Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary ArteryLOTUSNCT03769038
Antegrade and Retrograde Dissection and Re-entry Approach for CTO
A study testing chronic total occlusion in people with Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Artery, run by Xijing Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
BACKGROUND:Chronic total occlusion (CTO) angioplasty is one of the most challenging procedures remaining for the interventional operator. Today, with contemporary CTO negotiation available strategies and significant operator expertise, the literature reports a 50%-95% success rate for recanalizing CTOs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Artery
- What is being tested?
- chronic total occlusion
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2018to 30 Sep 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- CTO time >3months and CTO length >20mm
Who cannot join
- age <18-years-old or >85-years-old,
- left ventricular ejection fraction ≦30%,
- allergy to medications (antiplatelet drugs, heparin, metal alloys, or contrast agents),
- a planned surgery within 6 months of PCI or planned thrombolysis,
- pregnant,
- a life expectancy of <6 months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
First affiliated hospital of fourth military medical university
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032
About this study
Official title: Long-term Outcomes of Successful Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Using the Antegrade and Retrograde Dissection and Re-entry Approach
BACKGROUND:Chronic total occlusion (CTO) angioplasty is one of the most challenging procedures remaining for the interventional operator. Today, with contemporary CTO negotiation available strategies and significant operator expertise, the literature reports a 50%-95% success rate for recanalizing CTOs. But PCIs of CTO lesions still carry a high rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Because previous reports have not specifically compare contemporary antegrade and retrograde dissection and re-entry dissection (ADR/RDR) technique on the long-term impact of ISR, so the investigators focused on the objective.
OBJECTIVES: This study hope to evaluate the frequency of angiographic ISR and further elucidate some ISR related higher risk factors among CTO PCI patients in intimal stent group using antegrade or retrograde wire escalation (AWE/RWE) techniques and sub-intimal stent group using contemporary antegrade or retrograde dissection and re-entry (ADR and/or RDR).
METHODS: A total of 300 consecutive selected patients with CTO lesion who will undergo successful revascularization by AWE/RWE and ADR/RDR techniques treatment will be enrolled in this prospective multicenter registry from December 1 2018 to December 31 2019. The primary study endpoint of the protocol is the bionary in-stent restenosis of CTO vessels at angiographic follow-up about 13 months. The secondary endpoints are: 1) CTO technique and procedure success rate; and 2) in-hospital and 30 days MACE (Cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, urgent repeat tratget vessel revascularization with either pericardiocentssis or surgery and stroke and stent thrombosis and stroke); 6months and 1-year and 2-year MACE including death, MI, and target CTO vessel revascularization and stroke ; and 3) Restenosis scores (R-scores) of related risk factors.
Read the detailed description
METHODS
- Trial overview and study population. ① This clinical trial is a prospective, exploratory, nonrandomized, multicenter trial evaluating the frequency of angiographic restenosis and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing CTO PCI in intimal stent group using antegrade or retrograde wire escalation (AWE/RWE) techniques and sub-intimal stent group using contemporary antegrade or retrograde dissection and re-entry (ADR or RDR) with everolimus-eluting stents (XIENCE Coronary Stent). ②According to high patient's volume registry studies in CTO lesions, the patients percentage of ADR or RDR strategy application was just only 20-25%36-37. If to get 60 patients for ADR or RDR strategies, the minimum CTO number are 300 patients. So in this registry study, 300 CTO cases, to which PCI will be attempted, are prospectively enrolled from Dec 1st 2018 to Dec 31st 2019 in the CTO registries of ten centers. The study was approved by the institutional review board at each site. For patients with multiple treated CTO, only the first CTO attempted was considered for the analysis. ③ Exclusions included age <18-years-old or >85-years-old, left ventricular ejection fraction ≦30%, allergy to medications (antiplatelet drugs, heparin, metal alloys, or contrast agents), a planned surgery within 6 months of PCI or planned thrombolysis, pregnant, a life expectancy of <6 months. ④ Participants will sign written informed consent for long-term telephone FU before the interventional procedure. Participants will be followed by a clinical visit or by a telephone interview for 30 day, 6 months and 12 months and 24 months post-procedure for assessment of adverse events. All patients with successful CTO PCI and without moderate or severe renal insufficiency will be scheduled for angiographic follow-up at 13 months. Compared with CTA, coronary angiography to evaluate restenosis is appropriate in all patients especially for severe coronary heart diseases patients with atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmia. It could provide accurate information about mild-severe angulation lesion and the stents traits like total stent length. Procedural and outcome data collection will be collected and entered by operators entered into a dedicated database. ⑤ The study will be performed in accordance with the Declaration of FMMU.
- Study endpoints and definitions The primary study endpoint of the protocol is the bionary in-stent restenosisof CTO vessels at the scheduled angiographic follow-up at 13 months. The secondary endpoints are: 1) CTO technique and procedure success rate; and 2) in-hospital and 30 days MACE (Cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, urgent repeat tratget vessel revascularization with either pericardiocentssis or surgery and stroke and stent thrombosis and stroke); 6 months and 1-year and 2-year MACE including death, MI, and target CTO vessel revascularization and stroke ; and 3) Restenosis scores (R-scores) of related risk factors.
Coronary CTOs will be defined as angiographic evidence of total occlusions with TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 0 and estimated durations of at least 3 months. Estimation of the occlusion duration is based on first onset of anginal symptoms, prior history of myocardial infarction in the target vessel territory, or comparison with a prior angiogram.
Procedural success will be defined as angiographic success(final residual stenosis <30% by visual estimation and TIMI flow grade 3 after CTO recanalization).
Clinical success will be defined as a procedural success without In-hospital MACCEs. In-hospital MACCEs is defined as the composite of non-Q-wave and Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), recurrent angina requiring urgent repeat revascularization with PCI orcoronary bypass surgery, stroke, and death. Non-Q-wave MI is defined as creatine kinase-MB enzyme elevation >3 times the upper limit of normal. When new pathological Q waves, in addition to enzyme elevation, will be observed on the electrocardiogram, the event is defined as a Q-wave MI. In all patients, creatine kinase and creatine kinase-MB is evaluated 6 h after the procedure and until their normalization if levels is abnormal.
Lesion complexity will be judged using the J-CTO (20)and calculated by allocating 1 point each for non-tapered proximal cap (ie, blunt or ambiguous), any calcification, any tortuosity, occlusion length >20 mm and any prior unsuccessful attempt. J-CTO score of ≥2 was defined as complex.
CTO proximal cap location is defined according to American Heart Association (AHA) classification and additionally coded as either ostial or non-ostial and proximal (left main, proximal left anterior descending, proximal circumflex or proximal right coronary artery) or distal (all other sites). Cap morphology is coded as blunt or tapered, or as ambiguous when there is lack of clarity over the origin of the ongoing vessel. Calcification within the CTO is coded as none visible, mild(spots only), moderate (<50% of vessel circumference) or severe (>50% of vessel circumference). Disease proximal and distal to the CTO is classified as absent, mild, moderate or severe. Aproximal or distal cap side branch is considered present if occurring ≤3 mm from the respective CTO cap. Occlusion length is estimated by dual injection, or from apparent length after guidewire crossing. Collaterals are classified according to Cohen and Rentrop and deemed interventional if, on angiographic inspection, are thought amenable to crossing by a guidewire and a microcatheter by the operator.
All deaths are considered cardiac unless otherwise documented. Stent thrombosis is defined according to the Academic Research Consortium criteria (13). Reocclusionis defined as a TIMI flow grade of 0 to1in the target CTO vessel, where restenosis is defined as > 50% luminal narrowing at the segment site, including the stent and 5 mm proximal and distal to the stent edges. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) is defined as any repeat PCI or coronary artery bypass graft surgery of the target lesion that includes 5 mm proximal and distal to the stented vessel segment.
A procedure is considered retrograde if an attempt is made to cross the lesion through a collateral vessel supplying the target vessel distal to the lesion. Complex lesions with unclear location of the proximal cap or with poor distal target are initially attempted by the retrograde approach. In those cases, after positioning of a microcatheter at the distal CTO cap, a true-to-true retrograde lumen crossing technique is first attempted for shorter lesions (<20 mm). When entering in the subintimal space or with longer lesions, knuckled wires are used to reach the proximal cap, followed most often by reverse-controlled anterograde and retrograde re-entry techniques.
A procedure is considered antegrade if no retrograde crossing attempts are made. An anterograde approach is initially attempted for short lesions (<20 mm) with clear proximal cap location and good distal vessel target using a wiring strategy. Anterograde dissection/re-entry using dedicated devices (CrossBoss and Stingray catheters) is, however, preferred for longer lesions with an optimal distal re-entry zone, without significant side branches that could be occluded by the technique, or when an initial wire escalation strategy failed. Wire-based anterograde dissection/re-entry was also used successfully when an initial attempt at crossing from a "true-to-true" approach failed. Such a strategy involves the use of a microcatheter delivered on a knuckled polymer-jacketed wire advanced into the subintimal dissection plane, with subsequent re-entry into the true distal lumen using a stiff tapered guidewire or a knuckled guidewire. A Stingray system will be used to cross from the false lumen to the true lumen, the so-called hybrid procedure, rapidly switching from one approach to another when the initial strategy attempted is failing.
- Being tested
- chronic total occlusion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
chronic total occlusionDevice
chronic total occlusion of coronary atery was opened and then stents were placed
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic Total Occlusion and Restenosis | Other | contemporary antegrade or retrograde dissection and re-entry (ADR or RDR) to open CTO Receives: Device: chronic total occlusion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the bionary in-stent restenosis of CTO vessels at the scheduled angiographic follow-up at 13 months.
the diamater of stents less than 50%
Measured: 13months after PCI
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Dec 2018
- Study start1 Dec 2018
- Primary completion31 Dec 2020
- Study completion30 Sep 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary ArteryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Xijing HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Xijing Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03769038
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- XJYY-LL-FJ-059
- Acronym
- LOTUS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 7 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long-term Outcomes of Successful Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Using the Antegrade and Retrograde Dissection and Re-entry Approach
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03769038
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LOTUS / XJYY-LL-FJ-059
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Xijing HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
BACKGROUND:Chronic total occlusion (CTO) angioplasty is one of the most challenging procedures remaining for the interventional operator. Today, with contemporary CTO negotiation available strategies and significant operator expertise, the literature reports a 50%-95% success rate for recanalizing CTOs. But PCIs of CTO lesions still carry a high rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Because previous reports have not specifically compare contemporary antegrade and retrograde dissection and re-entry dissection (ADR/RDR) technique on the long-term impact of ISR, so the investigators focused on the objective.
OBJECTIVES: This study hope to evaluate the frequency of angiographic ISR and further elucidate some ISR related higher risk factors among CTO PCI patients in intimal stent group using antegrade or retrograde wire escalation (AWE/RWE) techniques and sub-intimal stent group using contemporary antegrade or retrograde dissection and re-entry (ADR and/or RDR).
METHODS: A total of 300 consecutive selected patients with CTO lesion who will undergo successful revascularization by AWE/RWE and ADR/RDR techniques treatment will be enrolled in this prospective multicenter registry from December 1 2018 to December 31 2019. The primary study endpoint of the protocol is the bionary in-stent restenosis of CTO vessels at angiographic follow-up about 13 months. The secondary endpoints are: 1) CTO technique and procedure success rate; and 2) in-hospital and 30 days MACE (Cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, urgent repeat tratget vessel revascularization with either pericardiocentssis or surgery and stroke and stent thrombosis and stroke); 6months and 1-year and 2-year MACE including death, MI, and target CTO vessel revascularization and stroke ; and 3) Restenosis scores (R-scores) of related risk factors.
Detailed description
METHODS
- Trial overview and study population. ① This clinical trial is a prospective, exploratory, nonrandomized, multicenter trial evaluating the frequency of angiographic restenosis and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing CTO PCI in intimal stent group using antegrade or retrograde wire escalation (AWE/RWE) techniques and sub-intimal stent group using contemporary antegrade or retrograde dissection and re-entry (ADR or RDR) with everolimus-eluting stents (XIENCE Coronary Stent). ②According to high patient's volume registry studies in CTO lesions, the patients percentage of ADR or RDR strategy application was just only 20-25%36-37. If to get 60 patients for ADR or RDR strategies, the minimum CTO number are 300 patients. So in this registry study, 300 CTO cases, to which PCI will be attempted, are prospectively enrolled from Dec 1st 2018 to Dec 31st 2019 in the CTO registries of ten centers. The study was approved by the institutional review board at each site. For patients with multiple treated CTO, only the first CTO attempted was considered for the analysis. ③ Exclusions included age <18-years-old or >85-years-old, left ventricular ejection fraction ≦30%, allergy to medications (antiplatelet drugs, heparin, metal alloys, or contrast agents), a planned surgery within 6 months of PCI or planned thrombolysis, pregnant, a life expectancy of <6 months. ④ Participants will sign written informed consent for long-term telephone FU before the interventional procedure. Participants will be followed by a clinical visit or by a telephone interview for 30 day, 6 months and 12 months and 24 months post-procedure for assessment of adverse events. All patients with successful CTO PCI and without moderate or severe renal insufficiency will be scheduled for angiographic follow-up at 13 months. Compared with CTA, coronary angiography to evaluate restenosis is appropriate in all patients especially for severe coronary heart diseases patients with atrial fibrillation and ventricular arrhythmia. It could provide accurate information about mild-severe angulation lesion and the stents traits like total stent length. Procedural and outcome data collection will be collected and entered by operators entered into a dedicated database. ⑤ The study will be performed in accordance with the Declaration of FMMU.
- Study endpoints and definitions The primary study endpoint of the protocol is the bionary in-stent restenosisof CTO vessels at the scheduled angiographic follow-up at 13 months. The secondary endpoints are: 1) CTO technique and procedure success rate; and 2) in-hospital and 30 days MACE (Cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, urgent repeat tratget vessel revascularization with either pericardiocentssis or surgery and stroke and stent thrombosis and stroke); 6 months and 1-year and 2-year MACE including death, MI, and target CTO vessel revascularization and stroke ; and 3) Restenosis scores (R-scores) of related risk factors.
Coronary CTOs will be defined as angiographic evidence of total occlusions with TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 0 and estimated durations of at least 3 months. Estimation of the occlusion duration is based on first onset of anginal symptoms, prior history of myocardial infarction in the target vessel territory, or comparison with a prior angiogram.
Procedural success will be defined as angiographic success(final residual stenosis <30% by visual estimation and TIMI flow grade 3 after CTO recanalization).
Clinical success will be defined as a procedural success without In-hospital MACCEs. In-hospital MACCEs is defined as the composite of non-Q-wave and Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), recurrent angina requiring urgent repeat revascularization with PCI orcoronary bypass surgery, stroke, and death. Non-Q-wave MI is defined as creatine kinase-MB enzyme elevation >3 times the upper limit of normal. When new pathological Q waves, in addition to enzyme elevation, will be observed on the electrocardiogram, the event is defined as a Q-wave MI. In all patients, creatine kinase and creatine kinase-MB is evaluated 6 h after the procedure and until their normalization if levels is abnormal.
Lesion complexity will be judged using the J-CTO (20)and calculated by allocating 1 point each for non-tapered proximal cap (ie, blunt or ambiguous), any calcification, any tortuosity, occlusion length >20 mm and any prior unsuccessful attempt. J-CTO score of ≥2 was defined as complex.
CTO proximal cap location is defined according to American Heart Association (AHA) classification and additionally coded as either ostial or non-ostial and proximal (left main, proximal left anterior descending, proximal circumflex or proximal right coronary artery) or distal (all other sites). Cap morphology is coded as blunt or tapered, or as ambiguous when there is lack of clarity over the origin of the ongoing vessel. Calcification within the CTO is coded as none visible, mild(spots only), moderate (<50% of vessel circumference) or severe (>50% of vessel circumference). Disease proximal and distal to the CTO is classified as absent, mild, moderate or severe. Aproximal or distal cap side branch is considered present if occurring ≤3 mm from the respective CTO cap. Occlusion length is estimated by dual injection, or from apparent length after guidewire crossing. Collaterals are classified according to Cohen and Rentrop and deemed interventional if, on angiographic inspection, are thought amenable to crossing by a guidewire and a microcatheter by the operator.
All deaths are considered cardiac unless otherwise documented. Stent thrombosis is defined according to the Academic Research Consortium criteria (13). Reocclusionis defined as a TIMI flow grade of 0 to1in the target CTO vessel, where restenosis is defined as > 50% luminal narrowing at the segment site, including the stent and 5 mm proximal and distal to the stent edges. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) is defined as any repeat PCI or coronary artery bypass graft surgery of the target lesion that includes 5 mm proximal and distal to the stented vessel segment.
A procedure is considered retrograde if an attempt is made to cross the lesion through a collateral vessel supplying the target vessel distal to the lesion. Complex lesions with unclear location of the proximal cap or with poor distal target are initially attempted by the retrograde approach. In those cases, after positioning of a microcatheter at the distal CTO cap, a true-to-true retrograde lumen crossing technique is first attempted for shorter lesions (<20 mm). When entering in the subintimal space or with longer lesions, knuckled wires are used to reach the proximal cap, followed most often by reverse-controlled anterograde and retrograde re-entry techniques.
A procedure is considered antegrade if no retrograde crossing attempts are made. An anterograde approach is initially attempted for short lesions (<20 mm) with clear proximal cap location and good distal vessel target using a wiring strategy. Anterograde dissection/re-entry using dedicated devices (CrossBoss and Stingray catheters) is, however, preferred for longer lesions with an optimal distal re-entry zone, without significant side branches that could be occluded by the technique, or when an initial wire escalation strategy failed. Wire-based anterograde dissection/re-entry was also used successfully when an initial attempt at crossing from a "true-to-true" approach failed. Such a strategy involves the use of a microcatheter delivered on a knuckled polymer-jacketed wire advanced into the subintimal dissection plane, with subsequent re-entry into the true distal lumen using a stiff tapered guidewire or a knuckled guidewire. A Stingray system will be used to cross from the false lumen to the true lumen, the so-called hybrid procedure, rapidly switching from one approach to another when the initial strategy attempted is failing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic Total Occlusion and Restenosis | Other | Device: chronic total occlusioncontemporary antegrade or retrograde dissection and re-entry (ADR or RDR) to open CTO |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- CTO time >3months and CTO length >20mm
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- age <18-years-old or >85-years-old,
- left ventricular ejection fraction ≦30%,
- allergy to medications (antiplatelet drugs, heparin, metal alloys, or contrast agents),
- a planned surgery within 6 months of PCI or planned thrombolysis,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| chronic total occlusionchronic total occlusion of coronary atery was opened and then stents were placed | Device | Chronic Total Occlusion and Restenosis |
Primary outcome
the bionary in-stent restenosis of CTO vessels at the scheduled angiographic follow-up at 13 months.
Time frame: 13months after PCI
the diamater of stents less than 50%
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Artery
Active, not recruiting
To Evaluate Whether IVUS-guided Drug-eluting Stent (DES) Implantation Leads to Better Clinical Outcomes Compared to Conventional Angiography in the Treatment of Chronic Complete Occlusion (CTO) Disease.
Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Artery
RecruitingObservational study
Real-World Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Predicting Functional Recovery After Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion Revascularization
Chronic Total Occlusions of Coronary Arteries, Stress Echocardiography (SE)
Not yet recruiting
Drug-Coated Balloon Only Strategy After Recanalization of Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions
Angina (Stable), Coronary Occlusion
RecruitingObservational study
Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention
Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing chronic total occlusion in people with Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Artery, run by Xijing Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the bionary in-stent restenosis of CTO vessels at the scheduled angiographic follow-up at 13 months. (time frame: 13months after PCI). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2022.