Surgical Wound HealingNCT03746132
Oxygen for Vascular Incisional Healing
A study testing EPIFLO in people with Surgical Wound Healing and Lower Extremity, run by Neogenix, LLC dba Ogenix at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Therapy (TCOT) as an adjunct to surgical wound healing in subjects undergoing vascular surgery for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Wound Healing, Lower Extremity, Revascularization
- What is being tested?
- EPIFLO
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Mar 2019to 31 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Elective Surgery
- Clean incisions
- Surgery being performed for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease
- Subject Age 18- 90
- Willing and capable of signing informed consent and following all study protocols
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Surgical site has abscess or cellulitis
- Systemic sepsis at the time of surgery
- Disseminated Cancer Patients
- Arterial entrapment
- Chronic moderate or high dose oral corticosteroid use
Show all 13Show fewer
- Subjects on chronic immune modulators/suppressors
- Known sensitivity to investigational device
- Subjects with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)
- Any disease or prior/planned surgery that in the investigator's opinion may interfere with the subject successfully completing the study.
- Overlapping participation in another treatment or interventional clinical trial.
- Family members or students of the Investigator or clinical site.
- Safety exclusion criterion: At the end of the procedure, the surgeon and PI can discuss to withdraw the patient, if it is felt that continuing in the study will be detrimental to the patient. For example, if the incision cannot be closed, or if it requires a muscle flap, or if the incision site encounters contamination or infection not recognized prior to randomization. The decision to withdraw the patient will be made in the OR, prior to being randomized.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Rachel C White, BSN, 410-706-2143, rwhite@som.umaryland.edu
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study of Transdermal, Continuous Oxygen Therapy for Surgical Site Wound Healing in High- Risk Subjects Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Therapy (TCOT) as an adjunct to surgical wound healing in subjects undergoing vascular surgery for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease. It is the intention of this study to administer oxygen using the TCOT approach to the surgical sites of subjects undergoing the surgery and to monitor the healing of the incision as well as infection rate. The hypothesis is that oxygen delivered transdermally to the surgical site in a continuous manner for up to 28 days will accelerate the healing process and reduce the infection rate compared to the Standard of Care.
Read the detailed description
This Safety \& Efficacy Study will be a randomized controlled trial of 100 subjects (Parallel design) aged 18 - 90 years who are scheduled to undergo vascular surgery at the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC) hospital. 50 subjects will be recruited for the control arm and 50 for the treatment arm. Subjects who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to receive the treatment device with Standard of Care or Standard of Care alone (1:1). The most proximal (e.g., groin) incision (subject to safety exclusion) will be studied.
The expected study treatment duration is 4 weeks. This means the subjects will be seeing their physician weekly for the first 4 weeks following their surgery, once they are recruited for the study.
During the study, there will be five study treatment visits: Study visit 1 (day 0) is the day of the surgery and of randomization. For those randomized to the treatment arm of the study, the EPIFLO device will be applied on this day immediately following surgery. For those randomized to the control group, standard gauze dressing will be applied to their incision site. The second study visit is 7 days following surgery (day 7) and the third, fourth, and fifth study visits are on days 14, 21, and 28 respectively. On the third study visit (day 14), a new EPIFLO will be applied and the old one discarded for those in the treatment arm of the study, because FDA has cleared each EPIFLO-15 device only for a maximum of 15 days of use, after which the used device must be disposed (single use, single patient, disposable device). The 5th study visit (Day 28), will be the final treatment study visit for all subjects, regardless of which treatment group they are in.
Those subjects whose incisional wound has healed during the study treatment period (28 days) will come in for a healing confirmation visit two weeks after it's noted to be healed. Note that an incision is not declared healed until the healing is confirmed after a two-week period after the first observation of complete healing. They will then have one final study visit, approximately 90 days from the first observation of wound closure, as their last study visit.
All subjects whose incisions have not completely healed by the fifth study visit (day 28) will also come in for one final study visit, approximately 90 days following their surgery, to have the study doctor assess the condition of the incision.
The investigational device of this protocol is the EPIFLO® Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Delivery. Components of this unit include: Small, silent disposable, battery-operated oxygen concentrator capable of delivering 98% to 100% oxygen (balance moisture) for fifteen days at a rate of ~3.0 ml/hour; and 36" long sterile cannula (tube) that conveys the oxygen from the concentrator device to the area beneath the bandage overlying the wound. EPIFLO is intended to provide transdermal, continuous oxygen delivery to chronic wounds. EPIFLO concentrates oxygen from atmospheric air and delivers the concentrated oxygen to the region of the wound bed creating an oxygen-enriched environment intended to promote the healing process in chronic wounds as an adjunct to standard wound care in wound management and treatment.
EPIFLO is worn in a convenient location in the body within 4-5 feet of the wound, beneath clothing without impairing its operation, and the subject is free to ambulate and continue with normal daily activities while being treated 24 hours per day for 15 days. The EPIFLO unit measures 2" x 2.5" x 1" and weighs 3.5 oz. A pouch (with belt loop) and arm band are provided to facilitate wearing of the device.
A Safety Monitor will be selected from unbiased wound care experts/vascular surgeons, selected by the Investigator and will not be affiliated with the sponsor of this study. The monitor charter will define the specific processes and procedures by which their assessments will be conducted.
All study data will be presented in subject data listings. Statistical analyses, if applicable, will be performed using SAS® for Windows, version 9.1 or later. Descriptive statistics (n, mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum) will be calculated by treatment group for continuous variables. Frequencies and percentages will be presented by treatment group for categorical variables. Missing data will not be imputed.
The disposition of all subjects who sign an ICF will be provided. The numbers of subjects randomized, completed, and discontinued during the study, as well as the reasons for all post-randomization discontinuations will be summarized by treatment group, for all centers combined and each center separately. Disposition and reason for study discontinuation will also be provided as a by-subject listing.
Demographics and baseline characteristics, including physical examination and medical history will be summarized by treatment group for Intent to treat (ITT) and Safety populations.
Data will be summarized, descriptively, according to the variable type:
- Continuous data: summaries will include the number of observations, mean, standard deviation, median, and minimum and maximum values.
- Categorical data: frequePrimary endpoint The primary endpoint of closure of the surgical incision between the active and control populations will be tested using a repeated measures analysis, specifically using a mixed model for repeated measures. This will be tested with a necessary p-value of .05 or smaller to demonstrate significance regarding the interaction between treatment and time of the follow-up visit when the measurement was taken.
The test statistic will follow a t-distribution with n-2 degrees of freedom, where t=(Interaction between time and treatment)/(Standard Error of the interaction) is the test statistic for testing the significance of treatment on wound healing, where n is the total number of patients in the study with at least one measurement taken for % of wound healed.
The test for significance will be conducted using a t-test against the Null Hypothesis that the impact of the interaction between treatment and measurement period on wound healing is zero. The test for significance will be made at α=.05. The statistical analysis will be conducted in SAS using the MIXED procedure with the specifications of maximum-likelihood estimation methods, model repeated measures, blocking by patient, and unstructured covariance matrix.
Secondary endpoint The secondary endpoint regarding rate of infection between the EPIFLO treatment and the control treatment will be tested at a significance level of .05 using Barnard's test. A 2x2 contingency table will be made between patients in the Active and Control arms, as well as the patients' incidences of at least one surgical site infection. The statistical analysis will be conducted in SAS using the FREQ procedure with the specification of EXACT BARNARD.
Any correlation between the primary and secondary endpoints will be assessed first by calculating the correlation coefficients for the secondary end points. If the secondary endpoint was found to be correlated with primary, then further analysis will be done only if primary endpoint shows statistical significance as per the study success rule defined above. If the secondary endpoint is not correlated with primary, then, further analysis of the secondary endpoint will be carried out as described below. The secondary endpoint will only be tested if the primary endpoint is statistically significant by the study success rule defined above.
A multiplicity adjustment strategy (to be fully described in our Statistical Analysis Plan) would be followed to control the overall Type I error at 0.05 level.
The SAP will fully describe the procedure to control the overall type I error rate at 5% level (or below) using the methodology described in the literature (ICH E9 (1998) on "Statistical principles for clinical trials")
Supportive Analysis To assess the consistency of the Primary Analysis results, supportive analyses will be conducted using the Per Protocol (PP) population. Statistical methodology for the supportive analyses will be the same as that of the primary analysis, with the exception of the analysis population used. The PP population will be used for the supportive analysis while ITT population will be used for the primary analysis. Subjects with no post baseline value for the primary endpoint will be considered NOT HEALED in this analysis.
Safety Analyses The Safety population will be used for the analysis of safety endpoints. For continuous variables data will be summarized by treatment using n, mean, SD, minimum and maximum values. For categorical variables data will be summarized by treatment using frequency and percentage. No inferential statistics are planned.
ncy counts and percentages will be used.
All aspects of the study will be conducted according to the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GPD), the Declaration of Helsinki (1989), the provisions specified in Title 21 Parts 50, 54, 56, and 812 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, this protocol, and all federal, State, and local laws of pertinent regulatory authorities.
- Conditions
- Surgical Wound Healing, Lower Extremity, Revascularization, Incision
- Being tested
- EPIFLO
- Keywords
- Vascular, Surgery, groin, incision, oxygen, infection, wound healing, Transdermal Continuos
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound, Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EPIFLODevice
Also called Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Therapy
EPIFLO is a 3 ounce oxygen generator that continuously delivers 3 ml/hr of pure oxygen to the wound site, to enable tissue regenerative processes, thus driving closure of delayed-healing acute or chronic wounds.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Therapy | Active comparator | Subjects who satisfy the inclusion/exclusion conditions will be randomly assigned to the Treatment arm which provides Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Treatment (TCOT) (as delivered by EPIFLO device), in addition to standard of care for the surgical wound Receives: Device: EPIFLO |
| Control | No intervention | Subjects who satisfy the inclusion/exclusion conditions will be randomly assigned to the control arm which provides standard of care for the surgical wound. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
surgical wound closure assessed using modified Bates-Jenson Wound Assessment Tool
Change in wound area
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Incidence of surgical site infection as determined by Szilagyi Tool
Occurrence of infection at the surgical wound site
Measured: 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Nov 2018
- Study start7 Mar 2019
- Primary completion31 Jul 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Surgical Wound HealingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Subjects who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to receive the treatment device with Standard of Care or Standard of Care alone (1:1).
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Neogenix, LLC dba Ogenix
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Maryland, College Park
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Khanjan Nagarsheth, MD, Principal investigator, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore MDBrajesh K Lal, Principal investigator, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03746132
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EPF-418
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Correia RM, Nakano LC, Vasconcelos V, Cristino MA, Flumignan RL. Prevention of infection in peripheral arterial reconstruction of the lower limb. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 29;10(10):CD015022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015022.pub2.
PubMed 41159585Cristino MA, Nakano LC, Vasconcelos V, Correia RM, Flumignan RL. Prevention of infection in aortic or aortoiliac peripheral arterial reconstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):CD015192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015192.pub2.
PubMed 40260835
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study of Transdermal, Continuous Oxygen Therapy for Surgical Site Wound Healing in High- Risk Subjects Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03746132
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EPF-418
- Conditions
- Surgical Wound Healing, Lower Extremity, Revascularization, Incision
- Keywords
- Vascular, Surgery, groin, incision, oxygen, infection, wound healing, Transdermal Continuos
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Neogenix, LLC dba OgenixIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University of Maryland, College Park
- Study start
- 7 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Therapy (TCOT) as an adjunct to surgical wound healing in subjects undergoing vascular surgery for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease. It is the intention of this study to administer oxygen using the TCOT approach to the surgical sites of subjects undergoing the surgery and to monitor the healing of the incision as well as infection rate. The hypothesis is that oxygen delivered transdermally to the surgical site in a continuous manner for up to 28 days will accelerate the healing process and reduce the infection rate compared to the Standard of Care.
Detailed description
This Safety \& Efficacy Study will be a randomized controlled trial of 100 subjects (Parallel design) aged 18 - 90 years who are scheduled to undergo vascular surgery at the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC) hospital. 50 subjects will be recruited for the control arm and 50 for the treatment arm. Subjects who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to receive the treatment device with Standard of Care or Standard of Care alone (1:1). The most proximal (e.g., groin) incision (subject to safety exclusion) will be studied.
The expected study treatment duration is 4 weeks. This means the subjects will be seeing their physician weekly for the first 4 weeks following their surgery, once they are recruited for the study.
During the study, there will be five study treatment visits: Study visit 1 (day 0) is the day of the surgery and of randomization. For those randomized to the treatment arm of the study, the EPIFLO device will be applied on this day immediately following surgery. For those randomized to the control group, standard gauze dressing will be applied to their incision site. The second study visit is 7 days following surgery (day 7) and the third, fourth, and fifth study visits are on days 14, 21, and 28 respectively. On the third study visit (day 14), a new EPIFLO will be applied and the old one discarded for those in the treatment arm of the study, because FDA has cleared each EPIFLO-15 device only for a maximum of 15 days of use, after which the used device must be disposed (single use, single patient, disposable device). The 5th study visit (Day 28), will be the final treatment study visit for all subjects, regardless of which treatment group they are in.
Those subjects whose incisional wound has healed during the study treatment period (28 days) will come in for a healing confirmation visit two weeks after it's noted to be healed. Note that an incision is not declared healed until the healing is confirmed after a two-week period after the first observation of complete healing. They will then have one final study visit, approximately 90 days from the first observation of wound closure, as their last study visit.
All subjects whose incisions have not completely healed by the fifth study visit (day 28) will also come in for one final study visit, approximately 90 days following their surgery, to have the study doctor assess the condition of the incision.
The investigational device of this protocol is the EPIFLO® Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Delivery. Components of this unit include: Small, silent disposable, battery-operated oxygen concentrator capable of delivering 98% to 100% oxygen (balance moisture) for fifteen days at a rate of ~3.0 ml/hour; and 36" long sterile cannula (tube) that conveys the oxygen from the concentrator device to the area beneath the bandage overlying the wound. EPIFLO is intended to provide transdermal, continuous oxygen delivery to chronic wounds. EPIFLO concentrates oxygen from atmospheric air and delivers the concentrated oxygen to the region of the wound bed creating an oxygen-enriched environment intended to promote the healing process in chronic wounds as an adjunct to standard wound care in wound management and treatment.
EPIFLO is worn in a convenient location in the body within 4-5 feet of the wound, beneath clothing without impairing its operation, and the subject is free to ambulate and continue with normal daily activities while being treated 24 hours per day for 15 days. The EPIFLO unit measures 2" x 2.5" x 1" and weighs 3.5 oz. A pouch (with belt loop) and arm band are provided to facilitate wearing of the device.
A Safety Monitor will be selected from unbiased wound care experts/vascular surgeons, selected by the Investigator and will not be affiliated with the sponsor of this study. The monitor charter will define the specific processes and procedures by which their assessments will be conducted.
All study data will be presented in subject data listings. Statistical analyses, if applicable, will be performed using SAS® for Windows, version 9.1 or later. Descriptive statistics (n, mean, standard deviation, median, minimum and maximum) will be calculated by treatment group for continuous variables. Frequencies and percentages will be presented by treatment group for categorical variables. Missing data will not be imputed.
The disposition of all subjects who sign an ICF will be provided. The numbers of subjects randomized, completed, and discontinued during the study, as well as the reasons for all post-randomization discontinuations will be summarized by treatment group, for all centers combined and each center separately. Disposition and reason for study discontinuation will also be provided as a by-subject listing.
Demographics and baseline characteristics, including physical examination and medical history will be summarized by treatment group for Intent to treat (ITT) and Safety populations.
Data will be summarized, descriptively, according to the variable type:
- Continuous data: summaries will include the number of observations, mean, standard deviation, median, and minimum and maximum values.
- Categorical data: frequePrimary endpoint The primary endpoint of closure of the surgical incision between the active and control populations will be tested using a repeated measures analysis, specifically using a mixed model for repeated measures. This will be tested with a necessary p-value of .05 or smaller to demonstrate significance regarding the interaction between treatment and time of the follow-up visit when the measurement was taken.
The test statistic will follow a t-distribution with n-2 degrees of freedom, where t=(Interaction between time and treatment)/(Standard Error of the interaction) is the test statistic for testing the significance of treatment on wound healing, where n is the total number of patients in the study with at least one measurement taken for % of wound healed.
The test for significance will be conducted using a t-test against the Null Hypothesis that the impact of the interaction between treatment and measurement period on wound healing is zero. The test for significance will be made at α=.05. The statistical analysis will be conducted in SAS using the MIXED procedure with the specifications of maximum-likelihood estimation methods, model repeated measures, blocking by patient, and unstructured covariance matrix.
Secondary endpoint The secondary endpoint regarding rate of infection between the EPIFLO treatment and the control treatment will be tested at a significance level of .05 using Barnard's test. A 2x2 contingency table will be made between patients in the Active and Control arms, as well as the patients' incidences of at least one surgical site infection. The statistical analysis will be conducted in SAS using the FREQ procedure with the specification of EXACT BARNARD.
Any correlation between the primary and secondary endpoints will be assessed first by calculating the correlation coefficients for the secondary end points. If the secondary endpoint was found to be correlated with primary, then further analysis will be done only if primary endpoint shows statistical significance as per the study success rule defined above. If the secondary endpoint is not correlated with primary, then, further analysis of the secondary endpoint will be carried out as described below. The secondary endpoint will only be tested if the primary endpoint is statistically significant by the study success rule defined above.
A multiplicity adjustment strategy (to be fully described in our Statistical Analysis Plan) would be followed to control the overall Type I error at 0.05 level.
The SAP will fully describe the procedure to control the overall type I error rate at 5% level (or below) using the methodology described in the literature (ICH E9 (1998) on "Statistical principles for clinical trials")
Supportive Analysis To assess the consistency of the Primary Analysis results, supportive analyses will be conducted using the Per Protocol (PP) population. Statistical methodology for the supportive analyses will be the same as that of the primary analysis, with the exception of the analysis population used. The PP population will be used for the supportive analysis while ITT population will be used for the primary analysis. Subjects with no post baseline value for the primary endpoint will be considered NOT HEALED in this analysis.
Safety Analyses The Safety population will be used for the analysis of safety endpoints. For continuous variables data will be summarized by treatment using n, mean, SD, minimum and maximum values. For categorical variables data will be summarized by treatment using frequency and percentage. No inferential statistics are planned.
ncy counts and percentages will be used.
All aspects of the study will be conducted according to the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GPD), the Declaration of Helsinki (1989), the provisions specified in Title 21 Parts 50, 54, 56, and 812 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, this protocol, and all federal, State, and local laws of pertinent regulatory authorities.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Subjects who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to receive the treatment device with Standard of Care or Standard of Care alone (1:1).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Therapy | Active comparator | Device: EPIFLOSubjects who satisfy the inclusion/exclusion conditions will be randomly assigned to the Treatment arm which provides Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Treatment (TCOT) (as delivered by EPIFLO device), in addition to standard of care for the surgical wound |
| Control | No intervention | –Subjects who satisfy the inclusion/exclusion conditions will be randomly assigned to the control arm which provides standard of care for the surgical wound. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Elective Surgery
- Clean incisions
- Surgery being performed for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease
- Subject Age 18- 90
- Willing and capable of signing informed consent and following all study protocols
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Surgical site has abscess or cellulitis
- Systemic sepsis at the time of surgery
- Disseminated Cancer Patients
- Arterial entrapment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EPIFLOAlso: Transdermal Continuous Oxygen TherapyEPIFLO is a 3 ounce oxygen generator that continuously delivers 3 ml/hr of pure oxygen to the wound site, to enable tissue regenerative processes, thus driving closure of delayed-healing acute or chronic wounds. | Device | Transdermal Continuous Oxygen Therapy |
Primary outcome
surgical wound closure assessed using modified Bates-Jenson Wound Assessment Tool
Time frame: 4 weeks
Change in wound area
1 secondary outcome
Incidence of surgical site infection as determined by Szilagyi Tool
Time frame: 90 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41159585Correia RM, Nakano LC, Vasconcelos V, Cristino MA, Flumignan RL. Prevention of infection in peripheral arterial reconstruction of the lower limb. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 29;10(10):CD015022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015022.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40260835Cristino MA, Nakano LC, Vasconcelos V, Correia RM, Flumignan RL. Prevention of infection in aortic or aortoiliac peripheral arterial reconstruction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 22;4(4):CD015192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015192.pub2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Surgical Wound Healing
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of Preoperative Radiation Therapy in Participants With Resectable Recurrent Abdominal Adrenocortical Carcinoma
Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC), Recurrent Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Arterial Stiffness During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Abdominal Wall Wounds
Postoperative Abdominal Wall Wound Complications, Surgical Wound Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study Of Surgical Repair Of Discontinuous Branching Pulmonary Arteries
Absent Pulmonary Artery
Recruiting
Management of Abdominal Post-surgical Scar With Ozoaqua Versus Standard Care
Wound Healing, Abdominal Surgery
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Oral Mucosal Grafting for Nasal Septal Perforation Repair
Nasal Septal Perforation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Khanjan Nagarsheth, MD principal investigator
University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore MD
Brajesh K Lal principal investigator
University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EPIFLO in people with Surgical Wound Healing and Lower Extremity, run by Neogenix, LLC dba Ogenix at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact SRINIVASAN SARANGAPANI, Ph.D. (781-702-6732, ssarangapani@ogenix.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
surgical wound closure assessed using modified Bates-Jenson Wound Assessment Tool (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03746132, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2021.