AzTrials
AzTrials

Early Childhood CariesART-ECCNCT03756025

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in Early Childhood Caries (ECC)

A study testing Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in people with Early Childhood Caries, run by Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Considering the severity and high prevalence of ECC, as well as the importance of early intervention and approach, the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment program, because of its advantages, consists of an important treatment alternative. However, only a few studies assess ART in babies affected by ECC. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 36 months
Conditions the study is for
Early Childhood Caries
What is being tested?
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
25 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
1 Jun 2008to 1 Jun 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 36 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • presence of active carious cavitated lesions;
  • least one deciduous molar in each of the different dental quadrants;
  • caries of shallow or medium depth, involving only the occlusal surface.

Who cannot join

  • Children who do not allow clinical procedures to be performed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Nossa Senhora da Conceição Hospital

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91350-200

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in Early Childhood Caries in Brazilian Babies: a Longitudinal Randomized Clinical Trial

Considering the severity and high prevalence of ECC, as well as the importance of early intervention and approach, the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment program, because of its advantages, consists of an important treatment alternative. However, only a few studies assess ART in babies affected by ECC. For this practice to be accepted as safe, scientific evidence must be built through longitudinal studies to evaluate ART performance and to this end, the present study is justified. Therefore, the aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment performed in babies suffering from ECC after a 4-year period and compare the clinical performance of Atraumatic Restorations performed with two different glass ionomer cements. The investigator's hypothesis is that there is no difference in the clinical performance of ARTs performed with the different GICs.

The study is characterized by longitudinal follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth-type clinical trial performed in babies affected by early childhood caries. The subjects were children of both sexes, aged between 18 and 36 months, with at least one deciduous molar in each of the different dental quadrants, presenting active cavitated lesions of shallow or medium depth, involving only the occlusal surface. The initial convenience sample consisted of 100 deciduous molars of 25 children attending Bebê Clínica of the School of Dentistry of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul-FO / UFRGS, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil;

Read the detailed description

The study is characterized by longitudinal follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth-type clinical trial performed in babies affected by early childhood caries. The subjects were children of both sexes, aged between 18 and 36 months, with at least one deciduous molar in each of the different dental quadrants, presenting active cavitated lesions of shallow or medium depth, involving only the occlusal surface. The initial convenience sample consisted of 100 deciduous molars of 25 children attending Bebê Clínica of the School of Dentistry of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul-FO / UFRGS, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil; this number being based on similar studies published in the literature [27, 28, 29]. The power of the sample was calculated using the PEPI program, version 4 (Computer Programs for Epidemiologists), for a significance level of 5%. Considering that the average success percentage in two years of ART on primary teeth facings was 88%, and the worst result found was 67% [30], the power obtained was of 70.1%.

All children in the study were enrolled in the oral health promotion program for babies, in which mothers accompanied by their children individually received information and guidance on food intake, breastfeeding, and oral hygiene. In addition to the guidance that was reinforced at each visit, children received topical application of fluoride by brushing with acidulated phosphate fluoride gel in four applications with intervals of one week, considering that all had active cavities [31].

The clinical trial was performed through the experimental split-mouth model, in which the 25 selected children had their teeth distributed randomly through a random number table, receiving ART restorations of a face with one of the two high-viscosity conventional glass ionomer cements studied: Vitro Molar® (DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and Ketac Molar Easy Mix® (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). The atraumatic restorations were performed in the dental office by a single operator trained in the ART Technique [20], who received the restorative material already prepared by a trained auxiliary, ensuring blinding of the study. The restorative procedure performed in relative isolation and without the use of anesthesia consisted of removal of the carious tissue using hand instrument excavators and dentin spoons, with subsequent conditioning of the cavity with a polyacrylic acid solution at 11.5% (DFL) applied with a microbrush for 10 seconds. Immediately after, the cavity was washed and dried with cotton balls. In this step, according to the randomization, the respective GIC was inserted and subsequent digital compression was performed for 30 seconds. After occlusal adjustment, the ARTs were protected with finish gloss Alfa Bond® (DFL).

Clinical assessments were carried out in three stages: after 1, 2 and 4 years. For this, the oral health status of the children was assessed by the presence of visible plaque and caries activity, and the quality of ART restorations by the ART criterion [20]. In the exams at 4 years, an additional assessment was done by means of the modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria [32] and the Visible Plaque Index-VPI and Gingival Bleeding Index-GBI [33]. Each evaluation was performed by a different blind examiner for the type of GIC used in ART and calibrated with the respective intra-examiner correlation coefficients: 1 year (ART Criterion: Kappa=0.81), 2 years (ART Criterion: Kappa=0.83), and 4 years (ART Criterion: Kappa=0.86; Modified USPHS Criteria: Kappa average=0.73; VPI: Kappa=0.79; caries activity: Kappa=1.0).

For the analysis of the general clinical performance of ART, through the success rate among the different GICs, the chi-square test was applied. In addition, the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare each individual clinical criterion between the materials (retention and anatomical shape, integrity and marginal discoloration, color of material, surface roughness and secondary caries), with all tests at the level of significance of 5% (p <0.05). The Visible Plaque Index (VPI) and Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), as well as caries activity were expressed through frequencies distribution.

Database construction and analysis, and interpretation of results were obtained by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 19.0.

Being tested
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)
Keywords
Early Childhood Caries, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment, Glass Ionomer Cement, Deciduous Tooth, Odontopediatrics

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)Procedure or surgery

    Also called ART

    The atraumatic restorations were performed in the dental office by a single operator trained in the ART Technique [20], who received the restorative material already prepared by a trained auxiliary, ensuring blinding of the study. The restorative procedure performed in relative isolation and without the use of anesthesia consisted of removal of the carious tissue using hand instrument excavators and dentin spoons, with subsequent conditioning of the cavity with a polyacrylic acid solution at 11.5% (DFL) applied with a microbrush for 10 seconds. Immediately after, the cavity was washed and dried with cotton balls. In this step, according to the randomization, the respective GIC was inserted and subsequent digital compression was performed for 30 seconds. After occlusal adjustment, the ARTs were protected with finish gloss Alfa Bond® (DFL).

Study groups in NCT03756025
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vitro Molar® (DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)ExperimentalART restorations of a face with one of the two high-viscosity conventional glass ionomer cements-Vitro Molar® (DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).
Receives: Procedure: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)
Ketac Molar Easy Mix® (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA).Active comparatorART restorations of a face with one of the two high-viscosity conventional glass ionomer cements-Ketac Molar Easy Mix® (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA).
Receives: Procedure: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the ART(Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ) criterion.

    Success: Codes 0(Present, satisfactory), 1(Present, slight deficiency at cavity margin of less than 0.5 mm) and 7(Not present, other restorative treatment performed)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the ART(Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ) criterion.

    Failure: Codes 2(Present, deficiency at cavity margin of 0.5 mm or more), 3(Present, fracture in restoration), 4(Present, fracture in tooth), and 8(Not present, tooth is not present)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the USPHS(United States Public Health Service ) criteria.

    Success: Codes A=Alfa (Restoration is intact and fully retained) and B=Bravo (Restoration is partially retained with some portion of the restoration still intact)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the USPHS(United States Public Health Service ) criteria.

    Failure: Codes C(Restoration is completely missing)

    Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Nov 2018
  2. Study start1 Jun 2008
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2008
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study is characterized by longitudinal follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth-type clinical trial performed in babies affected by early childhood caries
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
25 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03756025
Sponsor's protocol ID
ART-ECC
Acronym
ART-ECC
Status last verified
Nov 2018
First submitted
21 Nov 2018
Last updated
28 Nov 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Faustino-Silva DD, Figueiredo MC. Atraumatic restorative treatment-ART in early childhood caries in babies: 4 years of randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Oct;23(10):3721-3729. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02800-8. Epub 2019 Jan 21.

    PubMed 30666480

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in people with Early Childhood Caries, run by Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical performance scale of restaruations through the ART(Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ) criterion. (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03756025, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in