Sedentary LifestyleNCT03733288
Reducing Contact Centre Call Agents' Sitting Time
A study testing Education and training sessions, Support emails and Team leader training in people with Sedentary Lifestyle and Physical Activity, run by Liverpool John Moores University at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The study investigates whether a workplace intervention can encourage highly sedentary contact centre call agents to sit less and move more at work. The effect of the intervention will be assessed at 12 weeks and 9 months. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sedentary Lifestyle, Physical Activity
- What is being tested?
- Education and training sessions, Support emails and Team leader training
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 11 Jul 2018to 9 Aug 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Call agents inclusion criteria:
- Full time member of staff (≥0.6 full time or part time equivalent worker in a permanent or temporary/agency position)
- Call agent job role
- Based onsite throughout the trial period
- Access to a work telephone and desktop computer with internet
- Ambulatory
Call agents exclusion criteria:
- Health problems that would impact ability to stand for 10 minutes at a time
- Planned absence >3 weeks during first 3 months of the trial
- Planned relocation to another workplace/site during the first 3 months of the intervention
- Pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Outcome, Process and Economic Evaluation of a Randomised Controlled Trial to Reduce Call Agents' Sitting Time at Work: Project SLAMM
The study investigates whether a workplace intervention can encourage highly sedentary contact centre call agents to sit less and move more at work. The effect of the intervention will be assessed at 12 weeks and 9 months. The hypothesis is that the intervention will reduce workplace sitting and increase workplace standing and light walking.
Read the detailed description
Study Design:
This randomised controlled trial has two experimental treatment arms, SLAMM and SLAMM+.
Recruitment:
- Organisation Level:
Organisation recruitment is via a tender process. A recruitment infographic and application form will be emailed to contact centres affiliated with the Call North West Forum (~700 centres in the North West of England). Organisations have 3-weeks to apply by submitting the application form to the research team. Applications will be reviewed and ranked, and if multiple suitable organisations apply, a meeting will be held with each organisation to discuss the organisation's suitability. Applicants will be notified of the decision via telephone call and subsequent confirmation email, with feedback as to why they were unsuccessful (if applicable). The gatekeeper from the successful organisation will receive a gatekeeper participant information and consent form to sign prior to individual level recruitment.
- Individual Level
Call Agents: Study information sessions during work hours at the organisation, and an email containing a participant information sheet, will be used to recruit call agents. Agents have 2 weeks to express interest. Interested employees will be screened for eligibility using stated criteria via telephone or in person. If inclusion criteria are met, written informed consent will be obtained and baseline assessments scheduled. There will be no racial or gender bias in participant selection.
Stand Up Champions: During agent recruitment, agents will be told about the opportunity to be a stand up champion and have 2 weeks to express interest. There is no limit to the number of champions recruited.
Team Leaders and Management: A participant information sheet and consent form sent via email will be used to recruit team leaders (focus group), middle managers (focus group) and senior managers (interviews) for the process evaluation on intervention acceptability and feasibility at 12 weeks and 9 months.
Group Assignment:
Following baseline data collection, randomisation to the SLAMM or SLAMM+ arm will occur using a number generator by a member of the research team not involved in recruitment. The unit of randomisation will be at the individual level. The participants will be informed of the outcome of the randomisation via email.
Data Collection:
Participants will complete assessments at baseline, 12-weeks and 9 months. Individual assessments include surveys, cardiometabolic and anthropometric measures, and objective physical activity and sedentary behaviour monitoring. Individual assessments will take place within the participant's work site during work hours. Participants will be asked to fast for a minimum of 8 hours, avoid smoking and active transport on the morning of the assessment, avoid alcohol, tea or coffee intake for a minimum of 12-h prior to assessments, and avoid strenuous exercise for a minimum of 24-h prior to assessments. A sub-sample of participants from each treatment arm will be randomly selected to take part in focus groups at 12 weeks and 9 months to evaluate intervention acceptability and feasibility.
Sample Size:
Allowing for moderate drop out, the study aimed to recruit 30 participants per arm and retain 23 participants per arm. A sample size of 23 per arm would achieve 90% power (alpha 5%; two-tailed) to detect a minimum difference of 60 minutes/8-hour workday between arms for workplace sitting time (primary outcome: expected standard deviation of 60 minutes/day).
Analyses:
- Outcome evaluation:
Data will be analysed by an independent statistician (blinded to the treatment arms) using STATA (STATACorp LP) with the alpha level set at p≤0.05. For continuous outcomes, intervention effects and changes within groups will be estimated using linear mixed models. Models will include fixed terms for group (intervention 1/intervention 2), time (3 or 9 months), and group-time interaction, with potential confounders. Estimates of changes within groups, and differences between groups, will be obtained using marginal means and pairwise comparisons of marginal means of the outcome.
- Process evaluation:
Inductive thematic analysis will identify, analyse and explore themes from focus group and interview data on intervention acceptability and feasibility at 12 weeks and 9 months. Surveys will also assess intervention acceptability and feasibility at 12 weeks and 9 months.
- Economic evaluation:
The economic evaluation will be conducted from three perspectives. From the health sector perspective, trial-and model-based cost-utility analyses will be performed to show the cost of the intervention per quality adjusted life year. From the employer perspective, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted to show the cost of the intervention per change in productivity. From the broader societal perspective, a cost-consequence analysis will be presented outlining all the costs and effects (in their natural units) which are incurred by the various stakeholders including the participants, and the participant's family and friends.
- Conditions
- Sedentary Lifestyle, Physical Activity
- Being tested
- Education and training sessions, Support emails, Team leader training, Height-adjustable workstation
- Keywords
- Intervention, Workplace, Sedentary behaviour, Physical activity, Adults, Economic, Evaluation
- Medical subject headings
- Sedentary Behavior, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Education and training sessionsBehavioural
Agents will be invited to attend sessions in intervention week 1, 3, 9, and month 6. Sessions will introduce (week 1) and reinforce (week 3, 9, month 6) the intervention aims, benefits of and ways to move more and sit less, with emphasis on active breaks. Feedback from baseline assessment will be provided and discussed in week 3 (health data) and 9 (activity data) and month 6 (health and activity data from the 12-week assessment). Each session will include discussion of daily standing/walking goals set by the research team, with timers and a goal log provided to participants in week 1 to enable self-monitoring. The Stand Up champions, and their role to encourage daily movement and sitting reduction through modelling and verbal support, will be communicated and reinforced in each session.
Support emailsBehavioural
Agents will receive support emails weekly (weeks 1-12) then monthly (months 4-9) across the intervention. Each email includes an infographic that encourages moving more and sitting less at work.
Team leader trainingBehavioural
Team leaders in the participating organisation will be invited to attend a training session before the intervention starts. The training aims to enhance team leader's capabilities to demonstrate positive movement and sitting behaviours at work and promote call agents to sit less and move more at work. Team leaders will be asked to include the intervention as an agenda item in their weekly team meetings with their call agents and their 1:1 sessions with call agents. Team leaders will be encouraged to incorporate walking into their 1:1 meetings with call agents.
Height-adjustable workstationDevice
After baseline, agents in the SLAMM+ arm will have a height-adjustable workstation installed on their existing workplace desk. This will enable work in a seated or standing position, with flexibility to alternate between postures. Desk installation will occur with support from the onsite organisation health and safety team. The research team will brief participants on safe and effective workstation use. A laminated sheet will be fixed to each workstation to remind participants of safe and effective use.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SLAMM | Experimental | Multi-component intervention (Education and training sessions, Support emails, Team leader training) Receives: Behavioral: Education and training sessions; Behavioral: Support emails; Behavioral: Team leader training |
| SLAMM+ | Experimental | Multi-component intervention (Education and training sessions, Support emails, Team leader training, Height-adjustable workstation) Receives: Behavioral: Education and training sessions; Behavioral: Support emails; Behavioral: Team leader training; Device: Height-adjustable workstation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in workplace sitting time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
An activpal monitor will objectively assess habitual sitting time for 24 hours over 7 consecutive days.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Secondary outcomes (31)
Change in workplace standing time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
An activpal monitor will objectively assess habitual standing time for 24 hours over 7 consecutive days.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in workplace walking time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
An activpal monitor will objectively assess habitual walking time for 24 hours over 7 consecutive days.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in whole day sitting time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
An activpal monitor will objectively assess habitual sitting time for 24 hours over 7 consecutive days.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in whole day standing time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
An activpal monitor will objectively assess habitual standing time for 24 hours over 7 consecutive days.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in whole day walking time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
An activpal monitor will objectively assess habitual walking time for 24 hours over 7 consecutive days.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in body mass index at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Calculated from assessment of stature and body mass
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in waist circumference at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Calculated from assessment of waist circumference
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in hip circumference at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Calculated from assessment of hip circumference
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in blood glucose at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Calculated from finger prick blood sampling
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in blood cholesterol at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Calculated from finger prick blood sampling
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in systolic blood pressure at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Calculated from automated blood pressure monitoring
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in diastolic blood pressure at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Calculated from automated blood pressure monitoring
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in endothelial function in the femoral artery at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Calculated from flow mediated dilation assessment
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in musculoskeletal discomfort or pain: Self-reported using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire
Discomfort or pain (neck, shoulders, elbows, wrist/hands, upper back, lower back, hips/thighs/buttocks, knees and ankles/feet) at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline. The answer options are 'Yes' (discomfort or pain) or 'No' (no discomfort or pain - better outcome).
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in wellbeing at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Self-reported using the Short Form Health Survey v2 questionnaire. The answer options include scales from 'Excellent' (better outcome) to 'Poor', 'Yes limited a lot' to 'No not limited at all' (better outcome), and, 'All of the time' to 'None of the time' (better outcome).
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in quality of life at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline: EuroQol-5D
Self-reported using the EuroQol-5D questionnaire. The answer options include scales from 'I have no problems...' (better outcome) to 'I am unable to...', and, 'The worst health you can imagine' to 'The best health you can imagine' (better outcome).
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in sleep at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Self-reported using the Pittsburgh sleep quality index questionnaire. The answer options include scales from 'Not during the past month' (better outcome) to 'Three or more times a week', 'Very good' (better outcome) to 'Very bad', and, 'No problem at all' (better outcome) to 'A very big problem'.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in work engagement at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Self-reported using the Utrecht Work Engagement scale. The answer options are scales from 'Never' to 'Always - everyday' (better outcome).
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in occupational fatigue at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Self-reported using the The Need for Recovery Scale. The answer options are 'Yes' or 'No'. The better outcome is question dependent.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in presenteeism at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Self-reported using the Work Limitations Questionnaire. The answer options are scales from 'All of the time' to 'None of the time'. The better outcome is question dependent.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in subjective absenteeism at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Self-reported using the Work Limitations Questionnaire. The answer options are scales from 'None' (better outcome) to '11 or more'.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in objective absenteeism at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Calculated from objectively assessed data to be provided from the participating organisation
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in job satisfaction at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Self-reported using a general job satisfaction questionnaire. The answer options are scales from 'Disagree strongly' to 'Agree strongly'. The better outcome is question dependent.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in work productivity at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Calculated from objectively assessed data to be provided from the participating organisation
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in primary and secondary healthcare resource use at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Self-reported using an adapted version of The Client Service Receipt Inventory questionnaire. The unit of measurement various across the questions with no scales.
Measured: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of intervention components: Likert scale
Self-reported by call agents using a Likert scale adapted from a previous trial. The answer options are scales from 'Very effective' (better outcome) to 'Very ineffective', and 'Strongly agree' (better outcome) to 'Strongly disagree'.
Measured: 12 weeks and 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of the assessment protocol: Likert scale
Self-reported by call agents using a Likert scale adapted from a previous trial. The answer options are scales from 'Strongly agree' (better outcome) to 'Strongly disagree'.
Measured: 12 weeks and 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention components: Focus groups with call agents
Call agents will take part in one focus group in which they will be asked to share their experiences and perceptions of the intervention components.
Measured: 12 weeks and 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention components: Focus groups with team leaders
Team leaders will take part in one focus group in which they will be asked to share their experiences and perceptions of the intervention components.
Measured: 12 weeks and 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention components: Focus groups with middle managers
Middle managers will take part in one focus group in which they will be asked to share their experiences and perceptions of the intervention components.
Measured: 12 weeks and 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention components: Interview with senior managers
Senior managers will take part in one interview in which they will be asked to share their experiences and perceptions of the intervention components.
Measured: 12 weeks and 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2018
- Study start11 Jul 2018
- Primary completion28 Jun 2019
- Study completion9 Aug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sedentary LifestyleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Liverpool John Moores University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Liverpool, University of Leicester, The University of Queensland
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lee Graves, Liverpool John Moores University
- Investigators
- Lee EF Graves, PhD, Principal investigator, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom, L3 2AT
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03733288
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18-SPS-Graves1
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Morris AS, Murphy RC, Hopkins ND, Low DA, Healy GN, Edwardson CL, Collins B, Timpson H, Shepherd SO, Cochrane M, Gavin D, Graves LEF. Sit Less and Move More-A Multicomponent Intervention With and Without Height-Adjustable Workstations in Contact Center Call Agents: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jan 1;63(1):44-56. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002066.
PubMed 33122540
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Outcome, Process and Economic Evaluation of a Randomised Controlled Trial to Reduce Call Agents' Sitting Time at Work: Project SLAMM
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03733288
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18-SPS-Graves1
- Conditions
- Sedentary Lifestyle, Physical Activity
- Keywords
- Intervention, Workplace, Sedentary behaviour, Physical activity, Adults, Economic, Evaluation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Liverpool John Moores UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Liverpool, University of Leicester, The University of Queensland
- Study start
- 11 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study investigates whether a workplace intervention can encourage highly sedentary contact centre call agents to sit less and move more at work. The effect of the intervention will be assessed at 12 weeks and 9 months. The hypothesis is that the intervention will reduce workplace sitting and increase workplace standing and light walking.
Detailed description
Study Design:
This randomised controlled trial has two experimental treatment arms, SLAMM and SLAMM+.
Recruitment:
- Organisation Level:
Organisation recruitment is via a tender process. A recruitment infographic and application form will be emailed to contact centres affiliated with the Call North West Forum (~700 centres in the North West of England). Organisations have 3-weeks to apply by submitting the application form to the research team. Applications will be reviewed and ranked, and if multiple suitable organisations apply, a meeting will be held with each organisation to discuss the organisation's suitability. Applicants will be notified of the decision via telephone call and subsequent confirmation email, with feedback as to why they were unsuccessful (if applicable). The gatekeeper from the successful organisation will receive a gatekeeper participant information and consent form to sign prior to individual level recruitment.
- Individual Level
Call Agents: Study information sessions during work hours at the organisation, and an email containing a participant information sheet, will be used to recruit call agents. Agents have 2 weeks to express interest. Interested employees will be screened for eligibility using stated criteria via telephone or in person. If inclusion criteria are met, written informed consent will be obtained and baseline assessments scheduled. There will be no racial or gender bias in participant selection.
Stand Up Champions: During agent recruitment, agents will be told about the opportunity to be a stand up champion and have 2 weeks to express interest. There is no limit to the number of champions recruited.
Team Leaders and Management: A participant information sheet and consent form sent via email will be used to recruit team leaders (focus group), middle managers (focus group) and senior managers (interviews) for the process evaluation on intervention acceptability and feasibility at 12 weeks and 9 months.
Group Assignment:
Following baseline data collection, randomisation to the SLAMM or SLAMM+ arm will occur using a number generator by a member of the research team not involved in recruitment. The unit of randomisation will be at the individual level. The participants will be informed of the outcome of the randomisation via email.
Data Collection:
Participants will complete assessments at baseline, 12-weeks and 9 months. Individual assessments include surveys, cardiometabolic and anthropometric measures, and objective physical activity and sedentary behaviour monitoring. Individual assessments will take place within the participant's work site during work hours. Participants will be asked to fast for a minimum of 8 hours, avoid smoking and active transport on the morning of the assessment, avoid alcohol, tea or coffee intake for a minimum of 12-h prior to assessments, and avoid strenuous exercise for a minimum of 24-h prior to assessments. A sub-sample of participants from each treatment arm will be randomly selected to take part in focus groups at 12 weeks and 9 months to evaluate intervention acceptability and feasibility.
Sample Size:
Allowing for moderate drop out, the study aimed to recruit 30 participants per arm and retain 23 participants per arm. A sample size of 23 per arm would achieve 90% power (alpha 5%; two-tailed) to detect a minimum difference of 60 minutes/8-hour workday between arms for workplace sitting time (primary outcome: expected standard deviation of 60 minutes/day).
Analyses:
- Outcome evaluation:
Data will be analysed by an independent statistician (blinded to the treatment arms) using STATA (STATACorp LP) with the alpha level set at p≤0.05. For continuous outcomes, intervention effects and changes within groups will be estimated using linear mixed models. Models will include fixed terms for group (intervention 1/intervention 2), time (3 or 9 months), and group-time interaction, with potential confounders. Estimates of changes within groups, and differences between groups, will be obtained using marginal means and pairwise comparisons of marginal means of the outcome.
- Process evaluation:
Inductive thematic analysis will identify, analyse and explore themes from focus group and interview data on intervention acceptability and feasibility at 12 weeks and 9 months. Surveys will also assess intervention acceptability and feasibility at 12 weeks and 9 months.
- Economic evaluation:
The economic evaluation will be conducted from three perspectives. From the health sector perspective, trial-and model-based cost-utility analyses will be performed to show the cost of the intervention per quality adjusted life year. From the employer perspective, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted to show the cost of the intervention per change in productivity. From the broader societal perspective, a cost-consequence analysis will be presented outlining all the costs and effects (in their natural units) which are incurred by the various stakeholders including the participants, and the participant's family and friends.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SLAMM | Experimental | Behavioral: Education and training sessions, Behavioral: Support emails, Behavioral: Team leader trainingMulti-component intervention (Education and training sessions, Support emails, Team leader training) |
| SLAMM+ | Experimental | Behavioral: Education and training sessions, Behavioral: Support emails, Behavioral: Team leader training, Device: Height-adjustable workstationMulti-component intervention (Education and training sessions, Support emails, Team leader training, Height-adjustable workstation) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Education and training sessionsAgents will be invited to attend sessions in intervention week 1, 3, 9, and month 6. Sessions will introduce (week 1) and reinforce (week 3, 9, month 6) the intervention aims, benefits of and ways to move more and sit less, with emphasis on active breaks. Feedback from baseline assessment will be provided and discussed in week 3 (health data) and 9 (activity data) and month 6 (health and activity data from the 12-week assessment). Each session will include discussion of daily standing/walking goals set by the research team, with timers and a goal log provided to participants in week 1 to enable self-monitoring. The Stand Up champions, and their role to encourage daily movement and sitting reduction through modelling and verbal support, will be communicated and reinforced in each session. | Behavioural | SLAMM, SLAMM+ |
| Support emailsAgents will receive support emails weekly (weeks 1-12) then monthly (months 4-9) across the intervention. Each email includes an infographic that encourages moving more and sitting less at work. | Behavioural | SLAMM, SLAMM+ |
| Team leader trainingTeam leaders in the participating organisation will be invited to attend a training session before the intervention starts. The training aims to enhance team leader's capabilities to demonstrate positive movement and sitting behaviours at work and promote call agents to sit less and move more at work. Team leaders will be asked to include the intervention as an agenda item in their weekly team meetings with their call agents and their 1:1 sessions with call agents. Team leaders will be encouraged to incorporate walking into their 1:1 meetings with call agents. | Behavioural | SLAMM, SLAMM+ |
| Height-adjustable workstationAfter baseline, agents in the SLAMM+ arm will have a height-adjustable workstation installed on their existing workplace desk. This will enable work in a seated or standing position, with flexibility to alternate between postures. Desk installation will occur with support from the onsite organisation health and safety team. The research team will brief participants on safe and effective workstation use. A laminated sheet will be fixed to each workstation to remind participants of safe and effective use. | Device | SLAMM+ |
Primary outcome
Change in workplace sitting time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
An activpal monitor will objectively assess habitual sitting time for 24 hours over 7 consecutive days.
31 secondary outcomes
Change in workplace standing time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in workplace walking time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in whole day sitting time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in whole day standing time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in whole day walking time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in body mass index at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in waist circumference at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in hip circumference at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in blood glucose at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in blood cholesterol at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in systolic blood pressure at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in diastolic blood pressure at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in endothelial function in the femoral artery at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in musculoskeletal discomfort or pain: Self-reported using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in wellbeing at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in quality of life at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline: EuroQol-5D
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in sleep at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in work engagement at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in occupational fatigue at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in presenteeism at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in subjective absenteeism at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in objective absenteeism at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in job satisfaction at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in work productivity at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Change in primary and secondary healthcare resource use at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline
Time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of intervention components: Likert scale
Time frame: 12 weeks and 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of the assessment protocol: Likert scale
Time frame: 12 weeks and 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention components: Focus groups with call agents
Time frame: 12 weeks and 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention components: Focus groups with team leaders
Time frame: 12 weeks and 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention components: Focus groups with middle managers
Time frame: 12 weeks and 9 months
Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention components: Interview with senior managers
Time frame: 12 weeks and 9 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Aug 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33122540Morris AS, Murphy RC, Hopkins ND, Low DA, Healy GN, Edwardson CL, Collins B, Timpson H, Shepherd SO, Cochrane M, Gavin D, Graves LEF. Sit Less and Move More-A Multicomponent Intervention With and Without Height-Adjustable Workstations in Contact Center Call Agents: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jan 1;63(1):44-56. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002066.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sedentary Lifestyle
Active, not recruiting
A Mobile App to Improve 24-Hour Movement Guideline Adherence in Preschoolers
Healthy, 24-Hour Movement Guidelines
Recruiting
Acute Endocrine Responses to Aerobic and Anaerobic Exercise in Sedentary Women: A Comparative Analysis of Thyroid Hormones and Cortisol
Sedentary Behavior, Acute Exercise
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Different Exercise Types on Irisin, Leptin, and Ghrelin Levels in Sedentary Women
Exercise Physiology, Metabolic Hormones
Not yet recruiting
Wearable Ankle Power Training (WearAPT) for Enhanced Mobility in Aging
Sedentary Behavior / Physical Inactivity, Aged
Active, not recruiting
Promoting Physical Activity in Older Hispanic/Latino(a) Adults
Sedentary Behavior, Physical Inactivity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lee EF Graves, PhD principal investigator
Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom, L3 2AT
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Education and training sessions, Support emails and Team leader training in people with Sedentary Lifestyle and Physical Activity, run by Liverpool John Moores University at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in workplace sitting time at 12 weeks and 9 months from baseline (time frame: Baseline (week 0), 12 weeks, 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03733288, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2019.