AzTrials
AzTrials

Cancer of the LungNCT03713099

NEUWAVE Flexible Probe Study #2

A study testing Microwave ablation in people with Cancer of the Lung and Lung Cancer, run by Ethicon, Inc. at 5 sites in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients with medically inoperable and operable secondary soft tissue lesion(s) of the lung will have transbronchial microwave ablation performed using cone beam CT for probe guidance and confirmation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cancer of the Lung, Lung Cancer, Neoplasms, Lung
What is being tested?
Microwave ablation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
31 Jul 2020to 31 Mar 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Signed Informed Consent
  • Patients greater or equal to 18 years of age
  • Performance status 0-2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group classification [ECOG])
  • Willing to fulfill all follow-up visit requirements
  • Medically inoperable and operable secondary soft tissue lesion(s) of the lung
  • A maximum of two ipsilateral soft tissue lesions less than or equal to 2cm in the outer two-thirds of the lung and not closer than 1cm to the pleura. Lesion size must be measured with at least 2-dimensional imaging.

Who cannot join

  • Scheduled concurrent procedure for the target soft tissue lesion(s) other than those that are lung-related
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Physical or psychological condition that would impair study participation
  • Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy at the time of screening
  • Patient with implantable devices, including pacemakers or other electronic implants
  • Prior pneumonectomy or bronchiectasis
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Severe neuromuscular disease
  • Patient count less than or equal to 50,000/mm cubed
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score of greater than or equal to 4
  • Inability to tolerate anesthesia
  • Expected survival less than 6 months
  • Clinically significant hypertension
  • Chronic, continuous ventilator support, which uses bi-level positive airway pressure (PAP) to improve lung function for severe conditions (however, intermittent PAP, for non-pulmonary conditions, such as sleep apnea, is permitted)
  • Endobronchial soft tissue lesions proximal to the segmental airways
  • Imaging findings of active pulmonary infection
  • The patient was judged unsuitable for study participation by the Investigator for any other reason.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • City of Hope

    Duarte, California, 91010

  • New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine

    New York, New York, 10065

  • FirstHealth Moore Regional Hospital

    Pinehurst, North Carolina, 28374

  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter Study of the NEUWAVE Flex Microwave Ablation System in the Ablation of Secondary Soft Tissue Lesions of the Lung

Patients with medically inoperable and operable secondary soft tissue lesion(s) of the lung will have transbronchial microwave ablation performed using cone beam CT for probe guidance and confirmation.

Read the detailed description

Adult patients with medically inoperable and operable secondary soft tissue lesion(s) of the lung less than 2cm will undergo transbronchial microwave ablation performed by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon using cone beam CT imaging for probe guidance and confirmation on ablation outcome. All treated patients will be followed for one year following the ablation procedure for efficacy and safety.

Being tested
Microwave ablation
Keywords
Microwave Ablation
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Microwave ablationDevice

    Microwave ablations will be performed under general anesthesia via a transbronchial approach by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon. Prior to the ablation, the treating physician will perform an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) to confirm disease staging.

Study groups in NCT03713099
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Microwave AblationExperimentalMicrowave ablations will be performed under general anesthesia via a transbronchial approach performed by an interventional pulmonologist or thoracic surgeon.
Receives: Device: Microwave ablation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Device User Experience Survey

    The Device User Experience Survey is an unvalidated, Sponsor-generated questionnaire aimed to increase the Sponsor's understanding of the usability of the NEUWAVE microwave ablation system. The questionnaire asks approximately 30 questions (includes yes/no responses, rating scales, and fill-in-the-blank sections) and is to be completed by the treating physician at the completion of each ablation. A summary of all treating physician responses will be generated at the completion of the study to summarize the overall user experience with the device.

    Measured: Day of ablation (day 0)

  2. Technical Success (lesion completely ablated)

    Technical Success is determined by the treating physician and is defined as the ablation zone completely overlapping or encompassing the target lesion plus an ablative margin, as assessed by cone beam CT imaging, immediately following the ablation procedure.

    Measured: Day of ablation (day 0)

  3. Technique Efficacy (lesion completely ablated)

    Technique Efficacy is determined by the treating physician and is defined as the ablation zone completely overlapping or encompassing the target lesion plus an ablative margin, as assessed by cone beam CT imaging, at Visit 3 (i.e. 30 days post-ablation).

    Measured: 30 days post-ablation

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Adverse Events

    Any AEs attributable to the ablation procedure, including all device-related, procedure-related, and SAEs, evaluated from the start of the ablation procedure throughout the entirety of the study (i.e. through 1 year post-ablation).

    Measured: 1 year post-ablation

  2. Primary Efficacy Rate

    The Primary Efficacy Rate is the percentage of target lesions successfully eradicated following the first ablation procedure, as assessed using CT imaging by the treating physician on the day of ablation.

    Measured: Day of ablation (day 0)

  3. Secondary Efficacy Rate

    The Secondary Efficacy Rate is defined as the percentage of soft tissue lesions that have undergone successful repeat ablations following identification of local soft tissue lesions progression, as assessed using CT imaging by the treating physician throughout the entirety of the study (i.e. 1 year post-ablation).

    Measured: 1 year post-ablation

  4. Target Lesion Recurrence

    Target Lesion Recurrence is defined as the reappearance of the lesion(s) at the treated site, as assessed using CT imaging by the treating physician throughout the entirety of the study (i.e. through 1 year post-ablation).

    Measured: 1 year post-ablation

  5. Length of Hospital Stay

    The Length of Hospital Stay is defined as the length of time of hospitalization from the end of the ablation procedure to the time of discharge (up to 23 hours post-ablation).

    Measured: Day of ablation (day 0)

  6. Hospital Readmission Rate

    The Hospital Readmission Rate is defined as the percentage of patients who were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of the ablation procedure.

    Measured: 30 days post-ablation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2018
  2. Study start31 Jul 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2022 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Changed study design prior to any patients enrolled.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03713099
Sponsor's protocol ID
NEU_2018_01
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
18 Oct 2018
Last updated
2 Jun 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Microwave ablation in people with Cancer of the Lung and Lung Cancer, run by Ethicon, Inc. at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Device User Experience Survey (time frame: Day of ablation (day 0)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in