Chronic PainNCT03774121
Cryoneurolysis for the Management of Chronic Pain in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
A study testing Cryoneurolysis and Neuromuscular exercise (GLA:D) in people with Chronic Pain and Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Pain is the principal symptom in knee osteoarthritis (OA) and results in a considerable amount of years lived with disability, emotional distress and has significant socioeconomic consequences. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee
- What is being tested?
- Cryoneurolysis and Neuromuscular exercise (GLA:D)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 87 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 26 Jun 2019to 1 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Referred to GLA:D by a physician.
- Age ≥ 18y
- Chronic knee pain for a minimum duration of 6 months.
- Pain intensity ≥ 40mm on a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS).
- Radiographic confirmation of osteoarthritis; Grade 2-4 changes according to the Kellgren Lawrence classification system
- A decrease of ≥ 50 % in VAS scores with diagnostic genicular nerve block.
- Written and oral understanding of Danish.
Who cannot join
- History of systemic inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis.
- Previous recipient of cryoneurolysis for the knee.
- Use of hyaluronic acid within the previous 30 days.
- Injection of corticosteroid within the previous 3 months.
- Clinical significant structural abnormities affecting locomotion and knee function aside from osteoarthritis and which might cause chronic knee pain.
- Body mass index ≥ 18 and ≤ 40 kg/m
Show all 11Show fewer
- In treatment for other pain conditions.
- Pregnancy
- Coagulopathy
- Uncontrolled serious disease (cancer, diabetes, etc.)
- Disease associated with reactions to cold, such as cryoglobulinemia, cold urticarial and Renaud's syndrome.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Cryoneurolysis for the Management of Chronic Pain in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis; A Randomized Controlled Study
Pain is the principal symptom in knee osteoarthritis (OA) and results in a considerable amount of years lived with disability, emotional distress and has significant socioeconomic consequences. Conservative treatment options, such as exercise, often fail to provide long-term pain relief and alternatively patients may be subjected to total knee arthroplasty. More than 20% of these patients experience persistent and unchanged pain post-surgery. Novel advances in the field of cryoneurolysis applies low temperatures to disrupt nerve signaling at the painful area and a recent study showed that it was possible to target the peripheral nerves in the knee and provide significant pain relief in patients with knee OA. This could potentially improve the efficacy of other therapies such as exercise, delaying or perhaps avoiding surgical intervention and improving quality of life in OA patients considerably. Further prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm the effects of cryoneurolysis treatment in patients with knee OA. The primary objective of the current project is to determine the effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its ability to decrease pain in patients with knee OA. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its ability to improve outcomes in the GLA:D program to potentially delay or avoid surgical intervention. 90 individuals with knee OA in the knee will be randomly allocated in either a cryoneurolysis intervention group or a sham group. Both groups will be assessed at baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up. The patients, therapists and data-manager will be blinded to the allocation. The primary outcome will be VAS knee pain intensity score, measured post cryoneurolysis treatment. Secondary outcome measures include functional performance, PRO-data (KOOS, EQ5D), analgesic use, a socio-economic evaluation and adverse effects.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND Pain is the principal symptom in knee osteoarthritis (OA) and results in a considerable amount of years lived with disability, emotional distress and has significant socioeconomic consequences. Knee OA in particular, has a high prevalence rate compared to other types of OA, and is also present in the younger working age population. The treatment of knee OA typically focuses on pain relief, however the effects of current conservative treatment options remain small to moderate and most are associated with side effects. In many cases patients alternatively may be subjected to partial/total knee arthroplasty (TKA). TKA is considered to be an effective treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis however more than 20% of patients receiving TKA, experience persistent and unchanged pain post-surgery. Reviewing these results, focus should be on low-risk, minimally invasive therapies. Novel advances in the field of cryoneurolysis are in that respect promising. Cryoneurolysis has made it possible to apply low temperatures to a target percutaneous peripheral nerve, causing Wallerian degeneration. This has been shown to provide pain relief in a variety of chronic pain conditions. Recently, Radnovich et al. (2017) targeted the genicular nerves to reduce pain in patients with knee OA. The authors reported significant pain relief in patients with knee OA for up to 150 days. The authors reported expected adverse effects, that were transient, with mild severity, requiring no further intervention. These results might suggest that cryoneurolysis treatment is a safe procedure, that may reduce both pain and symptoms in patients with knee OA. Further prospective randomized controlled studies, with adequate power are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of cryoneurolysis treatment in patients with knee OA.
In Denmark, a neuromuscular exercise program (GLA:D) has been implemented, for the treatment of knee and hip OA in clinical practice. Recent studies show that exercise reduce pain and improve function in people with knee or hip OA. Despite of these reports the beneficial effects remains moderate with difficulties in maintaining these effects at long-term follow-up and includes a significant discontinuation rate for patients reporting high pain levels. In this line, pain and muscle weakness, among others, have been reported to be major barriers for physical exercise. The application of cryoneurolysis treatment as an effective pain reducing treatment prior to a standardized exercise program could perhaps provide significant pain relief, resulting in improved adherence, exercise effectiveness and long-term benefits of both therapies.
The primary objective of the current project is to determine the effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its proposed ability to decrease pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its ability to improve outcomes in the GLA:D program to potentially delay or avoid surgical intervention.
We hypothesize that cryoneurolysis in combination with GLA:D will be a safe and effective therapeutic option with few side effects to reduce pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis and may post pone surgical intervention.
TRIAL DESIGN This study is a randomized, controlled, trial (RCT) designed to test the efficacy of cryoneurolysis treatment in patients with knee osteoarthritis followed by a neuromuscular exercise program (GLA:D). The patients will be randomly allocated in either a cryoneurolysis intervention group (CRYO) or a sham group (SHAM) and will be assessed at baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up. The tests will include both patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and objective functional measurements.
RECRUITMENT AND SAMPLE SIZE Patients with pain and knee OA confirmed by radiography, are referred to GLA:D by their general practitioner prior to assessment of surgery eligibility at the hospital. The current project will recruit these patients in collaboration with selected general practitioners in the Region of Southern Denmark. According the Region of Southern Denmark, an average of 270 patients participate in the GLA:D program every year. Based on this estimation and considering the eligibility criteria to participate in the current project, recruitment will continue for up to 1 year.
The planned number of trial participants is based on the assumed superiority of the cryoneurolysis treatment over control. Estimating the sample size for a two-sample means test with a level of significance at 0.05, assuming a common standard deviation (SD) of 30 in VAS pain intensity scores indicates that for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, 74 individuals is required to obtain a power of at least 80% to establish a minimal clinically significant difference (MCSD) of 20 in VAS pain scores. The MCSD and common standard deviation is based on previous findings with a similar patient group and intervention. With an expected drop-out rate of 20%, a total of 94 individuals will be included in the project, 47 in each group.
ALLOCATION AND BLINDING Randomization will be performed as computer-generated block randomization with a 1:1 allocation ratio using random block sizes of 2, 4 and 6 in either group CRYO or group SHAM. The randomization restrictions will not be disclosed to ensure allocation concealment and the sequence will be performed by an external co-investigator.
To account for the placebo effect and reduce the risk of bias, the patients, therapists and data-manager will be blinded to the allocation. Blinding will be assured using a sham trial that includes the same procedures as cryoneurolysis treatment but without any freezing temperatures. Thus, visible marks as a result of the procedures in both groups will be similar.
INTERVENTIONS Diagnostic nerve block. All patients reporting a decrease of ≥ 50 % in VAS pain scores at least 15 min after a diagnostic nerve block of the genicular nerves.
Cryoneurolysis. The current project involves the novel application and test of cryoneurolysis, in the treatment of OA related pain. The rationale behind this method, is based on previous reports showing that low temperature conditions can alter nerve function. This technology allows for reversible destruction of nerves, also known as Wallerian degeneration, that prevents nerve signaling and potentially alleviate pain and motor dysfunction in a number of medical conditions. A probe will be inserted percutaneously at the target anterior femoral cutaneous nerve and infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve guided by ultrasound visualization to accurately determine the location of the nerve and to account for adjacent neurovascular structures and variations in anatomical structures. The target locations are drawn directly on the patients' skin prior to treatment along which a dose of local anesthetic will be injected subcutaneously before treatment. Cryoneurolysis at each target site requires 2-4 freeze cycles with a duration of 3 mins, and with thaw cycles between 20-40 seconds. A temperature probe will be inserted adjacent to the target nerve and cryoneurolysis-probe to ensure a controlled cooling effect and to control nerve damage. The sham intervention includes a similar procedure but using a sham probe.
GLA:D. SHAM and CRYO will both participate in the GLA:D program, which is a standard education and exercise program for patients with osteoarthritis in Denmark. The program is performed in groups and with the supervision of an experienced physiotherapist specialized in training of musculoskeletal disorders and has a duration of 8 weeks.
STATISTICAL METHODS The treatment groups will be examined for comparability based on baseline demographic and prognostic measures. An Intention-To-Treat (ITT) analysis will be used for all allocated patients and a mixed effects model will be used on the continuous outcome measures to determine the effects of cryoneurolysis treatment from baseline to post treatment and follow-ups [Between groups factor: CRYO vs SHAM, within groups factor: time]. The model will use robust estimation methods to account for outliers. Finally, a multiple imputation approach will be used in case of missing data. All P-values < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
ETHICS AND SIGNIFICANCE The project will be conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki and will be registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. The Project has been approved by the Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S-20180089).
Cryoneurolysis could potentially provide an effective, safe and minimally invasive option to treat pain in OA patients. The potential benefits include increased functional capacity and quality of life as a result of significant pain relief and improved benefits of physical exercise, ultimately postponing or making surgical intervention unnecessary. Finally, an important perspective, is the application of cryoneurolysis in other areas - such as managing pain, related to surgery, to improve rehabilitation.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Being tested
- Cryoneurolysis, Neuromuscular exercise (GLA:D), Sham
- Keywords
- Cryoneurolysis, Exercise, Pain, Physical capacity
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Motor Activity, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CryoneurolysisDevice
Also called Cryoablation
A cryoprobe will be inserted percutaneously and freeze the target nerves (infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve \& anterior femoral cutaneous nerve) guided by ultrasound visualization.
Neuromuscular exercise (GLA:D)Other
The GLA:D program, is a standard education and exercise program for patients with osteoarthritis in Denmark. The program is performed in groups and with the supervision of an experienced physiotherapist specialized in training of musculoskeletal disorders.
ShamDevice
The sham intervention includes a similar procedure but without freezing temperatures.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CRYO | Experimental | Subjected to Cryoneurolysis treatment and Neuromuscular training (GLA:D). Receives: Device: Cryoneurolysis; Other: Neuromuscular exercise (GLA:D) |
| SHAM | Sham comparator | Subjected to similar procedures as CRYO, but without freezing temperatures. Subjected to Neuromuscular training (GLA:D). Receives: Other: Neuromuscular exercise (GLA:D); Device: Sham |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in NRS knee pain intensity score
NRS consists of a numerical, from 0 to 10, anchored by two verbal descriptors, "no pain" for the score of zero and "worst pain imaginable" for the score of 10. NRS is a self-reported tool where the respondent is asked their current pain intensity.
Measured: Change in NRS pain score, between baseline and two weeks post surgery
Secondary outcomes (15)
Change in Pain location
Pain location as drawn by the patient.
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Functional Performance Evaluated by the 30 second chair-stand test.
The outcome is the total number of complete chair stands performed for the duration of the task (one chair stand represents a stand followed by a sit movement).
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in use of Analgesics
Use of analgesics from medical records
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Number of Adverse effects
Pre-defined and unexpected adverse effects
Measured: Reported adverse effects 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Pain type
Change in pain type using prespecified pain definitions
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Functional Performance Evaluated by the 40m fast-paced walk test.
The outcome is expressed as speed. i.e. walking distance (40m) divided by the time to perform the task (s).
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Functional Performance Evaluated by the 9 step stair test.
The outcome is the total time to perform the task (s).
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Functional Performance Evaluated by Maximum Voluntary Contraction
As measured in moment force of the knee extensors (Nm)
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Quality of Life using the Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ5D)
EQ5D consists of 5 subscales; Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety / depression. An health state score is obtained based on the responses from 1-5 in each subscale, from which a single index value is calculated representing patients' overall health state.
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in self-rated health using the Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ5D)
EQ5D includes a so called EQ VAS score which is the patients' self-rated health on a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labelled "the best health you can imagine" and "the worst health you can imagine".
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in the subscale "Pain" using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS score)
KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) us calculated for each subscale.
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in the subscale "other Symptoms" using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS score)
KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) us calculated for each subscale.
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in the subscale "Function in daily living (ADL)" using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS score)
KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) us calculated for each subscale.
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in the subscale "Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec)" using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS score)
KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) us calculated for each subscale.
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in the subscale "Knee related Quality of Life (QoL)" using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS score)
KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) us calculated for each subscale.
Measured: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2018
- Study start26 Jun 2019
- Primary completion1 Mar 2023
- Study completion1 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Odense University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Niels-Peter Brøchner Nielsen, PhD, Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
- Investigators
- Bibi (Valgerdur) Gram, PhD, Study director, Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern DenmarkCarsten Kock-Jensen, MD, Study director, Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern DenmarkNiels-Peter B Nielsen, PhD, Principal investigator, Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03774121
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CryoKnee01
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 3 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
SUNDERLAND S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951 Dec;74(4):491-516. doi: 10.1093/brain/74.4.491. No abstract available.
PubMed 14895767Ilfeld BM, Preciado J, Trescot AM. Novel cryoneurolysis device for the treatment of sensory and motor peripheral nerves. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016 Aug;13(8):713-25. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1204229. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
PubMed 27333989Radnovich R, Scott D, Patel AT, Olson R, Dasa V, Segal N, Lane NE, Shrock K, Naranjo J, Darr K, Surowitz R, Choo J, Valadie A, Harrell R, Wei N, Metyas S. Cryoneurolysis to treat the pain and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Aug;25(8):1247-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
PubMed 28336454Trescot AM. Cryoanalgesia in interventional pain management. Pain Physician. 2003 Jul;6(3):345-60.
PubMed 16880882Skou ST, Roos EM. Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D): evidence-based education and supervised neuromuscular exercise delivered by certified physiotherapists nationwide. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 7;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1439-y.
PubMed 28173795Dasa V, Lensing G, Parsons M, Harris J, Volaufova J, Bliss R. Percutaneous freezing of sensory nerves prior to total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2016 Jun;23(3):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
PubMed 26875052Lewis GN, Rice DA, McNair PJ, Kluger M. Predictors of persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):551-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu441. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
PubMed 25542191O'Brien T, Breivik H. The impact of chronic pain-European patients' perspective over 12 months. Scand J Pain. 2012 Jan 1;3(1):23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.11.004.
PubMed 29913762Ageberg E, Link A, Roos EM. Feasibility of neuromuscular training in patients with severe hip or knee OA: the individualized goal-based NEMEX-TJR training program. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jun 17;11:126. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-126.
PubMed 20565735Nygaard NB, Koch-Jensen C, Vaegter HB, Wedderkopp N, Blichfeldt-Eckhardt M, Gram B. Cryoneurolysis for the management of chronic pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a double-blinded randomized controlled sham trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 26;22(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04102-1.
PubMed 33637085
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cryoneurolysis for the Management of Chronic Pain in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis; A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03774121
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CryoKnee01
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Keywords
- Cryoneurolysis, Exercise, Pain, Physical capacity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern DenmarkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Odense University Hospital
- Study start
- 26 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pain is the principal symptom in knee osteoarthritis (OA) and results in a considerable amount of years lived with disability, emotional distress and has significant socioeconomic consequences. Conservative treatment options, such as exercise, often fail to provide long-term pain relief and alternatively patients may be subjected to total knee arthroplasty. More than 20% of these patients experience persistent and unchanged pain post-surgery. Novel advances in the field of cryoneurolysis applies low temperatures to disrupt nerve signaling at the painful area and a recent study showed that it was possible to target the peripheral nerves in the knee and provide significant pain relief in patients with knee OA. This could potentially improve the efficacy of other therapies such as exercise, delaying or perhaps avoiding surgical intervention and improving quality of life in OA patients considerably. Further prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm the effects of cryoneurolysis treatment in patients with knee OA. The primary objective of the current project is to determine the effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its ability to decrease pain in patients with knee OA. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its ability to improve outcomes in the GLA:D program to potentially delay or avoid surgical intervention. 90 individuals with knee OA in the knee will be randomly allocated in either a cryoneurolysis intervention group or a sham group. Both groups will be assessed at baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up. The patients, therapists and data-manager will be blinded to the allocation. The primary outcome will be VAS knee pain intensity score, measured post cryoneurolysis treatment. Secondary outcome measures include functional performance, PRO-data (KOOS, EQ5D), analgesic use, a socio-economic evaluation and adverse effects.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND Pain is the principal symptom in knee osteoarthritis (OA) and results in a considerable amount of years lived with disability, emotional distress and has significant socioeconomic consequences. Knee OA in particular, has a high prevalence rate compared to other types of OA, and is also present in the younger working age population. The treatment of knee OA typically focuses on pain relief, however the effects of current conservative treatment options remain small to moderate and most are associated with side effects. In many cases patients alternatively may be subjected to partial/total knee arthroplasty (TKA). TKA is considered to be an effective treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis however more than 20% of patients receiving TKA, experience persistent and unchanged pain post-surgery. Reviewing these results, focus should be on low-risk, minimally invasive therapies. Novel advances in the field of cryoneurolysis are in that respect promising. Cryoneurolysis has made it possible to apply low temperatures to a target percutaneous peripheral nerve, causing Wallerian degeneration. This has been shown to provide pain relief in a variety of chronic pain conditions. Recently, Radnovich et al. (2017) targeted the genicular nerves to reduce pain in patients with knee OA. The authors reported significant pain relief in patients with knee OA for up to 150 days. The authors reported expected adverse effects, that were transient, with mild severity, requiring no further intervention. These results might suggest that cryoneurolysis treatment is a safe procedure, that may reduce both pain and symptoms in patients with knee OA. Further prospective randomized controlled studies, with adequate power are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of cryoneurolysis treatment in patients with knee OA.
In Denmark, a neuromuscular exercise program (GLA:D) has been implemented, for the treatment of knee and hip OA in clinical practice. Recent studies show that exercise reduce pain and improve function in people with knee or hip OA. Despite of these reports the beneficial effects remains moderate with difficulties in maintaining these effects at long-term follow-up and includes a significant discontinuation rate for patients reporting high pain levels. In this line, pain and muscle weakness, among others, have been reported to be major barriers for physical exercise. The application of cryoneurolysis treatment as an effective pain reducing treatment prior to a standardized exercise program could perhaps provide significant pain relief, resulting in improved adherence, exercise effectiveness and long-term benefits of both therapies.
The primary objective of the current project is to determine the effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its proposed ability to decrease pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The secondary objective is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryoneurolysis in its ability to improve outcomes in the GLA:D program to potentially delay or avoid surgical intervention.
We hypothesize that cryoneurolysis in combination with GLA:D will be a safe and effective therapeutic option with few side effects to reduce pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis and may post pone surgical intervention.
TRIAL DESIGN This study is a randomized, controlled, trial (RCT) designed to test the efficacy of cryoneurolysis treatment in patients with knee osteoarthritis followed by a neuromuscular exercise program (GLA:D). The patients will be randomly allocated in either a cryoneurolysis intervention group (CRYO) or a sham group (SHAM) and will be assessed at baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up. The tests will include both patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and objective functional measurements.
RECRUITMENT AND SAMPLE SIZE Patients with pain and knee OA confirmed by radiography, are referred to GLA:D by their general practitioner prior to assessment of surgery eligibility at the hospital. The current project will recruit these patients in collaboration with selected general practitioners in the Region of Southern Denmark. According the Region of Southern Denmark, an average of 270 patients participate in the GLA:D program every year. Based on this estimation and considering the eligibility criteria to participate in the current project, recruitment will continue for up to 1 year.
The planned number of trial participants is based on the assumed superiority of the cryoneurolysis treatment over control. Estimating the sample size for a two-sample means test with a level of significance at 0.05, assuming a common standard deviation (SD) of 30 in VAS pain intensity scores indicates that for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, 74 individuals is required to obtain a power of at least 80% to establish a minimal clinically significant difference (MCSD) of 20 in VAS pain scores. The MCSD and common standard deviation is based on previous findings with a similar patient group and intervention. With an expected drop-out rate of 20%, a total of 94 individuals will be included in the project, 47 in each group.
ALLOCATION AND BLINDING Randomization will be performed as computer-generated block randomization with a 1:1 allocation ratio using random block sizes of 2, 4 and 6 in either group CRYO or group SHAM. The randomization restrictions will not be disclosed to ensure allocation concealment and the sequence will be performed by an external co-investigator.
To account for the placebo effect and reduce the risk of bias, the patients, therapists and data-manager will be blinded to the allocation. Blinding will be assured using a sham trial that includes the same procedures as cryoneurolysis treatment but without any freezing temperatures. Thus, visible marks as a result of the procedures in both groups will be similar.
INTERVENTIONS Diagnostic nerve block. All patients reporting a decrease of ≥ 50 % in VAS pain scores at least 15 min after a diagnostic nerve block of the genicular nerves.
Cryoneurolysis. The current project involves the novel application and test of cryoneurolysis, in the treatment of OA related pain. The rationale behind this method, is based on previous reports showing that low temperature conditions can alter nerve function. This technology allows for reversible destruction of nerves, also known as Wallerian degeneration, that prevents nerve signaling and potentially alleviate pain and motor dysfunction in a number of medical conditions. A probe will be inserted percutaneously at the target anterior femoral cutaneous nerve and infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve guided by ultrasound visualization to accurately determine the location of the nerve and to account for adjacent neurovascular structures and variations in anatomical structures. The target locations are drawn directly on the patients' skin prior to treatment along which a dose of local anesthetic will be injected subcutaneously before treatment. Cryoneurolysis at each target site requires 2-4 freeze cycles with a duration of 3 mins, and with thaw cycles between 20-40 seconds. A temperature probe will be inserted adjacent to the target nerve and cryoneurolysis-probe to ensure a controlled cooling effect and to control nerve damage. The sham intervention includes a similar procedure but using a sham probe.
GLA:D. SHAM and CRYO will both participate in the GLA:D program, which is a standard education and exercise program for patients with osteoarthritis in Denmark. The program is performed in groups and with the supervision of an experienced physiotherapist specialized in training of musculoskeletal disorders and has a duration of 8 weeks.
STATISTICAL METHODS The treatment groups will be examined for comparability based on baseline demographic and prognostic measures. An Intention-To-Treat (ITT) analysis will be used for all allocated patients and a mixed effects model will be used on the continuous outcome measures to determine the effects of cryoneurolysis treatment from baseline to post treatment and follow-ups [Between groups factor: CRYO vs SHAM, within groups factor: time]. The model will use robust estimation methods to account for outliers. Finally, a multiple imputation approach will be used in case of missing data. All P-values < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
ETHICS AND SIGNIFICANCE The project will be conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki and will be registered in ClinicalTrials.gov. The Project has been approved by the Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S-20180089).
Cryoneurolysis could potentially provide an effective, safe and minimally invasive option to treat pain in OA patients. The potential benefits include increased functional capacity and quality of life as a result of significant pain relief and improved benefits of physical exercise, ultimately postponing or making surgical intervention unnecessary. Finally, an important perspective, is the application of cryoneurolysis in other areas - such as managing pain, related to surgery, to improve rehabilitation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CRYO | Experimental | Device: Cryoneurolysis, Other: Neuromuscular exercise (GLA:D)Subjected to Cryoneurolysis treatment and Neuromuscular training (GLA:D). |
| SHAM | Sham comparator | Other: Neuromuscular exercise (GLA:D), Device: ShamSubjected to similar procedures as CRYO, but without freezing temperatures. Subjected to Neuromuscular training (GLA:D). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Referred to GLA:D by a physician.
- Age ≥ 18y
- Chronic knee pain for a minimum duration of 6 months.
- Pain intensity ≥ 40mm on a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS).
- Radiographic confirmation of osteoarthritis; Grade 2-4 changes according to the Kellgren Lawrence classification system
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- History of systemic inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis.
- Previous recipient of cryoneurolysis for the knee.
- Use of hyaluronic acid within the previous 30 days.
- Injection of corticosteroid within the previous 3 months.
- Clinical significant structural abnormities affecting locomotion and knee function aside from osteoarthritis and which might cause chronic knee pain.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CryoneurolysisAlso: CryoablationA cryoprobe will be inserted percutaneously and freeze the target nerves (infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve \& anterior femoral cutaneous nerve) guided by ultrasound visualization. | Device | CRYO |
| Neuromuscular exercise (GLA:D)The GLA:D program, is a standard education and exercise program for patients with osteoarthritis in Denmark. The program is performed in groups and with the supervision of an experienced physiotherapist specialized in training of musculoskeletal disorders. | Other | CRYO, SHAM |
| ShamThe sham intervention includes a similar procedure but without freezing temperatures. | Device | SHAM |
Primary outcome
Change in NRS knee pain intensity score
Time frame: Change in NRS pain score, between baseline and two weeks post surgery
NRS consists of a numerical, from 0 to 10, anchored by two verbal descriptors, "no pain" for the score of zero and "worst pain imaginable" for the score of 10. NRS is a self-reported tool where the respondent is asked their current pain intensity.
15 secondary outcomes
Change in Pain location
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Functional Performance Evaluated by the 30 second chair-stand test.
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in use of Analgesics
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Number of Adverse effects
Time frame: Reported adverse effects 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Pain type
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Functional Performance Evaluated by the 40m fast-paced walk test.
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Functional Performance Evaluated by the 9 step stair test.
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Functional Performance Evaluated by Maximum Voluntary Contraction
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in Quality of Life using the Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ5D)
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in self-rated health using the Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ5D)
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in the subscale "Pain" using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS score)
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in the subscale "other Symptoms" using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS score)
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in the subscale "Function in daily living (ADL)" using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS score)
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in the subscale "Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec)" using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS score)
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Change in the subscale "Knee related Quality of Life (QoL)" using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS score)
Time frame: Change between baseline, 2 weeks post cryoneurolysis, post GLA;D and at 6, 12 and 24 month follow-up.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2024.
- Background: PubMed 14895767SUNDERLAND S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951 Dec;74(4):491-516. doi: 10.1093/brain/74.4.491. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27333989Ilfeld BM, Preciado J, Trescot AM. Novel cryoneurolysis device for the treatment of sensory and motor peripheral nerves. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016 Aug;13(8):713-25. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1204229. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
- Background: PubMed 28336454Radnovich R, Scott D, Patel AT, Olson R, Dasa V, Segal N, Lane NE, Shrock K, Naranjo J, Darr K, Surowitz R, Choo J, Valadie A, Harrell R, Wei N, Metyas S. Cryoneurolysis to treat the pain and symptoms of knee osteoarthritis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Aug;25(8):1247-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
- Background: PubMed 16880882Trescot AM. Cryoanalgesia in interventional pain management. Pain Physician. 2003 Jul;6(3):345-60.
- Background: PubMed 28173795Skou ST, Roos EM. Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D): evidence-based education and supervised neuromuscular exercise delivered by certified physiotherapists nationwide. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 7;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1439-y.
- Background: PubMed 26875052Dasa V, Lensing G, Parsons M, Harris J, Volaufova J, Bliss R. Percutaneous freezing of sensory nerves prior to total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2016 Jun;23(3):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
- Background: PubMed 25542191Lewis GN, Rice DA, McNair PJ, Kluger M. Predictors of persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):551-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu441. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
- Background: PubMed 29913762O'Brien T, Breivik H. The impact of chronic pain-European patients' perspective over 12 months. Scand J Pain. 2012 Jan 1;3(1):23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.11.004.
- Background: PubMed 20565735Ageberg E, Link A, Roos EM. Feasibility of neuromuscular training in patients with severe hip or knee OA: the individualized goal-based NEMEX-TJR training program. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jun 17;11:126. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-126.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33637085Nygaard NB, Koch-Jensen C, Vaegter HB, Wedderkopp N, Blichfeldt-Eckhardt M, Gram B. Cryoneurolysis for the management of chronic pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis; a double-blinded randomized controlled sham trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 26;22(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04102-1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bibi (Valgerdur) Gram, PhD study director
Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
Carsten Kock-Jensen, MD study director
Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
Niels-Peter B Nielsen, PhD principal investigator
Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cryoneurolysis and Neuromuscular exercise (GLA:D) in people with Chronic Pain and Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in NRS knee pain intensity score (time frame: Change in NRS pain score, between baseline and two weeks post surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03774121, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2024.