects usually generate many uncertainties and inaccuracies affecting the interpretations of the exams and the diagnosis, as well as the treatment. Fuzzy Systems Theory, also known as nebulous logic, is used to interpret the approximate mode of human reasoning, to take it to a numerical format and to obtain answers in an environment of uncertainties that serve as a subsidy to decision-making . A Fuzzy system based on Fuzzy logic. It can also be considered as a kind of expert, knowledge-based system. The development of the proposed Fuzzy Scale for Skeletal Muscle Pain Evaluation used the Mamdani method that allowed the representation of specialist knowledge (s) to construct the rule base. The construction of this system was based on the numerical scale of pain adopted and spread worldwide, and on the range of motion represented by the action of the muscles and articular components of the human body. The diffuse model proposed by the Fuzzy Scale for Muscle Skeletal Pain Evaluation uses 25 rules using binary XOR logic. For the volunteer tests, the proposed model was a non-randomized single intervention transverse study to analyze and compare the model of diffuse pain evaluation with the numerical pain scale performed with 535 volunteers.

Conditions
Pain
Being tested
Experimental Group
Keywords
Evaluation of pain, Fuzzy systems theory
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Experimental GroupDiagnostic test

    All volunteers were evaluated by numerical pain scale and Fuzzy scale. This procedure was performed to compare the efficacy of the Fuzzy Scale demonstrating greater accuracy of quantification of skeletal muscle pain

Study groups in NCT03710954
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental GroupExperimentalAll the volunteers were evaluated through numerical evaluation of pain that assumes a subjective condition, the researcher showed the numerical scale of pain, being 0 without pain, 1 to 4 mild pain, 5 moderate pain, 6 to 9 severe pain and 10 worse pain possible pain, which was interpreted by the volunteer. In the Fuzzy Pain Scale, the evaluation of the range of motion was done where the evaluator used the goniometer (plastic instrument that verifies the angulation of the joint movement) and supplied the Fuzzy system with these data.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Experimental Group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Numerical scale of pain

    Patients across this scale quantified their pain between 0 without pain, 1 to 4 mild pain, 5 moderate pain, 6 to 9 severe pain and 10 worst possible pain

    Measured: 10 minutes

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Fuzzy Pain Scale

    The evaluation of the range of motion was done by an evaluator who used a goniometer (plastic instrument that verifies the angulation of joint movement) according to: Spine-cervical Flexion: 0-65°; Cervical extension: 0-50°; Shoulder-horizontal Adduction: 0-40°; Internal rotation: 0-90°; External rotation: 0-90 °; Flexion: 0-145°; Extension: 145-0°; Elbow: Pronation: 0-90°; Supination: 0-90°; Flexion: 0-90°; Fist-extension: 0-75°; Radial deviation: 0-25ø; Ulnar deviation: 0-45°; Flexion: 0-95 °; Extension: 0-35 °; Lumbar spine-lateral flex: 0-40 °; Trunk rotation: 0-35 °; Flexion (knee flexion): 0-125°; Flexion (knee extended): 0-90°; Extension: 0-10°; Hip-external rotation: 0-45°; Abduction: 0-45°; Adduction: 0-15°; Flexion: 0-140°; Knee-Bending: 0-140°; Ankle-Dorsiflexion: 0-20°; Plant flexion: 0-45°. Supplying the Fuzzy Pain Analysis System.

    Measured: 10 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Oct 2018
  2. Study start1 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion20 Sep 2016
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
535 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03710954
Sponsor's protocol ID
17258413.0.0000.5497
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
16 Oct 2018
Last updated
26 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Experimental Group in people with Pain, run by Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Numerical scale of pain (time frame: 10 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in