Early Childhood CariesART-ECCNCT03756025
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in Early Childhood Caries (ECC)
A study testing Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in people with Early Childhood Caries, run by Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Considering the severity and high prevalence of ECC, as well as the importance of early intervention and approach, the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment program, because of its advantages, consists of an important treatment alternative. However, only a few studies assess ART in babies affected by ECC. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 36 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Early Childhood Caries
- What is being tested?
- Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2008to 1 Jun 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 36 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- presence of active carious cavitated lesions;
- least one deciduous molar in each of the different dental quadrants;
- caries of shallow or medium depth, involving only the occlusal surface.
Who cannot join
- Children who do not allow clinical procedures to be performed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Nossa Senhora da Conceição Hospital
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91350-200
About this study
Official title: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in Early Childhood Caries in Brazilian Babies: a Longitudinal Randomized Clinical Trial
Considering the severity and high prevalence of ECC, as well as the importance of early intervention and approach, the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment program, because of its advantages, consists of an important treatment alternative. However, only a few studies assess ART in babies affected by ECC. For this practice to be accepted as safe, scientific evidence must be built through longitudinal studies to evaluate ART performance and to this end, the present study is justified. Therefore, the aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment performed in babies suffering from ECC after a 4-year period and compare the clinical performance of Atraumatic Restorations performed with two different glass ionomer cements. The investigator's hypothesis is that there is no difference in the clinical performance of ARTs performed with the different GICs.
The study is characterized by longitudinal follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth-type clinical trial performed in babies affected by early childhood caries. The subjects were children of both sexes, aged between 18 and 36 months, with at least one deciduous molar in each of the different dental quadrants, presenting active cavitated lesions of shallow or medium depth, involving only the occlusal surface. The initial convenience sample consisted of 100 deciduous molars of 25 children attending Bebê Clínica of the School of Dentistry of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul-FO / UFRGS, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil;
Read the detailed description
The study is characterized by longitudinal follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth-type clinical trial performed in babies affected by early childhood caries. The subjects were children of both sexes, aged between 18 and 36 months, with at least one deciduous molar in each of the different dental quadrants, presenting active cavitated lesions of shallow or medium depth, involving only the occlusal surface. The initial convenience sample consisted of 100 deciduous molars of 25 children attending Bebê Clínica of the School of Dentistry of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul-FO / UFRGS, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil; this number being based on similar studies published in the literature [27, 28, 29]. The power of the sample was calculated using the PEPI program, version 4 (Computer Programs for Epidemiologists), for a significance level of 5%. Considering that the average success percentage in two years of ART on primary teeth facings was 88%, and the worst result found was 67% [30], the power obtained was of 70.1%.
All children in the study were enrolled in the oral health promotion program for babies, in which mothers accompanied by their children individually received information and guidance on food intake, breastfeeding, and oral hygiene. In addition to the guidance that was reinforced at each visit, children received topical application of fluoride by brushing with acidulated phosphate fluoride gel in four applications with intervals of one week, considering that all had active cavities [31].
The clinical trial was performed through the experimental split-mouth model, in which the 25 selected children had their teeth distributed randomly through a random number table, receiving ART restorations of a face with one of the two high-viscosity conventional glass ionomer cements studied: Vitro Molar® (DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and Ketac Molar Easy Mix® (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). The atraumatic restorations were performed in the dental office by a single operator trained in the ART Technique [20], who received the restorative material already prepared by a trained auxiliary, ensuring blinding of the study. The restorative procedure performed in relative isolation and without the use of anesthesia consisted of removal of the carious tissue using hand instrument excavators and dentin spoons, with subsequent conditioning of the cavity with a polyacrylic acid solution at 11.5% (DFL) applied with a microbrush for 10 seconds. Immediately after, the cavity was washed and dried with cotton balls. In this step, according to the randomization, the respective GIC was inserted and subsequent digital compression was performed for 30 seconds. After occlusal adjustment, the ARTs were protected with finish gloss Alfa Bond® (DFL).
Clinical assessments were carried out in three stages: after 1, 2 and 4 years. For this, the oral health status of the children was assessed by the presence of visible plaque and caries activity, and the quality of ART restorations by the ART criterion [20]. In the exams at 4 years, an additional assessment was done by means of the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria [32] and the Visible Plaque Index-VPI and Gingival Bleeding Index-GBI [33]. Each evaluation was performed by a different blind examiner for the type of GIC used in ART and calibrated with the respective intra-examiner correlation coefficients: 1 year (ART Criterion: Kappa=0.81), 2 years (ART Criterion: Kappa=0.83), and 4 years (ART Criterion: Kappa=0.86; Modified USPHS Criteria: Kappa average=0.73; VPI: Kappa=0.79; caries activity: Kappa=1.0).
For the analysis of the general clinical performance of ART, through the success rate among the different GICs, the chi-square test was applied. In addition, the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare each individual clinical criterion between the materials (retention and anatomical shape, integrity and marginal discoloration, color of material, surface roughness and secondary caries), with all tests at the level of significance of 5% (p <0.05). The Visible Plaque Index (VPI) and Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), as well as caries activity were expressed through frequencies distribution.
Database construction and analysis, and interpretation of results were obtained by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 19.0.
- Conditions
- Early Childhood Caries
- Being tested
- Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)
- Keywords
- Early Childhood Caries, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment, Glass Ionomer Cement, Deciduous Tooth, Odontopediatrics
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)Procedure or surgery
Also called ART
The atraumatic restorations were performed in the dental office by a single operator trained in the ART Technique [20], who received the restorative material already prepared by a trained auxiliary, ensuring blinding of the study. The restorative procedure performed in relative isolation and without the use of anesthesia consisted of removal of the carious tissue using hand instrument excavators and dentin spoons, with subsequent conditioning of the cavity with a polyacrylic acid solution at 11.5% (DFL) applied with a microbrush for 10 seconds. Immediately after, the cavity was washed and dried with cotton balls. In this step, according to the randomization, the respective GIC was inserted and subsequent digital compression was performed for 30 seconds. After occlusal adjustment, the ARTs were protected with finish gloss Alfa Bond® (DFL).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vitro Molar® (DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) | Experimental | ART restorations of a face with one of the two high-viscosity conventional glass ionomer cements-Vitro Molar® (DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Receives: Procedure: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) |
| Ketac Molar Easy Mix® (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). | Active comparator | ART restorations of a face with one of the two high-viscosity conventional glass ionomer cements-Ketac Molar Easy Mix® (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). Receives: Procedure: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the ART(Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ) criterion.
Success: Codes 0(Present, satisfactory), 1(Present, slight deficiency at cavity margin of less than 0.5 mm) and 7(Not present, other restorative treatment performed)
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the ART(Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ) criterion.
Failure: Codes 2(Present, deficiency at cavity margin of 0.5 mm or more), 3(Present, fracture in restoration), 4(Present, fracture in tooth), and 8(Not present, tooth is not present)
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the USPHS(United States Public Health Service ) criteria.
Success: Codes A=Alfa (Restoration is intact and fully retained) and B=Bravo (Restoration is partially retained with some portion of the restoration still intact)
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the USPHS(United States Public Health Service ) criteria.
Failure: Codes C(Restoration is completely missing)
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Nov 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2008
- Primary completion31 Dec 2008
- Study completion1 Jun 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Early Childhood CariesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study is characterized by longitudinal follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth-type clinical trial performed in babies affected by early childhood caries
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniel Demétrio Faustino da Silva, Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03756025
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ART-ECC
- Acronym
- ART-ECC
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 28 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Faustino-Silva DD, Figueiredo MC. Atraumatic restorative treatment-ART in early childhood caries in babies: 4 years of randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Oct;23(10):3721-3729. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02800-8. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
PubMed 30666480
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in Early Childhood Caries in Brazilian Babies: a Longitudinal Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03756025
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ART-ECC / ART-ECC
- Conditions
- Early Childhood Caries
- Keywords
- Early Childhood Caries, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment, Glass Ionomer Cement, Deciduous Tooth, Odontopediatrics
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Nossa Senhora da ConceicaoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Considering the severity and high prevalence of ECC, as well as the importance of early intervention and approach, the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment program, because of its advantages, consists of an important treatment alternative. However, only a few studies assess ART in babies affected by ECC. For this practice to be accepted as safe, scientific evidence must be built through longitudinal studies to evaluate ART performance and to this end, the present study is justified. Therefore, the aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment performed in babies suffering from ECC after a 4-year period and compare the clinical performance of Atraumatic Restorations performed with two different glass ionomer cements. The investigator's hypothesis is that there is no difference in the clinical performance of ARTs performed with the different GICs.
The study is characterized by longitudinal follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth-type clinical trial performed in babies affected by early childhood caries. The subjects were children of both sexes, aged between 18 and 36 months, with at least one deciduous molar in each of the different dental quadrants, presenting active cavitated lesions of shallow or medium depth, involving only the occlusal surface. The initial convenience sample consisted of 100 deciduous molars of 25 children attending Bebê Clínica of the School of Dentistry of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul-FO / UFRGS, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil;
Detailed description
The study is characterized by longitudinal follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth-type clinical trial performed in babies affected by early childhood caries. The subjects were children of both sexes, aged between 18 and 36 months, with at least one deciduous molar in each of the different dental quadrants, presenting active cavitated lesions of shallow or medium depth, involving only the occlusal surface. The initial convenience sample consisted of 100 deciduous molars of 25 children attending Bebê Clínica of the School of Dentistry of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul-FO / UFRGS, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil; this number being based on similar studies published in the literature [27, 28, 29]. The power of the sample was calculated using the PEPI program, version 4 (Computer Programs for Epidemiologists), for a significance level of 5%. Considering that the average success percentage in two years of ART on primary teeth facings was 88%, and the worst result found was 67% [30], the power obtained was of 70.1%.
All children in the study were enrolled in the oral health promotion program for babies, in which mothers accompanied by their children individually received information and guidance on food intake, breastfeeding, and oral hygiene. In addition to the guidance that was reinforced at each visit, children received topical application of fluoride by brushing with acidulated phosphate fluoride gel in four applications with intervals of one week, considering that all had active cavities [31].
The clinical trial was performed through the experimental split-mouth model, in which the 25 selected children had their teeth distributed randomly through a random number table, receiving ART restorations of a face with one of the two high-viscosity conventional glass ionomer cements studied: Vitro Molar® (DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and Ketac Molar Easy Mix® (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). The atraumatic restorations were performed in the dental office by a single operator trained in the ART Technique [20], who received the restorative material already prepared by a trained auxiliary, ensuring blinding of the study. The restorative procedure performed in relative isolation and without the use of anesthesia consisted of removal of the carious tissue using hand instrument excavators and dentin spoons, with subsequent conditioning of the cavity with a polyacrylic acid solution at 11.5% (DFL) applied with a microbrush for 10 seconds. Immediately after, the cavity was washed and dried with cotton balls. In this step, according to the randomization, the respective GIC was inserted and subsequent digital compression was performed for 30 seconds. After occlusal adjustment, the ARTs were protected with finish gloss Alfa Bond® (DFL).
Clinical assessments were carried out in three stages: after 1, 2 and 4 years. For this, the oral health status of the children was assessed by the presence of visible plaque and caries activity, and the quality of ART restorations by the ART criterion [20]. In the exams at 4 years, an additional assessment was done by means of the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria [32] and the Visible Plaque Index-VPI and Gingival Bleeding Index-GBI [33]. Each evaluation was performed by a different blind examiner for the type of GIC used in ART and calibrated with the respective intra-examiner correlation coefficients: 1 year (ART Criterion: Kappa=0.81), 2 years (ART Criterion: Kappa=0.83), and 4 years (ART Criterion: Kappa=0.86; Modified USPHS Criteria: Kappa average=0.73; VPI: Kappa=0.79; caries activity: Kappa=1.0).
For the analysis of the general clinical performance of ART, through the success rate among the different GICs, the chi-square test was applied. In addition, the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare each individual clinical criterion between the materials (retention and anatomical shape, integrity and marginal discoloration, color of material, surface roughness and secondary caries), with all tests at the level of significance of 5% (p <0.05). The Visible Plaque Index (VPI) and Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), as well as caries activity were expressed through frequencies distribution.
Database construction and analysis, and interpretation of results were obtained by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 19.0.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study is characterized by longitudinal follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth-type clinical trial performed in babies affected by early childhood caries
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vitro Molar® (DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) | Experimental | Procedure: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)ART restorations of a face with one of the two high-viscosity conventional glass ionomer cements-Vitro Molar® (DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). |
| Ketac Molar Easy Mix® (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). | Active comparator | Procedure: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)ART restorations of a face with one of the two high-viscosity conventional glass ionomer cements-Ketac Molar Easy Mix® (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 36 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- presence of active carious cavitated lesions;
- least one deciduous molar in each of the different dental quadrants;
- caries of shallow or medium depth, involving only the occlusal surface.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children who do not allow clinical procedures to be performed.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)Also: ARTThe atraumatic restorations were performed in the dental office by a single operator trained in the ART Technique [20], who received the restorative material already prepared by a trained auxiliary, ensuring blinding of the study. The restorative procedure performed in relative isolation and without the use of anesthesia consisted of removal of the carious tissue using hand instrument excavators and dentin spoons, with subsequent conditioning of the cavity with a polyacrylic acid solution at 11.5% (DFL) applied with a microbrush for 10 seconds. Immediately after, the cavity was washed and dried with cotton balls. In this step, according to the randomization, the respective GIC was inserted and subsequent digital compression was performed for 30 seconds. After occlusal adjustment, the ARTs were protected with finish gloss Alfa Bond® (DFL). | Procedure or surgery | Ketac Molar Easy Mix® (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA)., Vitro Molar® (DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) |
Primary outcome
Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the ART(Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ) criterion.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Success: Codes 0(Present, satisfactory), 1(Present, slight deficiency at cavity margin of less than 0.5 mm) and 7(Not present, other restorative treatment performed)
Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the ART(Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ) criterion.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Failure: Codes 2(Present, deficiency at cavity margin of 0.5 mm or more), 3(Present, fracture in restoration), 4(Present, fracture in tooth), and 8(Not present, tooth is not present)
2 secondary outcomes
Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the USPHS(United States Public Health Service ) criteria.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the USPHS(United States Public Health Service ) criteria.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Nov 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30666480Faustino-Silva DD, Figueiredo MC. Atraumatic restorative treatment-ART in early childhood caries in babies: 4 years of randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Oct;23(10):3721-3729. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02800-8. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Early Childhood Caries
Not yet recruiting
This Feasibility Study Will Evaluate the Study Protocols for Treatment and Follow-up Controls of Primary Molars With Caries in Children Treated With Stainless Steel Crowns or Conventional Fillings. Treatment Success and Potential Failures Will be Followed at 3, 6 and 12 Months Post Treatment.
Dental Caries, Early Childhood Caries (ECC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Povidone Iodine Efficacy Study
Early Childhood Caries
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical Performance and Failure Rates of Restorations Following Pediatric Dental Rehabilitation Under General Anesthesia
Pediatric Dental General Anesthesia, Restoration
Not yet recruiting
WhatsApp Messages to Improve Mothers' Oral Health Knowledge and Children's Toothbrushing
Oral Health, Dental Caries
RecruitingObservational study
Analysis of Salivary Proteins in Young Children as an Device to Improve Caries Risk Assessment
Early Childhood Caries (ECC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in people with Early Childhood Caries, run by Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the ART(Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ) criterion. (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03756025, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2018.