AzTrials
AzTrials

ARDSNCT03764319

Low Frequency, Ultra-low Tidal Volume Ventilation in Patients With ARDS and ECMO

A study testing Ultra-protective ventilator settings and Standard ventilator settings in people with ARDS and Acute Lung Injury, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the most severe form of respiratory failure, presented in 10% of all intensive care patients and carrying a high mortality rate. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a rescue treatment for patients with severe ARDS. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
What is being tested?
Ultra-protective ventilator settings and Standard ventilator settings
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
6 Nov 2018to 1 Aug 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Moderate to severe ARDS - Partial pressure of oxygen/Fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) < 200 mmHg
  • ECMO < 24 hours in situ
  • Gender-matched
  • Age-matched

Who cannot join

  • BMI > 40
  • Expected weaning of ECMO < 3 days (postoperative ECMO)
  • Combustion
  • Restrictive chest wall impairment
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Austria1 site
  • Medical University of Vienna - Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine

    Vienna, Austria, 1090

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: Low Frequency, Ultra-low Tidal Volume Ventilation in Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: a Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is the most severe form of respiratory failure, presented in 10% of all intensive care patients and carrying a high mortality rate. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a rescue treatment for patients with severe ARDS. Mechanical ventilator settings in patients with severe ARDS during ECMO therapy are not clearly defined at the moment.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of a rigorous low breathing frequency and ultra-low tidal volume ventilation strategy on clinical outcome, compared to standard ventilator settings following the recent guidelines in patients with severe ARDS treated with ECMO.

The hypothesis is that a low breathing frequency and ultra-low tidal volume ventilation strategy is more protective for the ARDS challenged lung and reduces the duration of mechanical ventilation and so increases the ventilator free days in patients with severe ARDS treated with ECMO.

Being tested
Ultra-protective ventilator settings, Standard ventilator settings
Keywords
ARDS, ECMO, Ventilation
Medical subject headings
Acute Lung Injury, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Lung Diseases, Respiratory Aspiration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultra-protective ventilator settingsOther

    4-5 Breaths per minute; 14-16 cmH2O Positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP) (adjust PEEP to 23 < Plateau pressure < 25 cmH2O); 23-25 cmH2O Plateau pressure (adjust to not exceed Tidal volume > 4 mL/kg Predicted body weight (PBW)); < 4mL/kg PBW Tidal volume; 1:5 Inspiration:Expiration (I:E)

  • Standard ventilator settingsOther

    12-25 Breaths per minute; 8-12 cmH2O PEEP; max. 35 cmH2O Plateau pressure

Study groups in NCT03764319
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupActive comparatorUltra-protective ventilator settings in patients with ARDS and ECMO.
Receives: Other: Ultra-protective ventilator settings
Control groupActive comparatorStandard ventilator settings in patients with ARDS and ECMO.
Receives: Other: Standard ventilator settings

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ventilator free days

    Ventilator free days

    Measured: Immediately after initiation of ECMO up to 28 days

  2. Time from randomization to fulfillment of extubation criteria

    Time from randomization (initiation of ECMO) to fulfillment of the extubation criteria:

    • ARDS resolved
    • Temperature ≥ 36°C and ≤ 39°C
    • Low FiO2 (< 0.5)
    • PEEP (< 8 cmH2O) requirement
    • Able to initiate spontaneous breaths
    • Tidalvolume > 5 mL/kg or > 325 mL
    • Minute ventilation 5-6 L/min
    • PaO2/FiO2 > 200 mmHg
    • pH ≥ 7.25
    • Ability to cough after deflating tube cuff
    • Respiratory rate 8-30/min
    • Hemodynamic stability

    Measured: Immediately after initiation of ECMO up to 28 days

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Total time of mechanical ventilation

    Total time of mechanical ventilation

    Measured: Start of mechanical ventilation up to 28 days

  2. 28 day mortality

    Mortality from initiation of ECMO till day 28 after initiation of ECMO

    Measured: Immediately after initiation of ECMO up to 28 days

  3. One year mortality

    Mortality from initiation of ECMO till one year after initiation of ECMO

    Measured: Immediately after initiation of ECMO up to one year

  4. Incidence of reintubation

    Incidence of reintubation

    Measured: Immediately after initiation of ECMO up to 28 days

  5. Length of ICU stay

    Length of ICU stay

    Measured: Immediately after initiation of ECMO

  6. Evaluation of RAS, ACE, ACE2.

    Analyses of leftover blood. Renin angiotensin system (RAS) and Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) evaluation.

    Measured: 2 months

  7. Evaluation of Cytokines in pg/ml

    IL-6, IL-8, TNFR1, RAGE, Protein C

    Measured: 2 months

  8. Evaluation of vitamin D status

    25(OH), 1,25(OH)

    Measured: Length of ICU stay

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Dec 2018
  2. Study start6 Nov 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2021
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Comparison of 2 groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03764319
Sponsor's protocol ID
MUVienna ARDS-ECMO
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
29 Nov 2018
Last updated
17 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultra-protective ventilator settings and Standard ventilator settings in people with ARDS and Acute Lung Injury, run by Medical University of Vienna at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ventilator free days (time frame: Immediately after initiation of ECMO up to 28 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in