Acute Myocardial InfarctionPhase 4DANBLOCKNCT03778554
Danish Trial of Beta Blocker Treatment After Myocardial Infarction Without Reduced Ejection Fraction
A Phase 4 study testing Metoprolol Succinate, Bisoprolol and Carvedilol in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (nSTEMI), run by Bispebjerg Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
To determine whether long-term treatment with oral betablocker therapy after myocardial infarction in patient with no heart failure reduces the composite outcome of recurrent MI, all-cause mortality, revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, ischemic stroke, incident… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myocardial Infarction, Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (nSTEMI), ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Metoprolol Succinate, Bisoprolol and Carvedilol
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,760 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 17 Dec 2018to 10 Dec 2035
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Left ventricular ejection fraction > 40%
- Myocardial infarction (MI) within previous two weeks
- The diagnosis of acute MI must meet the Universal European Society of Cardiology (ESC) definition of MI
Who cannot join
- Clinical evidence of heart failure at the time of discharge
- Pregnancy or of child bearing age not using safe anticonception throughout the study period
- Lack of signed informed consent and expected cooperation during follow-up
- Any medical condition where beta blocker treatment is indicated according to the treating physician
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Bispebjerg Hospital, Dept. of Cardiology Y builing 67, 1.floor, Bispebjerg Bakke 23
Copenhagen, 2400
About this study
Official title: Danish Trial of Beta Blocker Treatment After Myocardial Infarction Without Reduced Ejection Fraction (DANBLOCK)
To determine whether long-term treatment with oral betablocker therapy after myocardial infarction in patient with no heart failure reduces the composite outcome of recurrent MI, all-cause mortality, revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
Read the detailed description
Aim: To determine whether long-term treatment with oral betablocker (BB) therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) in patient with no heart failure reduces the composite outcome of recurrent MI, all-cause mortality, revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
The inclusion- and event rate in DANBLOCK have been continuously assessed since the first patient was randomized in December 2018. The inclusion- and event rate have been lower than expected, in part due to COVID-19. To enhance feasibility, the decision was made by the Steering Committees to combine the data from DANBLOCK with the data from the Norwegian BETAMI (NCT03646357) and publish the primary endpoint, key secondary endpoints and most other secondary endpoints together (presented below).
The trials have similar designs, only minor differences in study entry criteria, and were, from the very beginning, coordinated with the aim of conducting sub-studies on pooled data. The primary endpoint has been harmonized without knowledge of the distribution of events. BETAMI and DANBLOCK will remain separate trials until the end of follow-up, where data from the trials will be combined and main results published together.
Intervention: BB therapy versus no therapy.
Main Inclusion Criteria: Patient that have suffered a MI, both Non-ST elevation MI and ST elevation MI and can be randomized within 14 days of MI with no signs of heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction>40%.
Main Exclusion Criteria: Any indication or contraindication for BB treatment other than secondary prevention according to the treating cardiologist
Primary study endpoint:
- The composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, revascularisation with PCI or CABG, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
Key secondary endpoints to be included in the main publication:
- Each of the components of the primary endpoint, i.e.: All-cause mortality, recurrent MI, revascularisation with PCI or CABG, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy increases the risk of hospitalization for 2 or 3rd degree AV-block, or implantation of pacemaker
- To assess clinical outcomes linked to beta-blocker therapy in the following subgroups: age (> vs <70 years), sex (men vs. women), beta-blocker dosage, STEMI vs. NSTEMI, LVEF subgroups (preserved vs. mid-range), country, hypertension and diabetes.
Other secondary endpoints are described in the Statistical Analysis Plan and under "Outcome Measures".
Other secondary objectives (for BETAMI-DANBLOCK substudies unless specified otherwise):
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular death compared to no such therapy
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy reduces the risk of stable and unstable angina compared to no such therapy
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or other tachyarrhythmias compared to no such therapy
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy increases the risk of hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma or peripheral artery disease.
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy increases the risk of hospitalization or outpatient visit for new-onset or dysregulated diabetes (DANBLOCK only)
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy affects the following patient related outcomes: Quality of life, angina, dyspnoea, anxiety, depression, sexual dysfunction or sleep disorders.
- To conduct cost-utility analysis in relation to quality of life and a health economic evaluation including drug use, health care utilization, employment, income, and benefit take-up
- To describe beta-blocker dosage and adherence
- To assess study safety
Safety endpoints:
The following safety endpoints will be reported in the main publication:
- Primary safety endpoint: A composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, incident HF, malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin at 30 days following randomization
- Other safety endpoint: All-Cause Mortality: A table of all deaths within the follow-up period
- Other safety endpoint: Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSARs): A table of all SUSARs within the follow-up period with number and frequency in each group. Reported by local investigators and obtained from the study databases.
All serious adverse events, including potential endpoints, are captured in the study database to be used for safety assessments and are reported continuously to regulatory authorities.
Sample Size: A total of approximately 2760 patients will be recruited and randomized 1:1 to BB treatment (type and dosage according to treating physician) or no BB treatment. Treatment must be initiated within 14 days of MI.
Sample size considerations: The study is event driven and a power calculation for the combined DANBLOCK-BETAMI trial has been performed in which 950 events will provide a power of 80% to detect a true treatment effect equal to a hazard ratio of 1.2 for no beta-blocker therapy.
Location: All departments of cardiology in Denmark are invited to participate. All patients admitted to hospital for MI will be screened for in- and exclusion criteria and contacted if eligible.
Treatment Duration: Estimated (non) treatment duration of a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 6.25 years (anticipated).
Follow-up: Patients will be followed from the randomization date until end of follow-up.
Intervention and dosage of BB treatment: The intervention will be active treatment with BB, type and dosage according to treating cardiologist choice and control will be standard care (without BB treatment). The treating cardiologist is recommended to use the highest dose deemed tolerable for the patient at the time of randomization. Dosage, adherence and cross-over will be monitored through linkage to the Danish Register of Medical Product Statistics.
Original sample size considerations: Assuming a hazard ratio of 1.2 for the non-treated group compared to the treated the DANBLOCK trial has 80% power to detect this effect with an accumulation of 900 events of the primary endpoint. With approximately 3570 patients randomized the investigators expect to reach 900 events within the study period.
Statistical Analysis: Please see the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB): This committee consisting of two senior cardiologists and one trial-science statistician will overview safety and will have access to unblinded data. They will formally review the accumulating data every 6 months throughout the study period to ensure there is no avoidable increased harm to patients. The DSMB may recommend trial termination due to excess risk associated with no treatment with BB.
Recruitment: All patients admitted to hospital for MI will be screened for in- and exclusion criteria and contacted if eligible. Logistics of identifying and contacting the patients will be organized locally; some hospitals will randomize patients before discharge, others will contact patients after discharge. Patients will be randomized 1:1.
Publication policy: On study completion the results will be submitted for publication in an international medical journal. The results of this study will also be submitted to the Competent Authority and the Ethics Committee according to EU and Danish regulations.
Furthermore, a joint analysis of the data from BETAMI-DANBLOCK with the REDUCE (NCT03278509), CAPITAL-RCT (NCT01155635), and REBOOT (NCT03596385) trials will be performed.
- Conditions
- Acute Myocardial Infarction, Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (nSTEMI), ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- Metoprolol Succinate, Bisoprolol, Carvedilol, Nebivolol
- Medical subject headings
- Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Metoprolol SuccinateDrug
Eligible patients randomized to receive long-term therapy with oral beta-blockade
BisoprololDrug
Eligible patients randomized to receive long-term therapy with oral beta-blockade
CarvedilolDrug
Eligible patients randomized to receive long-term therapy with oral beta-blockade
NebivololDrug
Eligible patients randomized to receive long-term therapy with oral beta-blockade
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Beta blocker treatment | Experimental | Treatment with beta blockers plus standard of care. Type and dosage according to treating cardiologist choice
* Bisoprolol up to a total dose of 10 mg daily
* Carvedilol up to a total dose of 50 mg daily
* Metoprolol succinate up to a total dose of 200 mg daily
* Nebivolol up to a total dose of 10 mg daily Receives: Drug: Metoprolol Succinate; Drug: Bisoprolol; Drug: Carvedilol; Drug: Nebivolol |
| No beta blocker treatment | No intervention | Standard care without beta blocker treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
A composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, revascularisation with PCI or CABG, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
Time to the composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, revascularisation with PCI or CABG, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiag origin on an intention to treat analysis. The composite outcome will be assessed through nationwide registries and adjudicated by an independent Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Committee.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Secondary outcomes (23)
Recurrent myocardial infarction
Key secondary endpoint. Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
All-cause mortality
Key secondary endpoint. Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Malignant ventricular arrhythmias
Key secondary endpoint. Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Incident heart failure (diagnosed at hospitalization or at out-patient visits)
Key secondary endpoint. Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Unplanned coronary revascularization
Key secondary endpoint. Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Ischemic stroke
Key secondary endpoint. Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin
Key secondary endpoint. Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Cardiovascular mortality
Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Hospitalization for stable and unstable angina pectoris
Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or other tachyarrhythmias
Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Hospitalization for bradycardia, AV-block, syncope, or need for pacemaker
Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Hospitalization for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease symptoms
Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated maximal follow-up 6 months - 6.25 years
Hospitalization or outpatient visit for peripheral artery disease
Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Hospitalization or outpatient visit for new-onset or dysregulated diabetes (DANBLOCK only)
Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Angina symptoms
Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) grading of angina pectoris.
Measured: E-questionnaires will be administered at inclusion, 3, 12 and 24 months
Exercise capacity (DANBLOCK only)
Data on exercise capacity (VO2peak) will measured before and after rehabilitation and recorded in the Danish Cardiac Rehabilitation database.
Measured: At the beginning of cardiac rehabilitation (within approximately 4 weeks after randomization) and at the end of cardiac rehabilitation (approximately 6-12 weeks after beginning of rehabilitation)
Blood pressure control (DANBLOCK only)
Data on blood pressure (systolic and diastolic) will measured before and after cardiac rehabilitation and recorded in the Danish Cardiac Rehabilitation database
Measured: At the beginning of cardiac rehabilitation (within approximately 4 weeks after randomization) and at the end of cardiac rehabilitation (approximately 6-12 weeks after beginning of rehabilitation)
Quality of life measure
EQ5D (a measure of health-related quality of life that can be used in a wide range of health conditions and treatments)
Measured: E-questionnaires will be administered at inclusion, 3, 12 and 24 months
Measures of depression and anxiety
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Measured: E-questionnaires will be administered at inclusion, 3, 12 and 24 months
Measures of sexual dysfunction
The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Measured: E-questionnaires will be administered at inclusion, 3, 12 and 24 months
Measures of sleeping disorder
Bergen insomnia Scale
Measured: E-questionnaires will be administered at inclusion, 3, 12 and 24 months
Adherence to the prescribed dosage of beta-blocker
Assessed through nationwide registries.
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Cost-utility analysis in relation to quality of life and a health economic evaluation including drug use, health care utilization, employment, income, and benefit take-up
Assessed through nationwide registries and study database
Measured: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2018
- Study start17 Dec 2018
- Primary completion1 Apr 2025
- Study completion10 Dec 2035 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE design)
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,760 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bispebjerg Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amager Hospital, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Bornholm Hospital, Gentofte Hospital, Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Hvidovre University Hospital, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Holbaek Hospital, Nykoebing Hospital, Naestved Hospital, Zealand University Hospital, Slagelse Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Hospital, Sydvestjysk Sygehus, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Sygehus Lillebaelt (Vejle and Kolding), Aarhus University Hospital, Hospitalsenheden Midt, Hospitalsenheden Vest, Regionshospitalet Horsens, Silkeborg Sygehus, Aalborg University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eva Prescott, Bispebjerg Hospital
- Investigators
- Eva IB Prescott, MD, DMsC, Principal investigator, Bispebjerg Frederiksberg University HospitalAnna Meta D Kristensen, MD, Study chair, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03778554
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-002699-42
- Other IDs
- 2018-002699-42, 2018
- Acronym
- DANBLOCK
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 10 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Holmager TLF, Kristensen AMD, Fagerland MW, Atar D, Hecht Olsen M, Bakken A, Munkhaugen J, Prescott E. Validating national registry data for randomized trials: comparison of registry-derived cardiovascular events with and without adjudication in the BETAMI-DANBLOCK trial. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2026 Sep 16;12(6):903-911. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcag055.
PubMed 41934630Munkhaugen J, Kristensen AMD, Halvorsen S, Holmager T, Olsen MH, Bakken A, Sehested TSG, Ruddox V, Maeng M, Vikenes K, Jensen SE, Steigen T, Lambrechtsen J, Jortveit J, Bovin A, Schirmer H, Christiansen MK, Wiseth R, Mikkelsen D, Larsen AI, Lyngby Kjaergaard C, Andresen K, Gustafsson I, Tuseth V, Larsen ML, Deeg PS, Veien K, Bohmer E, Botker HE, Brattrud AO, Bronnum-Schou J, Pettersen AR, Bang LE, Oie E, Engstrom T, Borg EB, Kristensen K, Nymo SH, Gislason G, Vethe NT, Abdulla JAM, Dammen T, Mouridsen MR, Bendz B, Bertelsen MLN, Hove JD, Schierbeck L, Snoer M, Davidsen C, Egholm G, Thomsen KK, Jadou G, Poenaru M, Krarup NT, Bottcher M, Staehr PB, Zwisler AD, Edvardsen T, Torp-Pedersen C, Otterstad JE, Lange T, Fagerland MW, Atar D, Prescott E; BETAMI-DANBLOCK Investigators. Beta-Blockers after Myocardial Infarction in Patients without Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2025 Nov 13;393(19):1901-1911. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2505985. Epub 2025 Aug 30.
PubMed 40888716Kristensen AMD, Bovin A, Zwisler AD, Cerquira C, Torp-Pedersen C, Botker HE, Gustafsson I, Veien KT, Thomsen KK, Olsen MH, Larsen ML, Nielsen OW, Hildebrandt P, Foghmar S, Jensen SE, Lange T, Sehested T, Jernberg T, Atar D, Ibanez B, Prescott E. Design and rationale of the Danish trial of beta-blocker treatment after myocardial infarction without reduced ejection fraction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 May 23;21(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4214-6.
PubMed 32446298
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Danish Trial of Beta Blocker Treatment After Myocardial Infarction Without Reduced Ejection Fraction (DANBLOCK)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03778554
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DANBLOCK / 2018-002699-42
- Conditions
- Acute Myocardial Infarction, Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (nSTEMI), ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,760 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Bispebjerg HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amager Hospital, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Bornholm Hospital, Gentofte Hospital, Glostrup University Hospital, Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Hvidovre University Hospital, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Holbaek Hospital, Nykoebing Hospital, Naestved Hospital, Zealand University Hospital, Slagelse Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Hospital, Sydvestjysk Sygehus, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Sygehus Lillebaelt (Vejle and Kolding), Aarhus University Hospital, Hospitalsenheden Midt, Hospitalsenheden Vest, Regionshospitalet Horsens, Silkeborg Sygehus, Aalborg University Hospital
- Study start
- 17 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Dec 2035 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine whether long-term treatment with oral betablocker therapy after myocardial infarction in patient with no heart failure reduces the composite outcome of recurrent MI, all-cause mortality, revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
Detailed description
Aim: To determine whether long-term treatment with oral betablocker (BB) therapy after myocardial infarction (MI) in patient with no heart failure reduces the composite outcome of recurrent MI, all-cause mortality, revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
The inclusion- and event rate in DANBLOCK have been continuously assessed since the first patient was randomized in December 2018. The inclusion- and event rate have been lower than expected, in part due to COVID-19. To enhance feasibility, the decision was made by the Steering Committees to combine the data from DANBLOCK with the data from the Norwegian BETAMI (NCT03646357) and publish the primary endpoint, key secondary endpoints and most other secondary endpoints together (presented below).
The trials have similar designs, only minor differences in study entry criteria, and were, from the very beginning, coordinated with the aim of conducting sub-studies on pooled data. The primary endpoint has been harmonized without knowledge of the distribution of events. BETAMI and DANBLOCK will remain separate trials until the end of follow-up, where data from the trials will be combined and main results published together.
Intervention: BB therapy versus no therapy.
Main Inclusion Criteria: Patient that have suffered a MI, both Non-ST elevation MI and ST elevation MI and can be randomized within 14 days of MI with no signs of heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction>40%.
Main Exclusion Criteria: Any indication or contraindication for BB treatment other than secondary prevention according to the treating cardiologist
Primary study endpoint:
- The composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, revascularisation with PCI or CABG, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
Key secondary endpoints to be included in the main publication:
- Each of the components of the primary endpoint, i.e.: All-cause mortality, recurrent MI, revascularisation with PCI or CABG, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy increases the risk of hospitalization for 2 or 3rd degree AV-block, or implantation of pacemaker
- To assess clinical outcomes linked to beta-blocker therapy in the following subgroups: age (> vs <70 years), sex (men vs. women), beta-blocker dosage, STEMI vs. NSTEMI, LVEF subgroups (preserved vs. mid-range), country, hypertension and diabetes.
Other secondary endpoints are described in the Statistical Analysis Plan and under "Outcome Measures".
Other secondary objectives (for BETAMI-DANBLOCK substudies unless specified otherwise):
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy reduces the risk of cardiovascular death compared to no such therapy
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy reduces the risk of stable and unstable angina compared to no such therapy
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or other tachyarrhythmias compared to no such therapy
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy increases the risk of hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma or peripheral artery disease.
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy increases the risk of hospitalization or outpatient visit for new-onset or dysregulated diabetes (DANBLOCK only)
- To study whether oral beta-blocker therapy affects the following patient related outcomes: Quality of life, angina, dyspnoea, anxiety, depression, sexual dysfunction or sleep disorders.
- To conduct cost-utility analysis in relation to quality of life and a health economic evaluation including drug use, health care utilization, employment, income, and benefit take-up
- To describe beta-blocker dosage and adherence
- To assess study safety
Safety endpoints:
The following safety endpoints will be reported in the main publication:
- Primary safety endpoint: A composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, incident HF, malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin at 30 days following randomization
- Other safety endpoint: All-Cause Mortality: A table of all deaths within the follow-up period
- Other safety endpoint: Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSARs): A table of all SUSARs within the follow-up period with number and frequency in each group. Reported by local investigators and obtained from the study databases.
All serious adverse events, including potential endpoints, are captured in the study database to be used for safety assessments and are reported continuously to regulatory authorities.
Sample Size: A total of approximately 2760 patients will be recruited and randomized 1:1 to BB treatment (type and dosage according to treating physician) or no BB treatment. Treatment must be initiated within 14 days of MI.
Sample size considerations: The study is event driven and a power calculation for the combined DANBLOCK-BETAMI trial has been performed in which 950 events will provide a power of 80% to detect a true treatment effect equal to a hazard ratio of 1.2 for no beta-blocker therapy.
Location: All departments of cardiology in Denmark are invited to participate. All patients admitted to hospital for MI will be screened for in- and exclusion criteria and contacted if eligible.
Treatment Duration: Estimated (non) treatment duration of a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 6.25 years (anticipated).
Follow-up: Patients will be followed from the randomization date until end of follow-up.
Intervention and dosage of BB treatment: The intervention will be active treatment with BB, type and dosage according to treating cardiologist choice and control will be standard care (without BB treatment). The treating cardiologist is recommended to use the highest dose deemed tolerable for the patient at the time of randomization. Dosage, adherence and cross-over will be monitored through linkage to the Danish Register of Medical Product Statistics.
Original sample size considerations: Assuming a hazard ratio of 1.2 for the non-treated group compared to the treated the DANBLOCK trial has 80% power to detect this effect with an accumulation of 900 events of the primary endpoint. With approximately 3570 patients randomized the investigators expect to reach 900 events within the study period.
Statistical Analysis: Please see the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB): This committee consisting of two senior cardiologists and one trial-science statistician will overview safety and will have access to unblinded data. They will formally review the accumulating data every 6 months throughout the study period to ensure there is no avoidable increased harm to patients. The DSMB may recommend trial termination due to excess risk associated with no treatment with BB.
Recruitment: All patients admitted to hospital for MI will be screened for in- and exclusion criteria and contacted if eligible. Logistics of identifying and contacting the patients will be organized locally; some hospitals will randomize patients before discharge, others will contact patients after discharge. Patients will be randomized 1:1.
Publication policy: On study completion the results will be submitted for publication in an international medical journal. The results of this study will also be submitted to the Competent Authority and the Ethics Committee according to EU and Danish regulations.
Furthermore, a joint analysis of the data from BETAMI-DANBLOCK with the REDUCE (NCT03278509), CAPITAL-RCT (NCT01155635), and REBOOT (NCT03596385) trials will be performed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE design)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Beta blocker treatment | Experimental | Drug: Metoprolol Succinate, Drug: Bisoprolol, Drug: Carvedilol, Drug: NebivololTreatment with beta blockers plus standard of care. Type and dosage according to treating cardiologist choice * Bisoprolol up to a total dose of 10 mg daily * Carvedilol up to a total dose of 50 mg daily * Metoprolol succinate up to a total dose of 200 mg daily * Nebivolol up to a total dose of 10 mg daily |
| No beta blocker treatment | No intervention | –Standard care without beta blocker treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Left ventricular ejection fraction > 40%
- Myocardial infarction (MI) within previous two weeks
- The diagnosis of acute MI must meet the Universal European Society of Cardiology (ESC) definition of MI
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Clinical evidence of heart failure at the time of discharge
- Pregnancy or of child bearing age not using safe anticonception throughout the study period
- Lack of signed informed consent and expected cooperation during follow-up
- Any medical condition where beta blocker treatment is indicated according to the treating physician
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Metoprolol SuccinateEligible patients randomized to receive long-term therapy with oral beta-blockade | Drug | Beta blocker treatment |
| BisoprololEligible patients randomized to receive long-term therapy with oral beta-blockade | Drug | Beta blocker treatment |
| CarvedilolEligible patients randomized to receive long-term therapy with oral beta-blockade | Drug | Beta blocker treatment |
| NebivololEligible patients randomized to receive long-term therapy with oral beta-blockade | Drug | Beta blocker treatment |
Primary outcome
A composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, revascularisation with PCI or CABG, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin.
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Time to the composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, revascularisation with PCI or CABG, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiag origin on an intention to treat analysis. The composite outcome will be assessed through nationwide registries and adjudicated by an independent Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Committee.
23 secondary outcomes
Recurrent myocardial infarction
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
All-cause mortality
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Malignant ventricular arrhythmias
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Incident heart failure (diagnosed at hospitalization or at out-patient visits)
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Unplanned coronary revascularization
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Ischemic stroke
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Cardiovascular mortality
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Hospitalization for stable and unstable angina pectoris
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or other tachyarrhythmias
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Hospitalization for bradycardia, AV-block, syncope, or need for pacemaker
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Hospitalization for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease symptoms
Time frame: Estimated maximal follow-up 6 months - 6.25 years
Hospitalization or outpatient visit for peripheral artery disease
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Hospitalization or outpatient visit for new-onset or dysregulated diabetes (DANBLOCK only)
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Angina symptoms
Time frame: E-questionnaires will be administered at inclusion, 3, 12 and 24 months
Exercise capacity (DANBLOCK only)
Time frame: At the beginning of cardiac rehabilitation (within approximately 4 weeks after randomization) and at the end of cardiac rehabilitation (approximately 6-12 weeks after beginning of rehabilitation)
Blood pressure control (DANBLOCK only)
Time frame: At the beginning of cardiac rehabilitation (within approximately 4 weeks after randomization) and at the end of cardiac rehabilitation (approximately 6-12 weeks after beginning of rehabilitation)
Quality of life measure
Time frame: E-questionnaires will be administered at inclusion, 3, 12 and 24 months
Measures of depression and anxiety
Time frame: E-questionnaires will be administered at inclusion, 3, 12 and 24 months
Measures of sexual dysfunction
Time frame: E-questionnaires will be administered at inclusion, 3, 12 and 24 months
Measures of sleeping disorder
Time frame: E-questionnaires will be administered at inclusion, 3, 12 and 24 months
Adherence to the prescribed dosage of beta-blocker
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Cost-utility analysis in relation to quality of life and a health economic evaluation including drug use, health care utilization, employment, income, and benefit take-up
Time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41934630Holmager TLF, Kristensen AMD, Fagerland MW, Atar D, Hecht Olsen M, Bakken A, Munkhaugen J, Prescott E. Validating national registry data for randomized trials: comparison of registry-derived cardiovascular events with and without adjudication in the BETAMI-DANBLOCK trial. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2026 Sep 16;12(6):903-911. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcag055.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40888716Munkhaugen J, Kristensen AMD, Halvorsen S, Holmager T, Olsen MH, Bakken A, Sehested TSG, Ruddox V, Maeng M, Vikenes K, Jensen SE, Steigen T, Lambrechtsen J, Jortveit J, Bovin A, Schirmer H, Christiansen MK, Wiseth R, Mikkelsen D, Larsen AI, Lyngby Kjaergaard C, Andresen K, Gustafsson I, Tuseth V, Larsen ML, Deeg PS, Veien K, Bohmer E, Botker HE, Brattrud AO, Bronnum-Schou J, Pettersen AR, Bang LE, Oie E, Engstrom T, Borg EB, Kristensen K, Nymo SH, Gislason G, Vethe NT, Abdulla JAM, Dammen T, Mouridsen MR, Bendz B, Bertelsen MLN, Hove JD, Schierbeck L, Snoer M, Davidsen C, Egholm G, Thomsen KK, Jadou G, Poenaru M, Krarup NT, Bottcher M, Staehr PB, Zwisler AD, Edvardsen T, Torp-Pedersen C, Otterstad JE, Lange T, Fagerland MW, Atar D, Prescott E; BETAMI-DANBLOCK Investigators. Beta-Blockers after Myocardial Infarction in Patients without Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2025 Nov 13;393(19):1901-1911. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2505985. Epub 2025 Aug 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32446298Kristensen AMD, Bovin A, Zwisler AD, Cerquira C, Torp-Pedersen C, Botker HE, Gustafsson I, Veien KT, Thomsen KK, Olsen MH, Larsen ML, Nielsen OW, Hildebrandt P, Foghmar S, Jensen SE, Lange T, Sehested T, Jernberg T, Atar D, Ibanez B, Prescott E. Design and rationale of the Danish trial of beta-blocker treatment after myocardial infarction without reduced ejection fraction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020 May 23;21(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4214-6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elicit Drugs in Myocardial Infarction
Young Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
Recruiting
Heart@Home Safety and Efficacy of Hospital-at-Home Care Versus Standard Hospitalization in Cardiac Patients
Myocardial Infarction, Myocarditis Acute
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Selatogrel Outcome Study in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eva IB Prescott, MD, DMsC principal investigator
Bispebjerg Frederiksberg University Hospital
Anna Meta D Kristensen, MD study chair
University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Metoprolol Succinate, Bisoprolol and Carvedilol in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (nSTEMI), run by Bispebjerg Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
A composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, revascularisation with PCI or CABG, ischemic stroke, incident heart failure, or malignant ventricular arrhythmia including resuscitated cardiac arrest of cardiac origin. (time frame: Estimated follow-up min 6 months - max 6.25 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03778554, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2025.