AzTrials
AzTrials

Airway MorbidityNCT03760692

I-gel vs Ambu AuraGain in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

A study testing i-gel and Ambu AuroGain in people with Airway Morbidity and Anesthesia, run by Dokuz Eylul University at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the effects of i-gel and Ambu AuraGain on ventilation parameters and surgical view during Trendelenburg position laparoscopic gynecological surgery in cases administered positive pressure ventilation without the use of neuromuscular agents. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Airway Morbidity, Anesthesia
What is being tested?
i-gel and Ambu AuroGain
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
102 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Nov 2018to 1 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ASA classification I-II
  • Between 18-65 years
  • Undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery

Who cannot join

  • Those with any neck or upper respiratory tract pathology
  • Those at risk of gastric content regurgitation/aspiration (previous upper GIS surgery, known hiatus hernia, gastroesophageal reflux, history of peptic ulcers, full stomach, pregnancy)
  • Those with low pulmonary compliance or high airway resistance (chronic pulmonary diseases)
  • Obese patients (BMI >35)
  • Those with throat pain, dysphagia and dysphonia
  • Those with possible or previous difficult airway
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Those with operations planned for longer than 4 hours
  • Conversion to laparotomy
  • Neuromuscular blocking agent used

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Spain1 site
  • Sureste University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care

    Madrid

Other trials in Spain

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Dokuz Eylul University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

    Izmir

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of I-gel and Ambu AuraGain Without Neuromuscular Blocker in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

To compare the effects of i-gel and Ambu AuraGain on ventilation parameters and surgical view during Trendelenburg position laparoscopic gynecological surgery in cases administered positive pressure ventilation without the use of neuromuscular agents.

Read the detailed description

Prospective, multicenter, randomized and double-blind study, aged from 18 to 65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

The patients are randomly assigned to 2 groups:

Group i-gel Group Ambu AuraGain

Procedure:

The investigation protocol contains the following sections:

  1. Induction of anaesthesia. For preoperative sedation 0.02 mg/kg midazolam IV will be administered. 2 minutes of 0.2 µ/kg/min remifentanil and 6 mg kg st-1 propofol infusion, IV 1-2 mg kg-1 propofol . No muscle relaxant will be used for insertion of the airway device.
  2. Bispectral index values will be held between 40-60.Bispectral index values will be within this interval by increasing or decreasing propofol infusion by 1 mg/kg after additional bolus dose of propofol (1 mg/kg).
  3. Insertion of the airway device. The size of the airway device used is based on the manufacturers' recommendations.
  4. Anesthesia maintenance will be ensured by 50% O2/air with 0.1-0.4 µ kg/min-1 remifentanil and 4-10 mg/kg/hr propofol IV infusion
  5. Functionality of the gastric drainage channel of the airway device
  6. Measurement of airway seal pressure (oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP): at baseline, and at 2 minutes after airway device insertion (T1), 10 minutes after insufflation (T2), before desufflation (T3), before removal of airway device (T4). The maximum pressure allowed is 40 cm H2O.
  7. Ventilatory mechanics and parameters and hemodynamic parameters are measured at baseline, and at T1, T2, T3 and T4.
  8. Perioperative complications: Cough, vomiting, laryngeal spasm, laryngeal Stridor, airway intervention requirements, hypoxia (SpO2 < 92%)
  9. Removal of the airway device: Presence of blood - 3 level grading (1:no blood; 2: trace amounts of blood; 3: clear amounts of blood). Complications: sore throat ( VAS:10-point scale), dysphonia (yes/no), dysphagia (yes/no).
Being tested
i-gel, Ambu AuroGain
Keywords
supraglottic airway device, laparoscopic gynecological surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • i-gelDevice

    Also called Group i-gel

    Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of insertion, ventilation and complications

  • Ambu AuroGainDevice

    Also called Group Ambu AuroGain

    Evaluation of clinical performance in terms of insertion, ventilation and complications

Study groups in NCT03760692
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group i-gelActive comparatorInsertion of the airway device. The size of the airway device used is based on the manufacturers' recommendations and evaluation of its clinical performance
Receives: Device: i-gel
Group Ambu AuragainExperimentalInsertion of the airway device. The size of the airway device used is based on the manufacturers' recommendations and evaluation of its clinical performance
Receives: Device: Ambu AuroGain

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Insertion time

    The time taken to successfully place the device in seconds

    Measured: intraoperative

  2. Change in airway seal pressure

    The maximum oropharyngeal leak pressure attained for each device.

    Measured: intraoperative

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of attempts at insertion

    The number of repeated attempts required for successfully placing the device. Each device was given a chance of 3 attempts if still unsuccessful after 3 attempts another device was placed.

    Measured: intraoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Nov 2018
  2. Study start1 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Prospective, multicenter, randomized
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
102 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03760692
Sponsor's protocol ID
351-SBKAEK
Other IDs
HUSE 012-ANR-2017
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
27 Nov 2018
Last updated
28 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing i-gel and Ambu AuroGain in people with Airway Morbidity and Anesthesia, run by Dokuz Eylul University at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Spain, Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Insertion time (time frame: intraoperative). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in