AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast DiseasesPhase 3NCT03764267

MAC vs TIVA Ambulatory Breast Augmentation

A Phase 3 study testing Remifentanil and general anesthetic in people with Breast Diseases, run by Ain Shams University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

hypothesis: the combination of LA with remifentanil and ketofol [monitored anesthesia care (MAC)] for ambulatory breast augmentation may result in results in better QoR on day of surgery as compared with total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA) . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Breast Diseases
What is being tested?
Remifentanil and general anesthetic
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2014to 1 Jan 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • ASA I, II

Who cannot join

  • ASA III

About this study

Official title: Monitored Anesthesia Care Using Remifentanil and Ketofol Results in a Superior Quality of Recovery Compared With Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Ambulatory Breast Augmentation

hypothesis: the combination of LA with remifentanil and ketofol [monitored anesthesia care (MAC)] for ambulatory breast augmentation may result in results in better QoR on day of surgery as compared with total i.v. anesthesia (TIVA) . The purpose of this study was to compare the QoR after MAC using remifentanil and ketofol with TIVA during ambulatory breast augmentation .

Read the detailed description

Breast augmentation surgery is commonly performed on an ambulatory basis under under general anesthesia (GA) with propofol and remifentanil or local anesthesia (LA). Although surgeons perform this operation comfortably under GA, Patients have anxiety and fear of complications due to GA. In addition, they expect a good postoperative quality of recovery (QOR) including ability to resume common activities (work and daily activities) without suffering from moderate to severe pain.

The LA is advantageous over GA in that airway instrumentation is not necessary, favorable recovery profile, decrease postoperative pain and vomiting, increase patient satisfaction and decrease the cost . However, patient anxiety or pain often leading to conversion of LA to GA, which suggests the concomitant use of i.v. sedatives and analgesics as a supplement to LA.

The combination of remifentanil and ketofol (propofol, ketamine) for sedation during regional anesthesia and LA has been shown to be a safe, effective technique, capable of maintains adequate analgesia with conscious sedation, haemodynamic stability, and achieves lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting with shorter recovery times.

Conditions
Breast Diseases
Being tested
Remifentanil, general anesthetic
Medical subject headings
Breast Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RemifentanilDrug

    Also called lidocaine, ropivaicaine

    Five minutes before infiltration of the local anesthestic by the surgeon, patients received an initial maintenance infusion of remifentanil 0.1 µg/kg/min and ketofol mixture 0.3 ml/kg (propofol 25 µg /kg/min and ketamine 10 µg/kg/min). ketofol mixture was prepared in a ratio of 1:2.5 (100 mg ketamine 2 mL (100 mg), propofol 1% 25 mL (250 mg), and glucose 5% 23 ml, total volume of 50 ml, each ml contain 2 mg ketamine + 5 mg propofol).

    Throughout the surgery, titration of the infusion rate of the remifentanil and ketofol were indicated by vital signs and expression of pain

  • general anestheticDrug

    Also called total intravenous anesthesia

    general anesthetic was induced with a bolus dose of remifentanil (1 ug/kg over 30 second) and propofol (2 mg/kg) followed by insertion of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). After the induction of anaesthesia and securing the airway, patient' lungs were ventilated with volume controlled ventilation, 50% oxygen/air mixtures in a circle system. .Anesthesia was maintained with remifentanil (0.5 ug/ kg/ min) and propofol (5 mg/kg/h). Remifentanil and propofol titrated to keep heart rate and the blood pressure within 20% of the baseline values and maintain BIS between 40 and 60, respectively. Patient movements were treated with additional i.v. bolus doses of remifentanil 0.5 ug/kg

Study groups in NCT03764267
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
remifentanilActive comparatorMAC group
Receives: Drug: Remifentanil
general anestheticActive comparatorTIVA group
Receives: Drug: general anesthetic

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of recovery

    Quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire, which includes five general quality of life dimensions: physical independence (5 items), pain (7 items), .emotional state (9 items), psychological support (7 items), and physical independence (5 items). Each item was graded with a 5-point score: none of the time, some of the time,usually, most of the time and all of the time. The total score on the QoR- 40 questionnaire ranges from 40 to 200 representing, respectively, extremely poor to excellent

    Measured: 24 hours postoperative

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Recovery room readiness times

    minutes

    Measured: 24 hours postoperative

  2. home readiness times

    minutes

    Measured: 24 hours postoperative

  3. adverse events

    vomiting

    Measured: 24 hours postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Dec 2018
  2. Study start1 Jan 2014
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03764267
Sponsor's protocol ID
Ainshamsuni-MAC-wbakhet
Status last verified
Dec 2018
First submitted
1 Dec 2018
Last updated
5 Dec 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Remifentanil and general anesthetic in people with Breast Diseases, run by Ain Shams University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of recovery (time frame: 24 hours postoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in