Hypotension Drug-InducedNCT03743870
Spinal Anesthesia in Caesarean Section
An observational study of Hypotension Drug-Induced and Cesarean Section Complications, run by Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Spinal anesthesia is a safe technique, widely used and tested in the gynecological field, so as to be considered the first choice technique in cesarean section, which allows to quickly obtain a valid sensor and motor block. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypotension Drug-Induced, Cesarean Section Complications, Spinal Anesthetics Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use
- What is being tested?
- Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2018to 30 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Women only
- Adult
Study population: The study will involve consecutive pregnant womento to be subjected/subjected to spinal anesthesia for cesarean section at the Obstetric Emergency Room of the "G. Rodolico" Presidium of the Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Policlinco-Vittorio Emanuele" of Catania that meet the inclusion and criteria of the study.
Who may be able to join
- signature of informed consent
- age between 18 and 40 years old
- indication for spinal anesthesia
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification I or II
- height less than 180 cm
- weight less than 100 kg
- absence of spinal deformities
Who cannot join
- age under 18 years old or over 40 yers old
- ASA III or IV
- contraindications to spinal anesthesia
- presence of hemodynamically relevant cardiovascular co-morbidities
- co-morbidities requiring invasive monitoring
- refusal of pregnant women to sign informed consent
Show all 13Show fewer
- refusal of pregnant women to spinal anesthesia
- spinal deformities in pregnant women
- known hypersensitivity to the anesthetics used
- weight over 100 kg
- height over 180 cm
- preeclampsia or eclampsia
- presence of fetal or placental abnormalities such as placenta previa or placental abruption
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
"G. Rodolico" Presidium of the Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele"
Catania, 95123
Carmelo Minardi, MD, +39 3398643162, minardi.carmelo@virgilio.it
Carmelo Minardi, MD
About this study
Official title: Spinal Anesthesia in Caesarean Section: Comparison Between Levobupivacaine and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine
Spinal anesthesia is a safe technique, widely used and tested in the gynecological field, so as to be considered the first choice technique in cesarean section, which allows to quickly obtain a valid sensor and motor block. Bupivacaine is one of the most widely used drug for obtaining spinal anesthesia in pregnant women undergoing caesarean section. Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic available as a racemic mixture of its two enantiomers, the R (+)- dextrobupivacaine and the S (-) - levobupivacaine, whose clinical use is widely validated. Racemic bupivacaine is available as a simple or hyperbaric solution, the latter being the most commonly used for spinal anesthesia. Levobupivacaine, which is the pure levorotatory enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine, is a slightly hypobaric solution compared to liquor and has shown less heart and nerve toxicity, probably due to its ability to bind proteins more rapidly, and a greater selectivity towards the sensory component compared to Bupivacaine, presents action and effects better predictable. Its baricity would also offer the advantage of providing a less sensitive block to the position.
Hypotension is one of the most common complications of spinal anesthesia and is particularly relevant in caesarean section because, in addition to the adverse effects on the parturient, it can have repercussions on the fetus through a reduction of placental perfusion.
Read more
Some studies have showed a similar incidence of hypotension in patients treated with bupivacaine compared to those treated with levobupivacaine, while others assert an equivalence between the two drugs. In most studies, however, a significantly lower incidence of hypotension and a greater hemodynamic stability were reported in pregnant patients undergoing spinal anesthesia by caesarean section with levobupivacaine.
Being both hyperbaric bupivacaine and levobupivacaine routinely used at the "G. Rodolico" Universitary Hospital of Catania for the spinal anesthesia of pregnant women undergoing caesarean section and being their use decided exclusively at discretion of the treating anesthesiologist, in the light of the discrepant data in the literature about the incidence of hypotension with the two drugs, the main objective of this observational study is to evaluate the hemodynamic effects mediated by levobupivacaine on pregnant women subjected to elective cesarean section and to compare them with those mediated by hyperbaric bupivacaine in an historical court of pregnant women subjected to caesarean section in the period between April 2017 and April 2018. The hemodynamic parameters will be monitored in real time with a non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring system (EV1000® platform + Clearsight® system - Edwards LifeSciences), routinely used in the "G. Rodolico" Universitary Hospital of Catania, allowing to obtain greater accuracy and veracity of the results compared to previous studies conducted on such anesthetics.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, monocentric, not for-profit, observational study, with historical control group, whose primary objective is the monitoring of changes in the hemodynamic condition, intended as continuous pressure measurements by means of a non-invasive system (EV1000® platform + Clearsight® system - Edwards Lifesciences), of a group of 125 pregnant women who have to undergo spinal anesthesia with Levobupivacaine for elective cesarean section at the "G. Rodolico" Presidium of Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Policlinco-Vittorio Emanuele" of Catania, and to compare them with those detected, with the same non-invasive system, in an historical cohort of 125 patients who underwent spinal anesthesia with Bupivacaine for an elective caesarean section in the period between April 2017 and April 2018.
The study will have an expected duration of one year from the time of its approval.
In the levobupivacaine group, during the preoperative anesthesiological examination, carried out approximately two weeks before the scheduled date of the surgical intervention, informed consent will be acquired and the eligible patients will be enrolled. On this occasion, an ASA class will be assigned and the following data will be collected:
- personal and general data:
- date of birth and age
- current weight
- weight before pregnancy
- height
- information concerning:
- any previous or concomitant diseases affecting the nervous, respiratory, cardiovascular system
- any previous or concomitant disease interesting: gastrointestinal system, hemolymphatic system, thyroid, pancreas, kidneys, liver, adrenal glands
- any immunodeficiencies
- any coagulopathies
- spinal deformities
- previous surgeries
- previous allergic events following the administration of drugs
- seasonal allergies
- previous pregnancies and their characteristics
- possible hypertension during the last quarter
- conditions that represent contraindications for spinal anesthesia. Upon arrival in the operating room, the Clearsight® non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring system will be placed at the fingers of the parturient and the usual intraoperative monitoring (ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, oxygen saturation) will be applied. The continuous recording of the following hemodynamic parameters, which will last for the whole duration of the intervention, will then begin through the EV1000® platform (Edwards Lifesciences): Cardiac Output (CO); Cardiac Index (CI); Stroke Volume (SV); Stroke Volume Index (SVI); Stroke Volume Variation (SVV); Pulse Rate Variation (PRV); Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR); Systemic Vascular Resistance Index (SVRI); Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (ScvO2); Pulse rate (PR); Systolic Pressure (SYS); Diastolic Pressure (DIA); Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP); Central Venous Pressure (CVP).These measurements will be made every twenty seconds.
Once the monitoring system has been applied, the patients will be placed in position and spinal anesthesia will be performed with Levobupivacaine 12 mg 0.5% and Fentanyl 25γ. Once the anesthetic is injected, patients will be subjected to dislocation of the uterus and placed in left lateral tilt. Once the sensory and motor block has been obtained, the surgery will begin. In the event of adverse reactions to the drug, therapeutic measures that are part of the usual clinical practice will be used.
Any episodes of hypotension during the operation will be treated by administration of 5 mg etilefrine in bolus and/or IV fluids; any episodes of bradycardia will be treated by administration of IV atropine 0.01 mg/kg.
Sensory block will be evaluated by objective examination: the investigators will evaluate the tactile discrimination ability of a blunt tip in contact with the patient's back, thus determining the level of anesthesia reached and the time in which it occurs. The measurements of this parameter will be carried out every fifteen minutes, during the first half hour, and then at thirty and sixty minutes until the restitutio of the physiological condition of the patient.
The motor block will be evaluated by Bromage score, ie by observing the residual motor capacity of the patient's lower limbs. The measurements of this parameter will be carried out every fifteen minutes, during the first half hour, and then at thirty and sixty minutes until the restitutio of the physiological condition of the patient.
For calculating the Aldrete's score, the following parameters will be assessed: respiration and consciousness through objective examination, systolic blood pressure using the classic intraoperative monitoring system and pulse oximetry oxygenation. The measurements of this score will be carried out every fifteen minutes during the first half hour, and then at thirty and sixty minutes until the restitutio of the physiological condition of the patient.
Patient data from the historical cohort will be collected by reviewing the clinical documentation related to the individual case.
Once collected, the data will be subjected to statistical and comparative processing in order to highlight statistically relevant differences concerning the effects mediated by the two anesthetics on the pregnant patient who undergoes elective cesarean section.
The data obtained will be analyzed using the SPSS software (Statistical Package for Social Sciences), version 21.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Differences with p≤ 0.05 will be considered significant.
The descriptive analysis will be performed using frequencies, percentages and frequency tables for qualitative variables. For the normally distributed quantitative variables the mean and standard deviation will be used, while for those not normally distributed the median and the interquartile range (IQR) will be used. For the comparison between the two groups will be used the Chi-square test with Yates correction or Fisher exact test for qualitative variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for quantitative variables.
Multivariate analysis will be performed using logistic regression models and the ORs (odds ratios) will be reported together with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
- Conditions
- Hypotension Drug-Induced, Cesarean Section Complications, Spinal Anesthetics Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use, Bradycardia
- Being tested
- Levobupivacaine, Bupivacaine
- Keywords
- intraoperative hypotension, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, cesarean section, spinal anaesthesia, intraoperative bradycardia
- Medical subject headings
- Hypotension, Bradycardia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LevobupivacaineDrug
Levobupivacaine will be spinally administered, as required by normal clinical practice, at the dose of 12 mg 0,5% in combination with fentanyl 25γ.
BupivacaineDrug
Bupivacaine has been spinally administered, as required by normal clinical practice, at the dose of 12 mg 0,5% in combination with fentanyl 25γ.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| levobupivacaine cohort | 125 pregnant patients that will have to undergo spinal anesthesia with Levobupivacaine for elective caesarean section. Receives: Drug: Levobupivacaine | |
| bupivacaine cohort | Historical control group made of 125 patients underwent spinal anesthesia with Bupivacaine for elective cesarean section during the period between April 2017 and April 2018. Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in blood pressure measured continuously by the EV1000® platform and the Clearsight® non-invasive system (Edwards Lifesciences) in the two study cohorts
Measured: From arrival in the operating room until the completion of surgical procedures
Secondary outcomes (16)
Incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia
Measured: At 60 minutes after completion of surgical procedures
Incidence of bradycardia during spinal anesthesia
Measured: At 60 minutes after completion of surgical procedures
Need for inotropes and / or vasopressor during surgery
Doses of inotropes and / or vasopressor administered during surgery
Measured: At 60 minutes after completion of surgical procedures
Need for fluids administration during surgery
Volume of fluids administered during surgery for the eventual treatment of hypotension
Measured: At 60 minutes after completion of surgical procedures
Level of the sensory block reached
Measured: At 15 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Time in which sensory block occurs
Measured: At 15 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Level of the sensory block reached
Measured: At 30 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Time in which sensory block occurs
Measured: At 30 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Level of sensory block reached
Measured: At 60 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Time in which sensory block occurs
Measured: At 60 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Level of the motor block reached by modified Bromage scale
The modified Bromage scale is a six-point scale used to asses the intensity of motor block by evaluation of the patient's ability to move their lower extremities: Score 1 = Complete block (unable to move feet or knees); Score 2 = Almost complete block (able to move feet only); Score 3 = Partial block (just able to move knees); Score 4 = Detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine (full flexion of knees); Score 5 = No detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine; Score 6 = Able to perform partial knee bend. The motor block is measured in both legs intermittently throughout labour, as the degree of block can change.
Measured: At 15 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Level of the motor block reached by modified Bromage scale
The modified Bromage scale is a six-point scale used to asses the intensity of motor block by evaluation of the patient's ability to move their lower extremities: Score 1 = Complete block (unable to move feet or knees); Score 2 = Almost complete block (able to move feet only); Score 3 = Partial block (just able to move knees); Score 4 = Detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine (full flexion of knees); Score 5 = No detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine; Score 6 = Able to perform partial knee bend. The motor block is measured in both legs intermittently throughout labour, as the degree of block can change.
Measured: At 30 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Level of the motor block reached by modified Bromage scale
The modified Bromage scale is a six-point scale used to asses the intensity of motor block by evaluation of the patient's ability to move their lower extremities: Score 1 = Complete block (unable to move feet or knees); Score 2 = Almost complete block (able to move feet only); Score 3 = Partial block (just able to move knees); Score 4 = Detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine (full flexion of knees); Score 5 = No detectable weakness of hip flexion while supine; Score 6 = Able to perform partial knee bend. The motor block is measured in both legs intermittently throughout labour, as the degree of block can change.
Measured: At 60 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Aldrete score evaluation.
The evaluation of Aldrete score, also known Post Anesthesia Recovery (PAR), focuses on the following directions: muscle activity, assessed by observing the patient's ability to move his extremities on command; respiratory efficiency, reflected by the respiratory effort; circulation, evaluated through systemic blood pressure and compared to the preanesthetic level; consciousness, reflected by full alertness and ability to answer questions; tegument color, that evaluates whether the skin aspect is normal or cyanotic or jaundiced. Each of the five items in the Aldrete score calculation is awarded from 0 to 2 points, depending on the answer chosen in the evaluation. The higher the score, the more likelihood of recovery without need of observation. Results vary between 0 and 10. Patients with scores of 9 and 10 can be safely discharged from operatory room. Scores of 10 indicate a patient in the best condition. Scores of 7 and below come with indication of continuous close observation.
Measured: At 15 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Aldrete's score evaluation
The evaluation of Aldrete score, also known Post Anesthesia Recovery (PAR), focuses on the following directions: muscle activity, assessed by observing the patient's ability to move his extremities on command; respiratory efficiency, reflected by the respiratory effort; circulation, evaluated through systemic blood pressure and compared to the preanesthetic level; consciousness, reflected by full alertness and ability to answer questions; tegument color, that evaluates whether the skin aspect is normal or cyanotic or jaundiced. Each of the five items in the Aldrete score calculation is awarded from 0 to 2 points, depending on the answer chosen in the evaluation. The higher the score, the more likelihood of recovery without need of observation. Results vary between 0 and 10. Patients with scores of 9 and 10 can be safely discharged from operatory room. Scores of 10 indicate a patient in the best condition. Scores of 7 and below come with indication of continuous close observation.
Measured: At 30 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Aldrete's score evaluation
The evaluation of Aldrete score, also known Post Anesthesia Recovery (PAR), focuses on the following directions: muscle activity, assessed by observing the patient's ability to move his extremities on command; respiratory efficiency, reflected by the respiratory effort; circulation, evaluated through systemic blood pressure and compared to the preanesthetic level; consciousness, reflected by full alertness and ability to answer questions; tegument color, that evaluates whether the skin aspect is normal or cyanotic or jaundiced. Each of the five items in the Aldrete score calculation is awarded from 0 to 2 points, depending on the answer chosen in the evaluation. The higher the score, the more likelihood of recovery without need of observation. Results vary between 0 and 10. Patients with scores of 9 and 10 can be safely discharged from operatory room. Scores of 10 indicate a patient in the best condition. Scores of 7 and below come with indication of continuous close observation.
Measured: At 60 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2018
- Primary completion1 Apr 2021
- Study completion30 Sep 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hypotension Drug-InducedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Marinella Astuto
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Carmelo Minardi, Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03743870
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 125/2018/PO
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Spinal Anesthesia in Caesarean Section: Comparison Between Levobupivacaine and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03743870
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 125/2018/PO
- Conditions
- Hypotension Drug-Induced, Cesarean Section Complications, Spinal Anesthetics Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use, Bradycardia
- Keywords
- intraoperative hypotension, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, cesarean section, spinal anaesthesia, intraoperative bradycardia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio EmanueleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Marinella Astuto
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Spinal anesthesia is a safe technique, widely used and tested in the gynecological field, so as to be considered the first choice technique in cesarean section, which allows to quickly obtain a valid sensor and motor block. Bupivacaine is one of the most widely used drug for obtaining spinal anesthesia in pregnant women undergoing caesarean section. Bupivacaine is a local anesthetic available as a racemic mixture of its two enantiomers, the R (+)- dextrobupivacaine and the S (-) - levobupivacaine, whose clinical use is widely validated. Racemic bupivacaine is available as a simple or hyperbaric solution, the latter being the most commonly used for spinal anesthesia. Levobupivacaine, which is the pure levorotatory enantiomer of racemic bupivacaine, is a slightly hypobaric solution compared to liquor and has shown less heart and nerve toxicity, probably due to its ability to bind proteins more rapidly, and a greater selectivity towards the sensory component compared to Bupivacaine, presents action and effects better predictable. Its baricity would also offer the advantage of providing a less sensitive block to the position.
Hypotension is one of the most common complications of spinal anesthesia and is particularly relevant in caesarean section because, in addition to the adverse effects on the parturient, it can have repercussions on the fetus through a reduction of placental perfusion.
Some studies have showed a similar incidence of hypotension in patients treated with bupivacaine compared to those treated with levobupivacaine, while others assert an equivalence between the two drugs. In most studies, however, a significantly lower incidence of hypotension and a greater hemodynamic stability were reported in pregnant patients undergoing spinal anesthesia by caesarean section with levobupivacaine.
Being both hyperbaric bupivacaine and levobupivacaine routinely used at the "G. Rodolico" Universitary Hospital of Catania for the spinal anesthesia of pregnant women undergoing caesarean section and being their use decided exclusively at discretion of the treating anesthesiologist, in the light of the discrepant data in the literature about the incidence of hypotension with the two drugs, the main objective of this observational study is to evaluate the hemodynamic effects mediated by levobupivacaine on pregnant women subjected to elective cesarean section and to compare them with those mediated by hyperbaric bupivacaine in an historical court of pregnant women subjected to caesarean section in the period between April 2017 and April 2018. The hemodynamic parameters will be monitored in real time with a non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring system (EV1000® platform + Clearsight® system - Edwards LifeSciences), routinely used in the "G. Rodolico" Universitary Hospital of Catania, allowing to obtain greater accuracy and veracity of the results compared to previous studies conducted on such anesthetics.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, monocentric, not for-profit, observational study, with historical control group, whose primary objective is the monitoring of changes in the hemodynamic condition, intended as continuous pressure measurements by means of a non-invasive system (EV1000® platform + Clearsight® system - Edwards Lifesciences), of a group of 125 pregnant women who have to undergo spinal anesthesia with Levobupivacaine for elective cesarean section at the "G. Rodolico" Presidium of Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Policlinco-Vittorio Emanuele" of Catania, and to compare them with those detected, with the same non-invasive system, in an historical cohort of 125 patients who underwent spinal anesthesia with Bupivacaine for an elective caesarean section in the period between April 2017 and April 2018.
The study will have an expected duration of one year from the time of its approval.
In the levobupivacaine group, during the preoperative anesthesiological examination, carried out approximately two weeks before the scheduled date of the surgical intervention, informed consent will be acquired and the eligible patients will be enrolled. On this occasion, an ASA class will be assigned and the following data will be collected:
- personal and general data:
- date of birth and age
- current weight
- weight before pregnancy
- height
- information concerning:
- any previous or concomitant diseases affecting the nervous, respiratory, cardiovascular system
- any previous or concomitant disease interesting: gastrointestinal system, hemolymphatic system, thyroid, pancreas, kidneys, liver, adrenal glands
- any immunodeficiencies
- any coagulopathies
- spinal deformities
- previous surgeries
- previous allergic events following the administration of drugs
- seasonal allergies
- previous pregnancies and their characteristics
- possible hypertension during the last quarter
- conditions that represent contraindications for spinal anesthesia. Upon arrival in the operating room, the Clearsight® non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring system will be placed at the fingers of the parturient and the usual intraoperative monitoring (ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, oxygen saturation) will be applied. The continuous recording of the following hemodynamic parameters, which will last for the whole duration of the intervention, will then begin through the EV1000® platform (Edwards Lifesciences): Cardiac Output (CO); Cardiac Index (CI); Stroke Volume (SV); Stroke Volume Index (SVI); Stroke Volume Variation (SVV); Pulse Rate Variation (PRV); Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR); Systemic Vascular Resistance Index (SVRI); Central Venous Oxygen Saturation (ScvO2); Pulse rate (PR); Systolic Pressure (SYS); Diastolic Pressure (DIA); Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP); Central Venous Pressure (CVP).These measurements will be made every twenty seconds.
Once the monitoring system has been applied, the patients will be placed in position and spinal anesthesia will be performed with Levobupivacaine 12 mg 0.5% and Fentanyl 25γ. Once the anesthetic is injected, patients will be subjected to dislocation of the uterus and placed in left lateral tilt. Once the sensory and motor block has been obtained, the surgery will begin. In the event of adverse reactions to the drug, therapeutic measures that are part of the usual clinical practice will be used.
Any episodes of hypotension during the operation will be treated by administration of 5 mg etilefrine in bolus and/or IV fluids; any episodes of bradycardia will be treated by administration of IV atropine 0.01 mg/kg.
Sensory block will be evaluated by objective examination: the investigators will evaluate the tactile discrimination ability of a blunt tip in contact with the patient's back, thus determining the level of anesthesia reached and the time in which it occurs. The measurements of this parameter will be carried out every fifteen minutes, during the first half hour, and then at thirty and sixty minutes until the restitutio of the physiological condition of the patient.
The motor block will be evaluated by Bromage score, ie by observing the residual motor capacity of the patient's lower limbs. The measurements of this parameter will be carried out every fifteen minutes, during the first half hour, and then at thirty and sixty minutes until the restitutio of the physiological condition of the patient.
For calculating the Aldrete's score, the following parameters will be assessed: respiration and consciousness through objective examination, systolic blood pressure using the classic intraoperative monitoring system and pulse oximetry oxygenation. The measurements of this score will be carried out every fifteen minutes during the first half hour, and then at thirty and sixty minutes until the restitutio of the physiological condition of the patient.
Patient data from the historical cohort will be collected by reviewing the clinical documentation related to the individual case.
Once collected, the data will be subjected to statistical and comparative processing in order to highlight statistically relevant differences concerning the effects mediated by the two anesthetics on the pregnant patient who undergoes elective cesarean section.
The data obtained will be analyzed using the SPSS software (Statistical Package for Social Sciences), version 21.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Differences with p≤ 0.05 will be considered significant.
The descriptive analysis will be performed using frequencies, percentages and frequency tables for qualitative variables. For the normally distributed quantitative variables the mean and standard deviation will be used, while for those not normally distributed the median and the interquartile range (IQR) will be used. For the comparison between the two groups will be used the Chi-square test with Yates correction or Fisher exact test for qualitative variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for quantitative variables.
Multivariate analysis will be performed using logistic regression models and the ORs (odds ratios) will be reported together with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| levobupivacaine cohort | – | Drug: Levobupivacaine125 pregnant patients that will have to undergo spinal anesthesia with Levobupivacaine for elective caesarean section. |
| bupivacaine cohort | – | Drug: BupivacaineHistorical control group made of 125 patients underwent spinal anesthesia with Bupivacaine for elective cesarean section during the period between April 2017 and April 2018. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- The study will involve consecutive pregnant womento to be subjected/subjected to spinal anesthesia for cesarean section at the Obstetric Emergency Room of the "G. Rodolico" Presidium of the Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Policlinco-Vittorio Emanuele" of Catania that meet the inclusion and criteria of the study.
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- signature of informed consent
- age between 18 and 40 years old
- indication for spinal anesthesia
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification I or II
- height less than 180 cm
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- age under 18 years old or over 40 yers old
- ASA III or IV
- contraindications to spinal anesthesia
- presence of hemodynamically relevant cardiovascular co-morbidities
- co-morbidities requiring invasive monitoring
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LevobupivacaineLevobupivacaine will be spinally administered, as required by normal clinical practice, at the dose of 12 mg 0,5% in combination with fentanyl 25γ. | Drug | levobupivacaine cohort |
| BupivacaineBupivacaine has been spinally administered, as required by normal clinical practice, at the dose of 12 mg 0,5% in combination with fentanyl 25γ. | Drug | bupivacaine cohort |
Primary outcome
Changes in blood pressure measured continuously by the EV1000® platform and the Clearsight® non-invasive system (Edwards Lifesciences) in the two study cohorts
Time frame: From arrival in the operating room until the completion of surgical procedures
16 secondary outcomes
Incidence of hypotension during spinal anesthesia
Time frame: At 60 minutes after completion of surgical procedures
Incidence of bradycardia during spinal anesthesia
Time frame: At 60 minutes after completion of surgical procedures
Need for inotropes and / or vasopressor during surgery
Time frame: At 60 minutes after completion of surgical procedures
Need for fluids administration during surgery
Time frame: At 60 minutes after completion of surgical procedures
Level of the sensory block reached
Time frame: At 15 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Time in which sensory block occurs
Time frame: At 15 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Level of the sensory block reached
Time frame: At 30 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Time in which sensory block occurs
Time frame: At 30 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Level of sensory block reached
Time frame: At 60 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Time in which sensory block occurs
Time frame: At 60 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Level of the motor block reached by modified Bromage scale
Time frame: At 15 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Level of the motor block reached by modified Bromage scale
Time frame: At 30 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Level of the motor block reached by modified Bromage scale
Time frame: At 60 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Aldrete score evaluation.
Time frame: At 15 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Aldrete's score evaluation
Time frame: At 30 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Aldrete's score evaluation
Time frame: At 60 minutes from the beginning of anesthesia
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2021.
Related trials for Hypotension Drug-Induced
RecruitingPhase 4
Premedication With Atenolol Versus Metoprolol for Controlled Hypotensive Anesthesia During Nasal Surgeries
Hypotension Drug-Induced
Not yet recruiting
Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver-Induced Hypotension: A Dynamic Consequence and Intraoperative Indicator of Fluid Responsiveness
Hypotension Drug-Induced, General Anesthesia Using Endotracheal Intubation
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lateral Decubitus Position After Spinal Anesthesia on Hemodynamic Stability in High-Risk Geriatric Patients
Hypotension Drug-Induced, Spinal Aneshtesia
RecruitingObservational study
The Impact of Multiple Antihypertensive Therapy on Post-Induction Hypotension Burden in Cardiac Surgery Patients
Hypotension on Induction, Cardiac Surgery
Recruiting
Hemodynamic Effects of Intravenous Paracetamol in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
Paracetamol, Hypotension Drug-Induced
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hypotension Drug-Induced and Cesarean Section Complications, run by Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Carmelo Minardi, MD (+39 3398643162, minardi.carmelo@virgilio.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in blood pressure measured continuously by the EV1000® platform and the Clearsight® non-invasive system (Edwards Lifesciences) in the two study cohorts (time frame: From arrival in the operating room until the completion of surgical procedures). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2021.