Traumatic Brain InjuryNCT03771950
Early Team Based Neuro-rehabilitation After Traumatic Brain Injury - a Pilot Study
A study testing Early team based neuro-rehabilitation in people with Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion, Brain, run by Vastra Gotaland Region at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The aim is to evaluate the study design, procedure and measurements in a randomised controlled pilot study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion, Brain
- What is being tested?
- Early team based neuro-rehabilitation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 1 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Head injury for the first time or repeated trauma.
- Diagnosed with brain concussion (ICD10 S060, S0600) by a physician.
- Persistent symptoms after mTBI or decreased activity level at time for inclusion.
- Exclusions criteria:
- No remaining symptoms after mTBI at time for inclusion.
- Returned to previous activity daily living level as before trauma.
- Other serious illness.
- Unwillingness to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim is to evaluate the study design, procedure and measurements in a randomised controlled pilot study.
Read the detailed description
Despite that mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common condition managed in various healthcare settings, early team based neurorehabilitation (TbNR) in post-concussion syndrom (PCS) is sparely investigated. Therefore we aim to design a high quality randomised controlled study (RCT) investigating the effect of early TbNR in PCS. Prior this RCT a pilot study will be conducted with the aim to evaluate the study design, procedure and measurements.
Method:
Thirty consecutive patients visiting Alingsås hospital emergency department due to head injury caused by fall, trauma to the head, traffic accident or abuse, and diagnosed with brain concussion (ICD10 S060, S0600) for the first time or after repeated trauma, will be asked to participate in the study. The patient will receive a written study information when discharged, and asked if an occupational therapist can contact the patient by phone for further information and screening questions 14 days after trauma. If the patient meet the inclusion criteria and wish to participate in the study a written informed consent will be obtained.
Test procedure:
A structured interview and the assessment described below will be performed at baseline 3-4 weeks after the trauma and after 16 weeks by an occupational therapist. Participant's characteristics such as age, gender, work ability, education, social status, previous trauma to the head and known comorbidity are collected. The classification of the mTBI will be collected from the patients' medical journal, as well as the result and time of the CT examination if it has been performed. Information about previous sick leave will be collected from the Swedish health insurance office. The number of visits to the occupational therapist (OT) and the physiotherapist (PT) will be recorded from the participant's medical journal.
Study protocol In this pilot study we plan to evaluate broadly as the persons with mTBI may suffer from a complex symptomatology, and the causes of persisting symptoms are unclear.
The following data will be collected:
- The number of patients who meet the inclusion criteria.
- The number of patients consenting participation in the study.
- The number of patients completing questionnaires at baseline and post-test.
- The number of patients who participate in the intervention.
Randomisation:
After screening for eligibility, fulfilling inclusion criteria and consenting to participation the baseline assessment will be conducted by an OT at enrolment. After this the patients will be randomised either to the intervention or control group in using lots in sealed envelopes based on a computer generated group allocation. The lots are kept in sealed envelopes prepared by a person not involved in the study. An OT will open the envelope and inform the patient about group allocation. All care providers will be blinded for baseline and post-test outcomes. A research co-worker who are involved in data management will be blinded for group allocation.
Interventions:
The patients randomised to the intervention group (n=15) will be treated by the PT and OT in TbNR. At the first visits a medical history will be taken, there after a structured interview will be made by the OT about activity level, and an examination of the patients bodily and neurological symptoms will be made by the PT. Based on this result a TbNR a rehabilitation plan is established consisting of the patient's goals, and the purpose that the patient shall be as active as possible without triggering symptoms. An individual exercise program is prescribed. Number of visits to TbNR will depend on the individual need for rehabilitation.
Between each appointment with TbNR, the patient will have personal tasks to accomplish with the purpose of being active based on symptoms and the adaptation to the current level of energy. Information about underlying causes of perceived symptoms will be present at the visits, and the patient will be given help to analyze the tasks that has been performed during the past week. The perceived symptoms will be logged in an activity log including estimation of fatigue and headache. A week-schedule will be created in the purpose of helping the patient to a balanced activity level in relation to their current capacity.
The PT assesses physical activity level and reactions to physical strain. Adaptations are made to the exercise program and advice is given on physical activity and exercises. When appropriate the OT advices about returning to work and adaptations concerning work.
Control:
Participants will be treated as usual, which is that they can search health care by themself.
Statistics:
Ratio and interval data are presented as mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD), ordinal data are presented as median, and 25th and 75th percentile, nominal data are presented in absolute and relative numbers.
Change between baseline and post-test will be analyzed for each outcome measure and between the groups. Depending if the data are normal distributed or not parametric or non-parametric tests will be used for differences between group.
Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Cohen's d will be used to estimate the effect size using mean difference between groups and pooled standard deviation of the mean differences. The magnitude of effect size will be considered small for d = 0.2 - 0.49, medium for d = 0.5-0.79, and large for d = 0.8-1.1 (16).
Odds ratio will be used to estimate effect size for binary dependent variable using logistic regression. Linear regression analysis will be used for change of outcome measurements adjusting for gender, number of head trauma and if the injury has been caused by another person or not. The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) for Windows, Version 22.0, 2013. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY: USA will be used for statistical analyses. A p-value < 0.05 is considered statistical significant.
Sample size:
In the planned pilot study 30 participants will be enrolled. This sample size is considered to be sufficient to analyze effect size for the included outcome measurements which will be used for planning the full-scale randomized controlled study involving more emergency hospitals and neuro teams.
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion, Brain
- Being tested
- Early team based neuro-rehabilitation
- Keywords
- rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Brain Concussion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Early team based neuro-rehabilitationBehavioural
A structured interview will be made by OT about activity level, and an examination of the patients bodily and neurological symptoms will be made by PT. Based on this result a rehabilitation plan is established consisting of the patient's goals, and the purpose that the patient shall be as active as possible without triggering symptoms. An individual exercise program is prescribed. Between each appointment the patient will have personal tasks to accomplish with the purpose of being active based on symptoms and the adaptation to the current level of energy. The perceived symptoms will be logged. A week-schedule will be created in the purpose of helping the patient to a balanced activity level in relation to their current capacity. The PT assesses physical activity level and reactions to physical strain. Adaptations are made to the exercise program and advice is given on physical activity and exercises. When appropriate OT advices about returning to work and adaptations concerning work.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Early team based neuro-rehabilitation after Traumatic Brain Injury Receives: Behavioral: Early team based neuro-rehabilitation |
| Control group | No intervention | Treatment as usual. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numbers of patients who meet the inclusion criteria and accept participation in the study?
Count how many of the patients want to participate in the study
Measured: 16 weeks after trauma
Secondary outcomes (14)
Numbers of participants who respond to the included measurements?
Count the number
Measured: 16 weeks after trauma
Numbers of participants who complete post-test?
Count the number
Measured: 16 weeks after trauma
Rivermead post-concussion symtoms questionnaire (Swedish version) (RPQ)
A valid, reliable and established measurement of self-perceived symptoms after brain concussion. The measurement consists of 16 items concerning perceived headache, vertigo, nausea, sensitivity to sound, sleeping disorders, fatigue, irritability, depression, frustration, poor memory, poor concentration, longer time to think, blurred vision, sensitivity to light, double vision and restlessness the past 24 hours compared to before the head injury. The symptoms are assessed on a 5-pointscale: never had symptom (category 0), had symptoms but they resolved (category 1), had moderate problems with symptom (category 2), having moderate problems with symptom (category 3), having severe problem with symptom (category 4)
Measured: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)
A valid and reliable measurement consisting of 20 items to measure fatigue. Various dimensions are estimated such as general fatigue, physical fatigue, decreased activity, reduced motivation and mental fatigue.
Measured: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Activity level is measured with GAP in everyday activity.
GAP measures participation by capturing the difference between what the patient wants to perform and actually performs. The measure consists of 30 items and the participant answers yes or no if the person performs the activity, and yes or no if the person wants to perform it.
Measured: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Leisure Time Physical Activity Instrument (LTPI) (Swedish version)
Captures the participant physical activity level: sedentary, light activity (does not increase respiratory rate), moderate activity (increased respiratory rate and increased body temperature), high activity level (significantly increases respiratory rate and body temperature)
Measured: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Sleep quantity is measured by two questions:
"Do you think that you get enough sleep?". Sleep quality is measured by the question: "Considering all, how do you think that you sleep?" The participants answers the questions on a four-grade-scale: the higher number-the better
Measured: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
RAND-36
Consists of 36 items that measure health-related quality of life comprising eight subscales ranging from 0-100. The subscales are physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health
Measured: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS Swedish version)
A self-evaluation measure of anxiety and depression in patients in somatic health care. HADS consists of 14 statements (0-21) for each part: HADS-anxiety and HADS-depression. Higher score indicate more server anxiety and depression.
Measured: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Gender, male and female
Gender will be collected from the participant medical record at baseline
Measured: Relation between gender and change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma in the outcomes measurements RPQ, MFI, LTPAI,GAP, Sleep, HADS.
Number of head trauma
Number of head trauma will be collected from the participants medical record at baseline
Measured: Relation between number of head trauma and change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma in the outcomes measurements RPQ, MFI, LTPAI,GAP, Sleep, HADS.
Trauma caused by another person or not (yes/no)
Information about if trauma is caused by another person or not, will be collected from the participants medical record at baseline
Measured: Relation between trauma caused by another person or not and change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma in the outcomes measurements RPQ, MFI, LTPAI,GAP, Sleep, HADS.
Self-reported comorbidity
Information about comorbidity will be collected in a structured interview at baseline
Measured: Relation between self-reported comorbidity and change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma in the outcomes measurements RPQ, MFI, LTPAI,GAP, Sleep, HADS.
Computer Tomografi (CT) assessment
If Computer Tomografi (CT) assessment was used be collected from the participants medical record at baseline
Measured: Relation between CT assessment and change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma in the outcomes measurements RPQ, MFI, LTPAI,GAP, Sleep, HADS.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2018
- Study start1 Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Traumatic Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Vastra Gotaland RegionThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vastra Gotaland Region
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Alingsås Hospital, Narhalsan primary care rehabilitation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03771950
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 470-18
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 27 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 11 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Lannsjo M, af Geijerstam JL, Johansson U, Bring J, Borg J. Prevalence and structure of symptoms at 3 months after mild traumatic brain injury in a national cohort. Brain Inj. 2009 Mar;23(3):213-9. doi: 10.1080/02699050902748356.
PubMed 19205957Lundin A, de Boussard C, Edman G, Borg J. Symptoms and disability until 3 months after mild TBI. Brain Inj. 2006 Jul;20(8):799-806. doi: 10.1080/02699050600744327.
PubMed 17060147Belmont A, Agar N, Azouvi P. Subjective fatigue, mental effort, and attention deficits after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Nov;23(9):939-44. doi: 10.1177/1545968309340327. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
PubMed 19574545Ponsford J, Cameron P, Fitzgerald M, Grant M, Mikocka-Walus A. Long-term outcomes after uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury: a comparison with trauma controls. J Neurotrauma. 2011 Jun;28(6):937-46. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1516. Epub 2011 May 25.
PubMed 21410321Middleboe T, Andersen HS, Birket-Smith M, Friis ML. Minor head injury: impact on general health after 1 year. A prospective follow-up study. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992 Jan;85(1):5-9.
PubMed 1546534Ziino C, Ponsford J. Selective attention deficits and subjective fatigue following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2006 May;20(3):383-90. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.3.383.
PubMed 16719631Cassidy JD, Cancelliere C, Carroll LJ, Cote P, Hincapie CA, Holm LW, Hartvigsen J, Donovan J, Nygren-de Boussard C, Kristman VL, Borg J. Systematic review of self-reported prognosis in adults after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S132-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.299.
PubMed 24581902Lannsjo M, Borg J, Bjorklund G, Af Geijerstam JL, Lundgren-Nilsson A. Internal construct validity of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Nov;43(11):997-1002. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0875.
PubMed 22031345Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res. 1995 Apr;39(3):315-25. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-o.
PubMed 7636775Mannerkorpi K, Hernelid C. Leisure Time Physical Activity Instrument and Physical Activity at Home and Work Instrument. Development, face validity, construct validity and test-retest reliability for subjects with fibromyalgia. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Jun 17;27(12):695-701. doi: 10.1080/09638280400009063.
PubMed 16012062Akerstedt T, Knutsson A, Westerholm P, Theorell T, Alfredsson L, Kecklund G. Sleep disturbances, work stress and work hours: a cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Sep;53(3):741-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00333-1.
PubMed 12217447Hays RD, Morales LS. The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):350-7. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002089.
PubMed 11491194Lisspers J, Nygren A, Soderman E. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD): some psychometric data for a Swedish sample. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Oct;96(4):281-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb10164.x.
PubMed 9350957Sawilowsky S. New Effect Size Rules of Thumb. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods [Internet]. 2009 Nov 1;8(2). Available from: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jmasm/vol8/iss2/26 OCH Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second edition. Hillsdale: Routlegde; 1988.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Team Based Neuro-rehabilitation After Traumatic Brain Injury - a Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03771950
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 470-18
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury, Concussion, Brain
- Keywords
- rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Vastra Gotaland RegionOther government
- Collaborators
- Alingsås Hospital, Narhalsan primary care rehabilitation
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim is to evaluate the study design, procedure and measurements in a randomised controlled pilot study.
Detailed description
Despite that mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a common condition managed in various healthcare settings, early team based neurorehabilitation (TbNR) in post-concussion syndrom (PCS) is sparely investigated. Therefore we aim to design a high quality randomised controlled study (RCT) investigating the effect of early TbNR in PCS. Prior this RCT a pilot study will be conducted with the aim to evaluate the study design, procedure and measurements.
Method:
Thirty consecutive patients visiting Alingsås hospital emergency department due to head injury caused by fall, trauma to the head, traffic accident or abuse, and diagnosed with brain concussion (ICD10 S060, S0600) for the first time or after repeated trauma, will be asked to participate in the study. The patient will receive a written study information when discharged, and asked if an occupational therapist can contact the patient by phone for further information and screening questions 14 days after trauma. If the patient meet the inclusion criteria and wish to participate in the study a written informed consent will be obtained.
Test procedure:
A structured interview and the assessment described below will be performed at baseline 3-4 weeks after the trauma and after 16 weeks by an occupational therapist. Participant's characteristics such as age, gender, work ability, education, social status, previous trauma to the head and known comorbidity are collected. The classification of the mTBI will be collected from the patients' medical journal, as well as the result and time of the CT examination if it has been performed. Information about previous sick leave will be collected from the Swedish health insurance office. The number of visits to the occupational therapist (OT) and the physiotherapist (PT) will be recorded from the participant's medical journal.
Study protocol In this pilot study we plan to evaluate broadly as the persons with mTBI may suffer from a complex symptomatology, and the causes of persisting symptoms are unclear.
The following data will be collected:
- The number of patients who meet the inclusion criteria.
- The number of patients consenting participation in the study.
- The number of patients completing questionnaires at baseline and post-test.
- The number of patients who participate in the intervention.
Randomisation:
After screening for eligibility, fulfilling inclusion criteria and consenting to participation the baseline assessment will be conducted by an OT at enrolment. After this the patients will be randomised either to the intervention or control group in using lots in sealed envelopes based on a computer generated group allocation. The lots are kept in sealed envelopes prepared by a person not involved in the study. An OT will open the envelope and inform the patient about group allocation. All care providers will be blinded for baseline and post-test outcomes. A research co-worker who are involved in data management will be blinded for group allocation.
Interventions:
The patients randomised to the intervention group (n=15) will be treated by the PT and OT in TbNR. At the first visits a medical history will be taken, there after a structured interview will be made by the OT about activity level, and an examination of the patients bodily and neurological symptoms will be made by the PT. Based on this result a TbNR a rehabilitation plan is established consisting of the patient's goals, and the purpose that the patient shall be as active as possible without triggering symptoms. An individual exercise program is prescribed. Number of visits to TbNR will depend on the individual need for rehabilitation.
Between each appointment with TbNR, the patient will have personal tasks to accomplish with the purpose of being active based on symptoms and the adaptation to the current level of energy. Information about underlying causes of perceived symptoms will be present at the visits, and the patient will be given help to analyze the tasks that has been performed during the past week. The perceived symptoms will be logged in an activity log including estimation of fatigue and headache. A week-schedule will be created in the purpose of helping the patient to a balanced activity level in relation to their current capacity.
The PT assesses physical activity level and reactions to physical strain. Adaptations are made to the exercise program and advice is given on physical activity and exercises. When appropriate the OT advices about returning to work and adaptations concerning work.
Control:
Participants will be treated as usual, which is that they can search health care by themself.
Statistics:
Ratio and interval data are presented as mean ± 1 standard deviation (SD), ordinal data are presented as median, and 25th and 75th percentile, nominal data are presented in absolute and relative numbers.
Change between baseline and post-test will be analyzed for each outcome measure and between the groups. Depending if the data are normal distributed or not parametric or non-parametric tests will be used for differences between group.
Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated. Cohen's d will be used to estimate the effect size using mean difference between groups and pooled standard deviation of the mean differences. The magnitude of effect size will be considered small for d = 0.2 - 0.49, medium for d = 0.5-0.79, and large for d = 0.8-1.1 (16).
Odds ratio will be used to estimate effect size for binary dependent variable using logistic regression. Linear regression analysis will be used for change of outcome measurements adjusting for gender, number of head trauma and if the injury has been caused by another person or not. The Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) for Windows, Version 22.0, 2013. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY: USA will be used for statistical analyses. A p-value < 0.05 is considered statistical significant.
Sample size:
In the planned pilot study 30 participants will be enrolled. This sample size is considered to be sufficient to analyze effect size for the included outcome measurements which will be used for planning the full-scale randomized controlled study involving more emergency hospitals and neuro teams.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Early team based neuro-rehabilitationEarly team based neuro-rehabilitation after Traumatic Brain Injury |
| Control group | No intervention | –Treatment as usual. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Head injury for the first time or repeated trauma.
- Diagnosed with brain concussion (ICD10 S060, S0600) by a physician.
- Persistent symptoms after mTBI or decreased activity level at time for inclusion.
- No remaining symptoms after mTBI at time for inclusion.
- Returned to previous activity daily living level as before trauma.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Early team based neuro-rehabilitationA structured interview will be made by OT about activity level, and an examination of the patients bodily and neurological symptoms will be made by PT. Based on this result a rehabilitation plan is established consisting of the patient's goals, and the purpose that the patient shall be as active as possible without triggering symptoms. An individual exercise program is prescribed. Between each appointment the patient will have personal tasks to accomplish with the purpose of being active based on symptoms and the adaptation to the current level of energy. The perceived symptoms will be logged. A week-schedule will be created in the purpose of helping the patient to a balanced activity level in relation to their current capacity. The PT assesses physical activity level and reactions to physical strain. Adaptations are made to the exercise program and advice is given on physical activity and exercises. When appropriate OT advices about returning to work and adaptations concerning work. | Behavioural | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Numbers of patients who meet the inclusion criteria and accept participation in the study?
Time frame: 16 weeks after trauma
Count how many of the patients want to participate in the study
14 secondary outcomes
Numbers of participants who respond to the included measurements?
Time frame: 16 weeks after trauma
Numbers of participants who complete post-test?
Time frame: 16 weeks after trauma
Rivermead post-concussion symtoms questionnaire (Swedish version) (RPQ)
Time frame: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)
Time frame: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Activity level is measured with GAP in everyday activity.
Time frame: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Leisure Time Physical Activity Instrument (LTPI) (Swedish version)
Time frame: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Sleep quantity is measured by two questions:
Time frame: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
RAND-36
Time frame: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS Swedish version)
Time frame: Effect size of change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma
Gender, male and female
Time frame: Relation between gender and change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma in the outcomes measurements RPQ, MFI, LTPAI,GAP, Sleep, HADS.
Number of head trauma
Time frame: Relation between number of head trauma and change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma in the outcomes measurements RPQ, MFI, LTPAI,GAP, Sleep, HADS.
Trauma caused by another person or not (yes/no)
Time frame: Relation between trauma caused by another person or not and change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma in the outcomes measurements RPQ, MFI, LTPAI,GAP, Sleep, HADS.
Self-reported comorbidity
Time frame: Relation between self-reported comorbidity and change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma in the outcomes measurements RPQ, MFI, LTPAI,GAP, Sleep, HADS.
Computer Tomografi (CT) assessment
Time frame: Relation between CT assessment and change from baseline to 16 weeks after trauma in the outcomes measurements RPQ, MFI, LTPAI,GAP, Sleep, HADS.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Dec 2018.
- Background: PubMed 19205957Lannsjo M, af Geijerstam JL, Johansson U, Bring J, Borg J. Prevalence and structure of symptoms at 3 months after mild traumatic brain injury in a national cohort. Brain Inj. 2009 Mar;23(3):213-9. doi: 10.1080/02699050902748356.
- Background: PubMed 17060147Lundin A, de Boussard C, Edman G, Borg J. Symptoms and disability until 3 months after mild TBI. Brain Inj. 2006 Jul;20(8):799-806. doi: 10.1080/02699050600744327.
- Background: PubMed 19574545Belmont A, Agar N, Azouvi P. Subjective fatigue, mental effort, and attention deficits after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Nov;23(9):939-44. doi: 10.1177/1545968309340327. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
- Background: PubMed 21410321Ponsford J, Cameron P, Fitzgerald M, Grant M, Mikocka-Walus A. Long-term outcomes after uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury: a comparison with trauma controls. J Neurotrauma. 2011 Jun;28(6):937-46. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1516. Epub 2011 May 25.
- Background: PubMed 1546534Middleboe T, Andersen HS, Birket-Smith M, Friis ML. Minor head injury: impact on general health after 1 year. A prospective follow-up study. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992 Jan;85(1):5-9.
- Background: PubMed 16719631Ziino C, Ponsford J. Selective attention deficits and subjective fatigue following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2006 May;20(3):383-90. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.3.383.
- Background: PubMed 24581902Cassidy JD, Cancelliere C, Carroll LJ, Cote P, Hincapie CA, Holm LW, Hartvigsen J, Donovan J, Nygren-de Boussard C, Kristman VL, Borg J. Systematic review of self-reported prognosis in adults after mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Mar;95(3 Suppl):S132-51. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.299.
- Background: PubMed 22031345Lannsjo M, Borg J, Bjorklund G, Af Geijerstam JL, Lundgren-Nilsson A. Internal construct validity of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. J Rehabil Med. 2011 Nov;43(11):997-1002. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0875.
- Background: PubMed 7636775Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res. 1995 Apr;39(3):315-25. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-o.
- Background: PubMed 16012062Mannerkorpi K, Hernelid C. Leisure Time Physical Activity Instrument and Physical Activity at Home and Work Instrument. Development, face validity, construct validity and test-retest reliability for subjects with fibromyalgia. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Jun 17;27(12):695-701. doi: 10.1080/09638280400009063.
- Background: PubMed 12217447Akerstedt T, Knutsson A, Westerholm P, Theorell T, Alfredsson L, Kecklund G. Sleep disturbances, work stress and work hours: a cross-sectional study. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Sep;53(3):741-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00333-1.
- Background: PubMed 11491194Hays RD, Morales LS. The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):350-7. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002089.
Related trials for Traumatic Brain Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Nanopulse Laser Therapy
TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Different Intravenous Fluids on Post-operative Chronic Subdural Hematoma Size and Recurrence
Chronic Subdural Hematoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Early team based neuro-rehabilitation in people with Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion, Brain, run by Vastra Gotaland Region at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numbers of patients who meet the inclusion criteria and accept participation in the study? (time frame: 16 weeks after trauma). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03771950, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2018.