AzTrials
AzTrials

Dyspnea; CardiacNCT03717779

Contribution LUS in the Diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure (AHF) in Patients Admitted to the ED

An observational study of Dyspnea; Cardiac, run by University of Monastir at 1 site in Tunisia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study assesses the potential of lung ultrasonography to diagnose heart failure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Dyspnea; Cardiac
What is being tested?
lung ultrasound
How many people
600 participants
Where
1 siteTunisia
Study dates
2 Jan 2016to 1 Oct 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: all patients admitted to the ED with acute dyspnea, with the final diagnosis of heart failure by the ICU team

Who may be able to join

  • non traumatic dyspnea with the final diagnosis of heart failure

Who cannot join

  • coma,
  • shock,Mechanical Ventilation,
  • vasopressor drugs
  • arrhythmia serious and sustained,
  • non consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Tunisia1 site
  • Emergency department of university hospital Fattouma Bourguiba of Monastir

    Monastir, 5000

Other trials in Tunisia

About this study

Official title: Contribution of Pulmonary Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Acute Heart Failure (AHF) in Patients Admitted to Emergency Department (ED) for Dyspnea

This study assesses the potential of lung ultrasonography to diagnose heart failure.

Read the detailed description

Dyspnea is one of the most distressing situations for the patient . Emergency cases do not always present in conditions that are ideal for immediate diagnosis, which sometimes compromises outcome. Physical examination, laboratory findings and radiography are imperfect, resulting in a need for sophisticated test results that delay management.

Lung ultrasonography is becoming a standard tool in critical cases in the ED.

the investigators aim to perform ultrasonography on consecutive patients admitted to the ICU with dyspnea, comparing lung ultrasonography results on initial presentation with the final diagnosis by the ICU team.

Three items were assessed: artifacts (horizontal A lines or vertical B lines indicating interstitial syndrome), lung sliding, and alveolar consolidation and/or pleural effusion, these items were grouped to assess ultrasound profiles.

This study assesses the potential of lung ultrasonography to diagnose heart failure.

Being tested
lung ultrasound
Keywords
Lung ultrasound,, heart failure, diagnosis, accuracy
Medical subject headings
Dyspnea, Heart Failure, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • lung ultrasoundDiagnostic test

    we perform a lung ultrasound to all the patients admitted for dyspnea independantly from the final diagnosis

Study groups in NCT03717779
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HF/HFpEFpatients with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction(HFpEF) perform LUS
Receives: Diagnostic Test: lung ultrasound
HF/HFrEFpatients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction(HFrEF) perform LUS
Receives: Diagnostic Test: lung ultrasound

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the accuracy of LUS in the diagnosis of heart failure

    the accuracy of LUS in the diagnosis of heart failure measured by sensitivity ,specificity, and area under the roc curve

    Measured: 0 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Oct 2018
  2. Study start2 Jan 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2017
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
600 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03717779
Sponsor's protocol ID
Lung Ultra Sound (LUS)
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
6 Jul 2018
Last updated
16 Jan 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Msolli MA, Sekma A, Marzouk MB, Chaabane W, Bel Haj Ali K, Boukadida L, Bzeouich N, Gannoun I, Trabelssi I, Laaouiti K, Grissa MH, Beltaief K, Dridi Z, Belguith A, Methamem M, Bouida W, Boukef R, Boubaker H, Nouira S; GREAT Network. Bedside lung ultrasonography by emergency department residents as an aid for identifying heart failure in patients with acute dyspnea after a 2-h training course. Ultrasound J. 2021 Feb 9;13(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13089-021-00207-9.

    PubMed 33559777

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Dyspnea; Cardiac, run by University of Monastir at 1 site in Tunisia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Tunisia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the accuracy of LUS in the diagnosis of heart failure (time frame: 0 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03717779, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in