HemodynamicPhase 4NCT03775876
Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol in Conjunction With Regional Block for Shoulder Arthroscopy
A Phase 4 study testing Shoulder Arthroscopy, Regional Block and Propofol in people with Hemodynamic and Sedation, run by Saint-Joseph University at 1 site in Lebanon.
Trial summary
Operative shoulder arthroscopy under regional block anesthesia often presents with hemodynamic challenges for the anesthesiologist, knowing that a low systolic blood pressure is required to minimize the bleeding. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemodynamic, Sedation, Satisfaction, Personal
- What is being tested?
- Shoulder Arthroscopy, Regional Block and Propofol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteLebanon
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2017to 15 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) I or II.
- Elective Shoulder arthroscopy.
Who cannot join
- Allergies to any of the used medications.
- ASA score of III or above.
- Cardiac abnormalities.
- Contraindications to regional blocks.
- Patient refusal.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol in Conjunction With Regional Block for Shoulder Arthroscopy: a Randomized Controlled Double Blind Trial
Operative shoulder arthroscopy under regional block anesthesia often presents with hemodynamic challenges for the anesthesiologist, knowing that a low systolic blood pressure is required to minimize the bleeding. Regional anesthesia is successfully performed to many patients in whom tracheal intubation or the placement of a laryngeal tube is undesired. Propofol has traditionally been used to provide sedation in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy under regional anesthesia. In contrast to Propofol, Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoceptor agonist that has been shown to provide sedation, analgesia and anxiolytic effects with minimal respiratory depression. Due to the effect of both drugs on blood pressure, the investigators set out to compare intraoperative hemodynamics of both drugs, along with the surgeon's satisfaction and the degree of comfort provided to patients undergoing interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder arthroscopy. The investigators also assessed whether the type of anesthetic agent used for sedation accounted for other differences in intra and post-operative outcome measures.
- Conditions
- Hemodynamic, Sedation, Satisfaction, Personal
- Being tested
- Shoulder Arthroscopy, Regional Block, Propofol, Dexmedetomidine, BIS
- Keywords
- Propofol, Dexmedetomidine, Regional anesthesia, Satisfaction, Shoulder arthroscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Personal Satisfaction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Shoulder ArthroscopyProcedure or surgery
Also called Surgery
patients in both groups are programmed for an elective shoulder arthroscopy surgery
Regional BlockProcedure or surgery
Also called Interscalene brachial plexus block
patients in both groups received regional block for anesthesia: brachial plexus blockade was performed using the interscalene approach under ultrasound combined to nerve stimulation. 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375% were injected.
PropofolDrug
Also called Propofol-Lipuro
propofol 10mg/ml was used for sedation as described in the arms section
DexmedetomidineDrug
Also called Dexmedetomidine Hcl 100 mcg (Micrograms)/ml Inj
Dexmedetomidine was diluted to 4mcg/ml and used for sedation as described in the arms section
BISDiagnostic test
Also called Bispectral index
sedation level was monitored using bispectral index to achieve values described in the arms group
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Propofol | Active comparator | Patients programmed for elective Shoulder arthroscopy surgery will receive a continuous intravenous infusion of Propofol. Infusion will be started after regional block (interscalene) being performed and will be continued to the end of wound closure. Infusion will be started at 2mg/Kg/h and modified to a maximum of 4 mg/Kg/h in order to achieve a bispectral index (BIS) between 60 and 90 and a Ramsay sedation score between two and four. Receives: Procedure: Shoulder Arthroscopy; Procedure: Regional Block; Drug: Propofol; Diagnostic Test: BIS |
| Dexmedetomidine | Active comparator | Patients programmed for elective Shoulder arthroscopy surgery will receive a continuous intravenous infusion of Dexmedetomidine. Infusion will be started after regional block (interscalene) being performed and will be continued to the end of wound closure. Infusion will be started at 1mcg/kg over 10 minutes then 0.2 mcg/Kg/h and modified to a maximum of 0.7 mcg/Kg/h in order to achieve a bispectral index (BIS) between 60 and 90 and a Ramsay sedation score between two and four with a maximum. Receives: Procedure: Shoulder Arthroscopy; Procedure: Regional Block; Drug: Dexmedetomidine; Diagnostic Test: BIS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
iSBP
initial Systolic Blood Pressure (iSBP) measurement at arrival to the operating room. Hour 0 is the time of patient's arrival to the operating room.
Measured: Hour 0
iMAP
initial Mean Arterial blood Pressure (iMAP) measurement at arrival to the operating room. Hour 0 is the time of patient's arrival to the operating room.
Measured: Hour 0
SBP
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure from iSBP
Measured: at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
MAP
change in Mean Arterial blood Pressure from iMAP
Measured: at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
Surgeon Satisfaction: Global satisfaction scale
Global satisfaction of the surgeon regarding anesthesia and patient immobility on a scale from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) collected at the end of surgery
Measured: up to 1 hour after surgery completion
Estimation of Bleeding
Surgeon's evaluation of the bleeding that had affected the surgeon's visibility on a scale from 0 (no bleeding) to 5 (very intense bleeding) collected at the end of surgery
Measured: up to 1 hour after surgery completion
Occurence of Hypotension
number of episodes of hypotension ( a drop of systolic blood pressure >30% of the initial value recorded at patient arrival to the operating theatre)
Measured: up to 0 minutes after admission to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
Secondary outcomes (17)
RR
respiratory rate (RR) per minute
Measured: at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
BPM
Beats per minute (BPM)
Measured: at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
SaO2
Oxygen Saturation (SaO2) (%)
Measured: at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
Vasopressors OR
use of vasoactive drugs during surgery (Yes or No)
Measured: up to 0 minutes after admission to the PACU
Vasopressors PACU
use of vasoactive drugs during PACU stay (Yes or No)
Measured: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
tBIS
time to achieve desired Bispectral Index (tBIS) level (minutes)
Measured: up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
PS1: scale
Patient Satisfaction 1(PS1): I would want to have the same anesthetic again on a 5 points Likert scale from 0 to 4: 0= Strongly disagree, 1= Disagree, 2= Neither agree nor disagree, 3= Agree, 4= Strongly agree.
Measured: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
PS2: scale
Patient Satisfaction 2(PS2): I felt pain on a 5 points Likert scale from 0 to 4: 0= Strongly disagree, 1= Disagree, 2= Neither agree nor disagree, 3= Agree, 4= Strongly agree.
Measured: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
PS3: scale
Patient Satisfaction 3(PS3): I was satisfied with my anesthetic care on a 5 points Likert scale from 0 to 4: 0= Strongly disagree, 1= Disagree, 2= Neither agree nor disagree, 3= Agree, 4= Strongly agree.
Measured: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
PS4: scale
Patient Satisfaction 4(PS4): I felt relaxed during the procedure on a 5 points Likert scale from 0 to 4: 0= Strongly disagree, 1= Disagree, 2= Neither agree nor disagree, 3= Agree, 4= Strongly agree.
Measured: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
PON
Occurrence of Post Operative Nausea (PON) at PACU at least on episode (yes or No)
Measured: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
POV
Occurence of Post Operative Vomiting (POV) at PACU at least on episode (yes or No)
Measured: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
Need for rescue analgesia: RA
need for rescue analgesia (RA) opioids at PACU (Yes or No)
Measured: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
ALDRETE score
time to reach modified Aldrete score of 9/10 at PACU (minutes)
Measured: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
VASi
Visual Analog Scale initial (VASi): Visual analog rating scale for pain (VAS) in which 0 is defined as no pain and 10 as maximum pain at PACU arrival (0-10)
Measured: up to 10 minutes after admission to the PACU
VASd
Visual Analog Scale discharge (VASd): Visual analog rating scale for pain in which 0 is defined as no pain and 10 as maximum pain at PACU discharge (0-10)
Measured: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
Occurence of Bradycardia
number of episodes of bradycardia (Heart rate <45/min)
Measured: up to 0 minutes after admission to the PACU
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Dec 2018
- Study start1 Mar 2017
- Primary completion1 Mar 2018
- Study completion15 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HemodynamicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- randomised controlled double blind trial
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Saint-Joseph University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hicham Abou Zeid, Saint-Joseph University
- Investigators
- Hicham A ABOU ZEID, M.D., M.Sc., Study chair, Saint Joseph University School of MedicineNouhad S AYOUB, M.D., Principal investigator, Saint Joseph University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03775876
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEHDF 945
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 18 Nov 2018
- Last updated
- 17 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Peng K, Li J, Ji FH, Li Z. Dexmedetomidine compared with propofol for pediatric sedation during cerebral angiography. J Res Med Sci. 2014 Jun;19(6):549-54.
PubMed 25197298Kim N, Yoo YC, Lee SK, Kim H, Ju HM, Min KT. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 28;21(12):3671-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671.
PubMed 25834336Wu Y, Zhang Y, Hu X, Qian C, Zhou Y, Xie J. A comparison of propofol vs. dexmedetomidine for sedation, haemodynamic control and satisfaction, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015 Aug;40(4):419-25. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12282. Epub 2015 May 13.
PubMed 25970229
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol in Conjunction With Regional Block for Shoulder Arthroscopy: a Randomized Controlled Double Blind Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03775876
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CEHDF 945
- Conditions
- Hemodynamic, Sedation, Satisfaction, Personal
- Keywords
- Propofol, Dexmedetomidine, Regional anesthesia, Satisfaction, Shoulder arthroscopy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Saint-Joseph UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Operative shoulder arthroscopy under regional block anesthesia often presents with hemodynamic challenges for the anesthesiologist, knowing that a low systolic blood pressure is required to minimize the bleeding. Regional anesthesia is successfully performed to many patients in whom tracheal intubation or the placement of a laryngeal tube is undesired. Propofol has traditionally been used to provide sedation in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy under regional anesthesia. In contrast to Propofol, Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoceptor agonist that has been shown to provide sedation, analgesia and anxiolytic effects with minimal respiratory depression. Due to the effect of both drugs on blood pressure, the investigators set out to compare intraoperative hemodynamics of both drugs, along with the surgeon's satisfaction and the degree of comfort provided to patients undergoing interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder arthroscopy. The investigators also assessed whether the type of anesthetic agent used for sedation accounted for other differences in intra and post-operative outcome measures.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- randomised controlled double blind trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Propofol | Active comparator | Procedure: Shoulder Arthroscopy, Procedure: Regional Block, Drug: Propofol, Diagnostic Test: BISPatients programmed for elective Shoulder arthroscopy surgery will receive a continuous intravenous infusion of Propofol. Infusion will be started after regional block (interscalene) being performed and will be continued to the end of wound closure. Infusion will be started at 2mg/Kg/h and modified to a maximum of 4 mg/Kg/h in order to achieve a bispectral index (BIS) between 60 and 90 and a Ramsay sedation score between two and four. |
| Dexmedetomidine | Active comparator | Procedure: Shoulder Arthroscopy, Procedure: Regional Block, Drug: Dexmedetomidine, Diagnostic Test: BISPatients programmed for elective Shoulder arthroscopy surgery will receive a continuous intravenous infusion of Dexmedetomidine. Infusion will be started after regional block (interscalene) being performed and will be continued to the end of wound closure. Infusion will be started at 1mcg/kg over 10 minutes then 0.2 mcg/Kg/h and modified to a maximum of 0.7 mcg/Kg/h in order to achieve a bispectral index (BIS) between 60 and 90 and a Ramsay sedation score between two and four with a maximum. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) I or II.
- Elective Shoulder arthroscopy.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Allergies to any of the used medications.
- ASA score of III or above.
- Cardiac abnormalities.
- Contraindications to regional blocks.
- Patient refusal.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Shoulder ArthroscopyAlso: Surgerypatients in both groups are programmed for an elective shoulder arthroscopy surgery | Procedure or surgery | Dexmedetomidine, Propofol |
| Regional BlockAlso: Interscalene brachial plexus blockpatients in both groups received regional block for anesthesia: brachial plexus blockade was performed using the interscalene approach under ultrasound combined to nerve stimulation. 20 ml ropivacaine 0.375% were injected. | Procedure or surgery | Dexmedetomidine, Propofol |
| PropofolAlso: Propofol-Lipuropropofol 10mg/ml was used for sedation as described in the arms section | Drug | Propofol |
| DexmedetomidineAlso: Dexmedetomidine Hcl 100 mcg (Micrograms)/ml InjDexmedetomidine was diluted to 4mcg/ml and used for sedation as described in the arms section | Drug | Dexmedetomidine |
| BISAlso: Bispectral indexsedation level was monitored using bispectral index to achieve values described in the arms group | Diagnostic test | Dexmedetomidine, Propofol |
Primary outcome
iSBP
Time frame: Hour 0
initial Systolic Blood Pressure (iSBP) measurement at arrival to the operating room. Hour 0 is the time of patient's arrival to the operating room.
iMAP
Time frame: Hour 0
initial Mean Arterial blood Pressure (iMAP) measurement at arrival to the operating room. Hour 0 is the time of patient's arrival to the operating room.
SBP
Time frame: at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure from iSBP
MAP
Time frame: at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
change in Mean Arterial blood Pressure from iMAP
Surgeon Satisfaction: Global satisfaction scale
Time frame: up to 1 hour after surgery completion
Global satisfaction of the surgeon regarding anesthesia and patient immobility on a scale from 0 (not satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) collected at the end of surgery
Estimation of Bleeding
Time frame: up to 1 hour after surgery completion
Surgeon's evaluation of the bleeding that had affected the surgeon's visibility on a scale from 0 (no bleeding) to 5 (very intense bleeding) collected at the end of surgery
Occurence of Hypotension
Time frame: up to 0 minutes after admission to the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU)
number of episodes of hypotension ( a drop of systolic blood pressure >30% of the initial value recorded at patient arrival to the operating theatre)
17 secondary outcomes
RR
Time frame: at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
BPM
Time frame: at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
SaO2
Time frame: at 10 minutes interval from the beginning up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
Vasopressors OR
Time frame: up to 0 minutes after admission to the PACU
Vasopressors PACU
Time frame: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
tBIS
Time frame: up to 0 minutes after the end of Propofol or Dexmedetomidine infusion
PS1: scale
Time frame: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
PS2: scale
Time frame: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
PS3: scale
Time frame: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
PS4: scale
Time frame: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
PON
Time frame: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
POV
Time frame: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
Need for rescue analgesia: RA
Time frame: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
ALDRETE score
Time frame: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
VASi
Time frame: up to 10 minutes after admission to the PACU
VASd
Time frame: up to 3 hours after surgery completion
Occurence of Bradycardia
Time frame: up to 0 minutes after admission to the PACU
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Dec 2018.
- Background: PubMed 25197298Peng K, Li J, Ji FH, Li Z. Dexmedetomidine compared with propofol for pediatric sedation during cerebral angiography. J Res Med Sci. 2014 Jun;19(6):549-54.
- Background: PubMed 25834336Kim N, Yoo YC, Lee SK, Kim H, Ju HM, Min KT. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar 28;21(12):3671-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671.
- Background: PubMed 25970229Wu Y, Zhang Y, Hu X, Qian C, Zhou Y, Xie J. A comparison of propofol vs. dexmedetomidine for sedation, haemodynamic control and satisfaction, during esophagogastroduodenoscopy under conscious sedation. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015 Aug;40(4):419-25. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12282. Epub 2015 May 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hemodynamic
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
CAROTID DOPPLER AND CEREBRAL OXIMERY IN POST CARDIAC ARREST ICU PATIENTS
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Carotid Doppler
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diastolic Shock Index for Predicting Hemodynamic Instability During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury, Hypotension (MeSH: D007022)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hicham A ABOU ZEID, M.D., M.Sc. study chair
Saint Joseph University School of Medicine
Nouhad S AYOUB, M.D. principal investigator
Saint Joseph University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Shoulder Arthroscopy, Regional Block and Propofol in people with Hemodynamic and Sedation, run by Saint-Joseph University at 1 site in Lebanon.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Lebanon. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
iSBP (time frame: Hour 0). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03775876, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Dec 2018.